Topic: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 61. (Read 59767 times)
April 26, 2019, 09:19:15 PM
Does this optimization work for the Beam algo? It seems to, but the FAQ say that it only works with 144.5 algo. Also, would there be any benefit to running this optimization along with an --oc optimization?
April 26, 2019, 07:59:16 PM
Could you please add Beam mining pool Sunpool to your FAQ list of pools?
https://sunpool.top/
beam.sunpool.top:3333
https://sunpool.top/
beam.sunpool.top:3333
April 26, 2019, 07:04:53 PM
The console says no rejected at all, but @NiceHash its ~15% in this tiny sample. In bigger samples you will see spikes up to 30-40% like I showed above. Hope this helps.
Driver 430.39, latest Win 10 + all patches. But same rejects also on 419.67 with RTX 2070 cards.
Hi joseph32,Driver 430.39, latest Win 10 + all patches. But same rejects also on 419.67 with RTX 2070 cards.
When you have a stale share you just get a yellow star on the miner console, the efficiency only accounts for the number of accepted and invalid shares. To see the other shares you have to look at the telemetry, it would be the middle value on the shares column.
As we said for cervajz, we can see that nicehash, after sending a new job, does not accept submissions from previous jobs. Some pools still accept it, others like nicehash do not. We've tested and managed to see that when the miner receives a new job, just before submiting a solution from a previous work, this results in a rejected share from that submission.
Can you let us know what reason for rejection does nicehash report. You can check your graphic. It can say rejected (target), rejected (stale), rejected (duplicate)...
Cheers
Highest reject reason is target, a few % is stale which is mostly splitted between stale and duplicate. Here is a screen. (Around 18:30 the miner wasnt farming, so thats why its 0).
Hi joseph32,
thank you for the log.
We believe we managed to reproduce your problem.
Try running miniZ without --pers auto, for mining BEAM. Or use --pers Beam-PoW.
Actually, when mining Beam --pers auto should not work on any pool, we are surprised you got accepted so many shares.
Let us know if this helped.
Cheers
Much better now, thanks for the tip! Also did a quick note to AwesomeMiner to change that auto
April 26, 2019, 06:45:06 PM
Sorry if this has been asked before, when is a win10 AMD friendly version been released?
Hi clousian,At the moment we are not considering to add support for AMD.
We suggest that you user another miner like lol miner that has a good AMD support.
Cheers
Okay cheers dude
April 26, 2019, 06:36:40 PM
Hi,
I get an "out of memory" error when I try to mine BEAM on Hive OS with my 1060 3GB cards. You said earlier that it's possible to mine on Linux, so am I doing something wrong?
I get an "out of memory" error when I try to mine BEAM on Hive OS with my 1060 3GB cards. You said earlier that it's possible to mine on Linux, so am I doing something wrong?
April 26, 2019, 05:07:07 PM
Hi, use last version miniz... w10, driver 430+,cpu g3930, 4GB RAM, 5x1080ti+1x1080, mine beam, speed is far better than gminer :-) good work
cpu load is 100%
Hi stzcze, cpu load is 100%
thanks for the encouragement.
CPU load shouldn't be high at all, we are looking into the problem at this moment.
Cheers
April 26, 2019, 04:10:57 PM
not stable for me, back to version v1.2m
Hi topteam,Code:
kernel: [ 678.861888] show_signal_msg: 18 callbacks suppressed
kernel: [ 678.861891] miniZ[2386]: segfault at c0 ip 0000560d8618c982 sp 00007fcc10ff2bd0 error 4 in miniZ[560d86098000+1fea000]
1775 Segmentation fault (core dumped) ~/miniZ --url [email protected]:20595 --pers BgoldPoW --par=144,5 --nocolor --telemetry 0 --gpu-line --extra --templimit 70C --tempunits C --latency --show-solratio --show-pers --shares-detail --oc2
sorry for this.
Could you post here a bit of the log just before the crash?
Thanks.
Cheers
PS crash on fee.server
thanks for the log. We just spotted the problem and it is fixed for the next release.
Cheers
April 26, 2019, 04:08:34 PM
Dear miniZ, i've got some bug reports for you:
1. HiveOS custom package doesn't save logs at all. Directory /var/log/miner/miniZ exists, but is empty all the time.
2. Load average is very high, like 6-7 on G3930. 11 Pascal GPUs. Would you like to abuse NVML in less frequent manner?
p.s. It would be epic to add some auto-tune feature, ok? No any evil --oc1 --oc2 --f11 --ohmygod347, but --autotune=speed|efficiency
Hi 2h4u.1. HiveOS custom package doesn't save logs at all. Directory /var/log/miner/miniZ exists, but is empty all the time.
2. Load average is very high, like 6-7 on G3930. 11 Pascal GPUs. Would you like to abuse NVML in less frequent manner?
p.s. It would be epic to add some auto-tune feature, ok? No any evil --oc1 --oc2 --f11 --ohmygod347, but --autotune=speed|efficiency
thank you for the bug reports.
1. We will look into this. Meanwhile you can run miniZ with --log.
2. Load should not be high at all. Does it happen again if you restart miniZ? Could you tell what coin are you mining? Maybe also which pool you are using.
If you try again, could you paste here a bit of the miniZ log?
Regarding the autotune, we will think about it
Cheers
April 26, 2019, 04:06:37 PM
The console says no rejected at all, but @NiceHash its ~15% in this tiny sample. In bigger samples you will see spikes up to 30-40% like I showed above. Hope this helps.
Driver 430.39, latest Win 10 + all patches. But same rejects also on 419.67 with RTX 2070 cards.
Hi joseph32,Driver 430.39, latest Win 10 + all patches. But same rejects also on 419.67 with RTX 2070 cards.
When you have a stale share you just get a yellow star on the miner console, the efficiency only accounts for the number of accepted and invalid shares. To see the other shares you have to look at the telemetry, it would be the middle value on the shares column.
As we said for cervajz, we can see that nicehash, after sending a new job, does not accept submissions from previous jobs. Some pools still accept it, others like nicehash do not. We've tested and managed to see that when the miner receives a new job, just before submiting a solution from a previous work, this results in a rejected share from that submission.
Can you let us know what reason for rejection does nicehash report. You can check your graphic. It can say rejected (target), rejected (stale), rejected (duplicate)...
Cheers
Highest reject reason is target, a few % is stale which is mostly splitted between stale and duplicate. Here is a screen. (Around 18:30 the miner wasnt farming, so thats why its 0).
Hi joseph32,
thank you for the log.
We believe we managed to reproduce your problem.
Try running miniZ without --pers auto, for mining BEAM. Or use --pers Beam-PoW.
Actually, when mining Beam --pers auto should not work on any pool, we are surprised you got accepted so many shares.
Let us know if this helped.
Cheers
April 26, 2019, 03:21:02 PM
Hi, use last version miniz... w10, driver 430+,cpu g3930, 4GB RAM, 5x1080ti+1x1080, mine beam, speed is far better than gminer :-) good work
cpu load is 100%
cpu load is 100%
April 26, 2019, 02:32:11 PM
not stable for me, back to version v1.2m
Hi topteam,Code:
kernel: [ 678.861888] show_signal_msg: 18 callbacks suppressed
kernel: [ 678.861891] miniZ[2386]: segfault at c0 ip 0000560d8618c982 sp 00007fcc10ff2bd0 error 4 in miniZ[560d86098000+1fea000]
1775 Segmentation fault (core dumped) ~/miniZ --url [email protected]:20595 --pers BgoldPoW --par=144,5 --nocolor --telemetry 0 --gpu-line --extra --templimit 70C --tempunits C --latency --show-solratio --show-pers --shares-detail --oc2
sorry for this.
Could you post here a bit of the log just before the crash?
Thanks.
Cheers
Code:
[ 0d 0h 5m19s] S: 31/0 744(732.4)Sol/s 1641(1589.8)W [fee.server]- 105ms (95.9%) (4.1%)
0>GTX 1070 S: 0/0 [60°C/65%] 28.91 I/s 58.4(58.2)Sol/s 141(139.8)W clk=1746MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.42 2.00 Sol/I
1>GTX 1070 S: 0/0 [55°C/50%] 29.40 I/s 59.0(59.1)Sol/s 137(137.5)W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43 2.00 Sol/I
2>GTX 1070 S: 0/0 [56°C/50%] 29.60 I/s 58.2(58.3)Sol/s 137(136.7)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43 1.97 Sol/I
3>GTX 1070 S: 0/0 [53°C/50%] 30.01 I/s 60.7(60.6)Sol/s 136(135.0)W clk=1835MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.45 2.00 Sol/I
4>GTX 1070 S: 0/0 [54°C/50%] 30.07 I/s 59.4(59.4)Sol/s 135(136.4)W clk=1835MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.44 1.98 Sol/I
5>GTX 1070 Ti S: 0/0 [48°C/50%] 34.00 I/s 66.9(67.0)Sol/s 135(129.1)W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.52 1.96 Sol/I
6>GTX 1070 Ti S: 0/0 [48°C/50%] 33.95 I/s 67.2(67.3)Sol/s 138(128.3)W clk=1771MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.52 1.99 Sol/I
7>GTX 1070 Ti S: 0/0 [56°C/50%] 33.58 I/s 67.5(67.3)Sol/s 140(136.1)W clk=1759MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.49 2.00 Sol/I
8>GTX 1070 Ti S: 0/0 [54°C/50%] 33.74 I/s 66.1(66.1)Sol/s 138(135.4)W clk=1759MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.49 1.97 Sol/I
9>GTX 1070 Ti S: 0/0 [55°C/50%] 34.02 I/s 68.7(68.7)Sol/s 137(118.5)W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.58 2.00 Sol/I
10>GTX 1070 Ti S: 0/0 [60°C/65%] 32.93 I/s 65.9(66.0)Sol/s 134(134.6)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.49 2.00 Sol/I
11>GTX 1070 Ti S: 0/0 [53°C/50%] 33.41 I/s 66.5(66.4)Sol/s 132(122.3)W clk=1759MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.54 1.97 Sol/I
[ 0d 0h 5m29s] S: 31/0 747(734.8)Sol/s 1615(1589.9)W [fee.server]- 105ms (95.9%) (4.1%)
0>GTX 1070 S: 0/0 [60°C/65%] 28.91 I/s 58.3(58.1)Sol/s 116(136.9)W clk=1771MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.42 2.00 Sol/I
1>GTX 1070 S: 0/0 [55°C/50%] 29.41 I/s 59.1(59.1)Sol/s 138(137.5)W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43 2.00 Sol/I
2>GTX 1070 S: 0/0 [56°C/50%] 29.61 I/s 58.1(58.2)Sol/s 138(136.9)W clk=1809MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43 1.97 Sol/I
3>GTX 1070 S: 0/0 [53°C/50%] 30.02 I/s 60.6(60.5)Sol/s 137(135.2)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.45 1.99 Sol/I
4>GTX 1070 S: 0/0 [54°C/50%] 30.06 I/s 59.6(59.5)Sol/s 136(136.4)W clk=1809MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.44 1.99 Sol/I
5>GTX 1070 Ti S: 0/0 [48°C/50%] 34.00 I/s 66.6(66.7)Sol/s 133(129.2)W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.52 1.97 Sol/I
6>GTX 1070 Ti S: 0/0 [48°C/50%] 33.95 I/s 67.5(67.5)Sol/s 139(129.0)W clk=1771MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.52 1.99 Sol/I
7>GTX 1070 Ti S: 0/0 [56°C/50%] 33.58 I/s 67.6(67.4)Sol/s 140(136.3)W clk=1759MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.49 2.00 Sol/I
8>GTX 1070 Ti S: 0/0 [54°C/50%] 33.73 I/s 66.8(66.6)Sol/s 133(135.0)W clk=1771MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.49 1.98 Sol/I
9>GTX 1070 Ti S: 0/0 [55°C/50%] 34.03 I/s 68.9(68.9)Sol/s 138(119.8)W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.57 2.00 Sol/I
10>GTX 1070 Ti S: 0/0 [60°C/65%] 32.93 I/s 66.2(66.2)Sol/s 131(134.1)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.49 2.00 Sol/I
11>GTX 1070 Ti S: 0/0 [54°C/50%] 33.42 I/s 66.3(66.3)Sol/s 137(123.5)W clk=1759MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.54 1.97 Sol/I
[ 0d 0h 5m39s] S: 31/0 748(736.0)Sol/s 1629(1593.0)W [fee.server]- 105ms (95.9%) (4.1%)
0>GTX 1070 S: 0/0 [60°C/65%] 28.91 I/s 58.2(58.1)Sol/s 129(137.1)W clk=1746MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.42 2.00 Sol/I
1>GTX 1070 S: 0/0 [55°C/50%] 29.41 I/s 58.8(59.0)Sol/s 139(137.7)W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43 2.00 Sol/I
kernel: [ 678.861888] show_signal_msg: 18 callbacks suppressed
kernel: [ 678.861891] miniZ[2386]: segfault at c0 ip 0000560d8618c982 sp 00007fcc10ff2bd0 error 4 in miniZ[560d86098000+1fea000]
1775 Segmentation fault (core dumped) ~/miniZ [email protected]:20595 --pers BgoldPoW --par=144,5 --nocolor --telemetry 0 --gpu-line --extra --templimit 70C --tempunits C --latency --show-solratio --show-pers --shares-detail --oc2
April 26, 2019, 02:15:48 PM
Dear miniZ, i've got some bug reports for you:
1. HiveOS custom package doesn't save logs at all. Directory /var/log/miner/miniZ exists, but is empty all the time.
2. Load average is very high, like 6-7 on G3930. 11 Pascal GPUs. Would you like to abuse NVML in less frequent manner?
p.s. It would be epic to add some auto-tune feature, ok? No any evil --oc1 --oc2 --f11 --ohmygod347, but --autotune=speed|efficiency
1. HiveOS custom package doesn't save logs at all. Directory /var/log/miner/miniZ exists, but is empty all the time.
2. Load average is very high, like 6-7 on G3930. 11 Pascal GPUs. Would you like to abuse NVML in less frequent manner?
p.s. It would be epic to add some auto-tune feature, ok? No any evil --oc1 --oc2 --f11 --ohmygod347, but --autotune=speed|efficiency
April 26, 2019, 02:12:50 PM
The console says no rejected at all, but @NiceHash its ~15% in this tiny sample. In bigger samples you will see spikes up to 30-40% like I showed above. Hope this helps.
Driver 430.39, latest Win 10 + all patches. But same rejects also on 419.67 with RTX 2070 cards.
Hi joseph32,Driver 430.39, latest Win 10 + all patches. But same rejects also on 419.67 with RTX 2070 cards.
When you have a stale share you just get a yellow star on the miner console, the efficiency only accounts for the number of accepted and invalid shares. To see the other shares you have to look at the telemetry, it would be the middle value on the shares column.
As we said for cervajz, we can see that nicehash, after sending a new job, does not accept submissions from previous jobs. Some pools still accept it, others like nicehash do not. We've tested and managed to see that when the miner receives a new job, just before submiting a solution from a previous work, this results in a rejected share from that submission.
Can you let us know what reason for rejection does nicehash report. You can check your graphic. It can say rejected (target), rejected (stale), rejected (duplicate)...
Cheers
Highest reject reason is target, a few % is stale which is mostly splitted between stale and duplicate. Here is a screen. (Around 18:30 the miner wasnt farming, so thats why its 0).
April 26, 2019, 02:04:53 PM
not stable for me, back to version v1.2m
Hi topteam,Code:
kernel: [ 678.861888] show_signal_msg: 18 callbacks suppressed
kernel: [ 678.861891] miniZ[2386]: segfault at c0 ip 0000560d8618c982 sp 00007fcc10ff2bd0 error 4 in miniZ[560d86098000+1fea000]
1775 Segmentation fault (core dumped) ~/miniZ --url [email protected]:20595 --pers BgoldPoW --par=144,5 --nocolor --telemetry 0 --gpu-line --extra --templimit 70C --tempunits C --latency --show-solratio --show-pers --shares-detail --oc2
sorry for this.
Could you post here a bit of the log just before the crash?
Thanks.
Cheers
April 26, 2019, 02:00:32 PM
The console says no rejected at all, but @NiceHash its ~15% in this tiny sample. In bigger samples you will see spikes up to 30-40% like I showed above. Hope this helps.
Driver 430.39, latest Win 10 + all patches. But same rejects also on 419.67 with RTX 2070 cards.
Hi joseph32,Driver 430.39, latest Win 10 + all patches. But same rejects also on 419.67 with RTX 2070 cards.
When you have a stale share you just get a yellow star on the miner console, the efficiency only accounts for the number of accepted and invalid shares. To see the other shares you have to look at the telemetry, it would be the middle value on the shares column.
As we said for cervajz, we can see that nicehash, after sending a new job, does not accept submissions from previous jobs. Some pools still accept it, others like nicehash do not. We've tested and managed to see that when the miner receives a new job, just before submiting a solution from a previous work, this results in a rejected share from that submission.
Can you let us know what reason for rejection does nicehash report. You can check your graphic. It can say rejected (target), rejected (stale), rejected (duplicate)...
Cheers
April 26, 2019, 01:40:07 PM
Hi, great Beam hashrate, but I have lot of rejects (20-30%) on nicehash on poolside.
Gminer, and Bimer are slower, but without rejects
Hi cervajz,Gminer, and Bimer are slower, but without rejects
Thanks for reporting this, we will look into this.
Could you tell us which GPUs are you using?
Also could you post here a bit of miniZ log? Or a bit of the console output.
Cheers
I have rtx 2080ti and 2070
GTX 1070ti and 1070
Drivers 430.39 and 419.35
log:
[ 0d 0h 5m10s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [61řC/37%]*25.42 I/s 50.0(50.0)Sol/s 179(178.7)W clk=1410MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 48ms
[ 0d 0h 5m20s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [61řC/35%] 25.39 I/s 50.0(50.0)Sol/s 177(178.5)W clk=1515MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 48ms
[ 0d 0h 5m30s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [61řC/37%] 25.38 I/s 50.3(50.2)Sol/s 180(178.8)W clk=1485MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 48ms
[ 0d 0h 5m40s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/38%] 25.37 I/s 50.3(50.2)Sol/s 181(179.0)W clk=1470MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 48ms
[ 0d 0h 5m50s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/38%] 25.33 I/s 50.0(50.1)Sol/s 182(179.2)W clk=1440MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 48ms
[ 0d 0h 6m00s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [61řC/34%]*25.33 I/s 50.1(50.1)Sol/s 175(178.6)W clk=1485MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 47ms
[ 0d 0h 6m10s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/34%]*25.33 I/s 50.1(50.1)Sol/s 177(178.6)W clk=1485MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 54ms
[ 0d 0h 6m20s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/38%]*25.34 I/s 50.3(50.2)Sol/s 179(178.8)W clk=1500MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 48ms
[ 0d 0h 6m30s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/38%]*25.35 I/s 50.1(50.1)Sol/s 179(178.7)W clk=1395MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 61ms
[ 0d 0h 6m40s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/35%]*25.33 I/s 50.1(50.1)Sol/s 178(178.7)W clk=1485MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 57ms
[ 0d 0h 6m50s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/34%]*25.32 I/s 49.9(50.0)Sol/s 181(178.9)W clk=1410MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 53ms
[ 0d 0h 7m00s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/38%]*25.31 I/s 49.8(50.0)Sol/s 180(178.9)W clk=1380MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 52ms
[ 0d 0h 7m10s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/37%] 25.30 I/s 49.8(50.0)Sol/s 179(178.9)W clk=1485MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 52ms
[ 0d 0h 7m20s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/34%]*25.27 I/s 50.1(50.1)Sol/s 179(178.9)W clk=1440MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 55ms
[ 0d 0h 7m30s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/37%]*25.26 I/s 49.9(50.0)Sol/s 180(178.9)W clk=1395MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 48ms
[ 0d 0h 7m40s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/38%]*25.26 I/s 49.9(50.0)Sol/s 181(179.1)W clk=1485MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 51ms
I had 6-10% rejected shares on pool during this log.
Hi cervajz,
thanks for your message.
We can see that nicehash, after sending a new job, does not accept submissions from previous jobs. Some pools still accept it, others like nicehash do not.
We've tested and managed to see that when the miner receives a new job, just before submiting a solution from a previous work, this results in a rejected share from that submission.
We will look into this, but we would not like to remove this submission because we do not think that miners will gain anything from it.
You'll get better efficiency on the pool, but you will earn the same (since nicehash does not accept it anyway).
As we said before, some pools still accept these submissions.
Could you check whether you notice a large difference from the hashrate reported by the pool and by the miner? Mind you that, for a better stats, it needs to run for a while.
Cheers
April 26, 2019, 01:16:47 PM
not stable for me, back to version v1.2m
Code:
kernel: [ 678.861888] show_signal_msg: 18 callbacks suppressed
kernel: [ 678.861891] miniZ[2386]: segfault at c0 ip 0000560d8618c982 sp 00007fcc10ff2bd0 error 4 in miniZ[560d86098000+1fea000]
1775 Segmentation fault (core dumped) ~/miniZ --url [email protected]:20595 --pers BgoldPoW --par=144,5 --nocolor --telemetry 0 --gpu-line --extra --templimit 70C --tempunits C --latency --show-solratio --show-pers --shares-detail --oc2
April 26, 2019, 12:53:09 PM
The console says no rejected at all, but @NiceHash its ~15% in this tiny sample. In bigger samples you will see spikes up to 30-40% like I showed above. Hope this helps.
Driver 430.39, latest Win 10 + all patches. But same rejects also on 419.67 with RTX 2070 cards.
Driver 430.39, latest Win 10 + all patches. But same rejects also on 419.67 with RTX 2070 cards.
Code:
miniZ,150,5[6:0:00]: Selecting GPU#0[0] GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Algo: EQ[150,5]
Pool#0: user[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
server[stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] port[3370] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Telemetry: [http://localhost:4029]
Logging:: file[miniZ.log] period[10] delay[0]
Temp. limit: [99øC]
[ 0d 0h 0m09s] S: 1/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [42øC/70%]*30.47 I/s 55.9(55.9)Sol/s 290(289.5)W clk=1890MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.19 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 0m19s] S: 2/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [50øC/70%] 31.05 I/s 60.3(60.3)Sol/s 285(285.2)W clk=1815MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 0m29s] S: 2/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [52øC/70%] 31.16 I/s 61.0(61.0)Sol/s 283(282.8)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 0m39s] S: 4/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [55øC/70%] 31.18 I/s 61.0(61.0)Sol/s 284(283.9)W clk=1845MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 0m49s] S: 7/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [57øC/70%]*31.16 I/s 61.1(61.1)Sol/s 286(285.7)W clk=1845MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 0m59s] S: 11/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [58øC/70%]*31.15 I/s 60.7(60.7)Sol/s 287(286.5)W clk=1815MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 1m09s] S: 11/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [60øC/70%] 31.12 I/s 61.2(61.2)Sol/s 286(286.2)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 1m19s] S: 11/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [61øC/70%] 30.99 I/s 61.6(61.6)Sol/s 286(285.9)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 1m29s] S: 11/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [62øC/70%] 30.91 I/s 60.9(60.9)Sol/s 287(286.3)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 1m39s] S: 12/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [63øC/70%]*30.89 I/s 61.6(61.6)Sol/s 284(285.2)W clk=1815MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 1m49s] S: 13/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [63øC/70%]*30.89 I/s 61.7(61.7)Sol/s 282(284.4)W clk=1815MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 1m59s] S: 14/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [64øC/70%]*30.89 I/s 61.8(61.8)Sol/s 282(284.0)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 2m09s] S: 14/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [65øC/70%] 30.88 I/s 61.5(61.5)Sol/s 283(283.9)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 2m19s] S: 15/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [65øC/70%]*30.87 I/s 61.7(61.7)Sol/s 284(284.1)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 2m29s] S: 17/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [65øC/70%]*30.86 I/s 62.1(62.1)Sol/s 285(284.3)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 2m39s] S: 18/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [66øC/70%] 30.85 I/s 61.8(61.8)Sol/s 285(284.3)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 2m49s] S: 19/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [66øC/70%]*30.84 I/s 61.5(61.5)Sol/s 285(284.5)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 2m59s] S: 20/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [67øC/70%]*30.83 I/s 61.4(61.4)Sol/s 286(284.7)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 3m09s] S: 20/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [67øC/70%] 30.82 I/s 61.4(61.4)Sol/s 285(284.8)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [fee.server] (97.4%) (2.6%)
[ 0d 0h 3m19s] S: 20/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [68øC/70%] 30.81 I/s 61.3(61.3)Sol/s 284(284.5)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [fee.server] (93.4%) (6.6%)
[ 0d 0h 3m29s] S: 20/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [68øC/70%] 30.80 I/s 61.7(61.7)Sol/s 285(284.6)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (88.5%) (11.5%)
[ 0d 0h 3m39s] S: 22/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [68øC/70%]*30.79 I/s 61.8(61.8)Sol/s 285(284.6)W clk=1815MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (89.0%) (11.0%)
[ 0d 0h 3m49s] S: 22/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [68øC/70%] 30.78 I/s 61.8(61.8)Sol/s 285(284.7)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (89.4%) (10.6%)
[ 0d 0h 3m59s] S: 23/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [68øC/70%]*30.77 I/s 62.0(61.9)Sol/s 287(285.1)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (90.0%) (10.0%)
[ 0d 0h 4m09s] S: 27/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [69øC/70%]*30.76 I/s 62.3(62.1)Sol/s 288(285.5)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (90.2%) (9.8%)
[ 0d 0h 4m19s] S: 27/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [69øC/70%] 30.75 I/s 61.8(61.8)Sol/s 287(285.5)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (90.6%) (9.4%)
[ 0d 0h 4m29s] S: 28/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [69øC/70%]*30.75 I/s 61.7(61.8)Sol/s 285(285.4)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (91.1%) (8.9%)
[ 0d 0h 4m40s] S: 30/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [69øC/70%]*30.73 I/s 61.7(61.7)Sol/s 284(285.3)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (91.4%) (8.6%)
[ 0d 0h 4m50s] S: 30/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [69øC/70%] 30.71 I/s 61.6(61.6)Sol/s 286(285.4)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (91.7%) (8.3%)
[ 0d 0h 5m00s] S: 31/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [69øC/70%]*30.70 I/s 61.6(61.7)Sol/s 287(285.5)W clk=1740MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (92.0%) (8.0%)
[ 0d 0h 5m10s] S: 31/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [69øC/70%] 30.69 I/s 62.0(61.9)Sol/s 283(285.2)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (92.3%) (7.7%)
[ 0d 0h 5m20s] S: 34/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.68 I/s 61.8(61.8)Sol/s 283(285.1)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (92.5%) (7.5%)
[ 0d 0h 5m30s] S: 34/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%] 30.66 I/s 61.8(61.8)Sol/s 283(285.0)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (92.7%) (7.3%)
[ 0d 0h 5m40s] S: 36/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.65 I/s 61.3(61.5)Sol/s 281(284.6)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (92.9%) (7.1%)
[ 0d 0h 5m50s] S: 36/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [69øC/70%] 30.64 I/s 61.3(61.5)Sol/s 283(284.6)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (93.1%) (6.9%)
[ 0d 0h 6m00s] S: 38/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.63 I/s 61.5(61.6)Sol/s 282(284.4)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (93.3%) (6.7%)
[ 0d 0h 6m10s] S: 43/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.62 I/s 61.7(61.7)Sol/s 282(284.3)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (93.5%) (6.5%)
[ 0d 0h 6m20s] S: 45/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.61 I/s 61.6(61.7)Sol/s 281(284.1)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (93.6%) (6.4%)
[ 0d 0h 6m30s] S: 45/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%] 30.61 I/s 61.5(61.6)Sol/s 283(284.1)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (93.8%) (6.2%)
[ 0d 0h 6m40s] S: 45/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%] 30.60 I/s 61.2(61.5)Sol/s 282(283.9)W clk=1815MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (93.8%) (6.2%)
[ 0d 0h 6m50s] S: 45/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%] 30.59 I/s 61.2(61.5)Sol/s 282(283.9)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (94.1%) (5.9%)
[ 0d 0h 7m00s] S: 47/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.59 I/s 61.2(61.4)Sol/s 281(283.7)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (94.3%) (5.7%)
[ 0d 0h 7m10s] S: 49/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.59 I/s 60.7(61.2)Sol/s 284(283.8)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (94.4%) (5.6%)
[ 0d 0h 7m20s] S: 52/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.58 I/s 61.1(61.3)Sol/s 283(283.8)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (94.5%) (5.5%)
[ 0d 0h 7m30s] S: 54/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.57 I/s 61.4(61.4)Sol/s 282(283.7)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (94.7%) (5.3%)
[ 0d 0h 7m40s] S: 59/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.57 I/s 61.2(61.4)Sol/s 270(282.6)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (94.8%) (5.2%)
[ 0d 0h 7m50s] S: 60/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.56 I/s 61.2(61.4)Sol/s 276(282.6)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (94.9%) (5.1%)
[ 0d 0h 8m00s] S: 61/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.56 I/s 61.3(61.4)Sol/s 278(282.5)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (95.0%) (5.0%)
[ 0d 0h 8m10s] S: 61/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%] 30.56 I/s 61.3(61.4)Sol/s 284(282.8)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (95.1%) (4.9%)
[ 0d 0h 8m20s] S: 63/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.55 I/s 61.5(61.5)Sol/s 283(282.8)W clk=1740MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (95.2%) (4.8%)
[ 0d 0h 8m30s] S: 64/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.55 I/s 61.4(61.4)Sol/s 283(282.8)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (95.2%) (4.8%)
[ 0d 0h 8m40s] S: 68/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.55 I/s 61.6(61.5)Sol/s 283(282.8)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (95.3%) (4.7%)
[ 0d 0h 8m50s] S: 69/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%] 30.55 I/s 61.9(61.6)Sol/s 284(282.9)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (95.5%) (4.5%)
[ 0d 0h 9m00s] S: 73/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%]*30.54 I/s 61.6(61.5)Sol/s 282(282.8)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (95.5%) (4.5%)
[ 0d 0h 9m10s] S: 74/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%] 30.54 I/s 61.6(61.5)Sol/s 285(283.0)W clk=1740MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (95.6%) (4.4%)
[ 0d 0h 9m20s] S: 76/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.53 I/s 61.6(61.5)Sol/s 285(283.1)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (95.7%) (4.3%)
[ 0d 0h 9m30s] S: 76/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%] 30.53 I/s 61.5(61.5)Sol/s 285(283.2)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (95.8%) (4.2%)
[ 0d 0h 9m40s] S: 76/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [70øC/70%] 30.53 I/s 61.4(61.4)Sol/s 286(283.3)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (95.9%) (4.1%)
[ 0d 0h 9m50s] S: 76/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.52 I/s 61.3(61.4)Sol/s 284(283.2)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (95.9%) (4.1%)
[ 0d 0h10m00s] S: 77/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.52 I/s 60.8(61.2)Sol/s 284(283.2)W clk=1740MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.0%) (4.0%)
[ 0d 0h10m10s] S: 77/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.52 I/s 60.5(61.1)Sol/s 284(283.3)W clk=1740MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.0%) (4.0%)
[ 0d 0h10m20s] S: 78/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.52 I/s 60.7(61.2)Sol/s 284(283.3)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.1%) (3.9%)
[ 0d 0h10m30s] S: 79/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.52 I/s 60.5(61.1)Sol/s 284(283.3)W clk=1740MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.2%) (3.8%)
[ 0d 0h10m40s] S: 81/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.52 I/s 60.5(61.1)Sol/s 283(283.3)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.3%) (3.7%)
[ 0d 0h10m50s] S: 85/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.51 I/s 60.6(61.1)Sol/s 281(283.1)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.3%) (3.7%)
[ 0d 0h11m00s] S: 85/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.51 I/s 60.8(61.1)Sol/s 283(283.2)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.4%) (3.6%)
[ 0d 0h11m10s] S: 86/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.51 I/s 60.7(61.1)Sol/s 284(283.3)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.4%) (3.6%)
[ 0d 0h11m20s] S: 87/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.51 I/s 60.7(61.1)Sol/s 282(283.2)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.5%) (3.5%)
[ 0d 0h11m30s] S: 89/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.51 I/s 60.4(61.0)Sol/s 283(283.2)W clk=1740MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.5%) (3.5%)
[ 0d 0h11m40s] S: 90/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.51 I/s 60.4(61.0)Sol/s 284(283.2)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.5%) (3.5%)
[ 0d 0h11m51s] S: 92/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.51 I/s 60.3(61.0)Sol/s 282(283.1)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.6%) (3.4%)
[ 0d 0h12m01s] S: 94/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.4(61.0)Sol/s 285(283.3)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.7%) (3.3%)
[ 0d 0h12m11s] S: 94/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.51 I/s 60.5(61.0)Sol/s 285(283.3)W clk=1740MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.7%) (3.3%)
[ 0d 0h12m21s] S: 94/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.50 I/s 60.3(60.9)Sol/s 284(283.3)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.7%) (3.3%)
[ 0d 0h12m31s] S: 94/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.50 I/s 60.4(60.9)Sol/s 284(283.3)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.8%) (3.2%)
[ 0d 0h12m41s] S: 94/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.51 I/s 60.1(60.8)Sol/s 284(283.4)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.8%) (3.2%)
[ 0d 0h12m51s] S: 94/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.50 I/s 60.2(60.8)Sol/s 282(283.3)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.9%) (3.1%)
[ 0d 0h13m01s] S: 96/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.2(60.8)Sol/s 283(283.3)W clk=1740MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (96.9%) (3.1%)
[ 0d 0h13m11s] S: 96/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.50 I/s 60.4(60.9)Sol/s 284(283.3)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.0%) (3.0%)
[ 0d 0h13m21s] S:100/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.8(60.9)Sol/s 284(283.4)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.0%) (3.0%)
[ 0d 0h13m31s] S:104/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.6(60.9)Sol/s 284(283.4)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.0%) (3.0%)
[ 0d 0h13m41s] S:106/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.2(60.8)Sol/s 284(283.4)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.1%) (2.9%)
[ 0d 0h13m51s] S:106/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.50 I/s 60.0(60.7)Sol/s 283(283.4)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.1%) (2.9%)
[ 0d 0h14m01s] S:108/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.1(60.7)Sol/s 283(283.3)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.1%) (2.9%)
[ 0d 0h14m11s] S:109/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.0(60.7)Sol/s 285(283.4)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.2%) (2.8%)
[ 0d 0h14m21s] S:110/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.3(60.7)Sol/s 283(283.4)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.2%) (2.8%)
[ 0d 0h14m31s] S:113/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.7(60.8)Sol/s 284(283.4)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.2%) (2.8%)
[ 0d 0h14m41s] S:114/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.5(60.8)Sol/s 286(283.5)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.3%) (2.7%)
[ 0d 0h14m51s] S:115/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.2(60.7)Sol/s 287(283.6)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.3%) (2.7%)
[ 0d 0h15m01s] S:115/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.50 I/s 60.5(60.8)Sol/s 284(283.6)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.3%) (2.7%)
[ 0d 0h15m11s] S:116/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.5(60.8)Sol/s 282(283.5)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.4%) (2.6%)
[ 0d 0h15m21s] S:117/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.50 I/s 60.3(60.7)Sol/s 283(283.5)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.4%) (2.6%)
[ 0d 0h15m31s] S:121/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.8(60.8)Sol/s 285(283.6)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.4%) (2.6%)
[ 0d 0h15m41s] S:122/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 61.2(60.9)Sol/s 284(283.6)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.4%) (2.6%)
[ 0d 0h15m51s] S:122/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.50 I/s 61.2(60.9)Sol/s 286(283.6)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.5%) (2.5%)
[ 0d 0h16m01s] S:122/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.49 I/s 61.3(60.9)Sol/s 284(283.6)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.5%) (2.5%)
[ 0d 0h16m11s] S:123/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.49 I/s 61.5(61.0)Sol/s 284(283.6)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.5%) (2.5%)
[ 0d 0h16m21s] S:124/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.49 I/s 61.5(61.0)Sol/s 285(283.7)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.6%) (2.4%)
[ 0d 0h16m31s] S:125/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.49 I/s 61.7(61.0)Sol/s 282(283.6)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.6%) (2.4%)
[ 0d 0h16m41s] S:125/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.49 I/s 61.8(61.0)Sol/s 283(283.6)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.6%) (2.4%)
[ 0d 0h16m51s] S:125/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.49 I/s 62.1(61.1)Sol/s 284(283.6)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.6%) (2.4%)
[ 0d 0h17m01s] S:125/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.49 I/s 62.0(61.1)Sol/s 284(283.6)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.6%) (2.4%)
[ 0d 0h17m11s] S:127/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 61.8(61.1)Sol/s 283(283.6)W clk=1740MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.7%) (2.3%)
[ 0d 0h17m21s] S:128/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 61.4(61.0)Sol/s 282(283.5)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.7%) (2.3%)
[ 0d 0h17m31s] S:128/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.50 I/s 61.4(61.0)Sol/s 288(283.7)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.7%) (2.3%)
[ 0d 0h17m41s] S:128/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.50 I/s 61.2(61.0)Sol/s 287(283.8)W clk=1785MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.7%) (2.3%)
[ 0d 0h17m51s] S:128/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.50 I/s 61.0(61.0)Sol/s 285(283.7)W clk=1740MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.8%) (2.2%)
[ 0d 0h18m01s] S:129/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.6(60.9)Sol/s 285(283.8)W clk=1770MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.8%) (2.2%)
[ 0d 0h18m11s] S:131/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.5(60.9)Sol/s 284(283.8)W clk=1740MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.8%) (2.2%)
[ 0d 0h18m21s] S:131/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.50 I/s 60.5(60.9)Sol/s 285(283.8)W clk=1740MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.8%) (2.2%)
[ 0d 0h18m31s] S:132/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 60.7(60.9)Sol/s 285(283.8)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.8%) (2.2%)
[ 0d 0h18m41s] S:132/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%] 30.50 I/s 61.2(61.0)Sol/s 283(283.8)W clk=1755MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.21 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.8%) (2.2%)
[ 0d 0h18m51s] S:135/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 61.5(61.0)Sol/s 284(283.8)W clk=1740MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.9%) (2.1%)
[ 0d 0h19m02s] S:136/0 0>RTX 2080 Ti ` 100% [71øC/70%]*30.50 I/s 61.6(61.0)Sol/s 282(283.7)W clk=1800MHz mclk=7699MHz Sol/W=0.22 [stratum+tcp://beam.eu.nicehash.com] (97.9%) (2.1%)
April 26, 2019, 12:01:50 PM
Hi, great Beam hashrate, but I have lot of rejects (20-30%) on nicehash on poolside.
Gminer, and Bimer are slower, but without rejects
Hi cervajz,Gminer, and Bimer are slower, but without rejects
Thanks for reporting this, we will look into this.
Could you tell us which GPUs are you using?
Also could you post here a bit of miniZ log? Or a bit of the console output.
Cheers
I have rtx 2080ti and 2070
GTX 1070ti and 1070
Drivers 430.39 and 419.35
log:
[ 0d 0h 5m10s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [61řC/37%]*25.42 I/s 50.0(50.0)Sol/s 179(178.7)W clk=1410MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 48ms
[ 0d 0h 5m20s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [61řC/35%] 25.39 I/s 50.0(50.0)Sol/s 177(178.5)W clk=1515MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 48ms
[ 0d 0h 5m30s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [61řC/37%] 25.38 I/s 50.3(50.2)Sol/s 180(178.8)W clk=1485MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 48ms
[ 0d 0h 5m40s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/38%] 25.37 I/s 50.3(50.2)Sol/s 181(179.0)W clk=1470MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 48ms
[ 0d 0h 5m50s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/38%] 25.33 I/s 50.0(50.1)Sol/s 182(179.2)W clk=1440MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 48ms
[ 0d 0h 6m00s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [61řC/34%]*25.33 I/s 50.1(50.1)Sol/s 175(178.6)W clk=1485MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 47ms
[ 0d 0h 6m10s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/34%]*25.33 I/s 50.1(50.1)Sol/s 177(178.6)W clk=1485MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 54ms
[ 0d 0h 6m20s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/38%]*25.34 I/s 50.3(50.2)Sol/s 179(178.8)W clk=1500MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 48ms
[ 0d 0h 6m30s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/38%]*25.35 I/s 50.1(50.1)Sol/s 179(178.7)W clk=1395MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 61ms
[ 0d 0h 6m40s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/35%]*25.33 I/s 50.1(50.1)Sol/s 178(178.7)W clk=1485MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 57ms
[ 0d 0h 6m50s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/34%]*25.32 I/s 49.9(50.0)Sol/s 181(178.9)W clk=1410MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 53ms
[ 0d 0h 7m00s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/38%]*25.31 I/s 49.8(50.0)Sol/s 180(178.9)W clk=1380MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 52ms
[ 0d 0h 7m10s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/37%] 25.30 I/s 49.8(50.0)Sol/s 179(178.9)W clk=1485MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 52ms
[ 0d 0h 7m20s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/34%]*25.27 I/s 50.1(50.1)Sol/s 179(178.9)W clk=1440MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 55ms
[ 0d 0h 7m30s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/37%]*25.26 I/s 49.9(50.0)Sol/s 180(178.9)W clk=1395MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 48ms
[ 0d 0h 7m40s] 0>RTX 2080 Ti 100% [62řC/38%]*25.26 I/s 49.9(50.0)Sol/s 181(179.1)W clk=1485MHz mclk=7299MHz Sol/W=0.28- 51ms
I had 6-10% rejected shares on pool during this log.
April 26, 2019, 11:34:43 AM
Hi, great Beam hashrate, but I have lot of rejects (20-30%) on nicehash on poolside.
Gminer, and Bimer are slower, but without rejects
Gminer, and Bimer are slower, but without rejects
Yes, getting the same picture. Usually 10-20% rejected, but also spikes of 30-40%. Definitely room for improvements here.
Thanks for reporting this.
Similarly to what we asked cervajz, could you tell us which GPUs and which pool are you using?
Also could you post here a bit of miniZ log? Or a bit of the console output.
We will look into this!
Cheers
Jump to: