Topic: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 64. (Read 60004 times)

Good day.
Real time (we have the duration of the farm) is needed to understand what happened
  with the farm. (pool reports a 30-minute delay in receipt of share)
It is difficult to find the place of failure in the log file if it is not specified when it happened.
Miner can automatically reboot and continue working.
Good luck.

me run miniz in linux ubuntu in mode - one miner - one videocard

count of run copy > 10

why in first gpu me see 10working copy miniZ and one copy in other card

nvidia-smi:

Hi Xenoflex,

Thank you for the encouragement!

As suggested by RoninAlek (Thanks RoninAlek!), you can create a .bat file with your personalised command line to run miniZ.

If you still need a configuration file we will consider your request for the next version.
Cheers

Hi Ziv1,
Can you explain better what you mean by 'time online'? Just to be sure

We have experienced the same behavior from our 10603 GB, for some OC values. Sometimes, the GPU gets stuck and stops mining for a few minutes.
If we ajust the OCs this behavior does not happen anymore.

With PL=72W we managed to run miniZ (with --oc1) and it runs smoothly, clk~1594MHz, mclk=3666MHz, 16.55 I/s, 33.1 Sol/s.
In MSI Afterburner would be something like core clock = +205, memory clock = -135, but you should test for your conditions. 

[ 0d 8h16m39s] S:254/0 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [53°C/48%] 16.55 I/s 33.3(33.1)Sol/s  72( 70.9)W clk=1594MHz mclk=3666MHz Sol/W=0.47 2.00 Sol/I [btcz.2miners.com] (97.9%) (2.1%)
[ 0d 8h16m49s] S:254/0 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [53°C/48%] 16.55 I/s 33.4(33.1)Sol/s  73( 70.9)W clk=1607MHz mclk=3666MHz Sol/W=0.47 2.00 Sol/I [btcz.2miners.com] (97.9%) (2.1%)
[ 0d 8h16m59s] S:254/0 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [53°C/48%] 16.55 I/s 33.2(33.1)Sol/s  75( 70.9)W clk=1607MHz mclk=3666MHz Sol/W=0.47 2.00 Sol/I [btcz.2miners.com] (97.9%) (2.1%)
[ 0d 8h17m09s] S:254/0 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [53°C/48%] 16.55 I/s 33.4(33.1)Sol/s  70( 70.9)W clk=1582MHz mclk=3666MHz Sol/W=0.47 2.00 Sol/I [btcz.2miners.com] (97.9%) (2.1%)

We suggest you to tune your values, but we'll keep looking into this behavior.
Thanks for the feedback!
Cheers

You talking about the GUI or the batch file? If you are talking about the batch file config, create a new batch file with:

miniZ -h
pause

If you are talking about the GUI, they have it on their website:
https://miniz.ch/miniz-gui-launcher/

Hi MiniZ,
very good work.
Is there a chance you add a configfile support?
Cheers!

Good day.
The log file needs time online.
It is difficult to look for failures in time to stop a farm from the pool.
There were 2 failures that were recorded by the pool (the duration of the failure was more than 20 minutes).
It was not recorded in the log file.
You can see only the temperature drop of the cards and the power consumption.

Good luck.



0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [52шC/46%] 16.12 I/s 31.9(32.1)Sol/s  69( 69.8)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [53шC/46%] 16.17 I/s 31.8(32.3)Sol/s  71( 71.3)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d11h19m46s] S:237/0 63(64.4)Sol/s 141(141.4)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [53шC/46%] 16.12 I/s 31.7(32.1)Sol/s  69( 69.8)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [54шC/48%] 16.18 I/s 31.7(32.3)Sol/s  72( 71.3)W clk=1569MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d11h19m56s] S:237/0 63(64.4)Sol/s 101(140.1)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [49шC/40%] 16.12 I/s 31.7(32.1)Sol/s  48( 69.7)W clk=1569MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [51шC/46%] 16.18 I/s 31.7(32.3)Sol/s  53( 71.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d11h20m06s] S:237/0 63(64.4)Sol/s  80(138.8)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [47шC/36%] 16.12 I/s 31.7(32.1)Sol/s  37( 69.7)W clk=1569MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [49шC/38%] 16.18 I/s 31.7(32.3)Sol/s  43( 71.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d11h20m16s!!!!!!?] S:237/0 63(64.4)Sol/s  48!!!!!?(136.7)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [45шC/32%] 16.12 I/s 31.7(32.1)Sol/s  22( 69.7)W clk=189MHz mclk=405MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [47шC/36%] 16.18 I/s 31.7(32.3)Sol/s  26( 71.2)W clk=898MHz mclk=810MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d11h20m27s!!!!!?] S:237/0 63(64.4)Sol/s  30(134.7)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)                                              
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [44шC/30%] 16.12 I/s 31.7(32.1)Sol/s  14( 69.6)W clk=139MHz mclk=405MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [46шC/32%] 16.18 I/s 31.7(32.3)Sol/s  16( 71.2)W clk=139MHz mclk=405MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d11h20m37s] S:237/0 58(64.3)Sol/s  21(132.7)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [43шC/30%] 14.77 I/s 29.1(32.1)Sol/s  10( 69.6)W clk=139MHz mclk=405MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [44шC/30%] 14.92 I/s 29.2(32.2)Sol/s  11( 71.1)W clk=139MHz mclk=405MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d11h20m47s] S:237/0 59(64.3)Sol/s  81(132.8)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [49шC/36%] 14.91 I/s 29.4(32.1)Sol/s  40( 69.6)W clk=1607MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [49шC/38%] 15.06 I/s 29.3(32.2)Sol/s  41( 71.1)W clk=1594MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d11h20m57s] S:237/0 59(64.3)Sol/s 110(132.9)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [50шC/38%] 15.04 I/s 29.4(32.1)Sol/s  53( 69.6)W clk=1594MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [50шC/40%] 15.18 I/s 29.8(32.2)Sol/s  57( 71.1)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d11h21m07s] S:237/0 60(64.3)Sol/s 129(133.1)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [50шC/40%] 15.15 I/s 30.2(32.1)Sol/s  64( 69.6)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [50шC/40%] 15.28 I/s 29.9(32.2)Sol/s  66( 71.1)W clk=1594MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d11h21m17s] S:237/0 61(64.3)Sol/s 137(133.3)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0



[ 0d16h58m25s] S:360/0 64(64.4)Sol/s 144(141.5)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [54шC/48%] 16.09 I/s 32.3(32.2)Sol/s  71( 69.6)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/50%] 16.16 I/s 31.3(32.2)Sol/s  73( 71.3)W clk=1569MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d16h58m35s] S:360/0 64(64.4)Sol/s 142(141.5)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [54шC/48%] 16.09 I/s 32.2(32.2)Sol/s  68( 69.6)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/50%] 16.16 I/s 32.0(32.2)Sol/s  73( 71.3)W clk=1569MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d16h58m45s] S:360/0 64(64.4)Sol/s 101(140.1)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [50шC/48%] 16.09 I/s 32.3(32.2)Sol/s  48( 69.6)W clk=1569MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [52шC/50%] 16.16 I/s 32.0(32.2)Sol/s  53( 71.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d16h58m55s] S:360/0 64(64.4)Sol/s  80(138.8)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [48шC/38%] 16.09 I/s 32.3(32.2)Sol/s  37( 69.6)W clk=1569MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [50шC/42%] 16.16 I/s 32.0(32.2)Sol/s  43( 71.2)W clk=1556MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d16h59m05s] S:360/0 64(64.4)Sol/s  48(136.8)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [46шC/34%] 16.09 I/s 32.3(32.2)Sol/s  22( 69.5)W clk=177MHz mclk=405MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [48шC/38%] 16.16 I/s 32.0(32.2)Sol/s  26( 71.2)W clk=898MHz mclk=810MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d16h59m15s] S:360/0 64(64.4)Sol/s  31(134.7)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [45шC/30%] 16.09 I/s 32.3(32.2)Sol/s  14( 69.5)W clk=139MHz mclk=405MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [47шC/34%] 16.16 I/s 32.0(32.2)Sol/s  16( 71.1)W clk=139MHz mclk=405MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d16h59m26s] S:360/0 64(64.4)Sol/s  22(132.7)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [44шC/30%] 16.09 I/s 32.3(32.2)Sol/s  11( 69.4)W clk=139MHz mclk=405MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [45шC/32%] 16.16 I/s 32.0(32.2)Sol/s  11( 71.1)W clk=139MHz mclk=405MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d16h59m36s] S:360/0 58(64.3)Sol/s  82(132.9)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [48шC/30%] 14.62 I/s 29.3(32.1)Sol/s  41( 69.4)W clk=1594MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [49шC/30%] 14.68 I/s 29.1(32.2)Sol/s  42( 71.1)W clk=1556MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d16h59m46s] S:360/0 59(64.3)Sol/s 113(133.0)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [50шC/38%] 14.77 I/s 29.9(32.1)Sol/s  55( 69.4)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [50шC/40%] 14.83 I/s 29.7(32.2)Sol/s  58( 71.1)W clk=1594MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d16h59m56s] S:360/0 60(64.3)Sol/s 127(133.2)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [51шC/40%] 14.91 I/s 29.9(32.1)Sol/s  64( 69.4)W clk=1607MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [51шC/42%] 14.97 I/s 30.1(32.2)Sol/s  63( 71.1)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d17h 0m06s] S:360/0 60(64.3)Sol/s 135(133.3)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [51шC/42%] 15.04 I/s 30.1(32.1)Sol/s  67( 69.4)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [52шC/42%] 15.09 I/s 30.2(32.2)Sol/s  68( 71.1)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d17h 0m16s] S:360/0 61(64.3)Sol/s 138(133.4)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [52шC/42%] 15.14 I/s 30.3(32.1)Sol/s  68( 69.4)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.46
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [52шC/44%] 15.21 I/s 30.6(32.2)Sol/s  70( 71.1)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
[ 0d17h 0m26s] S:360/0 61(64.3)Sol/s 140(133.6)W [btcz.2miners.com] (98.0%) (2.0%)

Hi johnstewart,
if you mean running at the same time in the same GPUs, yes that might be the cause.
If you have other miners running on the same GPU, miniZ may not have enough memory available to run or can get unstable.
Cheers

Hello i tried with only one instance and it closed by itself ... i Think it could be something with cgminer et bfgminer who are running at the same time for my moonlanders and my newpack

Hi Ziv1,

you are right, it is confusing. We will exclude from Total as well, in the next version.
The fee share is adding to the Total share (the sum of each GPU share). The fee share is not being added to the individual GPU count.
You can see this if running with --share-detail.

The number of shares cannot be directly compared because the difficulty of fee shares can be very different.
You can submit less shares when compared to the number fee share but this doesn't mean that you are earning less.
Low difficulty share is worth less than a high difficulty share. What you earn depends on the number of shares weighted on the share difficulty. 

Cheers

Good day.
In the log file when calculating valid shares confusion.
When shown in the log file fee.server shares are added.
[ 0d 0h 2m49s] S:  2/0 145(145.2)Sol/s 342(349.2)W [btcz.2miners.com]- 74ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [54шC/45%] 17.83 I/s 35.5(35.5)Sol/s  83( 86.7)W clk=1746MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.41
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/48%] 18.10 I/s 36.3(36.3)Sol/s  87( 87.7)W clk=1784MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.41
 2>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/48%] 18.15 I/s 37.0(37.0)Sol/s  83( 87.6)W clk=1797MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.42
 3>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/48%] 17.82 I/s 36.0(36.0)Sol/s  90( 87.2)W clk=1784MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.41
[ 0d 0h 2m59s] S:  3/0 145(144.8)Sol/s 350(350.1)W [fee.server]- 76ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [54шC/45%] 17.83 I/s 35.5(35.5)Sol/s  87( 87.3)W clk=1759MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.41
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/48%]*18.10 I/s 36.0(36.0)Sol/s  88( 87.9)W clk=1809MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.41
 2>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/48%] 18.15 I/s 36.9(36.9)Sol/s  86( 87.8)W clk=1809MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.42
 3>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/48%] 17.82 I/s 36.0(36.0)Sol/s  88( 87.2)W clk=1759MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.41
[ 0d 0h 3m09s] S:  5/0!!!??? 144(144.3)Sol/s 355(351.1)W [fee.server]- 78ms (94.7%) (5.3%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [54шC/45%] 17.82 I/s 35.5(35.5)Sol/s  90( 87.9)W clk=1771MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.40
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/48%] 18.09 I/s 36.5(36.4)Sol/s  88( 87.8)W clk=1847MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.42
 2>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/45%] 18.14 I/s 36.6(36.6)Sol/s  87( 87.8)W clk=1797MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.42
 3>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/48%] 17.82 I/s 35.8(35.8)Sol/s  90( 87.6)W clk=1771MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.41
[ 0d 0h 3m19s] S:  5/0 145(144.6)Sol/s 361(352.6)W [btcz.2miners.com]- 74ms (92.3%) (7.7%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [54шC/45%] 17.82 I/s 35.5(35.5)Sol/s  89( 87.8)W clk=1771MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.40
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/48%] 18.09 I/s 36.4(36.4)Sol/s  91( 88.5)W clk=1797MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.41
 2>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/48%] 18.14 I/s 37.1(37.1)Sol/s  90( 88.3)W clk=1797MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.42
 3>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/48%] 17.82 I/s 35.9(35.9)Sol/s  91( 88.0)W clk=1797MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.41
[ 0d 0h 3m29s] S:  7/0 146(145.5)Sol/s 357(352.6)W [btcz.2miners.com]- 78ms (92.7%) (7.3%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [54шC/45%]*17.82 I/s 35.5(35.5)Sol/s  90( 88.2)W clk=1733MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.40
 1>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/48%] 18.09 I/s 36.5(36.5)Sol/s  87( 88.0)W clk=1784MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.41
 2>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/48%] 18.14 I/s 37.2(37.2)Sol/s  89( 88.3)W clk=1797MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.42
 3>GTX 1060 3GB ` 100% [55шC/48%]*17.82 I/s 35.7(35.7)Sol/s  90( 88.1)W clk=1759MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.40


Thanks for your work.

Hi johnstewart,
You can see here how to check the pagefile size and how to manage it.
The required pagefile size depends on the type and number of GPUs. For example for 2x2080 (8GB) an ideal number would be 2x8GB=16GB.
Let us know if it worked.
Cheers

Windows 10 pro i9 9900k 16g xpm rtx 2080 duke oc driver up to date .. i don't know how to in reader the page file ?

Hi johnstewart,
Which OS are you using?
Could this be related with insuficient memory? If so try to increase the page file, by a generous amount.
If this is not the case, please give us some other details: nvidia driver, excerpt of the log right before the exit.
Thanks

Hello so the 1.2m version works fine with rtx 2080 over 100 sols with oc2
Just this versions seeems to don't support two instances in the same time. One instance just closes by itself

Hi HonestAbeX1, borox,
sorry about this.
We will fix this in the next version.
Please use the alternative syntax -cd argument that is working.
Thanks!
Cheers

Hi BigHarryArmsi,
Thank you.
We did not test this but an upgrade Afterburner to the latest version 4.6.0 beta 9 may be usefull.
Cheers

Hi Ziv1,
An ntdll error is not very specific, so hard to understand, but we will keep digging your problem.
It still can be usefull to get an excerpt of the log just before the crash.
Can you explain what you mean with
"I would like more production (85 \ 15) acceptable (90 \ 10)." ?
Thanks!
Cheers

I can confirm this.

Hi, starting with the latest version m, it seems the argument --cuda-devices # # is no longer recognized because the miner seems to ignore it and just mines with all gpus.  It worked with all prior versions up to version l correctly.  Could you investigate and resolve please?  Thanks.