why you not use usb riser ?
If you can insert 4 cards per rig, it fits into nice pc case and temperatures are in acceptable range - forget about risers. That build is safer.
this was my original intention to Phil, to find an optimum method to rack or get them rig into a decent chassis, for ISP hosting.
So far 4xGPU mobo in a decent full ATX may do the trick like Phil's Rosewill case.
Any other suggestions is welcomed.
They're a bit more expensive, but NewEgg DOES list at least 2 actual 4U rackmount cases with "8 perepheral" slots suitable for mounting 4x dual-width GPUs.
One of them had 3x 120mm fans (might need to upgrade to BETTER fans but the spaces are there to do so), the other though looked like a single-fan setup that would NOT provide decent airflow for cooling with anything less than a 140mm Delta top-end screamer (but only has the SPACE to mount a 120, which IME would be marginal but MIGHT be enough with the 250+ CFM Delta 120s).
Does anyone else hate Etherpool's new "pretty but DAMN it's a pain to see all the info that's USEFUL" stats display?
I find having to click a BUNCH of times, AND change pages, just to see all the USEFUL info that was on their old design page irritating.
I want the mining calculation and the INDIVIDUAL CHARTS PER CLIENT on one page, always displayed - the current setup takes me something like 10 TIMES as long to do my "miner check" routine multiple times a day, and just absolutely sucks - yet they insist on wasting a ton of space on "pretty" and "fancy" shit I couldn't care less about like that "shares each hour" chart. Having to click on each client to GET the damned chart is a major waste of time when you have quite a few miners.
They take WAY too long to decide a miner has shut down, which is why I want the CHARTS - I can usually tell by the CHART when a miner is shut down a good hour BEFORE their "oops, client died" stuff figures it out.