1. Pay the bounty hunters in either ETH or BTC, rather than in tokens
2. Don't list the token in any of the exchanges until the development is complete (but this should be informed to the bounty hunters)
3. Since bounty allocation is less than 2% of the total, the ICO team can purchase the tokens once they are dumped
4. Put a limit (say 80%) for the tokens that must be retained for a certain period by the bounty hunters
5. Announce incentives for those bounty hunters who hold on to their coins
You are more than right bro, I really love this. If what you just listed can be done it think they will have nothing to complain about the bounty hunters. I think they will blame themselves or the project owners. Thanks for this
The problem as far as I am concerned is not from bounty hunters as they usually tend to hold about 1% of the total tokens or coins in the long run, and most of the dump is actually done by the bigger holders who are obviously just looking for the weak hands to shed off and in this case, that would be bounty hunters who would be selling at loss, and that is something I classify as bad for anyone doing that.
It is a free world though, and that is why I so much agree with Bryant second statement, because unless there is a real life product that would drive in demand, the market would just end up speculative and there is nothing anyone can do about that.