Pages:
Author

Topic: 📈 NastyFans: The Bitcoin Enthusiast Fan Club (est. 2012) - page 91. (Read 959381 times)

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
...
Your problem is that you still see Bitcoin as if it was a currency. It isn't... it is a commodity, which is easily bartered and can be used as payment for goods, but at its heart, it is a commodity.
...

Lol, OK, a commodity.  You give this d00d 10 barrels of oil, and get back one.  Profit!

But it's becoming obvious that I'm intruding on some creepy SnM/humiliation/degradation fetish played out between consenting adults.  Like a battered housewife, you'll defend your abuser with blood still dripping out of your broken nose.  Different strokes, I guess Undecided
I should learn to be more accepting.
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 250

Hey... stop posting my sister's silhouette... she gets ornery and we have to get the tranquilizer guns out of storage again...

=squeak=
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 250
...Profit is still profit... coin value itself could have easily gone down too...

If Bitcoin value has gone down, you wouldn't get higher divs.  And nothing, not even hoarding, hurts Bitcoin as much as supporting obvious scams.  Thanks for making Bitcoiners look like clueless, bumbling rubes who don't even know when they're being duped.
Guys, guys guys...

Your problem is that you still see Bitcoin as if it was a currency. It isn't... it is a commodity, which is easily bartered and can be used as payment for goods, but at its heart, it is a commodity.

Everything is priced based on their real-world cost, and the current commodity value of Bitcoin, so you know how much bitcoin to exchange. I know of no good or service, anywhere, that isn't pegged to real-world value, and where the cost of the item is strictly in Bitcoin with no regard for the real-world value of the item.

All I care about at the end of the day, is my real-world balance higher? And yes, it is.

=squeak=
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
@Squeaker:  Yes.  Yes you have.  You just don't quite get it yet.
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 250
LOL! Thank you for your losses.


Not really though.
Haven't had any losses, but you're welcome just the same. Smiley

=squeak=
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
...Profit is still profit... coin value itself could have easily gone down too...

If Bitcoin value has gone down, you wouldn't get higher divs.  And nothing, not even hoarding, hurts Bitcoin as much as supporting obvious scams.  Thanks for making Bitcoiners look like clueless, bumbling rubes who don't even know when they're being duped.
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
CONGRATULATIONS FORUM INVESTORS! ONLY 65% LOSS IN BTC.

Beats my investments in silver & the S&P 500.   Wink

Bitcoin 2-year performance: 9,812.2%
Nasty Mining 2-year performance*: 1,341.5%
S&P 500 2-year performance*: 45.7%
Silver 2-year performance: -31.5%

*excludes distributions
They are only willing to see actual BTC amounts, not real-world value... in local currencies, it has definitely been profitable.

If you're looking at the real-world money that was spent, and your real-world return? Since that's what everyone's living expenses are in? Not too shabby.

=squeak=


Not too shabby? Would have been more profitable to do nothing. I say shabby it is.
Profit is still profit... coin value itself could have easily gone down too... some of us make investments and spend, others of us just hoard...

Hoarders don't help the bitcoin economy, spenders do... and those of us spending on mining hardware, invest in the health of the network long term, as we believe in it.

A worthwhile investment in my book. If it weren't for people like us, people like you would have no profits whatsoever.

=squeak=


LOL! Thank you for your losses.


Not really though.
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 250
CONGRATULATIONS FORUM INVESTORS! ONLY 65% LOSS IN BTC.

Beats my investments in silver & the S&P 500.   Wink

Bitcoin 2-year performance: 9,812.2%
Nasty Mining 2-year performance*: 1,341.5%
S&P 500 2-year performance*: 45.7%
Silver 2-year performance: -31.5%

*excludes distributions
They are only willing to see actual BTC amounts, not real-world value... in local currencies, it has definitely been profitable.

If you're looking at the real-world money that was spent, and your real-world return? Since that's what everyone's living expenses are in? Not too shabby.

=squeak=


Not too shabby? Would have been more profitable to do nothing. I say shabby it is.
Profit is still profit... coin value itself could have easily gone down too... some of us make investments and spend, others of us just hoard...

Hoarders don't help the bitcoin economy, spenders do... and those of us spending on mining hardware, invest in the health of the network long term, as we believe in it.

A worthwhile investment in my book. If it weren't for people like us, people like you would have no profits whatsoever.

=squeak=
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
CONGRATULATIONS FORUM INVESTORS! ONLY 65% LOSS IN BTC.

Beats my investments in silver & the S&P 500.   Wink

Bitcoin 2-year performance: 9,812.2%
Nasty Mining 2-year performance*: 1,341.5%
S&P 500 2-year performance*: 45.7%
Silver 2-year performance: -31.5%

*excludes distributions
They are only willing to see actual BTC amounts, not real-world value... in local currencies, it has definitely been profitable.

If you're looking at the real-world money that was spent, and your real-world return? Since that's what everyone's living expenses are in? Not too shabby.

=squeak=


Not too shabby? Would have been more profitable to do nothing. I say shabby it is.
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 250
CONGRATULATIONS FORUM INVESTORS! ONLY 65% LOSS IN BTC.

Beats my investments in silver & the S&P 500.   Wink

Bitcoin 2-year performance: 9,812.2%
Nasty Mining 2-year performance*: 1,341.5%
S&P 500 2-year performance*: 45.7%
Silver 2-year performance: -31.5%

*excludes distributions
They are only willing to see actual BTC amounts, not real-world value... in local currencies, it has definitely been profitable.

If you're looking at the real-world money that was spent, and your real-world return? Since that's what everyone's living expenses are in? Not too shabby.

=squeak=
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
CONGRATULATIONS FORUM INVESTORS! ONLY 65% LOSS IN BTC.

Beats my investments in silver & the S&P 500.   Wink

Bitcoin 2-year performance: 9,812.2%
Nasty Mining 2-year performance*: 1,341.5%
S&P 500 2-year performance*: 45.7%
Silver 2-year performance: -31.5%

*excludes distributions
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
As promised, I compiled all of the publicly available information dating back to the GLBSE days.  All statistics are averages based off of the actual seat trades using the daily USD conversion rates.

Thanks to those who attended the live chat

https://i.imgur.com/HcClRPM.png

https://i.imgur.com/YTC5xeu.png

https://i.imgur.com/LiJl7Jc.png

https://i.imgur.com/ZwSLcR6.png

CONGRATULATIONS FORUM INVESTORS! ONLY 65% LOSS IN BTC.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
As promised, I compiled all of the publicly available information dating back to the GLBSE days.  All statistics are averages based off of the actual seat trades using the daily USD conversion rates.

Thanks to those who attended the live chat








donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Here's the official response from Domains4Bitcoins.com regarding the downtime for NastyFans.org.

Quote from: Domains4Bitcoins.com
Hi there,

Thank you for contacting Domains 4 Bitcoins Support.

We had a issue this weekend with "Angler Exploit" using our DNS servers.  As a result we have switched name servers temporarily until we can resolve this issue with our Administrators.  We will update you once we get a update from them and will find out what can be done to avoid this issue going forward.

Please let us know if you have any other questions.

Thank you,

Domains 4 Bitcoins Support
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
That's the monthly average? 

Yes, that is the monthly average as it is seen from our pool readings.  You can add 3TH/s to NastyMining to account for our cloud mining if you'd like.  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 766
Merit: 250
Is that with the BFL gear hashing also?
I hope not - we should have more than that even though the BFL 3 TH/s hasn't been going for very long..
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
Is that with the BFL gear hashing also?
sr. member
Activity: 766
Merit: 250
JUNE 2014 MINING STATS:
NastyPool: 1.92 TH/s
NastyMining: 1.77 TH/s

OgNasty: 1.55 TH/s
silverfuture: 59.8 GH/s
Squirrel Dearing: 55.8 GH/s
Bees_Brothers: 51 GH/s
ManeBjorn: 49.1 GH/s

That's the monthly average? 
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
JUNE 2014 MINING STATS:
NastyPool: 1.92 TH/s
NastyMining: 1.77 TH/s

OgNasty: 1.55 TH/s
silverfuture: 59.8 GH/s
Squirrel Dearing: 55.8 GH/s
Bees_Brothers: 51 GH/s
ManeBjorn: 49.1 GH/s
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I'll be available to host a live chat tomorrow at 1:00pm PST to discuss all things Nasty.  I'll also be posting the monthly stats and historical quarterly data for the last 2 years as it becomes available.


Now heading to the kitchen to make some honey roasted almonds  Grin

Pages:
Jump to: