some arguments don;t need evidence, if its logically so god damn obvious
You actually made a statement that he owns 30%, breaking his own rule on 1 BTC, just like Utopian, this isn't a logical argument but a speculation. How do you know Utopian does own 60%? You should get back to Nem topic because as far as I am concerned Nxt IPO was simple, with everything distributed according to stakeholders, in an IPO that was open for 2 month, with no special stakes reserved for anyone. That's a public record on BTT forum as that original IPO thread still exists.
great,
its obvious he put in atleast 1, i am not sure if he put more than one, that is speculation
i didn;t make a statement, i said
'how do we know he doesn;t own 30% +'
which actually isn;t a statement, its a question
and even if he didn;t break his own rule,
he might have gotten his mother, sister, brother, familly to put in one each, which means he wasn;t breaking his rule
and to be honest that wouldn;t be a problem, as he wrote the code
but anyways,
i can;t be bothered to have a petty argument about something i don;t really care about,
just stop trolling the NEM thread
