Maybe everyone should calm down and let the arguments speak for themselves.
This can be seen neither on the side of the core devs nor on the opposite side.
There is not only black or white.
"
https://twitter.com/Jaguar0625/status/1485257317675417602 "
" I am not working for the entitled SN holder."
This is true and none of the so-called SN operators would expect this.
On the other hand, there are no SN operators under symbol. That's why I don't understand this statement. There are only node operators. And everyone can buy as much XYM as they want.
This means that it can operate a voting node, but it has no advantage over other nodes. Instead, it bears a greater risk than a peer or Api node operator.
That's why posts about SN contributors under Symbol actually make no sense at all.
Some operate their own node and others operate a node on a central platform (allnodes).
(What do I think about this? See one post above.)
That is why everyone who runs a node via the operator allnodes should hold back with his opinion.
A large part of the SN operators under NIS1, have jumped ship long ago.
The SN operators + NIS1 node operators who have continued to support NIS1 have in some cases taken a great risk and ensured that, for example, Japanese projects such as Nemgraph etc., had a reasonable transition period available. Now these SN operators are being called the last dirt.
If you look at it closely, the SN operators were the contributors of the years since 2014. No one is born as an operator of a SN. Everybody starts small. And everyone has contributed something to NEM in their own way.
Now the question is actually who is responsible for the mistakes of the past years. Unfortunately, the core devs are evading responsibility here. After all, they were significantly involved in every wrong decision.
Isn't that so?
however smaller altcoins should follow with greater show (precentage). 
[/url
