[NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 212.

Walrusbonzo

hero member

Activity: 682

Merit: 500

Quote from: sypher9 on June 10, 2017, 06:21:21 PM

Code:

%B% -r 0 -a %A06% -o stratum+tcp://%A06%.%POOL%:4233 -u %ADDY% -p %PASS% -15

Swtiching to "B" did not work on it's own, but switching to "B" and ALSO removing the -i 15 DID!!!

Code:

%B% -r 0 -a %A06% -o stratum+tcp://%A06%.%POOL%:4233 -u %ADDY% -p %PASS%

Went from ~500 kH/s to 1445 kH/s

Code:

Starting NemosMiner-v1.7.4 if this helped you please donate #Nemo....
*** ccminer alexis-1.0 for nVidia GPUs from alexis78@github ***
*** Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 7.5 (Recommended)

*** Based on tpruvot@github ccminer
*** Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
*** Include some of the work of djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

[2017-06-10 18:19:03] Starting on stratum+tcp://myr-gr.mine.zpool.ca:5433
[2017-06-10 18:19:03] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-06-10 18:19:03] 1 miner thread started, using 'myr-gr' algorithm.
[2017-06-10 18:19:03] ...terminating workio thread
*** ccminer alexis-1.0 for nVidia GPUs from alexis78@github ***
*** Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 7.5 (Recommended)

*** Based on tpruvot@github ccminer
*** Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
*** Include some of the work of djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

[2017-06-10 18:19:03] Starting on stratum+tcp://lyra2v2.mine.zpool.ca:4533
[2017-06-10 18:19:03] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-06-10 18:19:03] 1 miner thread started, using 'lyra2v2' algorithm.
[2017-06-10 18:19:04] ...terminating workio thread
*** ccminer 2.0 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 8.0 64-bits

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2017-06-10 18:19:04] Starting on stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233
[2017-06-10 18:19:04] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-06-10 18:19:04] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-06-10 18:19:04] 1 miner thread started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2017-06-10 18:19:04] Stratum difficulty set to 16 (0.00024)
[2017-06-10 18:19:04] neoscrypt block 1403251, diff 0.246
[2017-06-10 18:19:05] GPU #0: Intensity set to 16 (+5), 65536 cuda threads
[2017-06-10 18:19:06] GPU #0: MSI GTX 1080 Ti, 1467.94 kH/s
[2017-06-10 18:19:06] accepted: 1/1 (diff 0.001), 1467.94 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:06] neoscrypt block 828155, diff 0.169
[2017-06-10 18:19:08] accepted: 2/2 (diff 0.001), 1471.63 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:08] accepted: 3/3 (diff 0.000), 1474.37 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:09] accepted: 4/4 (diff 0.001), 1471.73 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:09] accepted: 5/5 (diff 0.002), 1469.97 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:10] GPU #0: MSI GTX 1080 Ti, 1447.89 kH/s
[2017-06-10 18:19:10] accepted: 6/6 (diff 0.001), 1465.55 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:11] accepted: 7/7 (diff 0.000), 1466.64 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:11] accepted: 8/8 (diff 0.000), 1467.09 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:11] accepted: 9/9 (diff 0.002), 1465.27 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:12] accepted: 10/10 (diff 0.000), 1462.07 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:12] accepted: 11/11 (diff 0.000), 1462.20 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:12] accepted: 12/12 (diff 0.000), 1461.54 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:13] accepted: 13/13 (diff 0.000), 1459.25 kH/s yes!

Much thanks!

Same here. Blakecoin is also faster on 1080ti using tanguy.

sypher9

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

Code:

%B% -r 0 -a %A06% -o stratum+tcp://%A06%.%POOL%:4233 -u %ADDY% -p %PASS% -15

Swtiching to "B" did not work on it's own, but switching to "B" and ALSO removing the -i 15 DID!!!

Code:

%B% -r 0 -a %A06% -o stratum+tcp://%A06%.%POOL%:4233 -u %ADDY% -p %PASS%

Went from ~500 kH/s to 1445 kH/s

Code:

Starting NemosMiner-v1.7.4 if this helped you please donate #Nemo....
*** ccminer alexis-1.0 for nVidia GPUs from alexis78@github ***
*** Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 7.5 (Recommended)

*** Based on tpruvot@github ccminer
*** Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
*** Include some of the work of djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

[2017-06-10 18:19:03] Starting on stratum+tcp://myr-gr.mine.zpool.ca:5433
[2017-06-10 18:19:03] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-06-10 18:19:03] 1 miner thread started, using 'myr-gr' algorithm.
[2017-06-10 18:19:03] ...terminating workio thread
*** ccminer alexis-1.0 for nVidia GPUs from alexis78@github ***
*** Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 7.5 (Recommended)

*** Based on tpruvot@github ccminer
*** Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
*** Include some of the work of djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

[2017-06-10 18:19:03] Starting on stratum+tcp://lyra2v2.mine.zpool.ca:4533
[2017-06-10 18:19:03] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-06-10 18:19:03] 1 miner thread started, using 'lyra2v2' algorithm.
[2017-06-10 18:19:04] ...terminating workio thread
*** ccminer 2.0 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 8.0 64-bits

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2017-06-10 18:19:04] Starting on stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233
[2017-06-10 18:19:04] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-06-10 18:19:04] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-06-10 18:19:04] 1 miner thread started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2017-06-10 18:19:04] Stratum difficulty set to 16 (0.00024)
[2017-06-10 18:19:04] neoscrypt block 1403251, diff 0.246
[2017-06-10 18:19:05] GPU #0: Intensity set to 16 (+5), 65536 cuda threads
[2017-06-10 18:19:06] GPU #0: MSI GTX 1080 Ti, 1467.94 kH/s
[2017-06-10 18:19:06] accepted: 1/1 (diff 0.001), 1467.94 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:06] neoscrypt block 828155, diff 0.169
[2017-06-10 18:19:08] accepted: 2/2 (diff 0.001), 1471.63 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:08] accepted: 3/3 (diff 0.000), 1474.37 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:09] accepted: 4/4 (diff 0.001), 1471.73 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:09] accepted: 5/5 (diff 0.002), 1469.97 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:10] GPU #0: MSI GTX 1080 Ti, 1447.89 kH/s
[2017-06-10 18:19:10] accepted: 6/6 (diff 0.001), 1465.55 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:11] accepted: 7/7 (diff 0.000), 1466.64 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:11] accepted: 8/8 (diff 0.000), 1467.09 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:11] accepted: 9/9 (diff 0.002), 1465.27 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:12] accepted: 10/10 (diff 0.000), 1462.07 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:12] accepted: 11/11 (diff 0.000), 1462.20 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:12] accepted: 12/12 (diff 0.000), 1461.54 kH/s yes!
[2017-06-10 18:19:13] accepted: 13/13 (diff 0.000), 1459.25 kH/s yes!

Much thanks!

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: creat326 on June 10, 2017, 09:15:09 AM

Quote from: minerx117 on June 09, 2017, 04:11:13 PM

Quote from: creat326 on June 09, 2017, 02:03:03 PM

any idea whether this is better than multipoolminer on mph?

they both have there goods point if you want to mine eth based coins or zcash based coins use mph....

zpool is great for keeping up with new coins to mine with high profitability

its really up to you.. both are performing very well at the moment ..

Best Regards
Nemo

Maybe I explained myself wrong. The question was whether NemosMinder is better than MultipoolMiner included on their website: https://github.com/aaronsace/MultiPoolMiner/releases
Because their own website points to that one instead of Nemos. So I wonder which one performs better.

try them both if you can,,, MultipoolMiner is great has benchmarking feature aaronsace has done a amazing job... (not nearly as simple as Nemosminer..) nemosminer is very very simple which means high stability over long periods of mining.. i happly leave my rigs running for weeks now they just auto restart once a day to prevent driver issues. Plus i run alexis78 as my main ccminer which MultipoolMiner does not so i should have better results with the new pascal cards...

sypher9

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

Quote from: Walrusbonzo on June 10, 2017, 03:39:07 AM

Quote from: sypher9 on June 09, 2017, 10:10:26 PM

I have a MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X running at Stock 100% TDP (1835MHz GPU, 5005MHz MEM). Here are my benchmarks:

Code:

SET PASS=c=BTC,equihash=0.42,myr-gr=124,lyra2z=2.7,lyra2v2=64,neoscrypt=1.47,blakecoin=8.3,c11=16.4,groestl=68,blake2s=7.4,x15=17.7,x17=16.7,nist5=83.4,skein=900,sib=15.4,lbry=492,timetravel=21,decred=4.8,veltor=39,bitcore=27.8,hmq1725=7.81,stats

Hope it helps.

Interesting results. Mostly the extra 20% on the power limit gives a boost as expected. But there are strange outliers.

You neoscrypt performance is more in line with the stock 1070 benchmark, clearly something is very wrong with my 0.56 performance.
My blakecoin performance is also very low compared to yours.

However...

Even at 80% I have quite a performance boost on c11, x17, sib, timetravel and veltor. I also get nearer to 0.63 with equihash at 80%.

Assuming we are using the same version of the miner, 1.7.4? I can only imagine the major difference could be the driver? What are you using? I'm on 382.53.

Cheers

Ok, so I checked again since everyone was having different results. It turns out I just took the neoscrypt
benchmark values from ccminer-2.0-release-x64-cuda-8.0.7z found here : https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases.

In order to get benchmarks, I created a benchmark.bat file in the same directory as the one I extracted the ccminer-x64.exe and used the flowing code:

Code:

ccminer-x64.exe --benchmark > benchmark.txt

The values I received for that benchmark were the following:

Code:

[2017-06-08 15:44:54] blakecoin : 8304139.4 kH/s, -10999 MB, 67108864 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] blake : 4767552.0 kH/s, 2 MB, 67108864 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] blake2s : 6717441.6 kH/s, 2 MB, 33554432 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] bmw : 2876996.4 kH/s, 66 MB, 2097152 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] bastion : 19386.4 kH/s, 234 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] deep : 66240.6 kH/s, 34 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] decred : 4961711.2 kH/s, 2 MB, 33554432 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] fresh : 25065.3 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] fugue256 : 723228.2 kH/s, 130 MB, 4194304 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] groestl : 68094.8 kH/s, 2 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] heavy : 64930.8 kH/s, 166 MB, 524032 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] hmq1725 : 7810.9 kH/s, 644 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] keccak : 1026037.0 kH/s, 130 MB, 2097152 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] jackpot : 18548.2 kH/s, 108 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] jha : 25728.4 kH/s, 134 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] lbry : 492183.5 kH/s, 2 MB, 8388608 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] luffa : 549619.1 kH/s, 130 MB, 2097152 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] lyra2 : 5103.1 kH/s, 12 MB, 65536 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] lyra2v2 : 64216.9 kH/s, 1570 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] lyra2z : 2651.5 kH/s, 12 MB, 65536 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] myr-gr : 124930.4 kH/s, 66 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] neoscrypt : 1475.3 kH/s, 306 MB, 65536 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] nist5 : 83465.4 kH/s, 66 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] penta : 26863.5 kH/s, 34 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] qubit : 32965.1 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] sha256d : 1846864.9 kH/s, 2 MB, 33554432 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] sha256t : 1066858.2 kH/s, 2 MB, 8388608 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] sia : 3129930.5 kH/s, 2 MB, 67108864 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] sib : 15462.1 kH/s, 1218 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] skein : 706579.5 kH/s, 2 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] skein2 : 640114.9 kH/s, 34 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] s3 : 66537.9 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] timetravel : 21979.2 kH/s, 34 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] bitcore : 27810.0 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x11evo : 12635.2 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x11 : 16460.0 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x13 : 17518.1 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x14 : 17889.2 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x15 : 17076.3 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x17 : 16736.9 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] vanilla : 6290462.1 kH/s, 2 MB, 16777216 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] veltor : 39056.8 kH/s, 130 MB, 2097152 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] whirlpool : 78090.1 kH/s, 2 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] zr5 : 6622.8 kH/s, 88 MB, 262144 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] GPU #1: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads[0m

However, when I am mining with Nemosminer-v1.7.4, I am indeed only getting ~ 500-600 kH/s for neoscrypt.

Would be good if the author of Nemosminer could intergrate ccminer-2.0-release-x64-cuda-8.0 into his already excellent application.

Thanks for everyone's input

Storx

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 233

Quote from: kopija on June 10, 2017, 03:43:24 PM

Quote from: minerx117 on June 10, 2017, 03:20:51 PM

Quote from: Storx on June 10, 2017, 02:39:55 PM

Has anyone else ran into the Illegal GPU Memory Access errors?
I ran through all the algo's last night to setup my batch file to my mining rig, after going through all of them 1 by 1 letting them mine for 5+ minutes each for averages i found many of the algo's were giving me this error.. which kinda sucks because one of the ones i truly like to mine when profitable is Lyra2REv2 and it wouldnt work for me at all, but if i start up nicehash it runs just fine in that miner.. im curious if there is a way to add the specific miner from their program to this batch file list at the top to mine it for me when the most profitable, but on zpool

yes it will be default intensity is to high for your cards.. add -i to you command try -i 15 and work you way up to -i 31 until you find your limit then back it off 1.. alexis78 is made for pascal 1070 so has default high intensities to increase hash-rate...

also make sure you've increase your virtual mem

First try increasing virtual memory to 30-35gb, that solved it for me.

Thank you for this info, i will try this out to see if it fixes my problem, do you know what the default intensity is by chance?.. in regards to the virtual memory, i have already set 64000mb to 68000mb to that based on the OP recommendations

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: Storx on June 10, 2017, 03:39:38 PM

Quote from: minerx117 on June 10, 2017, 03:23:34 PM

Quote from: Storx on June 10, 2017, 02:30:52 PM

Quote from: Sentenza31 on June 10, 2017, 01:17:15 PM

Hello,

Your script is amazing, but I'm having trouble estimating the payment in 24 hours, I've done some calculations, but I'm not sure.

Currently, my minor is on Blake2 at 14.26 GH / S
If I go to http://www.zpool.ca/api/status estimate_current => 0.00085816

0.00085816 * 14.26 = 0.012237 BTC => 35 USD per day ??

That sounds fine, my calculations are correct? Is the value of the zpool API reliable?

I think this number is to volatile to estimate your earnings...... im getting slightly higher GH than u on 2 x 1080tis... and i only made $20.84 worth of btc in the last 24 hours on Blake2....
You have to remember that 2% pool fee, and ccminer have 2% dev fee
so your 0.012237*0.96=$33.62 if the numbers were truly correct

no ccminer has no DEV fee thats 0%

Hmm, when i was asking about this on another post on when my earnings didnt make sense, multiple people posted to the wiki showing all the ccminers had dev fees...

No sp-mod is the only DEV who adds fee's or a price tag to versions of ccminer and i don't use sp-mod....

kopija

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: Storx on June 10, 2017, 03:39:38 PM

Hmm, when i was asking about this on another post on when my earnings didnt make sense, multiple people posted to the wiki showing all the ccminers had dev fees...

Link, please.

kopija

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: minerx117 on June 10, 2017, 03:20:51 PM

Quote from: Storx on June 10, 2017, 02:39:55 PM

Has anyone else ran into the Illegal GPU Memory Access errors?
I ran through all the algo's last night to setup my batch file to my mining rig, after going through all of them 1 by 1 letting them mine for 5+ minutes each for averages i found many of the algo's were giving me this error.. which kinda sucks because one of the ones i truly like to mine when profitable is Lyra2REv2 and it wouldnt work for me at all, but if i start up nicehash it runs just fine in that miner.. im curious if there is a way to add the specific miner from their program to this batch file list at the top to mine it for me when the most profitable, but on zpool

yes it will be default intensity is to high for your cards.. add -i to you command try -i 15 and work you way up to -i 31 until you find your limit then back it off 1.. alexis78 is made for pascal 1070 so has default high intensities to increase hash-rate...

also make sure you've increase your virtual mem

First try increasing virtual memory to 30-35gb, that solved it for me.

Storx

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 233

Quote from: minerx117 on June 10, 2017, 03:23:34 PM

Quote from: Storx on June 10, 2017, 02:30:52 PM

Quote from: Sentenza31 on June 10, 2017, 01:17:15 PM

Hello,

Your script is amazing, but I'm having trouble estimating the payment in 24 hours, I've done some calculations, but I'm not sure.

Currently, my minor is on Blake2 at 14.26 GH / S
If I go to http://www.zpool.ca/api/status estimate_current => 0.00085816

0.00085816 * 14.26 = 0.012237 BTC => 35 USD per day ??

That sounds fine, my calculations are correct? Is the value of the zpool API reliable?

I think this number is to volatile to estimate your earnings...... im getting slightly higher GH than u on 2 x 1080tis... and i only made $20.84 worth of btc in the last 24 hours on Blake2....
You have to remember that 2% pool fee, and ccminer have 2% dev fee
so your 0.012237*0.96=$33.62 if the numbers were truly correct

no ccminer has no DEV fee thats 0%

Hmm, when i was asking about this on another post on when my earnings didnt make sense, multiple people posted to the wiki showing all the ccminers had dev fees...

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: Storx on June 10, 2017, 02:30:52 PM

Quote from: Sentenza31 on June 10, 2017, 01:17:15 PM

Hello,

Your script is amazing, but I'm having trouble estimating the payment in 24 hours, I've done some calculations, but I'm not sure.

Currently, my minor is on Blake2 at 14.26 GH / S
If I go to http://www.zpool.ca/api/status estimate_current => 0.00085816

0.00085816 * 14.26 = 0.012237 BTC => 35 USD per day ??

That sounds fine, my calculations are correct? Is the value of the zpool API reliable?

I think this number is to volatile to estimate your earnings...... im getting slightly higher GH than u on 2 x 1080tis... and i only made $20.84 worth of btc in the last 24 hours on Blake2....
You have to remember that 2% pool fee, and ccminer have 2% dev fee
so your 0.012237*0.96=$33.62 if the numbers were truly correct

no ccminer has no DEV fee thats 0%

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: Storx on June 10, 2017, 02:39:55 PM

Has anyone else ran into the Illegal GPU Memory Access errors?
I ran through all the algo's last night to setup my batch file to my mining rig, after going through all of them 1 by 1 letting them mine for 5+ minutes each for averages i found many of the algo's were giving me this error.. which kinda sucks because one of the ones i truly like to mine when profitable is Lyra2REv2 and it wouldnt work for me at all, but if i start up nicehash it runs just fine in that miner.. im curious if there is a way to add the specific miner from their program to this batch file list at the top to mine it for me when the most profitable, but on zpool

yes it will be default intensity is to high for your cards.. add -i to you command try -i 15 and work you way up to -i 31 until you find your limit then back it off 1.. alexis78 is made for pascal 1070 so has default high intensities to increase hash-rate...

also make sure you've increase your virtual mem

Storx

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 233

Has anyone else ran into the Illegal GPU Memory Access errors?
I ran through all the algo's last night to setup my batch file to my mining rig, after going through all of them 1 by 1 letting them mine for 5+ minutes each for averages i found many of the algo's were giving me this error.. which kinda sucks because one of the ones i truly like to mine when profitable is Lyra2REv2 and it wouldnt work for me at all, but if i start up nicehash it runs just fine in that miner.. im curious if there is a way to add the specific miner from their program to this batch file list at the top to mine it for me when the most profitable, but on zpool

Storx

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 233

Quote from: Sentenza31 on June 10, 2017, 01:17:15 PM

Hello,

Your script is amazing, but I'm having trouble estimating the payment in 24 hours, I've done some calculations, but I'm not sure.

Currently, my minor is on Blake2 at 14.26 GH / S
If I go to http://www.zpool.ca/api/status estimate_current => 0.00085816

0.00085816 * 14.26 = 0.012237 BTC => 35 USD per day ??

That sounds fine, my calculations are correct? Is the value of the zpool API reliable?

I think this number is to volatile to estimate your earnings...... im getting slightly higher GH than u on 2 x 1080tis... and i only made $20.84 worth of btc in the last 24 hours on Blake2....
You have to remember that 2% pool fee, and ccminer have 2% dev fee
so your 0.012237*0.96=$33.62 if the numbers were truly correct

Sentenza31

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Hello,

Your script is amazing, but I'm having trouble estimating the payment in 24 hours, I've done some calculations, but I'm not sure.

Currently, my minor is on Blake2 at 14.26 GH / S
If I go to http://www.zpool.ca/api/status estimate_current => 0.00085816

0.00085816 * 14.26 = 0.012237 BTC => 35 USD per day ??

That sounds fine, my calculations are correct? Is the value of the zpool API reliable?

Walrusbonzo

hero member

Activity: 682

Merit: 500

Quote from: a4si on June 10, 2017, 03:45:13 AM

Quote from: Walrusbonzo on June 09, 2017, 05:55:06 PM

Retested Neoscrypt and it's actually worse than initially thought. I accidentally recorded hashrate for two cards before. For one card it's 560 kH/s, so a 50% drop!

I've also tested the Nicehash Neoscrypt miner and I only get 480kH/s with that.

Same here, both of my 1080ti are doing 500-550 each while all four 1070 are doing 1000+ each... runing latest nemo and latest drivers. Mustb be sth with program or drivers?

Quote from: NetopyrMan on June 10, 2017, 04:35:23 AM

Quote from: a4si on June 10, 2017, 03:45:13 AM

Quote from: Walrusbonzo on June 09, 2017, 05:55:06 PM

Retested Neoscrypt and it's actually worse than initially thought. I accidentally recorded hashrate for two cards before. For one card it's 560 kH/s, so a 50% drop!

I've also tested the Nicehash Neoscrypt miner and I only get 480kH/s with that.

Same here, both of my 1080ti are doing 500-550 each while all four 1070 are doing 1000+ each... runing latest nemo and latest drivers. Mustb be sth with program or drivers?

i have same "issue" on my 1080ti with neoscrypt even if using another miners

Thanks both for confirming it's not just me.

cryptoinvestor_x

newbie

Activity: 71

Merit: 0

Running a 1080 Rig and found similar results to the 1080ti that it doesn't perform 30% better on all algos due to the GDDR5x memory.

Running on Blake2s, LBRY and Skein exclusively at 80% TDP for 150W Power Draw reported on software at roughly 1900 core /4200 mem clocks (different models so offsets are different).

Anyone else have results or experience with GTX 1080s? (not the 1080TI)

creat326

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

Quote from: minerx117 on June 09, 2017, 04:11:13 PM

Quote from: creat326 on June 09, 2017, 02:03:03 PM

any idea whether this is better than multipoolminer on mph?

they both have there goods point if you want to mine eth based coins or zcash based coins use mph....

zpool is great for keeping up with new coins to mine with high profitability

its really up to you.. both are performing very well at the moment ..

Best Regards
Nemo

Maybe I explained myself wrong. The question was whether NemosMinder is better than MultipoolMiner included on their website: https://github.com/aaronsace/MultiPoolMiner/releases
Because their own website points to that one instead of Nemos. So I wonder which one performs better.

tortellino

sr. member

Activity: 504

Merit: 250

Quote from: tortellino on June 10, 2017, 03:35:06 AM

is it also possible not to mine BTC but mine coins with the best algo directly? For example: FTC on port 4233 when its the most profitable algo. And so on for all the other coins. I think then i have to add every address of the coins in the ADDY place, correct?

any ideas?

NetopyrMan

member

Activity: 144

Merit: 10

Quote from: a4si on June 10, 2017, 03:45:13 AM

Quote from: Walrusbonzo on June 09, 2017, 05:55:06 PM

Retested Neoscrypt and it's actually worse than initially thought. I accidentally recorded hashrate for two cards before. For one card it's 560 kH/s, so a 50% drop!

I've also tested the Nicehash Neoscrypt miner and I only get 480kH/s with that.

Same here, both of my 1080ti are doing 500-550 each while all four 1070 are doing 1000+ each... runing latest nemo and latest drivers. Mustb be sth with program or drivers?

i have same "issue" on my 1080ti with neoscrypt even if using another miners

Topic: [NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 212. (Read 289447 times)