Topic: [NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 214. (Read 289464 times)

Software generally reports 197~200w at 80%, how accurate that is, I have no idea. Need to hook up my power meter to check whole rig power usage.

I'm going to retest neoscrypt, no idea why it's so out of whack.

And thanks very much for your work! Great stuff.

any idea what wattage your 1080ti is using @ that 80% tdp ? whats up with the neoscrypt speed 1080ti slower than a 1070 @70 tdp?

all my speeds are from a G1 Gaming 1070 @70%tdp (125watt) +55core +596mem

I just tested my 1080TIs with power limit set to 80%, my results -

	Nemo Stock	Walrusbonzo - 1080ti - 80% power	Percentage change
myr-gr	67	115	71.64%
lyra2v2	37	66	78.38%
neoscrypt	1.13	0.56	-50%
decred	2.6	4.3	65.38%
blakecoin	4.7	5.6	19.15%
c11	16.4	27.9	70.12%
groestl	32	58	81.25%
blake2s	3.73	6.6	76.94%
x17	10.9	18.25	67.43%
nist5	46.3	78.2	68.90%
skein	512.3	895	74.70%
sib	11.8	20.5	73.73%
lbry	272	468	72.06%
timetravel	26	36	38.46%
veltor	30	54.9	83.00%
bitcore	16	25.1	56.88%
hmq1725	4.58	7.2	57.21%

Can others confirm these results? Anyone else notice a very odd result for neoscrypt?

SET PASS=c=BTC,myr-gr=115,lyra2v2=66,neoscrypt=0.56,decred=4.3,blakecoin=5.6,c11=27.9,groestl=58,blake2s=6.6,x17=18.25,nist5=78.2,skein=895,sib=20.5,lbry=468,timetravel=36,veltor=54.9,bitcore=25.1,hmq1725=7.2,stats

can anyone tell me how to adjust the strattum dif per algo?

they both have there goods point if you want to mine eth based coins or zcash based coins use mph....

zpool is great for keeping up with new coins to mine with high profitability

its really up to you.. both are performing very well at the moment ..

Best Regards
Nemo

1. i already have auto restart setup in windows on my rigs... every rig restarts it's self once every 24hours to. prevent driver/ccminer crashes over long peroids of mining better to do  a full restart than just restarting ccminer.. my nemosminer.bat is copied into startup folder so it auto starts every time the rig turns on...  how to=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNyJQ5G2bTA works with win10..

2. yeh i tried makes more problems than it solves lots of crashes... its better to leave it and just wait 20-60secs for your cards to start hashing..

3. i don't see why not i don't tho.... i just input the hash for one card all my rigs use the same gpu's so its algs...

Best Regards
Nemo

any idea whether this is better than multipoolminer on mph?

But i think some cards are significantly better in certain algos than others, and the result might not be optimal. I got 1080s and 1080Tis. Will it be ok on default settings?

Couple of comments & suggestions & questions:

1. might be good to include in next release the reset timer so if somebody has a problem with crashing/freezing miner the bat file can reset/restart the miner every XY minutes or hours.

I have mine set as a precaution to restart every 6h (you set it in seconds, thus 21600 number below = 60s/min*60min/h*6h). The other timer /T 5 gives 5s break before it restarts the miner - you can freely change this one to whatever second you wish

Basically I have an start.bat with below config (I guess this could be done within NemosMiner.bat file also...):



2. for the guys which have problem with multicard rigs where all cards taking some time to star you might try to use below parameter. This would force all cards to start spin instantly.


WARNING: for me it works normally couple of minutes only, then CPU utilization goes to 100% and miner crashes. If I don't use this parameter everything works fine just it takes some time for all cards to start up (couple of minutes); you may give it a try if it works OK for you...


3. I have a question on setting normalization values, my rig is 4x1070 and 2x1080ti. Can I use combined hashing power to set up the values? Example:


thank you

no need for benchmarks with nemo, benchmark stats are already in the .bat file and work for all nvidia cards

Hi. I'd like to use your miner on ZPOOL. What's the most efficient way to benchmark my GPUs for all supported algos? Should I just look them up in zpool's benchmark section? Or is there a better way? Maybe run them one by one (but how to do this?) to test my actual speeds?

problem is with you or your rig/pc Ive tested no issues on my side....

Same results, also tried with tpruvot miner...

[2017-06-07 14:57:32] Starting on stratum+tcp://skein.mine.zpool.ca:4933
[2017-06-07 14:57:32] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-06-07 14:57:32] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-06-07 14:57:32] 3 miner threads started, using 'skein' algorithm.
[2017-06-07 14:57:33] Stratum difficulty set to 0.1
[2017-06-07 14:57:33] skein block 842249, diff 1497.773
[2017-06-07 14:57:34] GPU #1: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads
[2017-06-07 14:57:34] GPU #2: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads
[2017-06-07 14:57:34] GPU #0: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads
*** ccminer 1.8.4 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 8.0

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2017-06-07 14:57:36] Starting on stratum+tcp://skein.mine.zpool.ca:4933
[2017-06-07 14:57:36] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-06-07 14:57:36] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-06-07 14:57:36] 3 miner threads started, using 'skein' algorithm.
[2017-06-07 14:57:36] Stratum difficulty set to 0.1
[2017-06-07 14:57:36] skein block 842249, diff 1497.773
[2017-06-07 14:57:37] GPU #1: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads
[2017-06-07 14:57:37] GPU #2: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads
[2017-06-07 14:57:37] GPU #0: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads
*** ccminer 1.8.4 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 8.0

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2017-06-07 14:57:39] Starting on stratum+tcp://skein.mine.zpool.ca:4933
[2017-06-07 14:57:39] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-06-07 14:57:39] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-06-07 14:57:39] 3 miner threads started, using 'skein' algorithm.
[2017-06-07 14:57:39] Stratum difficulty set to 0.1
[2017-06-07 14:57:39] skein block 842249, diff 1497.773
[2017-06-07 14:57:39] GPU #0: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads
*** ccminer 1.8.4 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 8.0

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2017-06-07 14:57:40] Starting on stratum+tcp://skein.mine.zpool.ca:4933

[ENDLESS LOOP NO HASHRATE ON ZPOOL]

Intrigued by your project i've been playing around with it a bit for the past few days and wondered why you're using an older binary of ccminer (ccminerAlexis78) instead of the latest version https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer ?
AFAIK the tpruvot fork also includes the changes of previous ccminer versions so should be as fast (if not faster) than previous versions.  The only exception I can think of would be the spmod fork of ccminer which is partially private.

So I've been manually comparing hashrates on blake2s between the versions and was surpised to find that the alexis78 version was slightly faster, which did not make sense to me.  I did notice though that my computer was noticabley laggier on alexis78 over tpruvot.  That got me thinking that maybe intensity is handled differently between the 2 so I started playing around with different settings on my stock GTX 1070.

on alexis78 with default settings = 3.7GH/s, intensity 25 = 3.5GH/s = intensity 30 = 3.67GH/s
on tpruvot with default settings = 3.4GH/s, intensity 25 = 3.4GH/s = intensity 30 = 3.67GH/s

So you might need to tweak the intensity settings a bit but ultimately you only need to use the latest version of ccminer (except for equihash).
Still need to play around with spmod as it could be faster on groestl and skein.

On the plus side I'm making about 50% through zpool than i was on nicehash.

try

ccminerAlexis78.exe -a skein -o stratum+tcp://skein.mine.zpool.ca:4933 -u btcaddress -p c=BTC,stats

i'll add sp to 1.7.5 for skein i find its only slighty slower but use all 6card straight away.. where as alexis is a little faster but takes 20-60secs to get all 6cards hashing.. 
your surprised.. yes there are a few algos more profitable than skein atm... x17 / lyra2v2 / blake2s ...  hmq1725 bitcore at times....

1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19404712
2. Skein has higer difficulty and the same price as X17 algo, so pool choses to mine X17 instead for higher profitability.

Hi

two questions:
1) if this included among the miners? Apparently it's the fastest. Or yours is faster? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ccminersp-mod-modded-nvidia-maxwell-pascal-kernels-826901

2) I'm surprised that it never seems to mine skein algorithm. After 48 hours I never saw it touched and it's always doing some other ones. My card it's a 1080ti. Skein is not the most profitable? It seems to focus a lot on the x17 which runs at 18mh/s

Hello to all,
I been mining for years, now I have a rig with 2x1070 1x 1080ti

ccminerAlexis78.exe stops just when it connects to pool.

Nicehash miner work, claymore eth 9.4 work.

there is any special requirement?

w7
drivers 381.89
ccminerAlexis78.exe -a skein -o stratum+tcp://skein.mine.zpool.ca:4933 -u btcaddress -p c=BTC,skein,stats

What is wrong?

Thank you!

Hi guys, i have a question....
at moment I using skein on Zpool but mining 5 different coin and convert all to btc;
i can add 5 wallet into bath file? Because I do not want to lose conversion.
Or i can mining just one coin? DGB for example? 
What do you think is the most profitable choice?
Sorry for the trouble, thank you all.