neoscrypt algo for ccminer and nvidia card: call for donation - page 5.

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: blue-yu on February 06, 2015, 08:10:09 AM

There is a little known problem with kopiemtu monitoring. Video card hash rate is reported in KH/S, but kopiemtu need khash/s to work normally. Can You fix this, or maybe there is some adjustment in kompiemtu's monitoring config file?

I don't know, I must admit I didn't try to various function of kopiemtu.
I can always try to modify that, it shouldn't be a big problem.

blue-yu

newbie

Activity: 58

Merit: 0

There is a little known problem with kopiemtu monitoring. Video card hash rate is reported in KH/S, but kopiemtu need khash/s to work normally. Can You fix this, or maybe there is some adjustment in kompiemtu's monitoring config file?

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: tbearhere on February 06, 2015, 05:29:05 AM

Latest lyra.
Still on the 750ti ..the one that has the video out hooked up for this computer ...low hash.
But it will have 450kh/s if I put it on my rig. For some reason the hash is very low on the card that has video out used.
My rig has no video out hooked up so it will give 450kh/s per 750ti no over clocking.
I'll try on my rig later.

the driver of that card has probably crashed at some point. You should reboot your rig.
If it isn't enough try also to add --throughput 3

tbearhere

legendary

Activity: 3164

Merit: 1003

Latest lyra.
Still on the 750ti ..the one that has the video out hooked up for this computer ...low hash.
But it will have 450kh/s if I put it on my rig. For some reason the hash is very low on the card that has video out used.
My rig has no video out hooked up so it will give 450kh/s per 750ti no over clocking.
I'll try on my rig later.

AliassailA

newbie

Activity: 50

Merit: 0

Hey 20mBTC sent for windows exe

Transaction ID:

9fee6bfd6f0898222cde199f01222ccfa081e3c32467a842564f8d415cdbc6d4

blue-yu

newbie

Activity: 58

Merit: 0

Great. 20 mBTC sent to You. I personaly still mine quark, but You send me exe for linux (kopiemtu) just to test and wait until neoscrypt mining is better then quark.

BR...

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: blue-yu on February 05, 2015, 10:56:35 AM

Hey, how to give this miner a try? Donate some btc, and then what? Download? Compile? Git?

right now, you need to donate at least 0.02btc to the address in my signature, then I will give you the exe
(windows or linux)

blue-yu

newbie

Activity: 58

Merit: 0

Hey, how to give this miner a try? Donate some btc, and then what? Download? Compile? Git?

StuffOfInterest

sr. member

Activity: 401

Merit: 250

Quote from: djm34 on February 05, 2015, 06:28:20 AM

Quote from: StuffOfInterest on February 05, 2015, 06:17:50 AM

Latest windows release from yesterday (I'm calling it neo4) is giving more boos than yays on both WestHash and YAAMP. Here is my launch command:

Code:

ccminer.exe -q -r 3 -R 10 --throughput 3 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u [myaddress] -p 1

It did show a slight increase in reported speed.

Quick console dump:

Code:

[2015-02-05 06:13:18] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233
[2015-02-05 06:13:18] 2 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2015-02-05 06:13:21] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 293.32 kh/s (293.32 +/- 0.00) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:24] accepted: 0/2 (0.00%), 338.83 kh/s (316.07 +/- 22.75) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:25] accepted: 0/3 (0.00%), 330.98 kh/s (321.04 +/- 19.86) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:26] accepted: 0/4 (0.00%), 338.69 kh/s (325.45 +/- 18.82) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:27] accepted: 1/5 (20.00%), 322.87 kh/s (324.94 +/- 16.87) (yay!!!)
[2015-02-05 06:13:28] accepted: 1/6 (16.67%), 296.28 kh/s (320.16 +/- 18.74) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:35] accepted: 1/7 (14.29%), 325.64 kh/s (320.95 +/- 17.45) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:37] accepted: 1/8 (12.50%), 344.54 kh/s (323.89 +/- 18.09) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:39] accepted: 1/9 (11.11%), 347.33 kh/s (326.50 +/- 18.58) (booooo)

this was reported previously, try using --diff 0.5 (the current difficulty is too low)

Much happier. Thanks.

Now running about 331 kh/s on 2 x eVGA 750 Ti SC cards at stock speed.

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: StuffOfInterest on February 05, 2015, 06:17:50 AM

Latest windows release from yesterday (I'm calling it neo4) is giving more boos than yays on both WestHash and YAAMP. Here is my launch command:

Code:

ccminer.exe -q -r 3 -R 10 --throughput 3 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u [myaddress] -p 1

It did show a slight increase in reported speed.

Quick console dump:

Code:

[2015-02-05 06:13:18] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233
[2015-02-05 06:13:18] 2 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2015-02-05 06:13:21] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 293.32 kh/s (293.32 +/- 0.00) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:24] accepted: 0/2 (0.00%), 338.83 kh/s (316.07 +/- 22.75) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:25] accepted: 0/3 (0.00%), 330.98 kh/s (321.04 +/- 19.86) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:26] accepted: 0/4 (0.00%), 338.69 kh/s (325.45 +/- 18.82) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:27] accepted: 1/5 (20.00%), 322.87 kh/s (324.94 +/- 16.87) (yay!!!)
[2015-02-05 06:13:28] accepted: 1/6 (16.67%), 296.28 kh/s (320.16 +/- 18.74) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:35] accepted: 1/7 (14.29%), 325.64 kh/s (320.95 +/- 17.45) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:37] accepted: 1/8 (12.50%), 344.54 kh/s (323.89 +/- 18.09) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:39] accepted: 1/9 (11.11%), 347.33 kh/s (326.50 +/- 18.58) (booooo)

this was reported previously, try using --diff 0.5 (the current difficulty is too low)

StuffOfInterest

sr. member

Activity: 401

Merit: 250

Latest windows release from yesterday (I'm calling it neo4) is giving more boos than yays on both WestHash and YAAMP. Here is my launch command:

Code:

ccminer.exe -q -r 3 -R 10 --throughput 3 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u [myaddress] -p 1

It did show a slight increase in reported speed.

Quick console dump:

Code:

[2015-02-05 06:13:18] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233
[2015-02-05 06:13:18] 2 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2015-02-05 06:13:21] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 293.32 kh/s (293.32 +/- 0.00) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:24] accepted: 0/2 (0.00%), 338.83 kh/s (316.07 +/- 22.75) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:25] accepted: 0/3 (0.00%), 330.98 kh/s (321.04 +/- 19.86) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:26] accepted: 0/4 (0.00%), 338.69 kh/s (325.45 +/- 18.82) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:27] accepted: 1/5 (20.00%), 322.87 kh/s (324.94 +/- 16.87) (yay!!!)
[2015-02-05 06:13:28] accepted: 1/6 (16.67%), 296.28 kh/s (320.16 +/- 18.74) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:35] accepted: 1/7 (14.29%), 325.64 kh/s (320.95 +/- 17.45) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:37] accepted: 1/8 (12.50%), 344.54 kh/s (323.89 +/- 18.09) (booooo)
[2015-02-05 06:13:39] accepted: 1/9 (11.11%), 347.33 kh/s (326.50 +/- 18.58) (booooo)

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

ok, I have finally a working linux version (based on sp/tpruvot release...)

For the moment, it will come in 2 flavors: kopiemtu (tested on my computer by without compute_52 support) and Ubuntu 14.04 latest cuda 6.5 with gtx900 support.

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: djm34 on February 03, 2015, 08:00:48 PM

the good news:

new speed: gtx980: 665kh/s
gtx780ti: 355kh/s
gtx750ti: 160kh/s
will be out soon

The bad news:
Still struggling to get the linux version working (might have to do a full check, which isn't easy with kopiemtu as it reboot on its own from time to time)

djm ... i can setup a system specifically for YOU under fedora that only YOU have access to if you like ...

ssh and screen are amazing little tools in linux Wink

...

you will have full security and accessibility with the machine - no one else ...

that way you can test and rebuild and do what is required whenever you require ...

i would prefer a direct build of the miner and only you can supply it - as im not the only miner out there that runs everything from fedora or redhat based system ...

let me know ...

#crysx

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

the good news:

new speed: gtx980: 665kh/s
gtx780ti: 355kh/s
gtx750ti: 160kh/s
will be out soon

The bad news:
Still struggling to get the linux version working (might have to do a full check, which isn't easy with kopiemtu as it reboot on its own from time to time)

frazier34567

member

Activity: 95

Merit: 10

Quote from: djm34 on February 02, 2015, 07:33:46 PM

Quote from: frazier34567 on February 02, 2015, 06:11:04 PM

Happens on both YAAMP and NiceHash.

ccminer.exe -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u BTCaddress -p 2 -d 0,1,2,4,5 --throughput 2,2,2,2,2

I put debugging on it it says Share above target.

use --diff 0.5 (just tried on nicehash works like a charm)

when there are lots of reject, it is usually a difficulty issue...
(by you should probably use throughput 3 or 3.5 (2 seems a bit extreme)

Put it at --diff 0.4 and 3.5 for throughput. It is running well. 742-747 per accepted share

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: frazier34567 on February 02, 2015, 06:11:04 PM

Quote from: djm34 on February 02, 2015, 01:29:03 PM

Quote from: frazier34567 on February 02, 2015, 12:58:24 PM

I am running 5 EVGA 750 ti SC no OC and if I try to do a throughput of 2 or 3.5 (Even did the 2,2,2,2,2) it gives me about 40-70% rejection rate. The submission seem to come faster but the number in boo's is really high and the hash rate is lower than throughput 1.

Windows 8.1 Professional
Neoscrypt miner beta 3

how is handled the pagefile ?
pagefile usage can be pretty big, I don't know if this could explain that

Also it can be a problem with the pool itself ? (my reject rate is close to 0% on blockfactory)
can you show me your command line ? may-be something wrong here

Happens on both YAAMP and NiceHash.

ccminer.exe -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u BTCaddress -p 2 -d 0,1,2,4,5 --throughput 2,2,2,2,2

I put debugging on it it says Share above target.

use --diff 0.5 (just tried on nicehash works like a charm)

when there are lots of reject, it is usually a difficulty issue...
(by you should probably use throughput 3 or 3.5 (2 seems a bit extreme)

frazier34567

member

Activity: 95

Merit: 10

Quote from: djm34 on February 02, 2015, 01:29:03 PM

Quote from: frazier34567 on February 02, 2015, 12:58:24 PM

I am running 5 EVGA 750 ti SC no OC and if I try to do a throughput of 2 or 3.5 (Even did the 2,2,2,2,2) it gives me about 40-70% rejection rate. The submission seem to come faster but the number in boo's is really high and the hash rate is lower than throughput 1.

Windows 8.1 Professional
Neoscrypt miner beta 3

how is handled the pagefile ?
pagefile usage can be pretty big, I don't know if this could explain that

Also it can be a problem with the pool itself ? (my reject rate is close to 0% on blockfactory)
can you show me your command line ? may-be something wrong here

Happens on both YAAMP and NiceHash.

ccminer.exe -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u BTCaddress -p 2 -d 0,1,2,4,5 --throughput 2,2,2,2,2

I put debugging on it it says Share above target.

Code:

[17:07:37] Starting NiceHash NeoScrypt with C:\cudaminer\neoscrypt\lyra2\lyra\ccminer.exe -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3341 -u BTCaddress -p x -d 0,1,2,4,5 --throughput 2,2,2,2,2 -D
[2015-02-02 17:07:38] 5 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2015-02-02 17:07:38] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3341
[2015-02-02 17:07:39] Failed to get Stratum session id
[2015-02-02 17:07:39] Stratum difficulty set to 64
[2015-02-02 17:07:40] DEBUG: job_id='1c7' extranonce2=0000 ntime=54d00338
[2015-02-02 17:07:40] Stratum detected new block
[2015-02-02 17:07:41] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 27.49 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:42] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 27.33 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:43] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 14.22 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:43] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 10.74 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:43] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 10.48 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:44] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 140.98 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:44] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 203.75 kh/s (203.75 +/- 0.00) (booooo)
[2015-02-02 17:07:44] DEBUG: reject reason: Share above target.
[2015-02-02 17:07:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 143.94 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:46] accepted: 1/2 (50.00%), 320.35 kh/s (262.05 +/- 58.30) (yay!!!)
[2015-02-02 17:07:48] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 150.07 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:48] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 148.58 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:49] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 148.18 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:49] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 147.68 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:49] accepted: 2/3 (66.67%), 738.45 kh/s (420.85 +/- 229.57) (yay!!!)
[2015-02-02 17:07:51] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 137.59 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:51] accepted: 2/4 (50.00%), 727.86 kh/s (497.60 +/- 239.16) (booooo)
[2015-02-02 17:07:51] DEBUG: reject reason: Share above target.
[2015-02-02 17:07:52] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 142.83 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:53] accepted: 3/5 (60.00%), 723.00 kh/s (542.68 +/- 232.14) (yay!!!)
[2015-02-02 17:07:54] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 144.32 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:54] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 148.95 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:54] accepted: 3/6 (50.00%), 722.25 kh/s (572.61 +/- 222.23) (booooo)
[2015-02-02 17:07:54] DEBUG: reject reason: Share above target.
[2015-02-02 17:07:55] DEBUG: job_id='1ca' extranonce2=0000 ntime=54d0034b
[2015-02-02 17:07:55] Stratum detected new block
[2015-02-02 17:07:55] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 150.51 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 146.39 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:55] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 147.98 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:55] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 148.76 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:55] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 128.99 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:07:55] accepted: 3/7 (42.86%), 722.64 kh/s (594.04 +/- 212.34) (booooo)
[2015-02-02 17:07:55] DEBUG: reject reason: Share above target.
[2015-02-02 17:07:55] accepted: 3/8 (37.50%), 722.64 kh/s (610.12 +/- 203.12) (booooo)
[2015-02-02 17:07:55] DEBUG: reject reason: Share above target.
[2015-02-02 17:08:01] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 145.18 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:08:01] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 145.94 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:08:01] accepted: 4/9 (44.44%), 714.48 kh/s (621.72 +/- 194.30) (yay!!!)
[2015-02-02 17:08:01] accepted: 5/10 (50.00%), 714.48 kh/s (630.99 +/- 186.41) (yay!!!)
[2015-02-02 17:08:06] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 146.01 khash/s
[2015-02-02 17:08:06] accepted: 5/11 (45.45%), 715.32 kh/s (638.66 +/- 179.38) (booooo)
[2015-02-02 17:08:06] DEBUG: reject reason: Share above target.

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: frazier34567 on February 02, 2015, 12:58:24 PM

I am running 5 EVGA 750 ti SC no OC and if I try to do a throughput of 2 or 3.5 (Even did the 2,2,2,2,2) it gives me about 40-70% rejection rate. The submission seem to come faster but the number in boo's is really high and the hash rate is lower than throughput 1.

Windows 8.1 Professional
Neoscrypt miner beta 3

how is handled the pagefile ?
pagefile usage can be pretty big, I don't know if this could explain that

Also it can be a problem with the pool itself ? (my reject rate is close to 0% on blockfactory)
can you show me your command line ? may-be something wrong here

frazier34567

member

Activity: 95

Merit: 10

I am running 5 EVGA 750 ti SC no OC and if I try to do a throughput of 2 or 3.5 (Even did the 2,2,2,2,2) it gives me about 40-70% rejection rate. The submission seem to come faster but the number in boo's is really high and the hash rate is lower than throughput 1.

Windows 8.1 Professional
Neoscrypt miner beta 3

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: scryptr on January 30, 2015, 02:10:46 PM

DJM34 --

The latest version of the miner runs well on my Win 7 x64 machine. I get 230+ kh/s on my GTX 960; this is about 1.5X the reported rate for a 750ti. Any big load on my i7 CPU slows down the mining, however.

Unfortunately, on my Ubuntu 14.04 rig, the only results I get are "segmentation fault". The miner boots, binds 6 theads to my 6 750ti cards, and I get at most one kh/s reading that is reasonable, sometimes followed by insanely high kh/s readouts, then the segmentation fault. Sometimes I just get the segmentation fault, sans any other output.

I hope things smooth out, I appreciate your hard work. If I could get some compilation tips, it may be an issue resolvable on my end. I plan to move to 14.10 this weekend, using default paths for the drivers. --scryptr

I am going to have a look into that... (you are not the first to report the problem, unfortunately...)

Topic: neoscrypt algo for ccminer and nvidia card: call for donation - page 5. (Read 33785 times)