DJM34 --
The latest version of the miner runs well on my Win 7 x64 machine. I get 230+ kh/s on my GTX 960; this is about 1.5X the reported rate for a 750ti. Any big load on my i7 CPU slows down the mining, however.
Unfortunately, on my Ubuntu 14.04 rig, the only results I get are "segmentation fault". The miner boots, binds 6 theads to my 6 750ti cards, and I get at most one kh/s reading that is reasonable, sometimes followed by insanely high kh/s readouts, then the segmentation fault. Sometimes I just get the segmentation fault, sans any other output.
I hope things smooth out, I appreciate your hard work. If I could get some compilation tips, it may be an issue resolvable on my end. I plan to reload my 14.04 system this weekend, using default paths for the drivers. CUDA 6.5 toolkit does not support Utopic Unicorn. --scryptr
Topic: neoscrypt algo for ccminer and nvidia card: call for donation - page 6. (Read 33785 times)
January 30, 2015, 02:10:46 PM
January 30, 2015, 11:05:33 AM
My two cents sent 
Transaction id: e8620e3cfa28d2a88766af5fc83b82d3599f22e4c5736a1b97fa2a0b6d7c2b38
Keep up the good work Djm34.
Transaction id: e8620e3cfa28d2a88766af5fc83b82d3599f22e4c5736a1b97fa2a0b6d7c2b38
Keep up the good work Djm34.
January 29, 2015, 10:27:31 PM
djm,
3rd release does not like my 2 x 750 Ti setup. Here are a few test runs I did:
Release 3, no options: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 21 kh/s
Release 3, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 159 kh/s, GPU1 = 18 kh/s
Release 2, no options: no options: (boom) GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
Release 2, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 164 kh/s
Release 2 with the "throughput" option specified is my champ right now.
With release 2, I've had NeoScrypt bubble up to most profitable in Miner Control a few times.
What is particular regarding gpu1 ? Is it one plugged into a monitor ? 3rd release does not like my 2 x 750 Ti setup. Here are a few test runs I did:
Release 3, no options: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 21 kh/s
Release 3, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 159 kh/s, GPU1 = 18 kh/s
Release 2, no options: no options: (boom) GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
Release 2, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 164 kh/s
Release 2 with the "throughput" option specified is my champ right now.
With release 2, I've had NeoScrypt bubble up to most profitable in Miner Control a few times.
Try using with release 3 --throughput 3 (because of rounding bug, that was what you were using in release 2)
Oh yeah, that made a difference. --throughput 3 is reporting about 308 kh/s combined for the two cards on accepted blocks. If I exclude the first couple of blocks which have low rates then the actual speed is around 320-330 kh/s. The reported values per gpu are around 160 kh/s and 170 kh/s for GPU 0 and 1 respectively. Looks like 3.5 was just too much for GPU 1.
Not sure which is connected to the monitor but I'd hazard a guess that it is GPU 1.
Thanks.
January 29, 2015, 10:05:35 PM
djm,
3rd release does not like my 2 x 750 Ti setup. Here are a few test runs I did:
Release 3, no options: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 21 kh/s
Release 3, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 159 kh/s, GPU1 = 18 kh/s
Release 2, no options: no options: (boom) GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
Release 2, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 164 kh/s
Release 2 with the "throughput" option specified is my champ right now.
With release 2, I've had NeoScrypt bubble up to most profitable in Miner Control a few times.
What is particular regarding gpu1 ? Is it one plugged into a monitor ? 3rd release does not like my 2 x 750 Ti setup. Here are a few test runs I did:
Release 3, no options: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 21 kh/s
Release 3, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 159 kh/s, GPU1 = 18 kh/s
Release 2, no options: no options: (boom) GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
Release 2, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 164 kh/s
Release 2 with the "throughput" option specified is my champ right now.
With release 2, I've had NeoScrypt bubble up to most profitable in Miner Control a few times.
Try using with release 3 --throughput 3 (because of rounding bug, that was what you were using in release 2)
Oh yeah, that made a difference. --throughput 3 is reporting about 308 kh/s combined for the two cards on accepted blocks. If I exclude the first couple of blocks which have low rates then the actual speed is around 320-330 kh/s. The reported values per gpu are around 160 kh/s and 170 kh/s for GPU 0 and 1 respectively. Looks like 3.5 was just too much for GPU 1.
Not sure which is connected to the monitor but I'd hazard a guess that it is GPU 1.
Thanks.
January 29, 2015, 05:34:26 PM
djm,
3rd release does not like my 2 x 750 Ti setup. Here are a few test runs I did:
Release 3, no options: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 21 kh/s
Release 3, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 159 kh/s, GPU1 = 18 kh/s
Release 2, no options: no options: (boom) GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
Release 2, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 164 kh/s
Release 2 with the "throughput" option specified is my champ right now.
With release 2, I've had NeoScrypt bubble up to most profitable in Miner Control a few times.
What is particular regarding gpu1 ? Is it one plugged into a monitor ? 3rd release does not like my 2 x 750 Ti setup. Here are a few test runs I did:
Release 3, no options: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 21 kh/s
Release 3, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 159 kh/s, GPU1 = 18 kh/s
Release 2, no options: no options: (boom) GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
Release 2, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 164 kh/s
Release 2 with the "throughput" option specified is my champ right now.
With release 2, I've had NeoScrypt bubble up to most profitable in Miner Control a few times.
Try using with release 3 --throughput 3 (because of rounding bug, that was what you were using in release 2)
January 29, 2015, 04:18:04 PM
V3 Release getting between 730 and 779 with my rig. 6 750 ti no overclock and monitor running one card at -throughput 3.5
January 29, 2015, 04:09:12 PM
djm,
3rd release does not like my 2 x 750 Ti setup. Here are a few test runs I did:
Release 3, no options: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 21 kh/s
Release 3, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 159 kh/s, GPU1 = 18 kh/s
Release 2, no options: no options: (boom) GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
Release 2, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 164 kh/s
Release 2 with the "throughput" option specified is my champ right now.
With release 2, I've had NeoScrypt bubble up to most profitable in Miner Control a few times.
3rd release does not like my 2 x 750 Ti setup. Here are a few test runs I did:
Release 3, no options: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 21 kh/s
Release 3, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 159 kh/s, GPU1 = 18 kh/s
Release 2, no options: no options: (boom) GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
Release 2, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 164 kh/s
Release 2 with the "throughput" option specified is my champ right now.
With release 2, I've had NeoScrypt bubble up to most profitable in Miner Control a few times.
January 29, 2015, 07:39:30 AM
date: 1/29/2015
sent: 0.01817859 BTC
Transaction ID: 8705c1991125ca01e14a917dd7206449664831b25adfb1fa68c8cd6e506d20e1
Thanks for the excellent work.
sent: 0.01817859 BTC
Transaction ID: 8705c1991125ca01e14a917dd7206449664831b25adfb1fa68c8cd6e506d20e1
Thanks for the excellent work.
January 28, 2015, 07:08:22 AM
Sadly, not the best for me right now. Getting 180 kh/s with 2 x eVGA 750 Ti SC (2GB) running at stock speed. Since one of the cards also supports my monitor the system experiences horrible lag while mining NeoScrypt. For my setup, currently gross earning is 1/6 of Quark on YAAMP. When power is factored in I'm barely in the positive net earning. Still, it's a start and with a little TLC I expect we'll see better even for my limited setup. Thanks for getting it out there for us to try. It is in the mix on my machine so we'll see how it does over the next few days as prices fluctuate up and down.
I'll try to release tomorrow a version with an adjustable intensity/throughput
Sorry, new version has no love for my 2 x 750 Ti setup.
Launch command:
ccminer.exe -q -r 3 -R 10 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u [myaddress] -p 1
Result is fast repeating:
[2015-01-27 21:45:04] GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
try to add "--througput 3.5" (or less) to the command line
Much better. Settles in at about 300 kh/s (+/- 30 after 45 units) on my setup. Will have to play with the tuning settings later.
January 28, 2015, 06:58:24 AM
Sadly, not the best for me right now. Getting 180 kh/s with 2 x eVGA 750 Ti SC (2GB) running at stock speed. Since one of the cards also supports my monitor the system experiences horrible lag while mining NeoScrypt. For my setup, currently gross earning is 1/6 of Quark on YAAMP. When power is factored in I'm barely in the positive net earning. Still, it's a start and with a little TLC I expect we'll see better even for my limited setup. Thanks for getting it out there for us to try. It is in the mix on my machine so we'll see how it does over the next few days as prices fluctuate up and down.
I'll try to release tomorrow a version with an adjustable intensity/throughput
Sorry, new version has no love for my 2 x 750 Ti setup.
Launch command:
ccminer.exe -q -r 3 -R 10 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u [myaddress] -p 1
Result is fast repeating:
[2015-01-27 21:45:04] GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
try to add "--througput 3.5" (or less) to the command line
Much better. Settles in at about 300 kh/s (+/- 30 after 45 units) on my setup. Will have to play with the tuning settings later.
January 28, 2015, 05:11:25 AM
Sadly, not the best for me right now. Getting 180 kh/s with 2 x eVGA 750 Ti SC (2GB) running at stock speed. Since one of the cards also supports my monitor the system experiences horrible lag while mining NeoScrypt. For my setup, currently gross earning is 1/6 of Quark on YAAMP. When power is factored in I'm barely in the positive net earning. Still, it's a start and with a little TLC I expect we'll see better even for my limited setup. Thanks for getting it out there for us to try. It is in the mix on my machine so we'll see how it does over the next few days as prices fluctuate up and down.
I'll try to release tomorrow a version with an adjustable intensity/throughput
Sorry, new version has no love for my 2 x 750 Ti setup.
Launch command:
ccminer.exe -q -r 3 -R 10 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u [myaddress] -p 1
Result is fast repeating:
[2015-01-27 21:45:04] GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
try to add "--througput 3.5" (or less) to the command line
January 27, 2015, 09:49:35 PM
Sadly, not the best for me right now. Getting 180 kh/s with 2 x eVGA 750 Ti SC (2GB) running at stock speed. Since one of the cards also supports my monitor the system experiences horrible lag while mining NeoScrypt. For my setup, currently gross earning is 1/6 of Quark on YAAMP. When power is factored in I'm barely in the positive net earning. Still, it's a start and with a little TLC I expect we'll see better even for my limited setup. Thanks for getting it out there for us to try. It is in the mix on my machine so we'll see how it does over the next few days as prices fluctuate up and down.
I'll try to release tomorrow a version with an adjustable intensity/throughput
Sorry, new version has no love for my 2 x 750 Ti setup.
Launch command:
ccminer.exe -q -r 3 -R 10 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u [myaddress] -p 1
Result is fast repeating:
[2015-01-27 21:45:04] GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
January 27, 2015, 04:54:23 PM
THANKS DJM34!!!
I now have something to test a new 960 with. I should check my messages more often! --scryptr
I now have something to test a new 960 with.
I should check my messages more often! --scryptr 
January 27, 2015, 05:33:15 AM
the dll's are from september 2014. Not sure though, the hashrate dropped now. down to 620. Need to test some more.
you might need to increase a bit the voltage so it can systain your oc... I tried to remove the dll but I don't see any difference: my core clock is 1466MHz (it is an factory OC so +175 lead to a crash)
edit: I must really have a crappy 750ti, I can't do more than 155MH/s
In case of crash you need to back up a bit the OC (it was crashing after a while with my defaut OC)
With my standard oc I get 155kh/s and 1 750ti ( it is factory super oc ) I get 5kh/s. My oc on my 750ti's like 1350 MHz.
I have noticed with scrypt my oc is +60 and +300mem .... on ccminer +130 and +60mem so I think I need to try as if i'm doing scrypt.
EDIT:The oc I used is my ccminer settings not my scrypt Cuda miner settings. It does seam that the card with the video out does very low hash. I'll try it on my asrock rig that has no cards with video output pluged in...using the mobo for the video.
January 26, 2015, 08:09:05 PM
Sadly, not the best for me right now. Getting 180 kh/s with 2 x eVGA 750 Ti SC (2GB) running at stock speed. Since one of the cards also supports my monitor the system experiences horrible lag while mining NeoScrypt. For my setup, currently gross earning is 1/6 of Quark on YAAMP. When power is factored in I'm barely in the positive net earning. Still, it's a start and with a little TLC I expect we'll see better even for my limited setup. Thanks for getting it out there for us to try. It is in the mix on my machine so we'll see how it does over the next few days as prices fluctuate up and down.
I'll try to release tomorrow a version with an adjustable intensity/throughput
January 26, 2015, 07:59:12 PM
Sadly, not the best for me right now. Getting 180 kh/s with 2 x eVGA 750 Ti SC (2GB) running at stock speed. Since one of the cards also supports my monitor the system experiences horrible lag while mining NeoScrypt. For my setup, currently gross earning is 1/6 of Quark on YAAMP. When power is factored in I'm barely in the positive net earning. Still, it's a start and with a little TLC I expect we'll see better even for my limited setup. Thanks for getting it out there for us to try. It is in the mix on my machine so we'll see how it does over the next few days as prices fluctuate up and down.
January 26, 2015, 07:20:33 PM
Getting about 148-152KH/s on my non OC 5X EVGA 750 ti SC and the one with the monitor gets 22KH/s
Added it to MC for now, 4th best crypto for me after Quark, X13 and X11
On concern is that when I launch it it says it is bind the GPUs 0-5 to CPUs 0-5. I only have a 2 core Pentium CPU. Is it just a thread count or something?
Most other say that 3 bind to CPU 0 and 3 Bind to CPU 1.
Fraz
It could be a lot a 750ti to handle both the monitor and algo. Added it to MC for now, 4th best crypto for me after Quark, X13 and X11
On concern is that when I launch it it says it is bind the GPUs 0-5 to CPUs 0-5. I only have a 2 core Pentium CPU. Is it just a thread count or something?
Most other say that 3 bind to CPU 0 and 3 Bind to CPU 1.
Fraz
usually when one of my card is plugged to a monitor it allocates about 200Mb of vram and the current version the algo use about 1.8Gb of vram, so that may cause problem as well as lag...
Regarding the number of gpu and number of cpu thread, I am not sure, but if it worked with older ccminer there is no reason it wouldn't work with this one.
January 26, 2015, 06:38:27 PM
Getting about 148-152KH/s on my non OC 5X EVGA 750 ti SC and the one with the monitor gets 22KH/s
Added it to MC for now, 4th best crypto for me after Quark, X13 and X11
On concern is that when I launch it it says it is bind the GPUs 0-5 to CPUs 0-5. I only have a 2 core Pentium CPU. Is it just a thread count or something?
Most other say that 3 bind to CPU 0 and 3 Bind to CPU 1.
Fraz
Added it to MC for now, 4th best crypto for me after Quark, X13 and X11
On concern is that when I launch it it says it is bind the GPUs 0-5 to CPUs 0-5. I only have a 2 core Pentium CPU. Is it just a thread count or something?
Most other say that 3 bind to CPU 0 and 3 Bind to CPU 1.
Fraz
January 26, 2015, 04:51:37 PM
im running no OC
PS is ok i interchange the cards and all good now
PS is ok i interchange the cards and all good now
January 26, 2015, 04:39:11 PM
hey all im gettin 4 to 500khs but i do no like this 
is going really fast and only show gpu#0 and some time the other 3
what can this be
you need to reduce a bit the overclock on at least gpu#0 (it probably has crashed) is going really fast and only show gpu#0 and some time the other 3what can this be
Jump to: