what can this be
Topic: neoscrypt algo for ccminer and nvidia card: call for donation - page 7. (Read 33785 times)
January 26, 2015, 04:36:32 PM
hey all im gettin 4 to 500khs but i do no like this http://s18.postimg.org/iafmt643d/Capture1.png is going really fast and only show gpu#0 and some time the other 3
what can this be
what can this be
January 26, 2015, 02:06:47 PM
My 2 gainward 750ti's non powered are doing 155-160 without overclocking.
Neoscrypts seems to be the most profitable to mine now. Here are my hashrate's on standard clock's:
2 750ti, 1 970 and 1 980
Neoscrypts seems to be the most profitable to mine now. Here are my hashrate's on standard clock's:
2 750ti, 1 970 and 1 980
sp_, looks like you have another machine mining the heck out of X11 there.
Looking forward to trying out NeoScrypt when I get home tonight. Thanks for getting it out to us DJM.
January 26, 2015, 02:00:25 PM
My 750ti none powered OCed to +150 reaching 180.5 kH/s...
January 26, 2015, 01:36:53 PM
My 2 gainward 750ti's non powered are doing 155-160 without overclocking.
Neoscrypts seems to be the most profitable to mine now. Here are my hashrate's on standard clock's:
2 750ti, 1 970 and 1 980
Neoscrypts seems to be the most profitable to mine now. Here are my hashrate's on standard clock's:
2 750ti, 1 970 and 1 980
January 26, 2015, 12:53:02 PM
the dll's are from september 2014. Not sure though, the hashrate dropped now. down to 620. Need to test some more.
you might need to increase a bit the voltage so it can systain your oc... I tried to remove the dll but I don't see any difference: my core clock is 1466MHz (it is an factory OC so +175 lead to a crash)
edit: I must really have a crappy 750ti, I can't do more than 155MH/s
In case of crash you need to back up a bit the OC (it was crashing after a while with my defaut OC)
January 26, 2015, 12:51:47 PM
The 970 is doing great 560KHASH:
One of the ti's has crashed, so reporting 40KHASH, the other ti 175KHASH,
One of the ti's has crashed, so reporting 40KHASH, the other ti 175KHASH,
January 26, 2015, 12:42:45 PM
the dll's are from september 2014. Not sure though, the hashrate dropped now. down to 620. Need to test some more.
January 26, 2015, 12:41:31 PM
thanks. I get a boost when I delete the 2 dll files.
cudart32_65.dll
cudart64_65.dll
(i am using the 22-jan-2015 driver)
The 980 is peaking at 700KHASH with +175 on the core and 200 on memory
nice to know... (and strange...) is that the latest whql ? cudart32_65.dll
cudart64_65.dll
(i am using the 22-jan-2015 driver)
The 980 is peaking at 700KHASH with +175 on the core and 200 on memory
January 26, 2015, 12:36:57 PM
thanks. I get a boost when I delete the 2 dll files.
cudart32_65.dll
cudart64_65.dll
(i am using the 22-jan-2015 driver)
The 980 is peaking at 700KHASH with +175 on the core and 200 on memory. but average perhaps 620?
cudart32_65.dll
cudart64_65.dll
(i am using the 22-jan-2015 driver)
The 980 is peaking at 700KHASH with +175 on the core and 200 on memory. but average perhaps 620?
January 26, 2015, 11:40:54 AM
Just send an email to all those who donated, if you didn't receive an email please pm me with the txid of your donation
if you received an email please don't
.
also the miner has been released to those I know they donated if you received an email please don't
. January 26, 2015, 09:36:47 AM
Just send an email to all those who donated, if you didn't receive an email please pm me with the txid of your donation
if you received an email please don't.
if you received an email please don't
. January 21, 2015, 06:21:04 AM
With the current prices and a kernal that does 630KHASH, It will be 83% more profitable to mine neoscrypt than x11@9MHASH (gtx 980)
Todays price:
3BTC/GHASH neoscrypr.
0.1161BTC/GHASH x11
0.4$ per 980 card on FTCTodays price:
3BTC/GHASH neoscrypr.
0.1161BTC/GHASH x11
or 0.3$ on DRK
the payouts of the algorithms vary from day to day. take a look at
http://www.yaamp.com/
Yaamp is paying 0.21 BTC / GHASH for quark. ccminer release 31 does 18MHASH@quark
($0,86184 per 980 per day) Still not alot, but it's paying 3 times bether than x11.
This is why you need to use a profit switcher software to get the maximum profit.
Spreadcoin however, is paying much more.
Sign up to be a betatester. Donate 0.1 BTC I will send the first version of the private boosted miner on sunday.
January 20, 2015, 07:34:22 PM
With the current prices and a kernal that does 630KHASH, It will be 83% more profitable to mine neoscrypt than x11@9MHASH (gtx 980)
Todays price:
3BTC/GHASH neoscrypr.
0.1161BTC/GHASH x11
Todays price:
3BTC/GHASH neoscrypr.
0.1161BTC/GHASH x11
0.4$ per 980 card on FTC
or 0.3$ on DRK
January 19, 2015, 03:16:19 PM
new numbers:
gtx980: 633kh/s (was 530kh/s)
gtx780:250kh/s 300kh/s change too fast
except for the moment it works with only one card at a time
gtx980: 633kh/s (was 530kh/s)
gtx780:
change too fastexcept for the moment it works with only one card at a time
Well done. You've impressed me.
January 20, 2015, 11:29:35 AM
Jump start the Donations again.
0.1 BTC Donated. That is 14 days of Mining Quark for me.
TxId: 8f25e50475a5923c6e896c7f28eea8f22a12508916ff2ce6ed45a75ac757da22
0.1 BTC Donated. That is 14 days of Mining Quark for me.
TxId: 8f25e50475a5923c6e896c7f28eea8f22a12508916ff2ce6ed45a75ac757da22
January 20, 2015, 07:48:17 AM
With the current prices and a kernal that does 630KHASH, It will be 83% more profitable to mine neoscrypt than x11@9MHASH (gtx 980)
Todays price:
3BTC/GHASH neoscrypr.
0.1161BTC/GHASH x11
Todays price:
3BTC/GHASH neoscrypr.
0.1161BTC/GHASH x11
January 20, 2015, 07:33:37 AM
new numbers:
gtx980: 633kh/s (was 530kh/s)
gtx780:250kh/s 300kh/s change too fast
except for the moment it works with only one card at a time
djm...Your working on the 970 too ..right? The 970 price per card per hash is a better deal. My next card will be the 970 or the new 960 depends on price per card per hash to electricity. gtx980: 633kh/s (was 530kh/s)
gtx780:
change too fastexcept for the moment it works with only one card at a time
I assume that all the 900 serie cards should behave in the same way as the 980... (at least for the 970, if the 960 is new tech a few things can differ)
(I have no plan in buying new cards at the moment... current profitability doesn't really justify it...)
January 19, 2015, 08:45:03 AM
Wolf0's public kernel is roughly 4x faster than Vehre's original one. That's a well done job I must say. I've made my point. Good luck whatever you do.
Private is around 8x faster than his on 290X.
With a global memory trick like in my last VLIW kernel?
Never looked at your kernel.
January 20, 2015, 07:29:45 AM
new numbers:
gtx980: 633kh/s (was 530kh/s)
gtx780:250kh/s 300kh/s change too fast
except for the moment it works with only one card at a time
djm...Your working on the 970 too ..right? The 970 price per card per hash is a better deal. My next card will be the 970 or the new 960 depends on price per card per hash to electricity. gtx980: 633kh/s (was 530kh/s)
gtx780:
change too fastexcept for the moment it works with only one card at a time
January 19, 2015, 07:41:44 PM
finally fixed my problem, now all the cards are able to work with one instance
gtx980: ~630kh/s (up to 646kh/s) tdp: 118% temp: 73°C
gtx750ti: ~150kh/s (no amelioration strangely) tdp: 86% temp: 55°C
gtx780ti: ~300kh/s tdp: 85% temp: 75°C
gtx980: ~630kh/s (up to 646kh/s) tdp: 118% temp: 73°C
gtx750ti: ~150kh/s (no amelioration strangely) tdp: 86% temp: 55°C
gtx780ti: ~300kh/s tdp: 85% temp: 75°C
Jump to: