Topic: Nevra (XEV) - Project is Terminated - page 12. (Read 11619 times)

yes it is true for those of us who have no merit we can only hope in this program and can only see the progress of this project.

i dnt know which discussion im going to join.. maybe here.. im just crossing my fingers..
hope someone could help me. thanks..

嗨Hey, man, where's the link? Can you send it for me?

So I noticed you have are on twitter and discord let me suggest you also getting a medium and telegram account setup. As these would expose the project future and get the community engaged, because if you get the cap of 1000 stakeholders of Nerva you would still require a larger community outside the stakeholders to follow up the project and it progress for them to determine if it worth them getting in. I don't think this thread is enough. More exposure.

I suspect this applies to my post?
You probably have never dealt with real investments if you write such simple things. A real investment is what is required after the project starts and claims to top 100 or now even top 20. Understanding the founder's biography and the main competitive advantages - the basic things that are always asked. As well as technical features of the project.
A strong community of the project means a real interest in his fate, and therefore a detailed study. Usually, those who simply participate wherever there is nothing to lose, getting their share quickly cash out and does not affect the development of the project as a whole. Remember that your time is more expensive than money and you lose it.
A detailed study takes hours and days. I have already spent many hours studying the project, the biography of its author and related things, because I was interested, as I said.
He asked about the skills of those who wants to be a part of the team. So it is ok if he was asked also. Don't see the negativity.

Now this looks like something else.
Besides the whitepaper and the technicalities, I very much like the transparency I have seen so far.
It's kinda of the same importance to me as having good features, I think people underestimate that these days, blinded by the idea of fast easy returns or just out of ignorance.
But pair that transparency with the necessary effort and you have a great place to start from.
I'll definitely be part of this if you'll have me that is

Thanks for your thoughtful questions and would be happy to answer them.

1) In regards to my technical experience, it's minimal, hence why i'm actively recruiting a Java developer. My technical experience with blockchains goes as far as understanding code and compiling and running the code, and verifying if everything is properly done. As far as writing/coding blockchains, that's not where my expertise lye's. I've always been a leader and investor. I have a well-rounded background in EE, a bachelors, so my experience with understanding concepts is pretty intensive.

I'm not looking into bringing in any contacts i've known prior, because most are busy with other projects or have left crypto entirely. Bringing in certain developers also creates drama for their past experiences, and i want to mitagate that, because then Nevra woulden't be about Nevra fully, it'd be about that person's background on that last coin. It both has drawbacks and benefits ofc. Nevra is a coin for the community by the community, i'm just supplying the materials to build the car, the car needs to be assembled.

2) As far as your heavier technical qualifications goes, it doesn't pertain to Nevra. We aren't re-writing the wheel here, and we aren't seeking any type of funds for even doing this distribution. You've mistaken Nevra for the other 1000s of shitcoins that are out there today. The goal of Nevra's testnet will be towards adding features and optimizing the blockchain minimal, so that it appears and acts in a different manner than NEM.

In regards to NEM, Utopianfuture and etc, they didn't re-create the wheel either. NEM is a fork off of NXT, while they claim to re-written all the code, i suspect it was due to the lack of fully running a NXT fork, due to code not being fully available. Thus, they just re-wrote NXT's code structure and created a different version. There are technical modifications to the blockchain, but at the heart of NEM, it's ultimately is a NXT 2.0.

Utopianfuture was not a technical guy, he was just the guy who came up with the idea of NEM, i don't believe he had any technicial background. By the time NEM was released, Utopian was long gone from NEM, due to the controversy of claiming double stakes.

I could get into details in regards to other developers, but just know they raised Millions in funds (directly or indirectly) to recruit top talent, but we are discussing the top 20 coins here. At a later time, Nevra will be in the same position, but it will take some time, a lot of effort and a bit of luck.

3) In regards to development, again we aren't going to re-create the wheel here. You misunderstand the purpose of Nevra, and what we are trying to achieve here. The entire goal and purpose of this project was born out of passion and disgust for what has been occurring on BTT. Many "devs" and scammers seek millions of USD in funding for a basic ERC20 token, or an infrastructure that was forked off of other coins, and ultimately re-branded.

The goal with Nevra is to basically due away with all the bullshit and return to the roots of crypto. The reason we are going to fork off of NEM instead of creating a brand new ERC20 token, or merely forking a POS coin, is because it will greatly enhance the appeal of this coin, and to show that with a bit of effort you can create something special. It will not take a lot of effort to add a few features, to make Nevra an original coin on the markets. We aren't trying to compete for the top TPS, or best anonymity, we are trying to really upset all airdrops and airdropped coin distributions, showing how it can be done, and how it supposed to be done. As this project gains more traction, there will be a broader interest to really pull in talent.

Lastly, NEM was founded by the community, you underestimate the amount of talent that lurks on BTT. You also said the egalitarian principal is invalid once the coin hits on an exchange, well getting listing on an exchange is not the ultimate goal. I would believe saying egalitarianism on an exchange is almost trivial, because principals and foundations are not started on an exchange, the start with the team and community behind the coin.

If there is anything i unanswered, let me know. Hope this helps a bit

OK, I have been watching this thread for a couple of days and I couldn't help but notice the no trust people are showing toward this project, but maybe this is because of what all airdrops had came to these days, NEVRA is a revolutionary project that will bring back the rules of  distribution back to its solid foundation and should be supported. I am not understanding why people are acting this way, I mean really? there is nothing to loose and everything to gain, the rules are simple, the team is honest and the communication is open, what else could you ask for? remember trust should be showed both ways so trust the team and be patient and you will be rewarded.  

Your reply is this thread I saw so far the most wonderful post, I carefully read your post, forgive my understanding of the blockchain is not deep enough, I can not fully understand you the contents of the post, but I agree with your words, this is not absolute equality in the world. Nevra is not truly absolutely equality, but they have been trying to do the best, We should recognize their efforts.