The only way is that they are almost as well managed by the best campaign managers that gives me a lot of confidence and those are the ones that one trusts the most, so these types of things are what one is guided to be able to take a step closer to trust , and yet, with risk, because things like that are very Dangerous.
Your fears are not different from my mind when it comes to picking the casino to play on most especially when the choice involves new casinos that I may not have played on before and this makes the task of choosing them very hard for me and each time I want to give a new casino a try I always choose the ones that have an ongoing signature campaign here in the forum, the reason being that, aside from the mangers doing some due diligence check on the project before accepting to promote them which go a long way to point to the casino credibility and also having a signature campaign is also an access to get a response anytime there is an issue on the casino, the response can come from campaigns participants who may have experienced a similar problem on the site before since they are the ones that always try out the new casinos before advertising or the team representatives who may be very active within the period of their campaigns.
Yes, it is very difficult to be able to trust a casino right away, we are players we can try a casino, play, see how much it is possible to play and win, what are their bonuses, how can their bonus system be, of contests that you can launch, how is your marketing, how much a community has done, and especially when you are new to the forum it is very difficult for all of us to be able to trust and once and for all give you that vote of confidence to make a deposit of once, because we don't know if they stole it, or something like that, it's also delicate, because a campaign manager will always do tests that we don't even know about, they may have an Arsenal of people who do their tests in the casino and inform them or something, or some other things , we don't know, the campaign managers in the forum have a very high level of intelligence and have a clinical eye to see which platforms can work or not, because it is also their reputation that is at stake and any poorly made movement is enough to make him a very harsh judgment, and take away his credibility within the forum, however, every campaigner is a human being, he is a person who can be wrong because he has the right, and no one is perfect, it's just that sometimes when it comes to money, people are pretty tough.
If a campaign manager trusts a project , trusts a casino Platform and they launch a signature campaign, sometimes it has been proven that it is not completely trustworthy, because some have committed fraud even so with a great campaign and that is something that It can happen, so in the event that something like this Happens , we can't jump once and for all to judge the Campaign Manager , First understand the situation and why not? support, we are human, however when a signature campaign is good, in the long term and the platform or casino Behaves Well , the reputation of the casino quickly rises and makes the campaign manager look very good , however I fully trust all the signature campaign managers in the forum who are Recognized as such, and that is if they give me at least 80% Confidence to Take the risk.