Topic: No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses - page 5. (Read 4516 times)

That's how it should work, no KYC, it's from the start until the end. If a gambler cheat the casino, do you think a gambler will comply with them in submitting a KYC documents? Of course no because that will only put him in danger and will get arrested since the casino itself they claimed to be regulated.  The thing is, when a casino market to people that they are "NO KYC" and people signed up because they think they'll gain privacy when gambling but later they are required a KYC, they might not like it and as a result, casinos reputation will be at risk.

THIS IS TRUE.

Waiting to see the update when it drops, because most of us that have being following up with the discussions on this thread have being seeking for a clarification of a provable and standstill statement on the KYC demands from your team, wether your site is a 100% no KYC or just some partial KYC.


Because some casinos may promise a no KYC at the start but along the line when the gambler win a substantial amount, their come up with such demands for verification before they can withdraw.

No KYC should be something we all may have to regard as well as going for, we need our privacy in whatever thing we are doing, we also have to consider the numbers of platforms that can afford to provide us with this, which we want starting right from the gambling platforms, so many gamblers have already been having difficult times from providing informations regarding their KYC informations.

Believe it or not, this is the first time I have read here on the forum from a long-standing member about this lenient treatment of private data and the extent of its impact on the concept of “privacy” in general.
We must always differentiate between the private information that we share with banks and well-known service institutions (banks, insurance companies...), and sharing that same data with companies on the Internet, especially those that do not have a clear headquarters, that is, they operate without according to proven legal licenses.
In the first case, your data is kept confidential in accordance with laws that the institution adheres to and declares this as part of the procedures for obtaining a license from the country granting approval for the activity. Any defect in the use of this data could expose the organization to unfair punitive measures that may lead to the payment of compensation in huge amounts or even the cessation of activity completely.
In the second case, the risk increases because the online company can use that data in different ways that are not compatible with the principle of “preserving personal data,” especially since users may never realize that. In addition, the servers of these sites are constantly vulnerable to hacking, and there are no sufficient guarantees about the absolute safety of their systems. There are many cases of hacking or scam projects, and with a simple search it is possible to review many examples of disasters that users have been exposed to as a result of their data being stolen or even sold on the black market.

They should be more specific since if they say that they are non KYC compliant casino but later on they ask this because they say that their is an investigation going on their account then this leave some thoughts that they are just fooling the people who trust that they would never ask this. And for stating this they should never ask this requirement so that no people will start to doubt at them since for sure that there's a lot of people will just think about that maybe in future they would use that KYC for them to delay the withdrawals of some users or totally block it since they can't provide what they asked. They should really stick on what they are promoting since its really shady if there's sudden changes that might happen to them.

That's why I got confused because usually when there's a KYC policy, the rules should be specific. When requiring more KYC during investigation, I think that's a different thing as it could be categorized to a special cases. You know, investigation like that does not happen most of the time, so we should only stick with the standard procedure when marketing the casino and talking about KYC process.

If your personal information/documents fall into the wrong hands then you have no idea what they can do with it. It's not only about knowing where you leave and the risk of getting robbed. Your personal documents can be used in illigal activities such as scamming other people. They can use it to create accounts in your name on some exchanges for example and use it for money laundering...
Submitting your personal documents to your bank agency is not the same as submitting them to an online casino.

This may be the first occasion I have read or even listened about such a thing like "low KYC"... But if I had to guess on what it means, then I would say it is about providing some personal information to the casino or service provider which is not as extensive as the "full KYC" which I typically asked when we wish to withdraw money from a casino.
Perhaps, instead asking for pictures of ourselves and our passports, they would ask for an email and Identity card (which is not as valuable as a passport in terms in identity verification).

Also, as far as I recall the casino licensed issued by the authorities in Curaçao are not suitable for casinos which do not want to impose their KYC practices on their gamblers. So my guess is OP meant simply to keep a separate section in his webpage to be dedicated for the ratings of casino licenses themselves, not casinos which operate under them.

It is all kind of a speculation from my part, though. 

Looking forward to it.

Anyway, I don't know if it has been asked already or I didn't read this in the OP before.. this one.
from OP
What do you mean but low KYC? Because if you promote no KYC, it should be completely no KYC at all.

Also you posted about your license.
Does this license providers allow you to operate with requiring KYC to gamblers?

Bro, truly, this is a consideration, but people are taking it too far. Think of it, since you've been growing up till today, how many places have you dropped your personal details and contact details? Have they harmed you till today? This is peculiar to those who overemphasise the danger in completing the KYC, it is not so bad and dangerous. Most of these guys are not even worth $2500, is that what they are coming to your house to rob you for? And if it is online, is the person childish to the point of clicking the unfamiliar links, sending OTP/2FA code to strangers or even entertaining a conversation with a stranger, especially when money is related? If the person did that, then it is his fault and not the fault of the KYC.

I'm just saying that in the worst-case scenario, we should not believe that KYC is a cause of imminent danger or privacy infringement. The data leak we are even talking about is in degree, and if they do not know you to warrant a direct threat, the major thing they need is your email and phone number, they do not have any business at your house. And if you are careful enough on your path, all their online efforts will still be to nothing. Some people will not stop making me laugh here, imagine, someone who has only $2500 as the maximum amount in an international casino that is many miles away from his country still afraid of data leaks and personal threats. Will they (perpetrators) fly from their country down to you just because of your peanut? People often take this too far despite completing KYC with banks and many other formal and informal establishments (brokerages, hotels, hospitals etc.).

There are many things that can be done, in fact one of the things that can result is that the erpns that go to play in a casino, sometimes a casino can be very honest in every way, but if they do not have the licenses, then they have They have to do it, they classify them as an unreliable casino, but come on, there are Casinos that meet all the requirements to obtain licenses , and a while later it becomes a scam and that is something that does not add up. , and I realize that it can't stop there, but I think that many need to open their eyes and see what they are getting into, I don't know if in the future there will be a casino with Monero without licenses and that they are honest, but based on everything What has been said and only the most shameless thing that can exist is Weight and it is a great option, although it goes against many rules.

We are working on a new big update soon.

Of course, you can retire to the forest and become a completely anonymous hermit and hunt for food, fish and collect fruits in order to survive.  But there are few who want such a life. 

As for life in society, it should be recognized that in the life of any person there are secrets that he definitely would not want to become public.  For example, you have a secret woman lover whom you are dating.  So, should you not hide this and tell your wife honestly?  Well, it’s clear what will follow!  Or, secretly from your employer, you are into gambling.  So what, will it do you any good if your employer finds out about this?  These examples clearly demonstrate the importance of maintaining anonymity in certain matters.  It is obvious.  Is total control over a person’s life an ideal society of the future?  Should civilization develop along this path?  By the way, KYC in crypto is just a small step in the development of total control. 
And in my opinion, the topic of crime and illegal payments in crypt is a drop in the ocean of financial crimes, where everyone operates in cash or even ordinary bank transfers.  This accusation of the entire cryptocurrency in its criminal nature is a fake that is intensively spreading into the mass consciousness by the banking financial clan and interested bosses and law enforcement agencies.  By the way, they also stand in the faithful service of these same banking clans and also receive their rather large sum.

Because some gamblers cares about their privacy and this is the reason why they do not want to deal with KYC especially for gambling purpose.
Not about afraid or not IMO but more about privacy preferences and I believe it may change later.
We all know that there was no KYC at all in this crypto world, not online gambling but also when it comes to exchange service.
Regulation changed later when most online services where money is involved need to deal with KYC, that's why people's preferences are also changed due to their needs.

Although there are some casinos that has KYC rules based on wagering/deposit/withdrawal limit but in fact casino can ask it anytime even if you have not reach the limit so dont rely on such limit but always be ready to be asked for KYC anytime.

I understand why people got afraid on submitting their KYC details since there's so many negative possibilities could happen to them if there's a sudden leakage of private data's on the platform you are using and you might encounter a problem like stolen identity issues or other related to frauds or scamming activity that's why to many people are still been skeptical to submit their information even if they know the platform they are using is reputable.

But we understand that this is common requirements now on casino or even on every crypto platforms we are using so the least thing we can do is to choose those most reputable among them all so we can minimize the risk to get a potential issue in future.

           -   Sometimes I don't understand why other gamblers seem so afraid to pass their KYC, and in the first place, if they read the Terms and Conditions of a casino platform, they will immediately see if it is my KYC or not.

And if, for example, a casino does not have KYC as long as you do not reach their total wagered requirements, you will be able to withdraw what you have won on the platform unless you have reached the limits; there are other casinos like that.

It is high time those guys perish the idea of anonymity, there shouldn't be a thing like that as long as you are a human being and are dealing with financial transactions. If anyone wants to be anonymous, the forest is there, go there, after all, you will not be a threat to the civilised society since you are living in the bush. But if you must live in civilized environment, then you must be accounted for, there must be the link between you and what you do. In all good sense, if you are not the kind that is illegal in activities, you have nothing to worry about, even as no one is revealing your details like many feared. Who even cares about that in most cases?

We all must know and acknowledge that regulation is a must unless there is no crime in the world where everyone is trusted to be sane and do the right thing. Is that what we experience in our societies? Certainly not. The more you allow anonymity, the more the evil doers use the opportunity to perpetrate their evil, and I do not think that is the society we all want to build.

However, many casinos are only hiding under the regulation to cheat their customers, some of the acclaimed no-KYC casinos would later ask for it when the customer is such that is good at his games and also withdraws frequently or wanting to withdraw a huge amount of money. That's just cheating and not about being answerable to any regulation. But if a KYC casino asks you for the KYC, it is their right since they are not a no-KYC casino, it may only take time, they will ask. Only that the odd times they ask at times could make it suspicious, nevertheless, they are still within their right.

But I continue to believe, and the experience of other players clearly confirms that sudden KYC in the event of withdrawal of money that you won in any casino is now an almost inevitable process and the inevitable course of development of the gaming industry. 
And now, increasingly, the exploitation of the marketing slogan “No KYC” is turning into a farce and a false promise.  I think that legislators are everywhere attacking cryptocurrency and such a characteristic feature of cryptocurrency as the anonymity of payments.  And many casinos in their jurisdictions simply cannot afford to operate normally and legally if they do not introduce this KYC procedure.
 This is all sad simply because millions of gamblers would prefer to remain completely anonymous, and the realities of the gambling industry provide fewer and fewer opportunities for this. 
So now everyone should probably be skeptical and distrustful when someone supposedly guarantees “No KYC”.

Hi there, we just recently joined bitcointalk, but basically i think https://www.overtimemarkets.xyz/ fits the description you guys are looking to list on your website perfectly.
You just need an Ethereum wallet to interact with the platform, limiting or banning successful users is not possible, and no KYC of course. Another important point is that the platform is non-custodial, meaning that you dont need to deposit or withdraw funds, you interact directly with the smart contracts and nobody can stop you from claiming your winnings.

Hi. My simple gambling website is based on the Waves blockchain and is decentralized. No account is needed, you only need a Waves wallet: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wavesplaycom-first-multi-token-for-waves-dice-coin-flip-referral-for-life-5201877