Topic: No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | Exclusive Bonuses - page 3. (Read 4171 times)

We have added a new Casino with KYC LEVEL 0.
Check it out on https://www.notokyc.com/ and don't forget we are hosting a 100$ Giveaway right now

We released a new update of notokyc.com. Also we are hosting a 100$ BTC GIVEAWAY right now here: https://www.notokyc.com/giveaway/

Well, we must not deny that there are many campaigns that are carried out in favor of KYC, and that is something that has always happened, they always promote that part well because they know that that is the best for them, but on a personal level I will never agree. leave my data on a platform, I am clear that in some casinos they try not to implement this KYC rule, but I prefer to leave them in casinos that are very reliable because I am not one to leave KYC, we already have enough leaving our KYC in the banks, in all the registrations they have for everyday things, cryptocurrencies and crypto sites should never ask for KYC, well that's my way of thinking, I respect anyone's point of view.

Yo guys, i have charged my anonsmm with xmr, but i've got nothing on the panel, i try to contact the owner, but i've got no answer

It's my first time with crytpo payments and i'm lost

If he wants to use a gambling platform without KYC, he must be able to find the right casino. That's because many casinos without KYC are not what we want. There is no guarantee that we will not have problems later.

And the casinos that ask for KYC are also the same for every gambler. They also have to be careful in choosing the casino because otherwise, they can get into trouble and have difficulty withdrawing their money.

But they can gamble without having to do KYC because there are still casinos that allow their users not to need to verify their accounts. They can still gamble with limited funds so they don't need to do KYC. And that's why we don't need to use a lot of money to gamble because after all, gambling is just for fun and entertainment. The people who do KYC are the ones who aim to win a lot of money so they are willing to do it.

You are right about this and that's if the list in the OP is even correct anymore, some of them might have become KYC compliant as we speak, except for the hardened ones that can even steal from you if care is not taken. Some planned their casino in a very crooked way just because they do not want to be answerable to any authority, and the question is whether anyone will be willing to work with such casinos simply because they are no-KYC. I can't do that.

That said, some will continue to advertise the no-KYC mantra but indeed request KYC from their customers, but those customers are selected, or should I say targetted. They could target them due to many reasons which include their good quality of playing, how often they withdraw and their current withdrawal size. If some or all of these are peculiar to the gambler and the casino could be asking for KYC, such should know that something is fishy, and the best is to run as far as your leg could take you.

I've never been a fan of no-KYC casinos and never will I be as the risk is high for me.

Leave a message to the OP then one thing for sure you will get notice as OP is active in this thread to give an update. And don't worry your reply in this thread will enough to get the attention to the OP.

Those gamblers who have the budget in gambling then they are ready to risk in that then this is a good site for them if they got successful then it's good to them cause they can withdraw thier winning Money. And if they loss then still okay cause the money they use is those Money that they can afford to loss. Which means they are already prepared of the possible outcome.

I think this is only good for those gamblers who didn't spend a lot of money on their gambling habits since they could able to shift into those NO KYC casino and take the risk since maybe the amount they going to gamble is they afford to lose which is small figures only.

But I guess for whales I guess they prefer to gamble on a KYC compliant casino which reputation has been established for years since they can assure that even if they deposit a large amount of money the chances for them to get scam is less. We have those reputable casinos here and I can attest that they are really a best choice compare than taking risk and stress on those casinos saying that they will never require a KYC to their clients since we don't know how long they would last.

I think the best solution is for one to go for a no KYC gambling platform if he thinks he is going to have issues with the casinos on the ground of the provisions for KYC, as regards this site and their offers, if you never experienced them before, then it's not right for us to conclude on what they are up to or not, what I will advise is for us to make search on what we want, if we see they have the same offers, then we go for it.

If we do tend to look up on their terms and conditions of each one of them with those non KYC casinos as of this moment but there would really be that a part or those words stated that they would really be asking some KYC at their own discretion or preference depending on the condition that you do have into on which means that there's no way that you would really be able on getting out in speaking about anonymity since they could really be able to ask it out anytime they do want and this something that they would really be asking on which means that there's no way that you would really be able to get away with this. If there would really be those truly anonymous sites on which same as you said that sooner or later they would really be that KYC compliant as regulation would becomes even more stricter.

Though, I think in this context it does not necessarily means an investigation being carried out by the casino in order for them to be able to continue to offer their services to us or for them to be able to allow us to withdraw some earnings we had. I believe there is an actual separation of levels within the KYC process.
It is something I learnt not long ago when I decided to join to the webpage of some payment processor, they would limit one's monthly volume based on the personal documents we sent during the process of signing up to their wallet.

If one decided to take pictures of one's Identity card, then they would only allow a monthly volume of 400$, on the other hand, submitting one's passport (which is supposed to be up-to-date), then the monthly limit will get increased to 1500$.

Since casinos and payment processors kind of go with the same regulations, then I believe that is what it is meant in this context when we talk about several levels of KYC.

The NO KYC thing has been frowned at by some regulatory agencies, they are making it uneasy for people to have to setup any form of Casino with the idea of NO KYC.

That list is going to be incorrect in no distant time cos the most of those casinos will be KYC compliant  in no distant time.

The way people turn up with Casinos today and hope that NO KYC is the best strategy to marketing should be frowned at as well.

No KYC casino is good but most of the time no KYC does not solve all the problems. KYC establishes trust between platforms and users, reassuring each party of the other's legitimacy. Know Your Customer (KYC) process is critical for crypto casinos and exchanges to implement. By verifying the identities of users, KYC helps prevent fraud and other financial crimes that could undermine the integrity of the crypto ecosystem. Thorough KYC involves collecting identifying information such as legal names, physical addresses, and government ID numbers. By taking the lead on rigorous KYC procedures, forward-thinking casinos and exchanges can show crypto's viability as a secure financial system.

I will advised from this regard that you send OP a pm as someone already advised, secondly, try visit their main site and see for yourself what they offers or contains and read through their policies, you may find it interesting to have a deal directly with them, i think OP as well should be their representative here on bitcointalk, engage him as well in other to have a smooth experience with them.

I see the purpose of this thread as more focused on information, in regards to everything that is a casino that does not ask for KYC, KYC for me is something that Follows me Everywhere , in all crypto and non-crypto platforms they ask for KYC  and that's something I don't like, we can Avoid all KYC in casinos, but if we do KYC in Other platforms that are not crypto, I don't know what we are looking for, I know that there must be a means of identification for everything and everyone , but it is time for us to see this as an option so that we can have a strategy on how to find the casino sites to play without KYC features , and that is reliable, how do we find? It is difficult to do something like this because the things that are done in this world have nothing to do with KYC, I actually don't know if there is a casino here without KYC or if the Thread is about a casino like that or if they want to set up a casino like that.

Provably there's no one in this forum have direct connection on the owners aside from those people who's working on their site. So maybe at least contact them here on their account used in this forum or try to contact them in site since for that maybe you can get an answer from them related to what are those interesting things you want to discuss with them.

I wonder what's the reason why suddenly you contact them since if you want partnership or whatsoever there are successful casino which is good to deal and offer something that they can't resist. I don't mean that this site is bad but they still need to prove something so people could able safe or have confidence to try this. Anyways good luck and maybe best to wait for them to go active since somehow provably they are watching this thread and want to get some insights of latest discussions made by people.

Did you mean NoToKYC itself? Well, it shouldn't be difficult to get in touch with him unless you've not given it time for a try. Although I've not tried any of these means before, you may try them. First, you may want to send him a private link through his Bitcointalk, I am sure he could be checking it once in a while. On checking now, his last activity here reads 25th of April which was just last week, so he is indeed checking.

Alternatively, on his website, there are columns for Blogs (at the upper side) and social media contacts like Telegram, Twitter, Discord and the rest on the bottom side. Those are the best means to contact anyone quicker if the person is still active.

I think sending direct PM will be enough since OP is constantly online and updating this
thread at least once a week ,
looks like your site is interested in dealing with them ? that's  a good sign of having larger marketing and good luck
about that and to your site as well guys.

Does anyone know how to contact the owner/admin of this site?

You have a point there and I must say that I am already aware of what you said as well. This is why one must ensure that they are not just gambling anyhow, they should gamble with those casinos that are big and serious enough and that can take security as a priority. Also, banks are not so different in the matter of data leaks, this is because it is human beings who are behind its operation as well and not some angels. If you know what many bank employees are doing all in the name of money, you will be amazed, so we should not exonerate them in this. Reputation, security and integrity matter here. Moreso, this is the reason why we should not just see a new casino and register there without thinking it through, why won't they leak your data?

Data leaks are not even peculiar to casinos or any formal or informal settings, banks and financial institutions' data could leak, hackers could infest them and we've seen a lot of government and private establishments where client/customer data got leaked. I've also done KYC with some formal financial establishments where afterwards I would be receiving strange calls and emails, so data leaks every time. But I am not saying this because I believe it is good but just not to exonerate the bank from it. As for the usage of one's data elsewhere, it is also not uncommon, but they do not necessarily need to lay hands on one's document before using one's profile and data all the same, they can doctor it, so risk is everywhere in this digital age.

Regardless, KYC completion is a standard and international procedure, and of course, it has its pros and cons, but no matter how we try to defend or reject it, we must obey in most climes.