Check this out, please:
http://hypecoins.com/coin-nobl-noblecoin.htmlThe difficulty calulations are wrong, but
you can compare all the recent coins (in means of difficulty rise and fall - hype? no-hype?): NOBL, LEAF, DGB, CASH, USDe, DOGE etc...
Typically, a "hype" fades rather quickly (
FOX), sometimes more slowly (
42).
Fast growing:
VTC,
TIPS,
NOBL's diff seems to rise gradually, in steps.
I think it's a good sign of "sustained development"
Anyway, more miners would be great!
I personally cannot stop thinking about facilitating CPU mining for all the fb/twitter afficionados ("likers" of our charities) with no computer knowledge at all...
Let's say, if 1000 of users "dedicate" 100% of their CPU power for 1 hour, for 1 common goal, could they raise some significant amount of Nobles to donate with or not? Who's going to do the math, assuming average home-grade CPUs (even laptops)?
Nice, gives a great overview!
Any idea of the logistics needed for the cpu idea?
When it comes to software, I think almost everything is technically ready: I'm dreaming about nice Windows installer with minerd included and preconfigured PLUS short Flash animation "How to start".
Atm I'm testing minerd, however, no "yay's", (on p2pool, yes lots of yays).
When it comes to a logistic for a charity, it's also simple I guess:
1. They announce a big action (mass-media included):
"Support you favourite charity with the power of your computer!
Dedicate 1 hour [a day?] of your computing power to do something significant!"
2. Then, 1000's of people download the "Noble Mining — Charity X Helping Kit".
When somebody downloads the package from the link, it should install automatically (in specified folder),
then a Wallet should run, and then minerd (CPU) mining should start (clickable option "Turn On/Off"), pointing to the first addres in the Wallet.
After some minutes, first Noble should start appearing on the balance, and then the user can have the pleasure to send them manually to a charity or to keep'em
In theory it should work, but maybe I'm totally wrong at some point?
