Author

Topic: ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod] - page 1044. (Read 170460 times)

hero member
Activity: 2156
Merit: 803
Top Crypto Casino
As per Google India's chance of winning this match is higher than England.
Hahaha

Does Google took account of Kohstrategy, suckshikharism, cutespins algorithm?

If not then result is going to be same as 2nd match. I would like if Virat wins the toss today and field first.

I do not know what algorithm they are using but the before match  ein probability score is pretty much accurate. I does changes after the match starts depending on the situation.

According to Google the win probability is  54 percent for India. It is not that big but I hope it becomes a reality.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1540
As per Google India's chance of winning this match is higher than England.
Hahaha

Does Google took account of Kohstrategy, suckshikharism, cutespins algorithm?

If not then result is going to be same as 2nd match. I would like if Virat wins the toss today and field first.
hero member
Activity: 2156
Merit: 803
Top Crypto Casino
But there is also some concern with the captain as well because he keeps repeating the spinners when they are going for too many runs, Bhuvi should come earlier when stokes targeting the spinners and also this match proves why the 6th bowling option is important.
The ODI series decider is today and England will be looking to win the match and series as they had a disappointing tour loosing the Test series and T20 series and if they could win this match they could win one series and the trouble with India is that the England batsman are playing well against the Indian spinners and they are struggling to control the run flow.

I expect Yuzvendra Chahal will be back in the team and Washington Sundar to replace Krunal Pandya.

Yes, this is the decider match and Kohli will not be intrested in taking any risk. After the poor performance of krunal and kuldeep in the last match the chance of chahal included in this match is very high. Kohli also needs to think his strategy for this match as some of the English batsmen are now playing good spin ball.

This will be a close match as being the decider. As per Google India's chance of winning this match is higher than England.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The ODI series decider is today and England will be looking to win the match and series as they had a disappointing tour loosing the Test series and T20 series and if they could win this match they could win one series and the trouble with India is that the England batsman are playing well against the Indian spinners and they are struggling to control the run flow.

I expect Yuzvendra Chahal will be back in the team and Washington Sundar to replace Krunal Pandya.

For England, there are two problematic spots. First one is their bowling in the depth overs (they conceded 127 runs during overs 41-50 in the second match, and a total of 115 runs during the first match). If they continue to concede 100 plus runs in the last 10 overs, then the chances of a win will remain low. The second factor is the weakness with their middle and lower order, although the inclusion of Liam Livingstone seems to have strengthened them.
hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 911
Have Fun )@@( Stay Safe
But there is also some concern with the captain as well because he keeps repeating the spinners when they are going for too many runs, Bhuvi should come earlier when stokes targeting the spinners and also this match proves why the 6th bowling option is important.
The ODI series decider is today and England will be looking to win the match and series as they had a disappointing tour loosing the Test series and T20 series and if they could win this match they could win one series and the trouble with India is that the England batsman are playing well against the Indian spinners and they are struggling to control the run flow.

I expect Yuzvendra Chahal will be back in the team and Washington Sundar to replace Krunal Pandya.
member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 38
~
No No obviously I was not judging him on the basis of this match only. I don't really agree with his role as a bowler. I mean he is useful sometimes but he is far away from being Jadeja to this team and secondly, he is slightly aged. He is kind of starting his career at age of 30 and won't be able to play for more than 4-5 years. If you give him 1-2 years to secure his place in the team he won't be able to serve the team for more than 2-3 years after that. So instead we should focus more on younger players who can serve the teams for 10 years or more. Sundar is just 21 years in age if you give him 2 years to get the best form he can be the next Kumble for India with much better batting for at least next 12 years.
Jadeja is a proven player and players like Krunal Pandya and Washington Sundar got the opportunities to play because of his injury. India is in a good spot as they are having a lot of talented players and age should not be a factor if they are performing well and they are rotating the players trying to find the best combinations and apart from a couple of players none of the spots are secure.
True but I think this would hurt India in the longer-term. I think cricket is a sport where you have to develop a player after giving him chances. You can see a lot of examples. Rohit Sharma didn't do any good to the team for the first 50 Matches but once the team developed him as an opener he is in a different tone. A very recent example is Rishab Pant who was consistently disappointing us but after the Australian tour has emerged as a Hero and would obviously go along for very long in the team. If we would just play based on the current best combination. We won't be able to make a lot of legendary players for the Country.
One bad game should never evaluate the full potential of a player s blaming one bowler isn't fair and also the pitch looks too flat and it was one of the matches where the maximum sixes scored of all time, so understand how good the pitch was to bat on. But there is also some concern with the captain as well because he keeps repeating the spinners when they are going for too many runs, Bhuvi should come earlier when stokes targeting the spinners and also this match proves why the 6th bowling option is important.
hero member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 619
~
No No obviously I was not judging him on the basis of this match only. I don't really agree with his role as a bowler. I mean he is useful sometimes but he is far away from being Jadeja to this team and secondly, he is slightly aged. He is kind of starting his career at age of 30 and won't be able to play for more than 4-5 years. If you give him 1-2 years to secure his place in the team he won't be able to serve the team for more than 2-3 years after that. So instead we should focus more on younger players who can serve the teams for 10 years or more. Sundar is just 21 years in age if you give him 2 years to get the best form he can be the next Kumble for India with much better batting for at least next 12 years.
Jadeja is a proven player and players like Krunal Pandya and Washington Sundar got the opportunities to play because of his injury. India is in a good spot as they are having a lot of talented players and age should not be a factor if they are performing well and they are rotating the players trying to find the best combinations and apart from a couple of players none of the spots are secure.
True but I think this would hurt India in the longer-term. I think cricket is a sport where you have to develop a player after giving him chances. You can see a lot of examples. Rohit Sharma didn't do any good to the team for the first 50 Matches but once the team developed him as an opener he is in a different tone. A very recent example is Rishab Pant who was consistently disappointing us but after the Australian tour has emerged as a Hero and would obviously go along for very long in the team. If we would just play based on the current best combination. We won't be able to make a lot of legendary players for the Country.
hero member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 535
~
No No obviously I was not judging him on the basis of this match only. I don't really agree with his role as a bowler. I mean he is useful sometimes but he is far away from being Jadeja to this team and secondly, he is slightly aged. He is kind of starting his career at age of 30 and won't be able to play for more than 4-5 years. If you give him 1-2 years to secure his place in the team he won't be able to serve the team for more than 2-3 years after that. So instead we should focus more on younger players who can serve the teams for 10 years or more. Sundar is just 21 years in age if you give him 2 years to get the best form he can be the next Kumble for India with much better batting for at least next 12 years.
Jadeja is a proven player and players like Krunal Pandya and Washington Sundar got the opportunities to play because of his injury. India is in a good spot as they are having a lot of talented players and age should not be a factor if they are performing well and they are rotating the players trying to find the best combinations and apart from a couple of players none of the spots are secure.
hero member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 619
I never liked Krunal too. If you just want a bowling All-Rounder on your side Washington Sundar is a much better option to have. Moreover, with lots of pace-bowling all-rounder, these days even going with two full-time spinners is an option. I feel Ashwin should come back in one day too, he never did anything wrong to be dropped off from the ODI or T20 Squad it was just the craze towards unorthodox bowlers.
Krunal Pandya played his second game and give him some time, today all the bowlers went for runs and you cannot blame him because of one game, he batted well in his debut match and i have seen him striking the ball well in IPL, so you have to give him the opportunity to show his skills. Even i have no idea why Ashwin is not in the shorter format as he is one of the best spinners India had and yet he is not included in the team.
No No obviously I was not judging him on the basis of this match only. I don't really agree with his role as a bowler. I mean he is useful sometimes but he is far away from being Jadeja to this team and secondly, he is slightly aged. He is kind of starting his career at age of 30 and won't be able to play for more than 4-5 years. If you give him 1-2 years to secure his place in the team he won't be able to serve the team for more than 2-3 years after that. So instead we should focus more on younger players who can serve the teams for 10 years or more. Sundar is just 21 years in age if you give him 2 years to get the best form he can be the next Kumble for India with much better batting for at least next 12 years.
member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 38
I still think India needs a spinner like Ashwin in ODI's. Chahal is good in T20's and Kuldeep in Tests as a backup but Ashwin and Jadeja combo in ODI's will be lethal.

For the 3rd ODI India must opt Chahal for sure ahead of Kuldeep and they really need a 6th bowler. Playing with 5 bowlers is not suited to India.


They had the 6th bowler in Hardik Pandya, but he couldn't bowl due to injury. And that was the reason why the Indian captain was overdependent on Krunal Pandya and Kuldeep Yadav, despite they being expensive. I don't know whether Chahal is the right choice here. He is a wicket taking bowler, but his economy rate is not good. Given the fact that the England batsmen are in good form, I won't be surprised if he goes for 7-8 runs per over.
I think Hardik Pandya recovered from that injury and he even bowled few days back in the T20 matches but not bowling on ODI is the real question. He may not be completely fit to bowl 10 overs but bowling 5 overs is enough for the 6th bowler.

And for the 3rd ODI, Chahal was in for sure in my opinion because there is no other better bowler for spin in the squad right now.
sr. member
Activity: 600
Merit: 256
I still think India needs a spinner like Ashwin in ODI's. Chahal is good in T20's and Kuldeep in Tests as a backup but Ashwin and Jadeja combo in ODI's will be lethal.

For the 3rd ODI India must opt Chahal for sure ahead of Kuldeep and they really need a 6th bowler. Playing with 5 bowlers is not suited to India.


They had the 6th bowler in Hardik Pandya, but he couldn't bowl due to injury. And that was the reason why the Indian captain was overdependent on Krunal Pandya and Kuldeep Yadav, despite they being expensive. I don't know whether Chahal is the right choice here. He is a wicket taking bowler, but his economy rate is not good. Given the fact that the England batsmen are in good form, I won't be surprised if he goes for 7-8 runs per over.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1150
For the 3rd ODI India must opt Chahal for sure ahead of Kuldeep and they really need a 6th bowler. Playing with 5 bowlers is not suited to India.
They already have the sixth bowler but not sure why they did not give him the ball for last 2 matches. Yes, I am just talking about Hardik Pandya who bowled all allocated 4 overs in T20 matches against England but never given a chance in ODIs; really surprising, might be any fitness reason. That Pune pitch must a typical Indian soil pitch where toss decides the match winner; do not ask me about the first ODI of this series where England threw away their wickets after Roy and Bairstow stand.

England were at 287/4 and a couple of additional wickets would have given advantage for India.
I don't think so. England were 287/4 at 36.1 overs which means even another 2 or 3 wickets may not produce any change in the final result by considering the batting depth of them until Reece Topley and for the scenarios of requiring another 50 runs from 14 overs.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1540
Kuldeep seems to losing his marbles and his confidence going down the drain, his place is not fixed in the any playing XI and he keep traveling with the squad. It would be good if he spend some time in domestic arena so that he can gets some match practice and wickets.

The carnage we witnessed today, it seemed like Indians were 50-70 runs short lol
Kuldeep Yadav is in and out of the team and even when he is in the squad he will not get all the matches and he is lacking match practice, he should be allowed to play domestic season to sharp his bowling but today the England batsman were brutal to every bowler as they were clearing the boundary with ease and unless you have two good bowlers there it is a difficult task to defend any score especially with a batting lineup like England.
Apart from that another concern is our openers are not taking game further in 1st power play when fielding restrictions are in place, they keep following conservative approach of -Dig in- and in doing so they are getting out. On the other hand England openers are providing excellent start for their team.




Entry fee
BTC : 0.0004 OR LTC: 0.1200

IPL 2021 Starts in

Pool address
BTC
Code:
3LPMCQ8G4Kdb5CmJcV4kFM4x79jqvEs6e2
LTC
Code:
MKr4jMUAsDfuJsh6aBMDK9wdzatYrZZ1zz

Deadline to Enter


Please start sending the entry fees and make a post with the payment transaction and the payment method you are going to use. I will list the participants in the next post as a draft.


Again, there will be no participants accepted after the deadline.

newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 1
I still think India needs a spinner like Ashwin in ODI's. Chahal is good in T20's and Kuldeep in Tests as a backup but Ashwin and Jadeja combo in ODI's will be lethal.

For the 3rd ODI India must opt Chahal for sure ahead of Kuldeep and they really need a 6th bowler. Playing with 5 bowlers is not suited to India.
hero member
Activity: 2156
Merit: 803
Top Crypto Casino
Kohli's captaincy once again failed. He should have continued with two of his best bowlers (Prasidh Krishna and Bhuvneshwar Kumar), after they got 3 English batsmen out in quick succession. But he immediately went for the spin duo of Krunal Pandya and Kuldeep Yadav, and it released all the tension that was built up. England were at 287/4 and a couple of additional wickets would have given advantage for India. But the stupid decision from Kohli to take the pacers off the attack cost India a win.

You learn from your mistakes kohli and this mistake might result in India losing the series. Still it was good game and was really a close one. Kohli's decision to introduce two spinner was to slow the run rate as English batsmen are not good with the spinners but it backfired. I hope he rethinks his strategy in the next match.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Kohli's captaincy once again failed. He should have continued with two of his best bowlers (Prasidh Krishna and Bhuvneshwar Kumar), after they got 3 English batsmen out in quick succession. But he immediately went for the spin duo of Krunal Pandya and Kuldeep Yadav, and it released all the tension that was built up. England were at 287/4 and a couple of additional wickets would have given advantage for India. But the stupid decision from Kohli to take the pacers off the attack cost India a win.
hero member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 535
I never liked Krunal too. If you just want a bowling All-Rounder on your side Washington Sundar is a much better option to have. Moreover, with lots of pace-bowling all-rounder, these days even going with two full-time spinners is an option. I feel Ashwin should come back in one day too, he never did anything wrong to be dropped off from the ODI or T20 Squad it was just the craze towards unorthodox bowlers.
Krunal Pandya played his second game and give him some time, today all the bowlers went for runs and you cannot blame him because of one game, he batted well in his debut match and i have seen him striking the ball well in IPL, so you have to give him the opportunity to show his skills. Even i have no idea why Ashwin is not in the shorter format as he is one of the best spinners India had and yet he is not included in the team.
hero member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 619
Placed a bet on England today with @2.68 odds  Lips sealed So cheering for Buttler & co  Grin

Okayish start for England if we go by their own standard but they didn't lose any wickets so its a positive sign, i feel dirty but want to see off day for Kuldeep again and don't want to see another 2 wickets in an over spell from Lord Thakur.  Roll Eyes
Once again the top order is striking well and the huge total looks very reachable at this time. Wondering no bowler managed to take any wicket at the half way mark and the only one wicket came from run out from hitman.

I am also having belief on the LORD THAKUR! Can he do it one more time? Haha... Grin
The inexperience was showing Pretty clearly in India's bowling today. One average match for Bhuvi and the whole bowling attack couldn't find their momentum. Especially Krunal he was hilarious in his bowling I have to say. India over relied on their spinners who were good for nothing today. If England would have batted first today they would have scored 400 easily.
Also the pitch looks too flat so stokes and Bairstow took advantage of spinners. India again missing the 6th bowling option which costed them too much in my opinion. I don't know what is the reason why Hardik is not bowling in the ODI matches which could become a game changer if he do it.

We have to appriciate stokes for taking the match away from India but he was unlucky to miss the century by one run who got out for Bhuvi short ball.
I Think India's problem is a lot of rotation these days. If a player has to stay at the bench after a good series he would often lose his game and that momentum he had earlier this is what is happening with Indian Team now.
One average match for Bhuvi and the whole bowling attack couldn't find their momentum. Especially Krunal he was hilarious in his bowling I have to say. India over relied on their spinners who were good for nothing today.
I agree. They made a big total like 337 look easy primarily thanks to Stokes and Bairstow. I never liked Krunal's bowling though he bats well now and then and Kuldeep hasn't improved at all.
snip~
I never liked Krunal too. If you just want a bowling All-Rounder on your side Washington Sundar is a much better option to have. Moreover, with lots of pace-bowling all-rounder, these days even going with two full-time spinners is an option. I feel Ashwin should come back in one day too, he never did anything wrong to be dropped off from the ODI or T20 Squad it was just the craze towards unorthodox bowlers.
hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 911
Have Fun )@@( Stay Safe
Kuldeep seems to losing his marbles and his confidence going down the drain, his place is not fixed in the any playing XI and he keep traveling with the squad. It would be good if he spend some time in domestic arena so that he can gets some match practice and wickets.

The carnage we witnessed today, it seemed like Indians were 50-70 runs short lol
Kuldeep Yadav is in and out of the team and even when he is in the squad he will not get all the matches and he is lacking match practice, he should be allowed to play domestic season to sharp his bowling but today the England batsman were brutal to every bowler as they were clearing the boundary with ease and unless you have two good bowlers there it is a difficult task to defend any score especially with a batting lineup like England.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1540
One average match for Bhuvi and the whole bowling attack couldn't find their momentum. Especially Krunal he was hilarious in his bowling I have to say. India over relied on their spinners who were good for nothing today.
I agree. They made a big total like 337 look easy primarily thanks to Stokes and Bairstow. I never liked Krunal's bowling though he bats well now and then and Kuldeep hasn't improved at all.

Kuldeep seems to losing his marbles and his confidence going down the drain, his place is not fixed in the any playing XI and he keep traveling with the squad. It would be good if he spend some time in domestic arena so that he can gets some match practice and wickets.

The carnage we witnessed today, it seemed like Indians were 50-70 runs short lol
Jump to: