ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod] - page 1132.

mersal

member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 38

Quote from: JSRAW on February 07, 2020, 02:02:02 AM

Only difference is Kiwis used 6th bowling option and Indians didn't. They had Kedar Jadhav as part-timer bowler but Virat didn't use him.

Part time bowlers are often effective in partnership breaking.Did Virat missed that fact? Shocked

Or he thought even their best can't do that why trying a part timer,it might worse the game much!Like what happened when Virat himself decided to bowl in an IPL. Cheesy

Haunebu

hero member

Activity: 3290

Merit: 984

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

Quote from: JSRAW on February 07, 2020, 02:51:54 AM

His economy rate is under 6 so i would say he was good enough to bowl at-least 2 overs. there are always chances that he gets the beating but when every bowler in team leaking runs then there is no harm to try part-timer, that's the real reason of keeping 6th bowling option in playing XI for starter.

This isn't a bad idea to be honest. Kedhar Jadhav is an underrated player who MSD backed many times in the past even though he plays slowly primarily due to this all rounder skills. He is a better option when compared to Kuldeep at present.

Hardik Pandya is another excellent option though I am not sure when he will properly recover. These 2 would prove to be great all rounders when compared to Dube and Kuldeep.

pakhitheboss

hero member

Activity: 2156

Merit: 803

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: Vishnu.Reang on February 07, 2020, 03:18:27 AM

Quote from: JSRAW on February 07, 2020, 02:51:54 AM

^^ Why not?

His economy rate is under 6 so i would say he was good enough to bowl at-least 2 overs. there are always chances that he gets the beating but when every bowler in team leaking runs then there is no harm to try part-timer, that's the real reason of keeping 6th bowling option in playing XI for starter.

Well.. there is nothing wrong in trying either him or some of the other part time bowlers for a couple of overs. But Kohli probably didn't wanted to take the risk. It was a very close match and a big over (in case the Kiwis can score 20 runs from it) can change the course of the match. Anyway, we don't know what could have happened if Kedar was given an opportunity to bowl.

India can add another bowler to the team line up. I do not think they will change the batting order in the next match.jadeja can be replaced by kedar jadav. We need to wait till tomorrow to see if there are any changes in bowling.

pakhitheboss

hero member

Activity: 2156

Merit: 803

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: erikalui on February 07, 2020, 03:27:20 AM

Why was India fined for slow over rate? They lost 80% of their fee and previous lost 40% and 20%. Is the fine only paid by the captain or the entire team?

It was because of the slow over rate.

Quote

After losing 2 back-to-back matches against NZ (one last year and this year), I am feeling that it's history repeating. Willaimson will be back in the third ODI while their team of batsmen is similar to their WC squad. India most likely will go with the same order but our opening batsmen are not good enough to sustain till the 10th over.

India needs someone like Rohit Sharma to open , unfortunately we do not have anyone. I also doubt they will change the order.

erikalui

legendary

Activity: 2632

Merit: 1094

Why was India fined for slow over rate? They lost 80% of their fee and previous lost 40% and 20%. Is the fine only paid by the captain or the entire team?

After losing 2 back-to-back matches against NZ (one last year and this year), I am feeling that it's history repeating. Willaimson will be back in the third ODI while their team of batsmen is similar to their WC squad. India most likely will go with the same order but our opening batsmen are not good enough to sustain till the 10th over.

Vishnu.Reang

sr. member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 453

Quote from: JSRAW on February 07, 2020, 02:51:54 AM

^^ Why not?

His economy rate is under 6 so i would say he was good enough to bowl at-least 2 overs. there are always chances that he gets the beating but when every bowler in team leaking runs then there is no harm to try part-timer, that's the real reason of keeping 6th bowling option in playing XI for starter.

Well.. there is nothing wrong in trying either him or some of the other part time bowlers for a couple of overs. But Kohli probably didn't wanted to take the risk. It was a very close match and a big over (in case the Kiwis can score 20 runs from it) can change the course of the match. Anyway, we don't know what could have happened if Kedar was given an opportunity to bowl.

JSRAW

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1540

^^ Why not?

His economy rate is under 6 so i would say he was good enough to bowl at-least 2 overs. there are always chances that he gets the beating but when every bowler in team leaking runs then there is no harm to try part-timer, that's the real reason of keeping 6th bowling option in playing XI for starter.

Vishnu.Reang

sr. member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 453

Quote from: JSRAW on February 07, 2020, 02:02:02 AM

Well its hard to be a bowler when everything going against them. just look at bowling card of both teams and see who bowled good in the last game?
695 runs scored in just 98.1 overs and only 10 wickets went down that day, so its not a fault of any single bowler. We should cut them some slack for one game, it happens sometimes. Give Kiwis batsmen credit for chase down mammoth target and move on to next game.

Only difference is Kiwis used 6th bowling option and Indians didn't. They had Kedar Jadhav as part-timer bowler but Virat didn't use him.

Do you really think that Kedar Jadhav could have made any difference? I have watched him bowling and my opinion is that he doesn't have any variations with him. In a match where Kuldeep Yadav went for almost 9 runs per over, this guy could have got smashed all around the park. And additionally, he hasn't bowled much during the past two-three years in international cricket.

JSRAW

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1540

Well its hard to be a bowler when everything going against them. just look at bowling card of both teams and see who bowled good in the last game?
695 runs scored in just 98.1 overs and only 10 wickets went down that day, so its not a fault of any single bowler. We should cut them some slack for one game, it happens sometimes. Give Kiwis batsmen credit for chase down mammoth target and move on to next game.

Only difference is Kiwis used 6th bowling option and Indians didn't. They had Kedar Jadhav as part-timer bowler but Virat didn't use him.

mersal

member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 38

Quote from: Vishnu.Reang on February 07, 2020, 12:01:53 AM

Quote from: mersal on February 06, 2020, 11:54:24 PM

Sometimes we can't win a game even after we played our better because opponents might played exceptionally well that is just normal in cricket.Now India have to tighten up their bowling line up the pitch will not be safe for 50 overs as which happen in 20 over format so there is bit more work for the selectors to find right combination for long format again.Tomorrow 2nd ODI will be played hope there will be some revenge from team India.

You can expect even a team such as Afghanistan or Bangladesh to defend a total of close to 350. The fact that Indians were unable to do so, even with the presence of Mohammad Shami and Jasprit Bumrah means that they need to rework on their bowling strategies. Bowlers such as Shardul Thakur and Kuldeep Yadav went for more than 8 runs per over during the last match.

In 2006,best team of cricket history Australia failed to defend a total of 430+ against South Africa so it means best team cannot win all the matches.

Total is not a matter to be honest,how much effort they are giving to defend matches will get you win on any match.

onrise

sr. member

Activity: 1512

Merit: 316

Quote from: pakhitheboss on February 06, 2020, 11:00:39 PM

Quote from: BitSat19 on February 06, 2020, 03:37:09 PM

Quote from: JohnBitCo on February 06, 2020, 01:55:03 PM

Quote from: onrise on February 06, 2020, 01:03:48 PM

In 2nd semifinal of U19 World Cup between NZ and Bangladesh, Bangladesh won it very easily chasing a score of 212 , they reached it in 44.1 balls and 6 wickets to spare . Now on Sunday we have a World Cup final between India and Bangladesh and would be a real contest to watch . India might just a little stronger then Bangladesh but on that day being a final pressure would be totally different .

I always though New Zealand were a better team than the Bangladesh and I also lot a bet today. Cry

Bangladesh play very well and never let Newzealand settled in the match. Would they be able to keep the same performance level in the finals. I doubt on this. Final of a Would cup is a pressure and India is much better & experienced team. But if you bet on Bangladesh, you will get better odds but the risk will be high.

I am not expecting any resistance from Bangladesh as India is much superior in all fields they will win this easily but if Bangladesh have good day then may be we will able to have some good match but until now for me its all about India as all boys giving very good performance in field bowling and batting this is perfect winning combination.

Cricket is unpredictable. Undoubtedly India is better than Bangladesh but things can change on the field. I am confident that India will win as of now they have performed like true professionals.

So far India has shown a good game of cricket in all departments as compared to Bangladesh but suddenly when it is a Final of world cup the situation automatically changes as their would be more pressure on India then Bangladesh to lift the cup . So in such cases the wickets fall quickly or suddenly momentum shifts. But I expect a good contest between both teams and it’s a worthy final to watch out for on coming Sunday .

Vishnu.Reang

sr. member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 453

Quote from: mersal on February 06, 2020, 11:54:24 PM

Sometimes we can't win a game even after we played our better because opponents might played exceptionally well that is just normal in cricket.Now India have to tighten up their bowling line up the pitch will not be safe for 50 overs as which happen in 20 over format so there is bit more work for the selectors to find right combination for long format again.Tomorrow 2nd ODI will be played hope there will be some revenge from team India.

You can expect even a team such as Afghanistan or Bangladesh to defend a total of close to 350. The fact that Indians were unable to do so, even with the presence of Mohammad Shami and Jasprit Bumrah means that they need to rework on their bowling strategies. Bowlers such as Shardul Thakur and Kuldeep Yadav went for more than 8 runs per over during the last match.

mersal

member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 38

Quote from: fullhdpixel on February 06, 2020, 03:17:16 PM

Quote from: erikalui on February 06, 2020, 05:31:05 AM

With inexperienced opening batsmen too, they managed 347 so 400 is not a bad target but Rohit not being there matters a lot. Glad to see dube out and feel Jadhav deserves a position top the order as he is a good batsmen.

Except few core players, there has been lots of changes in India teams since their last visit to New Zealand just 12 months back. But, India managed to whitewash in T20 (with 2 surprising tie finishes and deserving super-over wins) but ODI needs long planning and if India would had batted 2nd on first ODI, I guess India might have chased even 400+ totals even with their debutant openers.

Sometimes we can't win a game even after we played our better because opponents might played exceptionally well that is just normal in cricket.Now India have to tighten up their bowling line up the pitch will not be safe for 50 overs as which happen in 20 over format so there is bit more work for the selectors to find right combination for long format again.Tomorrow 2nd ODI will be played hope there will be some revenge from team India.

pakhitheboss

hero member

Activity: 2156

Merit: 803

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: BitSat19 on February 06, 2020, 03:37:09 PM

Quote from: JohnBitCo on February 06, 2020, 01:55:03 PM

Quote from: onrise on February 06, 2020, 01:03:48 PM

In 2nd semifinal of U19 World Cup between NZ and Bangladesh, Bangladesh won it very easily chasing a score of 212 , they reached it in 44.1 balls and 6 wickets to spare . Now on Sunday we have a World Cup final between India and Bangladesh and would be a real contest to watch . India might just a little stronger then Bangladesh but on that day being a final pressure would be totally different .

I always though New Zealand were a better team than the Bangladesh and I also lot a bet today. Cry

Bangladesh play very well and never let Newzealand settled in the match. Would they be able to keep the same performance level in the finals. I doubt on this. Final of a Would cup is a pressure and India is much better & experienced team. But if you bet on Bangladesh, you will get better odds but the risk will be high.

I am not expecting any resistance from Bangladesh as India is much superior in all fields they will win this easily but if Bangladesh have good day then may be we will able to have some good match but until now for me its all about India as all boys giving very good performance in field bowling and batting this is perfect winning combination.

Cricket is unpredictable. Undoubtedly India is better than Bangladesh but things can change on the field. I am confident that India will win as of now they have performed like true professionals.

BitSat19

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 62

Quote from: JohnBitCo on February 06, 2020, 01:55:03 PM

Quote from: onrise on February 06, 2020, 01:03:48 PM

In 2nd semifinal of U19 World Cup between NZ and Bangladesh, Bangladesh won it very easily chasing a score of 212 , they reached it in 44.1 balls and 6 wickets to spare . Now on Sunday we have a World Cup final between India and Bangladesh and would be a real contest to watch . India might just a little stronger then Bangladesh but on that day being a final pressure would be totally different .

I always though New Zealand were a better team than the Bangladesh and I also lot a bet today. Cry

Bangladesh play very well and never let Newzealand settled in the match. Would they be able to keep the same performance level in the finals. I doubt on this. Final of a Would cup is a pressure and India is much better & experienced team. But if you bet on Bangladesh, you will get better odds but the risk will be high.

I am not expecting any resistance from Bangladesh as India is much superior in all fields they will win this easily but if Bangladesh have good day then may be we will able to have some good match but until now for me its all about India as all boys giving very good performance in field bowling and batting this is perfect winning combination.

fullhdpixel

hero member

Activity: 2828

Merit: 611

Quote from: onrise on February 06, 2020, 01:03:48 PM

Now on Sunday we have a World Cup final between India and Bangladesh and would be a real contest to watch . India might just a little stronger then Bangladesh but on that day being a final pressure would be totally different .

Really going to be a good contest. I checked few gambling houses but not offering this match to bet with. If you have any sportsbook listing this U19 world cup final match, please share here. I guess India must be the clear favorites yet Bengal tigers may surprise them. I guess it will not be an easy pick even I have been watch the whole tournament closely.

Quote from: erikalui on February 06, 2020, 05:31:05 AM

With inexperienced opening batsmen too, they managed 347 so 400 is not a bad target but Rohit not being there matters a lot. Glad to see dube out and feel Jadhav deserves a position top the order as he is a good batsmen.

Except few core players, there has been lots of changes in India teams since their last visit to New Zealand just 12 months back. But, India managed to whitewash in T20 (with 2 surprising tie finishes and deserving super-over wins) but ODI needs long planning and if India would had batted 2nd on first ODI, I guess India might have chased even 400+ totals even with their debutant openers.

JohnBitCo

sr. member

Activity: 2030

Merit: 356

Quote from: onrise on February 06, 2020, 01:03:48 PM

In 2nd semifinal of U19 World Cup between NZ and Bangladesh, Bangladesh won it very easily chasing a score of 212 , they reached it in 44.1 balls and 6 wickets to spare . Now on Sunday we have a World Cup final between India and Bangladesh and would be a real contest to watch . India might just a little stronger then Bangladesh but on that day being a final pressure would be totally different .

I always though New Zealand were a better team than the Bangladesh and I also lot a bet today. Cry

Bangladesh play very well and never let Newzealand settled in the match. Would they be able to keep the same performance level in the finals. I doubt on this. Final of a Would cup is a pressure and India is much better & experienced team. But if you bet on Bangladesh, you will get better odds but the risk will be high.

onrise

sr. member

Activity: 1512

Merit: 316

In 2nd semifinal of U19 World Cup between NZ and Bangladesh, Bangladesh won it very easily chasing a score of 212 , they reached it in 44.1 balls and 6 wickets to spare . Now on Sunday we have a World Cup final between India and Bangladesh and would be a real contest to watch . India might just a little stronger then Bangladesh but on that day being a final pressure would be totally different .

Vishnu.Reang

sr. member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 453

Quote from: Indymoney on February 06, 2020, 10:14:27 AM

Quote from: Vishnu.Reang on February 06, 2020, 09:39:05 AM

Quote from: Tipstar on February 06, 2020, 09:02:22 AM

Surely New Zealand had the benefit of batting second and New Zealand fields are really smaller compared to that in India so it were a batsmen dominated match. Though we can't say that was the only reason for the Indian team to lose, that was one of the reasons. New Zealand is one of the most stable ODI team at current time, just below India in current ratings.

You are ignoring several factors here. New Zealand was without their best players. They were without their best batsman (Kane Williamson) and their best bowlers (Trent Boult, Matt Henry and Lockie Ferguson). Some of their batsmen were out of form (such as Ross Taylor, who regained his form in the first ODI). New Zealand played as a team to win the match, despite several setbacks.

New Zealand is historical a fighting team they have too many ups and downs but their fighting ability is never been end they fight till end now recently they are on top after some long time as Pakistan thrash them two time in World Cup 92 after this now they are again very good side to watch but injury problems and players personal issues also give them some serious set backs.

I haven't noticed any superhuman performance from the New Zealand team in the recent years. They have performed above average, and I will admit that. At the same time, other teams outside the big 3, such as South Africa, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh have been unable to stop the decline in their respective performances. So in a relative sense, New Zealand can be termed as a rising cricket force.

A part of their recent success should be attributed to the presence of several South Africa born players, including BJ Watling, Neil Wagner, Colin Munro and Colin de Grandhomme. In addition to these players, Ross Taylor is part-Samoan and Ish Sodhi was born in India. And these additions have neutralized the loss of Ben Stokes to England.

Indymoney

full member

Activity: 896

Merit: 236

Quote from: Vishnu.Reang on February 06, 2020, 09:39:05 AM

Quote from: Tipstar on February 06, 2020, 09:02:22 AM

Surely New Zealand had the benefit of batting second and New Zealand fields are really smaller compared to that in India so it were a batsmen dominated match. Though we can't say that was the only reason for the Indian team to lose, that was one of the reasons. New Zealand is one of the most stable ODI team at current time, just below India in current ratings.

You are ignoring several factors here. New Zealand was without their best players. They were without their best batsman (Kane Williamson) and their best bowlers (Trent Boult, Matt Henry and Lockie Ferguson). Some of their batsmen were out of form (such as Ross Taylor, who regained his form in the first ODI). New Zealand played as a team to win the match, despite several setbacks.

New Zealand is historical a fighting team they have too many ups and downs but their fighting ability is never been end they fight till end now recently they are on top after some long time as Pakistan thrash them two time in World Cup 92 after this now they are again very good side to watch but injury problems and players personal issues also give them some serious set backs.

Topic: ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod] - page 1132. (Read 170099 times)