Just kidding
The upgrade actually was very smooth. Love the new libusb support. Thanks for your hard work, guys! 
Topic: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.11.0 - page 359. (Read 5806015 times)
April 27, 2013, 03:34:51 PM
I just upgraded to 3.0.1 (git) from 2.10.4 and my hashrate dropped by 10%! You broke my GPU?
Just kidding The upgrade actually was very smooth. Love the new libusb support. Thanks for your hard work, guys!
Just kidding
The upgrade actually was very smooth. Love the new libusb support. Thanks for your hard work, guys! 
April 27, 2013, 02:27:21 PM
Hi ckolivas, I just sent you a small change proposal in git to change the way api reports mhs. Can you please review it and include it in the next release? thanks!
April 27, 2013, 12:06:27 PM
Ahhh so none of the Above ..i should have recalled the "true" statement from trying to add "auto-gpu" : true,.... without the True. Duh.
One rig is over "u=22" the rest are at about u= 12 so will try the upped Diff .
Thanks.
One rig is over "u=22" the rest are at about u= 12 so will try the upped Diff .
Thanks.
April 27, 2013, 11:48:27 AM
HI,
Problem ...after adding a few more rigs , my modem is crashing nearly every night. From The readme I see this...
--net-delay Impose small delays in networking to not overload slow routers
How do I implement this in the .config file...Multi Choice see if I guess Correct. :')
1) "net-delay" : , (i pick this one...no argument and comma to go to next line?...lol)
2) "--net-delay" : ,
3) "net-delay"
4)"net-delay" : 10 ,
I do try to read and try things myself' but this is one of those things that could take a long time to see if actually working. If none of the above are correct and explanation as to what is correct and why would really help this noob.
I know the --net-delay is a command line switch and is slightly changed for the .config file but can it also be used with the ..(--).
And after all of that , will this help with a modem shutting down or do I need to up Diff \ shares for my Pool?
Problem ...after adding a few more rigs , my modem is crashing nearly every night. From The readme I see this...
Quote
--net-delay Impose small delays in networking to not overload slow routers
How do I implement this in the .config file...Multi Choice see if I guess Correct. :')
1) "net-delay" : , (i pick this one...no argument and comma to go to next line?...lol)
2) "--net-delay" : ,
3) "net-delay"
4)"net-delay" : 10 ,
I do try to read and try things myself' but this is one of those things that could take a long time to see if actually working. If none of the above are correct and explanation as to what is correct and why would really help this noob.
I know the --net-delay is a command line switch and is slightly changed for the .config file but can it also be used with the ..(--).
And after all of that , will this help with a modem shutting down or do I need to up Diff \ shares for my Pool?
Code:
"net-delay" : true,
If your U value is higher than 20, I'd recommend increasing your share difficulty.
April 27, 2013, 11:44:57 AM
HI,
Problem ...after adding a few more rigs , my modem is crashing nearly every night. From The readme I see this...
--net-delay Impose small delays in networking to not overload slow routers
How do I implement this in the .config file...Multi Choice see if I guess Correct. :')
1) "net-delay" : , (i pick this one...no argument and comma to go to next line?...lol)
2) "--net-delay" : ,
3) "net-delay"
4)"net-delay" : 10 ,
I do try to read and try things myself' but this is one of those things that could take a long time to see if actually working. If none of the above are correct and explanation as to what is correct and why would really help this noob.
I know the --net-delay is a command line switch and is slightly changed for the .config file but can it also be used with the ..(--).
And after all of that , will this help with a modem shutting down or do I need to up Diff \ shares for my Pool?
Problem ...after adding a few more rigs , my modem is crashing nearly every night. From The readme I see this...
Quote
--net-delay Impose small delays in networking to not overload slow routers
How do I implement this in the .config file...Multi Choice see if I guess Correct. :')
1) "net-delay" : , (i pick this one...no argument and comma to go to next line?...lol)
2) "--net-delay" : ,
3) "net-delay"
4)"net-delay" : 10 ,
I do try to read and try things myself' but this is one of those things that could take a long time to see if actually working. If none of the above are correct and explanation as to what is correct and why would really help this noob.
I know the --net-delay is a command line switch and is slightly changed for the .config file but can it also be used with the ..(--).
And after all of that , will this help with a modem shutting down or do I need to up Diff \ shares for my Pool?
April 27, 2013, 08:37:01 AM
Just upgraded to ubuntu 13.04 - cgminer didn't like it:
cgminer/cgminer: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
cgminer/cgminer: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I believe you can quickly fix this by running ln -s /usr/lib/libudev
April 27, 2013, 06:05:23 AM
Just upgraded to ubuntu 13.04 - cgminer didn't like it:
cgminer/cgminer: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Current cgminer is built on 12.10 equivalent ... cgminer/cgminer: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
April 27, 2013, 05:33:10 AM
Just upgraded to ubuntu 13.04 - cgminer didn't like it:
cgminer/cgminer: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
cgminer/cgminer: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
April 27, 2013, 12:28:43 AM
Hi
I am trying to test cgminer with a 3650D (included in A6 CPUs). I am using Ubuntu 12.04
If I do:
I get:
Apparently, I can compile cgminer with no problems, but when I do:
I get:
Where could I start to troubleshot this?
I am trying to test cgminer with a 3650D (included in A6 CPUs). I am using Ubuntu 12.04
If I do:
Code:
sudo aticonfig --adapter=all --odgt
I get:
Code:
Adapter 0 - AMD Radeon HD 6530D
Sensor 0: Temperature - 13.00 C
Sensor 0: Temperature - 13.00 C
Apparently, I can compile cgminer with no problems, but when I do:
Code:
cgminer -n
I get:
Code:
[2013-04-27 00:20:39] CL Platform 0 vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
[2013-04-27 00:20:39] CL Platform 0 name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
[2013-04-27 00:20:39] CL Platform 0 version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1113.2)
[2013-04-27 00:20:39] Error -1: Getting Device IDs (num)
[2013-04-27 00:20:39] clDevicesNum returned error, no GPUs usable
[2013-04-27 00:20:39] 0 GPU devices max detected
[2013-04-27 00:20:39] CL Platform 0 name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
[2013-04-27 00:20:39] CL Platform 0 version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1113.2)
[2013-04-27 00:20:39] Error -1: Getting Device IDs (num)
[2013-04-27 00:20:39] clDevicesNum returned error, no GPUs usable
[2013-04-27 00:20:39] 0 GPU devices max detected
Where could I start to troubleshot this?
April 26, 2013, 06:54:05 PM
... and anyone interested
There's a change from the spec with the ZOX command
The reply from getting the work result queue (ZOX) has an extra line (vs the spec) inserted first at the top.
It is: "INPROCESS:1" (1 or 0)
1 means it is currently hashing on work
0 means it isn't
No idea why they added that.
We certainly don't need it
There's a change from the spec with the ZOX command
The reply from getting the work result queue (ZOX) has an extra line (vs the spec) inserted first at the top.
It is: "INPROCESS:1
1 means it is currently hashing on work
0 means it isn't
No idea why they added that.
We certainly don't need it
Good Job to the Devs.....knew you guys would be all over this...Thanks
April 26, 2013, 03:33:07 PM
last version give me error with p2pool, like lost connection to server
April 26, 2013, 02:11:29 PM
Has anyone tested these drivers on 5850's with cgminer using scrypt?
Headsup for 5k series users.
Ok. I've expressed uninstalled 13.2 Beta 7, ran driver sweeper in safe mode, rebooted back into safe mode, did a registry clean with registry clean expert, rebooted. I've installed 13.5 Beta 2 on my Windows7 x64 machine. I am guessing with supplied SDK, as GPU-z showed I have opencl enabled.
Mining on cgminer 3.0.1-windows scrypt.
I don't see any increase nor decrease in hash rate for litecoin mining with my two 5850's on 13.5 Beta 2 with cgminer 3.0.1-Windows scrypt.
So far, so good. This is good news for me so far, prior, anything over past 13.2 beta 7 drivers, I had sensor detect problems with hwinfo64, and overclock problems, these problems are solved with this latest AMD driver I am using now, also this driver is good for 7k series card I am guessing, so, if and when I get a 7950, I should have no problems, hopefully.
~Cheers
April 26, 2013, 01:24:35 PM
Quote
Q: Which AMD driver is the best?
A: Unfortunately AMD has a history of having quite a few releases with issues
when it comes to mining, either in terms of breaking mining, increasing CPU
usage or very low hashrates. Only experimentation can tell you for sure, but
some good releases were 11.6, 11.12, 12.4 and 12.8. Note that older cards may
not work with the newer drivers.
A: Unfortunately AMD has a history of having quite a few releases with issues
when it comes to mining, either in terms of breaking mining, increasing CPU
usage or very low hashrates. Only experimentation can tell you for sure, but
some good releases were 11.6, 11.12, 12.4 and 12.8. Note that older cards may
not work with the newer drivers.
April 26, 2013, 01:13:08 PM
it's working fine with 13.1.
I found your solution! 
April 26, 2013, 12:41:41 PM
I couldn't get it working with 13.4 either, but it's working fine with 13.1.
April 26, 2013, 12:04:11 PM
... 13.5 beta 2 AMD drivers ...
Try something more reliable?
Try something more reliable?
April 26, 2013, 11:23:13 AM
Can you help me figure out what is wrong when I try to use 3.0.1? It is specific to this new version because 2.11.4 is still working. I am on Windows 7 x64 with all the updates and I have a 6970 in it with the 13.5 beta 2 AMD drivers.
Thank you!
Code:
cgminer.exe caused an Access Violation at location 004312fa in module cgminer.exe Reading from location 052d51ce.
Registers:
eax=00000000 ebx=0028f03c ecx=00000000 edx=00000000 esi=0200a8c8 edi=0206266a
eip=771b15de esp=0028f028 ebp=0028f558 iopl=0 nv up ei pl zr na po nc
cs=0023 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00000246
Call stack:
771B15DE ntdll.dll:771B15DE ZwRaiseException
0043341B cgminer.exe:0043341B
00430291 cgminer.exe:00430291
00418D16 cgminer.exe:00418D16
004010B9 cgminer.exe:004010B9 __mingw_CRTStartup crt1.c:244
00401284 cgminer.exe:00401284 WinMainCRTStartup crt1.c:274
76B333AA kernel32.dll:76B333AA BaseThreadInitThunk
771C9EF2 ntdll.dll:771C9EF2 RtlInitializeExceptionChain
771C9EC5 ntdll.dll:771C9EC5 RtlInitializeExceptionChain
Thank you!
April 26, 2013, 10:43:43 AM
Hi,
is there a different between the cminer.exe from the downloadpage and one selfcompiled on Windows?
The downloaded .exe is ~500 K and the selfcompiled ~320K ?
That would explain why I'm not able to push my 7970 above 600 with this release.is there a different between the cminer.exe from the downloadpage and one selfcompiled on Windows?
The downloaded .exe is ~500 K and the selfcompiled ~320K ?
April 26, 2013, 10:40:53 AM
Hi,
is there a different between the cminer.exe from the downloadpage and one selfcompiled on Windows?
The downloaded .exe is ~500 K and the selfcompiled ~320K ?
That would explain why I'm not able to push my 7970 above 600 with this release. is there a different between the cminer.exe from the downloadpage and one selfcompiled on Windows?
The downloaded .exe is ~500 K and the selfcompiled ~320K ?
April 26, 2013, 09:06:34 AM
Hi,
is there a different between the cminer.exe from the downloadpage and one selfcompiled on Windows?
The downloaded .exe is ~500 K and the selfcompiled ~320K ?
is there a different between the cminer.exe from the downloadpage and one selfcompiled on Windows?
The downloaded .exe is ~500 K and the selfcompiled ~320K ?
Jump to: