Topic: Official Thread: AMT - page 53. (Read 678353 times)

rofl... good luck with that one. do you know how many times AMT has literally told me the check was "in the mail"? These guys are conning you. they will string you along until they can finally assemble some shoddy miner with chinese PSU's and faulty chips that will need to be OC'ed to hit advertised speeds and subsequently burn up. DON'T FALL FOR THE RUSE MAN. not once on these boards has AMT ever told the truth.

I challenge you to find me just 1 update or delivery date that was true. this goes or you too zipkin... name one instance you have told the truth.

some amt stickers lol.to be fair i cant think what else the kit would need

1TH (power saver) to 1.1TH (Nominal) to 1.3TH (Turbo)

send my refund too. i do not want anything from you.

No one wants your outdated, overpriced miners, or your box O parts - build it yourself Miner or any of your excellent customer service.  We just would like our money back.  The money you have spent on the junk you cant assemble right and are asking your customers to do it for you.  IF THERE are any miners in existence anyway.  Not just one or two for you pretty pictures.

Alright, please write to [email protected] and someone will get back to you. Thanks.

You guys are making mountains out of hills again. We offered the kit option for 2 reasons alone.

1. We noticed 3 out of 4 clients are removing their miners from the case anyway, either to look at it and or to give it better airflow or what ever. We know that because they are asking questions about reversing the fans, switching the modules, etc etc.

2. Its a faster build and shipment process. It gets people miners faster and gets our shipments over with, and maybe these 18 hour days can turn into 12 hour days.

That's all. Please stop making mountains out of hills.

We would like to get a few more opinions we'd like to get from you guys about what to throw in the kit.

I do not want a kit, I would just like a refund.

We never said they miners are causing fires or overheating. The miner runs fine and perfectly, sometimes the chips can get a bit hot when running in turbo mode, but thats expected of any miner.

You seemed to be turning around there, and being a bit more nice on this thread. We've added you to the kit list as requested despite your claims. Would you like us to remove you from that list or send you're miner, a bit confused here.

Also we have no intentions of delivering bad miners to anyone, despite their behavior. This is a product that our clients ordered and despite our feelings towards those clients it is our obligation to deliver to a working product.

We're also launching limited sales for a 2.4Th/s (100 units total) (April 1st delivery guaranteed ) and 3.0Th/s (50 units Total) (April 15th delivery guaranteed ). We'll update the site shortly but our main goal in the moment is to assemble and ship these 1.2's and get them out the door and reviewed by the community. Sales for both of these lots will be open for a limited time.


That was a good April Fools. 

Nothing for April 1st delivery "Guaranteed"

ISAWHIM please email [email protected] so we can arrange the stuff for you.

You don't need to go that far, we're looking into the dual case for kit setup. And again a 1500Watt supply will work for all 5 modules.

Hey com'n. we started picking up the phone again. Baby steps.

Your not even a client, and again we banned you from purchasing AMT products. Also didn't you say it was impossible to get 1500 watt supply to power all 5 modules?

Along those lines.... Those of us with orders for 520's not th-hashers... Hmm since as (now) spec'd it is 200gh/blade (regardless of 'pushed' or not), um so for 520's, what, custom blades with fewer chips? we get 600 instead?

How about if you have blades that won't do the full 200 - but run fine slower - use them for the 520's? Works for me. one caveat: no dead chips allowed. Just happy but slower ones.

  So I take this subject of it being a 'real' 1.2th vs not being one right?
Folks, welcome to the world of binning. A standard practice throughout the solid-state electronic components industry. The only point that matters is: do they reliably run at 1.2th +/- whatever %? Or for cpu's s: 1.6, 1.8, 3.2, 3.6, 3.8, whatever GHz. Not can you make them go faster. It's all about does in this case the chip package as presented performs reliably. BMch & AMT say yes. Works for me.

Intel, AMD, all GPU makers do it.Hell even power semi makers do it to some extent. With these and cpu, gpu's etc., from any given wafer there are some chips that can do very well (run fastest with lowest errors) and some not so good. They do work fine at slower speeds though so.... Test and separate by performance and sell them accordingly by their sustainable performance. Same chips, often from the same wafer. There is just enough confidence that the better/best will hold up to the higher speed so you sell them for more $$.

Gee, of the 4 Ant S1's I have rated 180GHs each, only 1 is over-clockable to 190GHs. So happens that it also still has the best HW rate doing it. Damn near but not quite zero. Push to 200 and errors skyrocket. As for the other 3 - @ out-of-the-box default of 180 they already have several x higher HW rate than the OC'd one so OC not even tried but gues what what - ya can eco-mode them as well. As in slow down. Guess what - the error rate drops substantially.

So, should I sue because Bitmaintech chose to label the Ants as 180 when they can run better at 160 or 140ghs (and as low as 0.6w/GH/s doing it vs 2w @180)? I think not. Goosed a bit from whatever you would call native mode(s) they run fine at 180. Some even faster.

regtable96 is still a little wet behind the ears in dealing with AMT. Give him a few months of dealing with them and he'll see the light. i too was once an AMT fanboy. all one has to do is look back to last november and you'll see me singing AMT praises and telling everyone im order #610. ohhh... i wish i could go back to those days and tell myself what i know now. it would go something like DON'T BUY A DAMN THING FROM THESE CROOKS.

You shouldn't beg, it's unbecoming. And you didn't differ.

It's the OS that makes it appear less... as in the OS takes up some of the storage space. More or less depending on a number of factors. Formatting IS part of the operating system.

every time i open this post its on page 26 some one is saying waiting for the big reveal