Having read through all the new pages, here's my analysis:
Perryl, I believe that your intentions here are sincere and you are looking to disseminate and receive the most up to date and accurate information possible. However, I'm not sure anymore exactly what it is you would like to see - you have repeatedly asked Bitbobb for proof you yourself say he cannot provide (can't prove a negative). Can you please, for my sake and others, sum up what it is specifically you would like to see, what your concerns are, and how you would prefer to see them addressed? I know you've asked people to just go back and read, but the truth is your posts are mixed in with a lot of controversy and FUD that makes it difficult to tease out your place in all this.
Thank you, my original intention was to let people know, from my perspective, because I was the person siege heard the flirting thing from. It was a comment about someone else in passing, but it seriously shouldn't affect his qualifications. Missing meetings, well, that's another thing entirely. Anyways.
I've never asked for proof, he's offered it yet not provided it. There is definitely a difference. I don't care what he proves. I don't care if he really is that Bitbobb, but I can see why Trumpcoin would/should. Does he need to prove anything to me? No. Not at all. I have said that multiple times too. He's running for a position, he claims someone is impersonating him, I have done nothing but play devil's advocate. Call it fud if you wish, but it makes no difference to me either way. I may buy Trumps, and I am still on this thread because I am asking specific questions about the coin itself. This issue, is behind me, and is honestly a waste of my time. Which is actually quite valuable. Not just to me, but to hundreds of other people. So, to sum it up. I don't need proof. He offered it and didn't fulfill his own offer. Even though I have said several times that I don't need proof, don't want proof, don't care, and everything in between.
I think I only asked someone to go back and read when they made a claim about something I said. If they are to make a claim about something I said they should make sure they are correct with what they're saying.
Thanks for being a little more understanding.
I am still a bit confused - you seem upset that BB has offered to provide proof (and he's actually done so, see below), but say you don't actually want or need it either way. If you don't care about proof, why are you concerned that none has been provided?
If what both of you are saying is true, that you don't need proof and that BB can provide more if someone can indicate what they would like to see, then we have no issue here and that part of the discussion can be dropped. I'm going to respond to your other questions in a different post, one sec...
P.S. Here is the proof that was provided by BB of being Doing earlier in the thread. I make no claims to the authenticity or quality of this proof, I just want it in a place everyone can see.
Apparently, I missed this post. You are correct, i did not see that.
"If you don't care about proof, why are you concerned that none has been provided?"
Because it was offered. No reason to even offer it. Just post it and say "there". So much more convincing than "I could post it, it's easy, but I'm too busy right now. Not too busy to talk to you, but too busy to press 'print screen'".
Other than that, yeah, dropped it already. I never did see the picture until right before I wrote this message. I mean, would you really expect me to put any effort into looking for a picture I never felt the need to see? It's sad, the world we live in, but it's the way it is. We can't even trust video evidence anymore.