Topic: OGnasty has been compromised. |ID!0T| - page 3. (Read 10144 times)

Please stop throwing a fit. Certainly, you can be more mature than half-doxing people, right? [as in, stopping it, not propelling it further]

---

I can understand having some frustration for the first week but it's been nearly a fortnight now. You already know what OG is going to do about the amount you want to be compensated: nothing.

---

I'm not affiliated with either of you and want to stay impartial but you're just being overzealous with this harassment.

Jason...right?

You know...it's hard to keep all the little details correct sometimes due to the concussion

What is this, Wheel of Fortune?   I don't think OGNasty cares if you know who he is. Didn't he invite you over to his vacation home or something earlier in the thread? 

Don't know about hyperthymesia, but you've got some sort of brain affliction that there probably aren't medications for.   Personality disorders are notoriously difficult to treat.  Give this up--piss or get your ass off the bowl.  Youve already discredited yourself by accusing everyone who disagrees with you of being alts of OGNasty.  Nobody gives a shit anymore what your problems are, and if you continue to escalate your aggressive posts, you'll be banned.  Hope that happens.

probably because 250 of those BTC are mine...better make it all 500

you know what to do: 1J58WZ948mo3QCzhpZKWuVgaYvZQ6tjiTF

also, I think I settled for one of these guys...

Has anyone else received a PM like this from isoneguy:
How does he know names?

Hey OG

Does your last name start with an L, a C or an S?

I've got your identity narrowed down to a small group of people and I want to make sure I get the right one.

Apparently I have hyperthymesia so it's really only a matter of time.

Can I get in on the extortion payout already?   I'd rather it all stayed in the shadows but that's your decision...

sigh...really I could use .25BTC though.

This is going too be a long one.

---

And? If you do this and he doesn't trust you for it, do you think that he should hold is tongue and not say so? If you can't handle people saying that they don't trust you, and showing such on a platform built for doing just that, log off the forum and turn off the computer.

You gave him the option of sending the BTC back to the sending address, or not sending the BTC anywhere. It's not like he had much of a choice.
Before you go off on one, I'm not saying you did anything wrong through doing this.

You don't seem to understand why someone would counter a negative rating. I should explain why later on in this post.

No.

What a hard life you must lead, being constantly 'extorted' and 'attacked'.

---

It's absolutely relevant. The whole point of countering a trust rating is that if it affects a user's trust score unjustly to the majority of users it can be undone somewhat. If for 99-100% of the forum, your trust score is untouched, there is no reason for a rating to be countered.

And it is irrelevant to the point you are trying to make. You're just looking for things to try and make your argument look better and Lauda's look worse.

cough. cough. cough. cough.

---

And me, and Hhampuz, and Zepher. Whether or not this is extortion is semantics, you have to be either lying or stupid to think that this user is trustworthy (especially in regards to the other things that he has done in the past).
If you truly care about the community like you always big yourself up to, whatever trade deals you have had with him are irrelevant.

I've seen Lauda talk to people that aren't on DT (and never have been) about their trust ratings on people like defcon. Don't think that you're being singled out.

---

That was shorter than I was expecting.

You are not in any position to be judging anyone else's behavior. Unlike yourself, others tend to learn from the mistakes that they make whilst treading on the path against criminals.

ohhh Blazed did it so its ok?? you have used that line before OG.. man up and admit you are a prick.

I find you complaining about extortion ironic considering that you are an extortionist yourself.

That's true.

This thread went completely sideways, which is one of the reasons for which I did not get involved in the accusation itself.


Disclaimer: I may or may not be guilty of this myself. There are too many negative trust ratings to check.

It's a little harsh, given that OGNasty is on DT, but I've also seen you be harsh as well.  I don't usually comment on DT peeps leaving such feedback out of respect.  DT members, in my opinion, should have a fairly thick skin when it comes to name calling, having scam accusations leveled at them, etc., and I do think OG's feedback here is probably unwarranted.  But you've said it repeatedly in other threads--if you don't trust someone,  you're justified in leaving a neg.  That's how our broken-ass trust system works.

Do you truly think that I have not complained about this? Their ratings were left before defcon23 was fully exposed as the blackmailer/extortionists that he is and they have a tendency not to revoke past ratings (which is also something that I tend to complain about).

Rather than injecting love, how about you comment on the trust rating left on Hellot?

To me, both of you are trustworthy despite your mudslinging.   I'd have no problem using either of you for escrow or to manage a sig campaign or whatever.  Nobody here is perfect, lest we forget.

*trying to inject some love*

In other words: You only care about yourself and people who benefit you. Got it.

Which is absolute nonsense. It has been proven over and over again that defcon23 is an unstable blackmailer/extortionist, and this is confirmed by a huge variety of negative trust ratings that he has received. There is absolutely no evidence that Hellot has threatened you nor extorted you in any way.

The person increasing the trust score of proven blackmailers should definitely be trusted.

I've only had positive interactions with defcon23 involving multiple sales, adverting agreements, and escrows.  The only person I've seen verifiable evidence they are an extortionist is you.  You do make a good point that proven extortionists shouldn't be trusted though...  I would pose your same question to anyone who has left you positive trust.

Blazed who is a DT member has left defcon23 positive trust twice.  Why single me out?  Even Mitchell who is a staff member here has left him positive trust.

Which is a perfectly valid use of the trust system, and does not answer the question that I've asked:

I only see another example of you countering an honest rating of mine.

http://i.imgur.com/ex4xVJp.png

There are no threats in the reference link.

Another example of you trying to find excuses for invalid exclusions.

These are not facts, but your interpretation of other people's doings. Just because you think Hellot is "extorting you" that doesn't mean that he is, and most surely that doesn't make it a fact.

Neither is the case. At least I do not attempt to hide counter ratings by disguising them as valid ratings which conveniently get posted after mine. Then again, you trust extortionists/blackmailers such as defcon23. Why are you complaining about Hellot's alleged "extortion" then?

I don't care about this particular situation as it has generate too much noise. The rating on Hellot is what I disagree with, and couldn't find any remote basis for it.

I stated in this very thread I would leave negative trust if you didn't make the OP whole and sent you a PM to let you know I was serious.  People reading this need to remember I got involved here when this was blowing up and at the time OG had told the OP he would refund but not refunded and OP was flipping out.  There was a thread on the collectibles section about this that brought me here.  I reviewed what was happening and saw both partied being irrational.  I saw OGNasty being unprofessional and I wanted to help a long standing member of the community because I thought he was letting his emotions get the best of him.  So I offered him a way out, a way to make the right choice without risk to himself or his customer.  I offered to cover him in case the OPs account(his customer) was compromised.  I don't think you took me up on it because I don't believe you wanted to do the right thing.  

And I made the right call.  Your customers account wasn't compromised.  You were antagonizing him to get him to lash out so we would all see it.  You said you wanted us to see it.  You were in complete control of the situation, you had his money and nobody could make you do anything.  To say that I am untrustworthy for trying to help and telling the truth just shows what type of person you are.  You are truly a piece of shit.