[OLD] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 # - page 156.

49er

newbie

Activity: 52

Merit: 0

Quote from: Luke-Jr on October 12, 2011, 12:29:37 PM

Namecoins that would otherwise be allotted to unregistered accounts will be distributed between miners who are interested in getting namecoins, and myself (as compensation for the time I put into our stable merged mining implementation).

Luke-Jr: I have a question about your pool if you don't mind. How do you decide on the split for the extra namecoins? Obviously you pay out the PPS for namecoins for those interested, but then how do you split the remaining "that would otherwise be allotted to unregistered accounts" between the "miners who are interested in getting namecoins, and [yourself]"?

Is it 50/50? 75/25? How do you calculate the bonus for those of us who are interested? Is it PPLNS with N being since the last split? Can we see somewhere what bonus we got on our NMC PPS?

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Just upgraded to bitcoind next-test (pre-0.6 + working pull requests) on Eligius. Seems to have gone fine, but let me know if anything seems off.

Note that this upgrade means we cannot go back to pushpool at this point (without reverting it of course) since the bitcoind maintainers no longer support solomining via getwork (it requires a lot of patches, some Eligius-specific which I didn't take the time to add to 0.6).

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Upgrading to Eloipool, my new poolserver written in Python 3 this week seems to have gone mostly smooth. Hopefully it will solve the pushpool-related issues including however we were being DoS'd. However, I did notice that older versions of PhoenixMiner had trouble with the new longpolls, so I've special-cased them for now. Please report any problems here or on IRC, so I can investigate.

Thanks to lemmi who wrote the 'midstate' Python module in C to provide midstate to miners that can't make their own. If anyone else wishes to contribute (including other pools), please get in touch!

EnergyVampire

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Hello Luke-jr,

What is up with the pay at the pool? Sorry if you answered this already but I can't find any info on it. I was a bit disappointed with the payout for block # 164104. Cry

Cheers!

Gavin Andresen

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 2301

Chief Scientist

Quote from: Luke-Jr on January 26, 2012, 09:09:00 PM

There is no OP_P2SH. BIP 12, 16, and 17 are all competing standards for P2SH. BIP 17 is the most sane, and BIP 16 the least.

No it is not! BIP 17 is bad for the network and will give you herpes!

sharky112065

sr. member

Activity: 383

Merit: 250

Quote from: BkkCoins on January 26, 2012, 10:04:02 PM

Quote from: sharky112065 on January 25, 2012, 07:22:44 PM

Quote from: BkkCoins on January 25, 2012, 12:06:39 AM

What's up with the Namecoin transactions info? I just checked my NMC json info using the python tool and it now shows my address as not existing any more.

I checked on the Namecoin block explorer and it shows a payout on the 19th. Was this a flushing out of balances and reset? Just wondering because I didn't get those NMC in my address at CryptoXchange even though past ones worked fine.

Code:

#!/usr/bin/env python

import json, urllib2, datetime

address = 'YourNameCoinAddressHere'
url = 'http://eligius.st/~luke-jr/raw/7/NMC/balances.json'

data = json.load(urllib2.urlopen(url, timeout=5))
print "Address  : " + address
print "Balance  : " + str(data[address]['balance']/100000000.0)
print "Everpaid : " + str(data[address]['everpaid']/100000000.0)
print "Oldest   : " + str(datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(data[address]['oldest']))
print "Newest   : " + str(datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(data[address]['newest']))

Did you change the /5/ to /7/ in the python code?

Ah. Didn't even think of that. Now it works but the Everpaid has never worked for me. Or maybe it just doesn't work now since I haven't been paid since changed to /7/?

Correct, Everpaid will show a value when you get your first payment on the new server.

BkkCoins

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1009

firstbits:1MinerQ

Quote from: sharky112065 on January 25, 2012, 07:22:44 PM

Quote from: BkkCoins on January 25, 2012, 12:06:39 AM

What's up with the Namecoin transactions info? I just checked my NMC json info using the python tool and it now shows my address as not existing any more.

I checked on the Namecoin block explorer and it shows a payout on the 19th. Was this a flushing out of balances and reset? Just wondering because I didn't get those NMC in my address at CryptoXchange even though past ones worked fine.

Code:

#!/usr/bin/env python

import json, urllib2, datetime

address = 'YourNameCoinAddressHere'
url = 'http://eligius.st/~luke-jr/raw/7/NMC/balances.json'

data = json.load(urllib2.urlopen(url, timeout=5))
print "Address  : " + address
print "Balance  : " + str(data[address]['balance']/100000000.0)
print "Everpaid : " + str(data[address]['everpaid']/100000000.0)
print "Oldest   : " + str(datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(data[address]['oldest']))
print "Newest   : " + str(datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(data[address]['newest']))

Did you change the /5/ to /7/ in the python code?

Ah. Didn't even think of that. Now it works but the Everpaid has never worked for me. Or maybe it just doesn't work now since I haven't been paid since changed to /7/?

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: jake262144 on January 26, 2012, 09:05:55 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on January 26, 2012, 08:56:52 PM

Don't troll. Eligius is pro-P2SH (BIP 17).

BIP17 is OP_CHV, not OP_P2SH - as you well know.
Be straight: Eligius is pro-BIP17 and therefore anti-BIP16, am I correct?

There is no OP_P2SH. BIP 12, 16, and 17 are all competing standards for P2SH. BIP 17 is the most sane, and BIP 16 the least.

jake262144

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: Luke-Jr on January 26, 2012, 08:56:52 PM

Don't troll. Eligius is pro-P2SH (BIP 17).

BIP17 is OP_CHV, not OP_P2SH - as you well know.
Be straight: Eligius is pro-BIP17 and therefore anti-BIP16, am I correct?

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: finway on January 26, 2012, 08:47:21 PM

Leave Eligius!

It's against /P2SH/

Don't troll. Eligius is pro-P2SH (BIP 17).

finway

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Leave Eligius!

It's against /P2SH/

sharky112065

sr. member

Activity: 383

Merit: 250

Quote from: BkkCoins on January 25, 2012, 12:06:39 AM

What's up with the Namecoin transactions info? I just checked my NMC json info using the python tool and it now shows my address as not existing any more.

I checked on the Namecoin block explorer and it shows a payout on the 19th. Was this a flushing out of balances and reset? Just wondering because I didn't get those NMC in my address at CryptoXchange even though past ones worked fine.

Code:

#!/usr/bin/env python

import json, urllib2, datetime

address = 'YourNameCoinAddressHere'
url = 'http://eligius.st/~luke-jr/raw/7/NMC/balances.json'

data = json.load(urllib2.urlopen(url, timeout=5))
print "Address  : " + address
print "Balance  : " + str(data[address]['balance']/100000000.0)
print "Everpaid : " + str(data[address]['everpaid']/100000000.0)
print "Oldest   : " + str(datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(data[address]['oldest']))
print "Newest   : " + str(datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(data[address]['newest']))

Did you change the /5/ to /7/ in the python code?

BkkCoins

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1009

firstbits:1MinerQ

What's up with the Namecoin transactions info? I just checked my NMC json info using the python tool and it now shows my address as not existing any more.

I checked on the Namecoin block explorer and it shows a payout on the 19th. Was this a flushing out of balances and reset? Just wondering because I didn't get those NMC in my address at CryptoXchange even though past ones worked fine.

Hotdog453

full member

Activity: 121

Merit: 100

My miners have Eligius as a backup, and I'm seeing it down. YMMV.

Schleicher

hero member

Activity: 675

Merit: 514

It's up.

epsillion

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

anyone tell me if the eligius pool is still down?

k9quaint

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

Set up a private pool for your important miners. Only tell them the IP. Cheesy

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: sadpandatech on January 18, 2012, 08:27:36 PM

On Topic; Luke, is it the getworks that are slowing down the hash rate without tripping CGminer to fallback? That parts seems a bit strange.

If I knew the problem, it'd be solved.

imsaguy

vip

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

Don't send me a pm unless you gpg encrypt it.

Quote from: sadpandatech on January 18, 2012, 08:27:36 PM

Quote from: rjk on January 18, 2012, 08:22:36 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Luke-Jr on January 18, 2012, 03:25:47 PM

We're under a tight DoS attack. Been analyzing it, but not sure what the cause is yet.

The cause is you dumbass,

Lets see how you handle this pool from now on.

Classy, as usual. Even had the nerve to steal Inaba's profile picture.

wow, that threw me off. I was thinking to myself, "What the hell crawled up Inaba's butt tonight?" =)

Seeing who it is, I am not surprised. Though, I can't really disagree with the sentiment. But the judges give it a 1 out of 10 for his approach.

cheers

P.S. *offers Plastic.Elastic a hug*

On Topic; Luke, is it the getworks that are slowing down the hash rate without tripping CGminer to fallback? That parts seems a bit strange.

Use the load balancing feature in cgminer and it'll help with that.

sadpandatech

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: rjk on January 18, 2012, 08:22:36 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Luke-Jr on January 18, 2012, 03:25:47 PM

We're under a tight DoS attack. Been analyzing it, but not sure what the cause is yet.

The cause is you dumbass,

Lets see how you handle this pool from now on.

Classy, as usual. Even had the nerve to steal Inaba's profile picture.

wow, that threw me off. I was thinking to myself, "What the hell crawled up Inaba's butt tonight?" =)

Seeing who it is, I am not surprised. Though, I can't really disagree with the sentiment. But the judges give it a 1 out of 10 for his approach.

cheers

P.S. *offers Plastic.Elastic a hug*

On Topic; Luke, is it the getworks that are slowing down the hash rate without tripping CGminer to fallback? That parts seems a bit strange.

Topic: [OLD] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 # - page 156. (Read 458370 times)