~snip~
for the group of people who are planning to have this type of sports event, they should think of the impact of these drugs to the athletes in long term. if they will be experimenting on these people, they should know the repercussions of their actions and for those athletes who will subject themselves to these drugs, they should also know what they are getting into.
maybe, as you said, they can do these to soldiers, but it is the same, both parties should acknowledge the impact of what they are doing.
It is necessary to disclose to the public the impact of using work-enhancing drugs so that the public does not misunderstand the intent and purpose of holding the sport. Apart from that, they also need to explain everything to the athletes because they are the ones who will use the medicine, and they will also feel it later. Not only for the short term but also for the long term so athletes know what to do later if something arises.
~snip~
Yes, making performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) might be viewed as an undertaking driven by financial gain. However, athletes, their trainers, and governing sporting organisations are also responsible for deciding whether to utilize these medications. This is in addition to the pharmaceutical industry. Regarding the worry that athletes can become "arrogant" as a result of using performance-enhancing drugs, it's crucial to keep in mind that character is shaped by more than just performance. Regardless of whether an athlete uses PEDs, arrogance is a possibility. Although they may increase one's physical capabilities, performance enhancers do not change a person's values, thinking, or attitudes. Last but not least, the idea that soldiers might take PEDs is a complicated one. While improving soldiers' skills may seem advantageous, this must be weighed against potential health hazards and ethical issues. A society should think on whether it is acceptable to put people's health at risk for alleged greater societal benefit.
Therefore, the pharmaceutical company that manufactures the drug must provide a more detailed explanation to the public so that people can accept it and not misunderstand it. We also don't know if other motives exist for holding the sport because they or the organizers will not provide detailed explanations. They may just want to provide a different show from what they already have. What is seen in society is that these drugs can improve a person's performance to have greater strength than not consuming them.