Hi)
Telegram bot
@xpm_bot
for http://coinsforall.io
miner statistics
test bot
https://t.me/xpm_bot
Topic: Open Source XPM (Primecoin) GPU Miner & Pool xpmforall.org - page 11. (Read 110139 times)
Website is laggy but it mines just fine.
The ball is over, the candles are out ... (Кoнчeн бaл, пoгacли cвeчи... (C) 
The new miner works better than the old one
Hi, wondering if you, or anyone can help me please.
I am a complete noob when it comes to linux, and have ubuntu 16.04 installed
when i try to run ./miner i get
"error: 100
failed with error CUDA_ERROR_NO_DEVICE at /home/user/build/xpmclient/src/xpm/cuda/xpmclient.cpp:825"
I have no idea what to do
J
Do you have gpu drivers installed?
The new miner works better than the old one
Hi, wondering if you, or anyone can help me please.
I am a complete noob when it comes to linux, and have ubuntu 16.04 installed
when i try to run ./miner i get
"error: 100
failed with error CUDA_ERROR_NO_DEVICE at /home/user/build/xpmclient/src/xpm/cuda/xpmclient.cpp:825"
I have no idea what to do
J
The new miner works better than the old one
How can we be sure that this is the REAL eXtremal and the other one is hacked?
I propose: to impose sanctions and condemn Russian hackers, for interfering in elections of REAL eXtremal. 
How can we be sure that this is the REAL eXtremal and the other one is hacked?
I hope you can regain access to your original account. Thanks!
Well, he included the new miner and this note regarding his original account in his original pool ( http://xpmforall.org/ ) . I hope you can regain access to your original account. Thanks!
Update of CUDA miner with bugfix:
Linux: http://coinsforall.io/distr/xpmclient-cuda-linux.tar.gz
Cannot update first post, because still no have access to main account.
Quote
failed with error CUDA_ERROR_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS at C:/build/xpmclient/src/xpm/cuda/xpmclient.cpp:657
Windows 64bit: http://coinsforall.io/distr/xpmclient-win64-cuda.tar.gzLinux: http://coinsforall.io/distr/xpmclient-cuda-linux.tar.gz
Cannot update first post, because still no have access to main account.
How can we be sure that this is the REAL eXtremal and the other one is hacked?
I hope you can regain access to your original account. Thanks!
I hope you can regain access to your original account. Thanks!
Update of CUDA miner with bugfix:
Linux: http://coinsforall.io/distr/xpmclient-cuda-linux.tar.gz
Cannot update first post, because still no have access to main account.
Quote
failed with error CUDA_ERROR_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS at C:/build/xpmclient/src/xpm/cuda/xpmclient.cpp:657
Windows 64bit: http://coinsforall.io/distr/xpmclient-win64-cuda.tar.gzLinux: http://coinsforall.io/distr/xpmclient-cuda-linux.tar.gz
Cannot update first post, because still no have access to main account.
How can we be sure that any person that appear behind eXtremal nick is real eXtremal ?
He can also be another hacker that will just write in English
Answer: we must trust, or use old miners
eXtremal.ik71, very good job, thank you!
And question, how about new miner with increased perfomance (especially for nvidia)?
I think that 1080ti cards can make more than 0.62-0.73 cpd...
And question, how about new miner with increased perfomance (especially for nvidia)?
I think that 1080ti cards can make more than 0.62-0.73 cpd...
Update of CUDA miner with bugfix:
Linux: http://coinsforall.io/distr/xpmclient-cuda-linux.tar.gz
Cannot update first post, because still no have access to main account.
Quote
failed with error CUDA_ERROR_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS at C:/build/xpmclient/src/xpm/cuda/xpmclient.cpp:657
Windows 64bit: http://coinsforall.io/distr/xpmclient-win64-cuda.tar.gzLinux: http://coinsforall.io/distr/xpmclient-cuda-linux.tar.gz
Cannot update first post, because still no have access to main account.
Bcё yпaлo 
Everything fell
Everything fell
Xpmforall pool down?
Repaired after DDoS, monitoring updated for prevent same accidents in future.
Xpmforall pool down?
Bcё yпaлo
Everything fell
Everything fell
Is it normal or can be higher?
0.42-0.47 Just wanted to share my config and cpd:
1x Club3D Radeon R9 270 '14 series (146W)
My CPD is 0.21
1x Club3D Radeon R9 270 '14 series (146W)
My CPD is 0.21
Thank you man!
What CPD can be achieved on Rx480/580 with 4 or 8 Gb RAM ? I have got only 0.40-0.41 CPD on my Rx580 8 Gb.
Is it normal or can be higher?
Just wanted to share my config and cpd:
1x Club3D Radeon R9 270 '14 series (146W)
XPMclient version 10.2.1
Catalyst driver 15.7.1
Windows 10 Pro N
platform = "amd";
onCrash = "0";
cpuload = "1";
target = "11";
sieveSize = "630";
weaveDepth = "40960";
width = "22";
windowSize = "4096";
devices = ["1"];
sieveprimorial = ["13"];
sievePerRound = ["6"];
My CPD is 0.21
1x Club3D Radeon R9 270 '14 series (146W)
XPMclient version 10.2.1
Catalyst driver 15.7.1
Windows 10 Pro N
platform = "amd";
onCrash = "0";
cpuload = "1";
target = "11";
sieveSize = "630";
weaveDepth = "40960";
width = "22";
windowSize = "4096";
devices = ["1"];
sieveprimorial = ["13"];
sievePerRound = ["6"];
My CPD is 0.21
Can someone share speeds for 280X and 290 ?
I got 0.32-0.33 on my Sapphire R9 280x (1100 clock/ 1500 memory, Blockchain driver) with these settings:
Code:
platform = "amd";
onCrash = "0";
cpuload = "1";
target = "11";
sieveSize = "420";
weaveDepth = "40960";
width = "auto";
windowSize = "8192";
multiplierLimits = ["24", "31", "35"];
devices = ["1"];
sievePerRound = ["5"];
onCrash = "0";
cpuload = "1";
target = "11";
sieveSize = "420";
weaveDepth = "40960";
width = "auto";
windowSize = "8192";
multiplierLimits = ["24", "31", "35"];
devices = ["1"];
sievePerRound = ["5"];
Can it be faster? Which settings can I change?
What OS do you use?
I figured out my mistake, now Im getting around 0.35 on 280X - Thanks! 
But I don't see any difference when playing with:
sieveSize
weaveDepth
windowSize
multiplierLimits
sievePerRound
Am I missing something else?
And what about 290/290X I'm getting around 0.40-0.42 on them seems a lil low compared to 280s....
But I don't see any difference when playing with:
sieveSize
weaveDepth
windowSize
multiplierLimits
sievePerRound
Am I missing something else?
And what about 290/290X I'm getting around 0.40-0.42 on them seems a lil low compared to 280s....
Jump to: