why did it take you so long to reply though ? was it hard to cook up that retort ?
oh yeah you sure showed me.. claimed you did not understand me then accused me of being mad.
i can spell it out for you nice and slow if you have a hard time reading..
and i am not mad and it is not a good come back because being mad or not has no bearing on whether a fact is in fact a fact.
and besides i have heard it before it's in the top 10 retorts list here..
spare me and come up with some original material
and
please make an effort to stay on topic if you don't mind thanks.
I'm absolutely on-topic. I have a very gemane comment about the irony of calling out shitcoins while advertising personal shitcoins in your signature. You're not the only one in this thread who is doing it. However, it seems to have touched a sore spot for you ("methinks the lady doth protest too much").
I do think that it's helpful to go ahead and spell things out "nice and slow" if that's your euphemism for typing something other than randomly generated vulgarity. Even without the obscentity, it's still not clear what you're trying to say here. I understand your points that:
1) "a fact is a fact"
Ok, this is a tautology. No problem, I agree that a fact is a fact (how could I disagree?). Do you want elaborate on what you assert to be of a factual nature?
2) "you are not mad"
Good. Being "mad" either means "crazy" or "enraged" and neither is a healthy state of mind, IMHO.
3) You wish I replied faster and you have some epithets regarding my intellect.
Don't worry, I'm not going to let ad hominem attacks destroy my state-of-mind. I can say that I, too, am not "mad".
Ok, with your points addressed, I'd be happy if you have anything useful to add to my discussion about "what makes a shitcoin a shitcoin" and the irony of everyone pointing to the other guy's coin and saying "that's shit", "mine is innovative".