Topic: overwhelming consensus excludes Lauda, remains in DT2, went in2 buz w sold act - page 9. (Read 11873 times)

I disagree.  He may have started this thread about something else, but he addressed my challenge directly, even going so far as to bring up the need for escrow. 

QS says he has evidence that I'm an alt of Lauda, and my bet was that he wouldn't be able to convince an as-yet-unagreed-upon disinterested third party.   

He should produce the evidence anyway or cease his paranoid, mentally deranged accusations.  For some reason only known to him, he won't do it.

So you're not taking the bet because... theymos?

I thought you had the indisputable evidence.

This is just another example of lauda and his "friends" trying to derail threads with negative information about him, and distract from information that puts him in a negative light.

I would also point out that lauda very much did not ask theymos to be the arbitrator of the bet he wanted to make that I do not have evidence that he is the same as ThePharmacist, who would be in a much better position to evaluate if these two accounts are the same person or not. Maybe the reason for this is that lauda does not want theymos publicly commenting on any of lauda's sockpuppets

He was never talking about betting about that. i.e. he was talking about the purchased accounts adding Lauda to their trust list and the other thing somehow got mixed into that.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30884533
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30950688
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30978164

Bump. 

Is this bet that Quickseller can prove I'm Lauda still on or what? Quickseller seems to have gone silent on the matter, but I want to see the evidence and I don't want this thread to wither on the vine until QS presents it.  This is the sucker-est bet I've ever seen, and I should probably borrow money just to take it.  lol

Come on cunt. Answer me, I'm about to book a villa for my summer holiday this will be perfect to cover the upgrade I really want

Are there any other allegations (particularly the ones that you recently promoted without proof) that are not true anymore?

Smart move lol.
I guess everyone here is pretty sure now that "the pharmacist" is not an alt account of "Lauda". According to my opinion the OP shall now accept that it was just a misconception and should excuse them both. As they both are members with dignity, will excuse the OP.
This thread is no more useful and continuing it will be a waste of time and energy. There are a lot more serious and legit issues on the forum to work on.
It's a humble request to you all to please leave this topic and move on positively.

Just been hear choking on popcorn for a while, but is this a clever way to hedge your bet, lol. Not looking to be rude, just made me laugh

I would like to bet whatever is equal to TMAN's monthly pay, which is his 2017 taxable income divided by 12.

However, I couldnt afford that

so I will bet 0.01 BTC that the pharmiest is not lauda

Are you taking other bets on top QS? And can we discuss what equates to proof?

I will let Lauda take this bet for the both of us. 

I would be curious to know who you have to convince, though.  It should be someone fairly neutral on the matter, and the escrow should be anyone other than someone QS would suggest.  Mitchell sounds aboutright.

I am not talking about some random accounts. I'm talking about the "evidence" that The Pharmacist and I are the same (hence my mentioning him in the previous post).

Seems you were right.

Links, please.  I myself should like to see those threads of which you speak!  Or did you only hear from a reliable source close to the forum friend of a friend about such threads?

---

I will take you at your word, because you have something called “credibility” which is much missing from some parts of this thread.

But wait:  Does this mean that I may now take pride in my achievements as one of this forum’s most famous members, cheered by decent folks and hated by scammers and spammers?  Or does it mean that I must be jealous of myself?  I am so confused.

At least, now I know that I can actually trust you as I trust myself.

Ummm, you literally already "figured out" who the purchased accounts that have you on their trust list are.....if you are wanting to bet if I can prove that 6 purchased accounts who are all owned by the same person have you on their trust list, you can go ahead and send 5 BTC to the address in my profile; I win the bet.

I don't think you are lauda anymore, which should be clear by the post you quoted. I do still think you are a very dishonest person who has a long history of dishonesty. This is not something new to you, considering how long people have been calling you dishonest around here....I am pretty sure there are threads from 2011 in which people were calling you dishonest.

Betting would be fun. One side seems to think the bet is for one thing, and the other for something else. Yeah, not going to happen.

I don't like betting, but I'll take this on, sure. You can propose some terms as I certainly don't plan on wasting time proposing things you'd instantly reject. Escrow Mitchell. Anywhere upwards from 5 BTC is fine.

---

I just need to check with The Pharmacist (or should I say, myself?). ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I think you are Lauda though, or maybe I just want you to be Lauda. I am not really sure anymore. 

I’ve already taken that bet.  My ante is my good name—all the time and effort I have invested posting day and night with a forum account which has earned 490+ merits in less than a month since the start of the merit system—and all my future expectations of intellectual discussion, business, and pleasure on this forum.

For if you have this evidence, then you can instantly destroy not only Lauda’s reputation, but the reputations of all publicly committed Lauda-supporters—including me.

I picked sides here.  I did so after reading through old threads, and carefully considering what I found there.  And in picking sides, I made my wager.  At this point, I myself am so publicly committed to supporting Lauda that if you were to drop some shocking evidence which proves serious wrongdoing, I would probably need to leave this forum forever.  For unlike you, I have things called dignity and a sense of shame which would prevent me from hanging around in disgrace just to troll people.  Do you think I would want to stay here as a laughingstock like you?

So, ante up, Quicksy.  Show your evidence.  You can force me to leave—humiliate me (yes, I know how you thirst for that)—wreck my hopes, dreams, and plans.  I’ve got a budding Github repo which people respect, a plum domain name (nym.zone) I plan to use for such business as for which I’d need sterling credibility, and high status as the current #4 all-time most-merited Bitcoin Forum user.  Also, attentions of a hot girl.  If you’ve been speaking the truth, then you can take all that away from me.  Just drop the evidence on Lauda.

For your part, you already lost all your reputational wagers to the degree that you have pretty girls laughing at you and your comedic total lack of credibility:


I think I already won any possible bet.

Oh, and by the way:  Thanks so much for this particular object demonstration of how easily you make bold accusations, then turn around and flatly contradict yourself a few days later after everybody is laughing at you:



Or at least, thanks for closing your eyes so you no longer see that I am very clearly Lauda.

How much are you willing to bet? Terms? Escrow?