As a side note, your anchor tags alone make better reading than half the posts in this thread.
Oh, no! Are those not private!? I had thought they were invisible, just like e-mail and ICQ. I am exposed!
My source is not important. I am not wrong though, you can ask the relevant parties if you don't believe me.
I would note that Lauda was also bragging about not paying taxes on his moderator income, and he was not specifying about US taxes.
This is coming off as some bizarro, upside-down version of a wannabe Eliot Ness: “Drat, I can’t get the cat on made-up charges of pill addiction, or non-existent sockpuppetting! But I’ll definitely succeed by twisting words to convict for tax evasion in an unknown jurisdiction, which may or may not have an income tax with unspecified rules. My source of ‘evidence’ is not important.”
Why, it’s exactly the sort of plan which the real Eliot Ness would hatch if he washed down a fistful of psychotropic pills with some moonshine, then decided to go after innocent people.Press Photo: Quicksy Ness will now get Lauda for TAX EVASION!
#ifdef QS_PSYCHOTIC_DELUSION
Quicksy Ness, please bring justice!This forum is controlled by a
Lauda gang
, as documented by our resident
ethically mature
expert.
I myself have been a victim of the Lauda gang:
Yeah, the Lauda gang is fearsome. I thought I was tough enough to survive a “beat-in” for the secret initiation, so I tried to join. It turns out, Lauda does worse: A “scratch-in” by cats! I’m still bleeding from that; and worst of all, they decided that I was too wimpy. At least they didn’t feed me to the lion—I’m thankful for that, but could Lauda be going soft?
Please stop the Lauda gang! You will be the hero of the forum.
#endif /* QS_PSYCHOTIC_DELUSION */
42
I can neither confirm nor deny that this is my tax number. However, I am somewhat leaning to the side of it being my number. I'll let
The Pharmacist,
nullius, Mr. Michael Cassio or one of my many other alts continue handling the case.
/sWell, if you don’t deny that 42 is your tax number, then that must be true. Sorry, the proof by non-denial is undeniable per QS-logic. I will now commence searching all the world’s tax databases for a tax number of 42, so I can dox
me you.
So you really like your story that Lauda is a tax evading sockpuppeting pill addict but you don't have proof or sources who could corroborate that. Is there any chance you could fuck off until you do? Rhetorical question.
You forgot: Lauda is a tax evading sockpuppeting pill addict
who turned you into a newt. Even if you got better, you should not let the crime go unpunished!
Moreover, I have
absolute proof that Lauda is guilty of the worst crime of all:
Lauda is Lauda. The heinousness of
being Lauda is evident from Quickseller’s tireless pursuit of justice; for no sane person would spend so much time trying to find a person guilty of
anything, if that person were not guilty of
everything simply by existing. Quickseller’s therapist PMed me to warn that he may actually commit suicide if I
point out the obvious make indelicate remarks about his sanity; and I would not wish to
commit an act of violence. Therefore, Quickseller must be sane, and the existential state of being Lauda must be an act of guilt. Q(S).E.D.
My source for proof of Lauda’s identity as Lauda is some guy with a Greek name; I forget which one. The contrary argument that the Lauda whom we observe is only a shadow cast by some unseen, unknown Lauda may seem colourable to residents of the.nym.zone, or to anyone who remembers that this is the Internet. However, Quickseller is a trusted philosopher on this forum who no doubt has “sources” which can even accurately describe Lauda as a thing-in-itself.
A thing which hurts spammers and scammers, then meows.
...ceterum censeo, Quickseller should kill himself!
