Serious discussion first:
And you know that you don't HAVE to do something when people on the intertubes express their preference one way or another, right? If I advise you to fuck yourself with a bag of rusty nails - please think this through. I wouldn't want you to make any rash decisions but I fully support your freedom of choice in this matter.
I have said several times before on this forum that I know how to hit where it hurts. Quickseller is accustomed to criticism, to rather understate the matter; moreover, although he is not eloquent in the artistic sense, he does have above-average verbal skills (as do many smooth-talking scammers, including Alia). Yet here, suddenly and uncharacteristically, he
flipped out:You both are a piece of shit. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?
That wasn’t even the initial version of his reply. Initially, he just lashed out and called Vod and me “a piece of shit”; he then promptly edited to reinforce his point with a “
seriously” F-bomb. I saw the earlier version. Clearly, he was in a state of emotional agitation. Why?
And why really drove him to create that
insane attack thread which I have
characterized as “Quickseller vs. The World”?
This reminds me of the incident in which a Tor Project employee revenge-doxed someone (!) who had suggested on Twitter that she should kill herself. She rationalized her such hypocritical anti-privacy action by alleging that this remark could cause her serious harm, due to her publicly known problems with depression and suicidal tendencies.
Triggering, y’know.
Mentally stable people are not internally put off-balance by being told to kill themselves. I know that if somebody on the Internet told me to kill myself, I would find that either boring, or mildly amusing in the
yah, sure sense. There is only one cause I can adduce for somebody becoming
upset by being told to kill himself: He has actual suicidal tendencies, and his therapist told him that suicide talk is harmful to him.
Really, you’ve seen Quickseller coolly slither about with his alts through 60+ page firestorms of clearly evidenced serious accusations against him. When did you ever see him react like this to a simple remark of the kind which has no power over any rational person?
You both are a piece of shit. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?
You both are a piece of shit. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?
It's quite obvious that nullius was merely suggesting the best way to
find Jesus
You of all people should know this because this is 100% Quicksy logic.
Hah. I had actually thought of that when posting. Then I realized, suicides go straight to the Sixth Circle of Hell.
(Aside: Having no such religious objections, I myself support an almost unlimited right to suicide. Those who kill themselves either face such a great pain that I cannot judge them, or are such weak wretches that they benefit all mankind by passing final judgment on themselves.)
"You now want me to write "Ceterum censeo, Quickseller se debet occidere." 100 times?
This is MADNESS !!!" <
humour at Quickseller's expense>
Well, if it isn’t the
Doppelgänger of the merit-beggar whom I once
awarded +1 for ironically begging me in Latin!
Now, in grand Pythonic style, we must hold a discussion on the spot about whether your use of the indicative be proper. I know that the historic original “Ceterum censeo” used the indicative, in the sense of declaring a future which
shall be, rather than a mere wish; but the English here being translated uses the word
should, in the context of my copypaste of Vod’s clearly subjunctive statements (emphasis added):
“I think Quickseller really
should kill himself.” Repeat: “I really
wish the guy
would kill himself already.” Whereas you indicate: “...Quickseller
shall kill himself.”
I raise this question, as a proud user of the subjunctive in English.
Ceterum censeo, Quickseller should kill himself.