hi guys
there is a problem with the miner mining cards with 8GB Samsung memory modded
it gives most of its shares as inncorrect shares but when using claymore its goes fine with no problem at all
have any one notice that and is there anysolution for it
Topic: PhoenixMiner 6.2c: fastest Ethereum/Ethash miner with lowest devfee (Win/Linux) - page 335. (Read 784857 times)
June 03, 2019, 07:08:17 AM
June 03, 2019, 05:39:24 AM
Author disappeared...
LOL last time online was today. How you came to the conclusion that the author is disappeared?
June 03, 2019, 05:30:06 AM
June 02, 2019, 10:40:12 PM
Phoenixminer 4.2c (Windows/Linux) added to https://www.minermonitoring.com/
Join our discord https://discord.gg/aGGaeqq
also, you can check the speed of the miner on different rigs using the benchmark page: https://minermonitoring.com/benchmark
Join our discord https://discord.gg/aGGaeqq
also, you can check the speed of the miner on different rigs using the benchmark page: https://minermonitoring.com/benchmark
June 02, 2019, 09:59:01 PM
Author disappeared...
June 02, 2019, 08:40:28 AM
Are you still sure Claymore is faster?
he is 100% correct, the new -strap settings in Claymore are the sh*t, i can mine 34.8 MH/s on my GTX 1070 with 105W. On PhoenixMiner it's about 33 MH/s.It depends on whether you can get the straps to actually work. A lot of people, including myself, have had a hard time getting the straps to run stable.
My rig crashes after about thirty minutes after having wildly fluctuating hashrates using the straps. All nvidia Gtx 1070's and 1060's. So until I figure that out, phoenixminer is faster and more stable.
June 02, 2019, 05:26:25 AM
After Claymore last ver. 14.6 you are not the fastest eth miner. I've got 32,3 mh/sec vs 31,5 with phoenix (RX480, bc drivers ). Your next pace, dev)
good to you , we dont care about your miner and your hashrate , i have 48.3 mh/s with all 580 8G , so 
what s the point in your post ?! ROFLWho authorized you to speak for all of us? Some of us are actually interested in all the info other people provide, as long as its honest
and not made up like yours
June 01, 2019, 10:45:42 PM
After Claymore last ver. 14.6 you are not the fastest eth miner. I've got 32,3 mh/sec vs 31,5 with phoenix (RX480, bc drivers ). Your next pace, dev)
good to you , we dont care about your miner and your hashrate , i have 48.3 mh/s with all 580 8G , so what s the point in your post ?! ROFLsounds made up
June 01, 2019, 08:03:29 PM
After Claymore last ver. 14.6 you are not the fastest eth miner. I've got 32,3 mh/sec vs 31,5 with phoenix (RX480, bc drivers ). Your next pace, dev)
good to you , we dont care about your miner and your hashrate , i have 48.3 mh/s with all 580 8G , so what s the point in your post ?! ROFL 
May 31, 2019, 01:24:45 PM
my micron 5x8 cards (sapphire nitro, se and normal) are doing 34.3mhs 1240/2250 @ 865mv
no mem errors nor incorrect shares
It really is possible and achievable but at the same time...unless bragging... I'm not sure why will I push them so much...no mem errors nor incorrect shares
I'd rather prefer to not turn this thread into claymore vs others war and d*ck waving. Lets just pretend that everyone is happy
Phoenix's AMD kernels are more "tweak-able" and are faster than Claymore's.
But Phoenix doesn't work as expected with latest 19.5.1 + drivers. We need an update
PS: Some phoenixminer results for last.
May 31, 2019, 01:13:34 PM
my micron 5x8 cards (sapphire nitro, se and normal) are doing 34.3mhs 1240/2250 @ 865mv
no mem errors nor incorrect shares
It really is possible and achievable but at the same time...unless bragging... I'm not sure why will I push them so much...no mem errors nor incorrect shares
I'd rather prefer to not turn this thread into claymore vs others war and d*ck waving. Lets just pretend that everyone is happy
Phoenix's AMD kernels are more "tweak-able" and are faster than Claymore's.
But Phoenix doesn't work as expected with latest 19.5.1 + drivers. We need an update
May 31, 2019, 12:26:40 PM
my micron 5x8 cards (sapphire nitro, se and normal) are doing 34.3mhs 1240/2250 @ 865mv
no mem errors nor incorrect shares
It really is possible and achievable but at the same time...unless bragging... I'm not sure why will I push them so much...no mem errors nor incorrect shares
I'd rather prefer to not turn this thread into claymore vs others war and d*ck waving. Lets just pretend that everyone is happy
May 31, 2019, 12:01:25 PM
After Claymore last ver. 14.6 you are not the fastest eth miner. I've got 32,3 mh/sec vs 31,5 with phoenix (RX480, bc drivers ). Your next pace, dev)
Phoenix linux:Quote
GPU2: PCI 0000:03:00, Radeon RX 580 8 GB - BIOS: 113-BE366EU-Z46, MEMINFO: SK Hynix H5GQ8H24MJR
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:84W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 53C, ASIC TEMP: 56C
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:84W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 53C, ASIC TEMP: 56C
Quote
GPUs: 1: 31.264 MH/s (174) 2: 31.489 MH/s (153) 3: 33.678 MH/s (181) 4: 31.826 MH/s (197)
Claymore linux:Quote
GPU2: PCI 0000:03:00, Radeon RX 580 8 GB - BIOS: 113-BE366EU-Z46, MEMINFO: SK Hynix H5GQ8H24MJR
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:85W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 54C, ASIC TEMP: 57C
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:85W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 54C, ASIC TEMP: 57C
Quote
ETH: GPU0 30.479 Mh/s, GPU1 30.595 Mh/s, GPU2 33.614 Mh/s, GPU3 31.638 Mh/s
Are you still sure Claymore is faster?Thats some really good Hynix memory you have over there. Is it maybe Sapphire RX580 Nitro SE?
no mem errors nor incorrect shares
May 31, 2019, 10:23:12 AM
It's not RX boost, thats how claymore calls it, its messing with refresh period of DRAM.
And yes, it has been "rxboost"-ed without Claymore and yes it is Sapphire nitro+ SE and no, its not better than normal nitros, just the timings are good
EDIT: Regarding NVIDIA optimizations the guy was talking - yes it is the only thing that can be better as of optimization of hardware, but not miner.
And yes, it has been "rxboost"-ed without Claymore and yes it is Sapphire nitro+ SE and no, its not better than normal nitros, just the timings are good
EDIT: Regarding NVIDIA optimizations the guy was talking - yes it is the only thing that can be better as of optimization of hardware, but not miner.
Well, those cards (both Micron and Hynix versions) are rated at 2100 MHz memory instead usual 2000MHz, so I guessed
that even if its nominally same memory, maybe manufacturer handpicked better chips
Same memory, same clock capabilities, just factory overclocked and colored in blue
May 31, 2019, 09:21:21 AM
It's not RX boost, thats how claymore calls it, its messing with refresh period of DRAM.
And yes, it has been "rxboost"-ed without Claymore and yes it is Sapphire nitro+ SE and no, its not better than normal nitros, just the timings are good
EDIT: Regarding NVIDIA optimizations the guy was talking - yes it is the only thing that can be better as of optimization of hardware, but not miner.
And yes, it has been "rxboost"-ed without Claymore and yes it is Sapphire nitro+ SE and no, its not better than normal nitros, just the timings are good
EDIT: Regarding NVIDIA optimizations the guy was talking - yes it is the only thing that can be better as of optimization of hardware, but not miner.
Well, those cards (both Micron and Hynix versions) are rated at 2100 MHz memory instead usual 2000MHz, so I guessed
that even if its nominally same memory, maybe manufacturer handpicked better chips
May 31, 2019, 07:42:55 AM
It's not RX boost, thats how claymore calls it, its messing with refresh period of DRAM.
And yes, it has been "rxboost"-ed without Claymore and yes it is Sapphire nitro+ SE and no, its not better than normal nitros, just the timings are good
EDIT: Regarding NVIDIA optimizations the guy was talking - yes it is the only thing that can be better as of optimization of hardware, but not miner.
And yes, it has been "rxboost"-ed without Claymore and yes it is Sapphire nitro+ SE and no, its not better than normal nitros, just the timings are good
EDIT: Regarding NVIDIA optimizations the guy was talking - yes it is the only thing that can be better as of optimization of hardware, but not miner.
May 31, 2019, 07:04:01 AM
After Claymore last ver. 14.6 you are not the fastest eth miner. I've got 32,3 mh/sec vs 31,5 with phoenix (RX480, bc drivers ). Your next pace, dev)
Phoenix linux:Quote
GPU2: PCI 0000:03:00, Radeon RX 580 8 GB - BIOS: 113-BE366EU-Z46, MEMINFO: SK Hynix H5GQ8H24MJR
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:84W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 53C, ASIC TEMP: 56C
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:84W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 53C, ASIC TEMP: 56C
Quote
GPUs: 1: 31.264 MH/s (174) 2: 31.489 MH/s (153) 3: 33.678 MH/s (181) 4: 31.826 MH/s (197)
Claymore linux:Quote
GPU2: PCI 0000:03:00, Radeon RX 580 8 GB - BIOS: 113-BE366EU-Z46, MEMINFO: SK Hynix H5GQ8H24MJR
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:85W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 54C, ASIC TEMP: 57C
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:85W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 54C, ASIC TEMP: 57C
Quote
ETH: GPU0 30.479 Mh/s, GPU1 30.595 Mh/s, GPU2 33.614 Mh/s, GPU3 31.638 Mh/s
Are you still sure Claymore is faster?did you use RX Boost in Phoenix and Claymore?
May 31, 2019, 06:31:39 AM
After Claymore last ver. 14.6 you are not the fastest eth miner. I've got 32,3 mh/sec vs 31,5 with phoenix (RX480, bc drivers ). Your next pace, dev)
Phoenix linux:Quote
GPU2: PCI 0000:03:00, Radeon RX 580 8 GB - BIOS: 113-BE366EU-Z46, MEMINFO: SK Hynix H5GQ8H24MJR
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:84W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 53C, ASIC TEMP: 56C
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:84W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 53C, ASIC TEMP: 56C
Quote
GPUs: 1: 31.264 MH/s (174) 2: 31.489 MH/s (153) 3: 33.678 MH/s (181) 4: 31.826 MH/s (197)
Claymore linux:Quote
GPU2: PCI 0000:03:00, Radeon RX 580 8 GB - BIOS: 113-BE366EU-Z46, MEMINFO: SK Hynix H5GQ8H24MJR
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:85W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 54C, ASIC TEMP: 57C
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:85W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 54C, ASIC TEMP: 57C
Quote
ETH: GPU0 30.479 Mh/s, GPU1 30.595 Mh/s, GPU2 33.614 Mh/s, GPU3 31.638 Mh/s
Are you still sure Claymore is faster?Thats some really good Hynix memory you have over there. Is it maybe Sapphire RX580 Nitro SE?
May 31, 2019, 05:46:18 AM
How to use Temperature Throttling?
I am trying to use
-tt 1 -tstop 68 -tstart 55 -tmax 63
Only the tstop and tstart work. How do I make throttle work on tmax 63 ?
Any help?
I am trying to use
-tt 1 -tstop 68 -tstart 55 -tmax 63
Only the tstop and tstart work. How do I make throttle work on tmax 63 ?
Any help?
May 31, 2019, 05:31:11 AM
Are you still sure Claymore is faster?
he is 100% correct, the new -strap settings in Claymore are the sh*t, i can mine 34.8 MH/s on my GTX 1070 with 105W. On PhoenixMiner it's about 33 MH/s.Jump to: