No, it means that you will not pay an extra service fee to the casino. The user will still cover the network transaction fee.
It's good that the casino does not charge extra fee like wallet maintenance, security maintenance and many service fee on their users in withdrawals.
I agree that user needs to pay network (on chain) transaction fee for their withdrawals because it is very unsustainable if the casino waives out that transaction fees for users. Their business treasury will be eaten up a lot if they cover it for users too.
Is there any casino that charges that? I didn't know. I only knew that some casinos were nulling your balance after a certain period of inactivity.
By the way, I think the best approach about crypto withdrawals from casinos will be if they allow VIP members or other high tier up members to withdraw for free. For those, who actively gamble, this is a very nice comfort and I believe every casino will get some more customers alone with that comfort.
Iron Mike couldn’t make it happen. I kind of thought it’s a match where experience would have to triumph over youthful age but nope, Jake Paul had the springs in his leg, his footwork made sure he was able to evade Iron Mike well enough while taking good jabs and landing perfect shots.
It wasn’t what I expected but, it would do.
Well, it was a very debatable match because it was Mike Tyson against him, probably the greatest fighter of all time. From this match it became obvious that 58 years old best boxer can't be an amateur youtuber boxer but I admit, part of me was thinking that Tyson would knock him out but in this match I think that more likely it was clear that he didn't have that fire in his eyes. He was on the ring just for the sake of being on the ring. It was clear that he didn't want to be there, maybe that's why he lost, I don't know. I'd love to see an angry Tyson against him.
