But you don't want to analyze a hand based on hindsight. Sitting on table you only know your hands at the start, and eventually the flop,turn and river. All the good poker players have charts they play off. They have a range off cards, the fold, call, or raise with. All depending on the position, stack, etc. Especially when playing online your information on your opponents is very limited. It's better to play based on a fixed system, and after a while you will notice if there are any flaws in your strategy and you lose money.
This is true - albeit a little broad for where this thread has evolved to. Anyone studying now a days is essentially handed charts to begin their journey then the understanding of why and how they came to be. The Pro's are constantly adjusting them in small ways, based on reviewing their previous plays and spots to find any amount of edge they may be missing. I used my charts fairly religiously for a few months and then moved away from them, to play from memory and experience. I have plans to look into another course that follows a completely different vein of game theory but am holding off for one of 2 bankroll milestones.
Online you can actually wind up with a significant amount more information on an opponent there are free to use HUD's and some sies even have a built in HUD. This gives you information you would be hardpressed to figure out in your head live.
Experience is one of the best tool to make a strategy. It will also depend on your objectives for if one wishes to play safety or gamble hard and as the result it could mean a lot of losses or a a big chances of winning.
Aside from experience there is also one thing that could make one win in poker and that is when instinct is high or when luck is on your side. There are times like this for being lucky and always end up winning on cards being held.
However, there is no really best or good strategy to win poker except for being lucky. Poker players can assess wether they can win or not. So it is a hard thing to make poker as a means of living. It should not be that way how we look at gambling instead gambling should be a past time or to occupy oneself when gets bored.
Experience is a necessity for anything. You can read and study all you want but if it can't be applied irl at best you can teach theory. Instinct is just an extension of experience/study/and practice. Luck is a bitch, and can be replaced with the word variance, and it hits both sides.
I wanted to clear that up because most of what you have written is inaccurate. There are definitely good strategies when it comes to poker, to think otherwise is crazy. The best in the world and even marginally profitable players use strategies some more in depth than others. There are a lot of people in the world who make a living playing poker, for each of them there are thousands who don't. Most of those are fun players who want to pop in and out and just enjoy seeing where the cards lay.
For everything in the world there are different ways to look at things. There is nothing wrong with someone treating poker like a job, they just have to train and develop the skills required. On that same vein there is nothing wrong with someone who wants to sit down and click buttons online or spew chips at a table if that's what they find fun.
I haven't had much time to play or grab spots to bring to the thread lately, lots of work lately. I am hoping to grab a spot that bothers me quite a bit, in the meantime here is the jist of it.
Having second pair with a good kicker, when the top pair pairs on the board. I really don't like it at any point but more so when I get to the turn or river. I know this isn't ideal for format and hope to grab a spot when I'm off work. It's similar to a paired flop that make a pair with the odd card out.