From <1% rejected consistently to >10% rejected so far.
I am testing different configs on 2 rigs now to see if I can get the rejects down - hard to sample over a short period of time. I do know that I hated this block reject scheme on clevermining, however. I liked the reject scheme on waffle before. But, I will admit I am very interested to see what kind of reject rate sfire would have under this new scheme - it might made a big different on profits depending on how badly people were abusing this.
Can we get some reject % data, and maybe ourselves vs pool (along with shift info maybe)?
I am testing different configs on 2 rigs now to see if I can get the rejects down - hard to sample over a short period of time. I do know that I hated this block reject scheme on clevermining, however. I liked the reject scheme on waffle before. But, I will admit I am very interested to see what kind of reject rate sfire would have under this new scheme - it might made a big different on profits depending on how badly people were abusing this.
Can we get some reject % data, and maybe ourselves vs pool (along with shift info maybe)?
So that would mean you were one of the miners who were taking up to 10% more of your fair share of profits from the pool, however unknowingly. For the others who had their equipment tuned correctly for mining almost anywhere else than wafflepool, they were receiving up to 10% less of profits directly due to their efforts, depending upon the ratio of efficient to inefficient miners in the pool. The actual percentages depend upon whether wafflepool was actually a pool of fools, and only poolwaffle knows that as he is the only one with access to the relevant statistics.
I too would be very curious about sfire's 20GH/s mining efficiency prior to the server changeover, which I consider to be a very welcome one. Ironically, depending upon that statistic, it might not have been the largest miner that was keeping us from efficiently mining the lowest difficult coins, but the smaller miners instead!
?
