Topic: [POOL][Scrypt][Scrypt-N][X11] Profit switching pool - wafflepool.com - page 53. (Read 465769 times)
June 22, 2014, 03:32:55 PM
Alternative pool suggestions?
June 22, 2014, 03:30:16 PM
Stats are down but I think mining is still going.
no mate its bad i think
hash droped from 70 to 30
so mining not ongoing
June 22, 2014, 03:26:51 PM
Same here. worker shows dead.
I'm sure it's fine as Im still getting work
I'm sure it's fine as Im still getting work
June 22, 2014, 03:13:41 PM
Stats are down but I think mining is still going.
June 22, 2014, 03:13:23 PM
WAFFLEPOOL ANY STATEMENT OR UPDATES ON THE SITUATION WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED! Where is all our mining power going to? Will we be compensated? How serious is the issue? Should we consider switching pools?
Anyone know another good x11 multi pool?
Anyone know another good x11 multi pool?
June 22, 2014, 03:07:23 PM
maybe hash redirecting
June 22, 2014, 03:06:12 PM
Yeah, page shows no workers even though they've been going strong all day/night.
Also didn't receive my daily morning payout...
Also didn't receive my daily morning payout...
June 22, 2014, 02:57:40 PM
Worker: dead ?
I tried other pools and its working, must be wafflepool. Was shocked my android app said 0.000 Mhs so i checked online
I tried other pools and its working, must be wafflepool. Was shocked my android app said 0.000 Mhs so i checked online
June 22, 2014, 02:57:17 PM
I'm also seeing zero hash rate poolside, but locally my rigs are submitting shares, with no change to the reject level. Probably just a display or API glitch on the server side.
Poolwaffle, can you take a look and make a statement to calm people down?
Poolwaffle, can you take a look and make a statement to calm people down?
same here
June 22, 2014, 02:56:35 PM
Worker Algorithm Hashrate (rejected) Show
(default) dead
(default) dead
June 22, 2014, 02:55:33 PM
I'm also seeing zero hash rate poolside, but locally my rigs are submitting shares, with no change to the reject level. Probably just a display or API glitch on the server side.
Poolwaffle, can you take a look and make a statement to calm people down?
Poolwaffle, can you take a look and make a statement to calm people down?
June 22, 2014, 02:52:23 PM
so shares counting ?? or lost??? continue mining?
June 22, 2014, 02:31:32 PM
same here: stratum+tcp://eu.wafflepool.com:3331 sgminer reporting 11Mh/s but stats page shows 884.33 kH/s
There seems to be a glitch or some issue with the pool. The entire X11 hashrate (as seen at the top-right corner) dropped from around 75 Gh/s to about 200 Mh/s.
I am not worried, I am sure it will get fixed soon - poolwaffle does an amazing job of taking care of this pool.
June 22, 2014, 02:27:31 PM
same here: stratum+tcp://eu.wafflepool.com:3331 sgminer reporting 11Mh/s but stats page shows 884.33 kH/s
June 22, 2014, 02:24:57 PM
hello! that happend? i using stratum+tcp://sea.wafflepool.com:3331 and i got 30mh hashrate. And about 3% rejects
not i see 736.94 kH/s (0.0%) That is this?? 10 minutes i cant' see normal hashrate.. but i have full speed on miners and 0 HW errors
not i see 736.94 kH/s (0.0%) That is this?? 10 minutes i cant' see normal hashrate.. but i have full speed on miners and 0 HW errors
same here on useast hashing good but the site is broken
June 22, 2014, 02:23:12 PM
hello! that happend? i using stratum+tcp://sea.wafflepool.com:3331 and i got 30mh hashrate. And about 3% rejects
not i see 736.94 kH/s (0.0%) That is this?? 10 minutes i cant' see normal hashrate.. but i have full speed on miners and 0 HW errors
not i see 736.94 kH/s (0.0%) That is this?? 10 minutes i cant' see normal hashrate.. but i have full speed on miners and 0 HW errors
June 22, 2014, 02:11:00 PM
Found that Wafflepool is one if not the most stable around (at least for my Gridseeds) after trying out severel others.
There is a good website where you can rate wafflepool, i just did
http://poolpicker.eu/reviews?pool=WafflePool
There is a good website where you can rate wafflepool, i just did
http://poolpicker.eu/reviews?pool=WafflePool
I must agree on this one.
Tested many around.
Good job, poolowner.
June 22, 2014, 08:56:43 AM
Looks like we are having a great run with guerillacoin Hope it lasts
Hope it lasts June 22, 2014, 06:14:31 AM
is everyone sure that for x11 it is 4 x of script? I was mining with a 750 ti evga superclocked from factory at 1305MHz and getting 250-260 khashes script using latest cuda miner and with no fine tuning or anything, just using wafflepool config setup using latest ccminer im averaging 2.5 to 2.6 mhashes which would be 10 times of script. And all this is running at 54C for 19 hours now.
[ ] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2548 khash/s
[ ] accepted: 1846/1849 (99.84%), 2548 khash/s (yay!!!)
[ ] Stratum detected new block
[ ] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2597 khash/s
[ ] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2452 khash/s
[ ] accepted: 1847/1850 (99.84%), 2452 khash/s (yay!!!)
[ ] Stratum detected new block
[ ] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2573 khash/s
so is this right?
[ ] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2548 khash/s
[ ] accepted: 1846/1849 (99.84%), 2548 khash/s (yay!!!)
[ ] Stratum detected new block
[ ] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2597 khash/s
[ ] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2452 khash/s
[ ] accepted: 1847/1850 (99.84%), 2452 khash/s (yay!!!)
[ ] Stratum detected new block
[ ] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2573 khash/s
so is this right?
4x is an rough estimate for AMD GPUs. NVIDIA ratio is indeed different. If you are getting 10x then you'll need to do some extra math to figure out your profitability against LTC, if you care about that. Or just enjoy
Ok Thank you very much.
June 21, 2014, 09:22:27 PM
You are going to get 20+MHs on X11, and reduce power costs running GPU. Look at stats page for X11
For help with 280x and 7950 I made a post with my config ... looking for it now.
For help with 280x and 7950 I made a post with my config ... looking for it now.
5mh/s of scrypt would be APPROXIMATELY 20mh/s of x11... it differs a bit depending on what kind of GPUs you are using. But I also moved 5mh/s of scrypt GPUs over to x11 and am getting right around 20mh/s now. As far as profitability... you can very easily compare algos at the top of the wafflepool stats pages. It's got all 3 algos listed and their profit vs litecoin. x11 is currently a bit higher than everything but it changes frequently. Another thing that's nice is that x11 uses about half the power that scrypt does. So you'll at least save money on electricity.
Many thanks for answering the questions. I see currently that scrypt is 170% of LTC, and x11 is 215% of LTC. What confuses me is that x11 algo is about 4x increase in hash over scrypt, so when these percentages increase over LTC is calculated, does that already take into account the 4x increase using the same AMD hardware? So what I'm really trying to ask, is if 5mh/s scrypt and 20mh/s x11 is the current stats on wafflepool (170% and 215% of LTC, respectively), or is it assuming 5mh/s scrypt and 5mh/s x11 is the states at the top?
The "vs LTC" percentage already includes the 4x ratio, so it is - roughly - apples to apples comparison for AMD GPUs. Other stats (e.g. BTC / 1MH ) are not adjusted by that ratio.
Jump to: