Topic: PRCDice.eu - Largest Dice invest site - Open since 2013! Chat, Play, Invest! - page 8. (Read 89214 times)

I just received a PM:


I'm not sure how to react, regarding the negative trust I previously left him.

I said it wasn't about the payment, but about the principle of the thing. Now that he's paid, if I leave the negative trust rating in place it seems like I'm punishing him unfairly. If I remove it, it seems like I was only trying to blackmail him after all.

As a compromise I'm changed it to a 'neutral' rating, so it's still visible for those who care to look, but doesn't contribute to the red warning sign next to all his posts. I hope that's the right thing to do...

Thanks Dean. I'm glad we sorted this out, and hope we can get on better in future.

Doog isn't an unreasonable guy and the problem can in fact be solved easily when you [...]

I just received a PM:


I'm not sure how to react, regarding the negative trust I previously left him.

I said it wasn't about the payment, but about the principle of the thing. Now that he's paid, if I leave the negative trust rating in place it seems like I'm punishing him unfairly. If I remove it, it seems like I was only trying to blackmail him after all.

As a compromise I'm changed it to a 'neutral' rating, so it's still visible for those who care to look, but doesn't contribute to the red warning sign next to all his posts. I hope that's the right thing to do...

Thanks Dean. I'm glad we sorted this out, and hope we can get on better in future.

I just received a PM:


I'm not sure how to react, regarding the negative trust I previously left him.

I said it wasn't about the payment, but about the principle of the thing. Now that he's paid, if I leave the negative trust rating in place it seems like I'm punishing him unfairly. If I remove it, it seems like I was only trying to blackmail him after all.

As a compromise I'm changed it to a 'neutral' rating, so it's still visible for those who care to look, but doesn't contribute to the red warning sign next to all his posts. I hope that's the right thing to do...

Thanks Dean. I'm glad we sorted this out, and hope we can get on better in future.

Hi,
I added 1 Bitcoin to your PRC balance as a long overdue reward for helping with that bug.

Cheers

Dean

Affiliates have been paid now. They are for the lifetime and will also carry over when the new site is live.
Thanks

Actually got my pay.  

Thanks... but my numbers don't match up for player g4l.

g4l    0.00527946 <- Shows he only played 52.7946 BTC, but my report I have is last checked he played 145.4619 BTC (ish.)

I gave him his rake back if 0.01454619 BTC is why I know, unless YOLO lied to me

Affiliates have been paid now. They are for the lifetime and will also carry over when the new site is live.
Thanks

?

...
---------------
Speaking about affiliates, will payments be done today (Monday)? Also, is there a limited period for which we get the % of affiliate activity, or is it 'for life'? It's not specified in terms.

Holy crap. thats a nice bug bounty, damn i really wish i have choosen IT as a profession

As an example (dredging up the past, sorry; if I could dredge up the future I would) when I ask "do you have an ETA for that withdrawal", it's best to just give an answer. "armory crashed so I need to resync it. it could take an hour" would be a good response. "its not 12 hours yet so whats youre problem" isn't a good response.

Dooglus, counting cards in online casino doesn't make any sense.Decks are shuffled after every hand.That's why owner said it's fine with him

joshstrike (MOD): was she still switching off tables?
a75rtuga: nh guys! Cheesy
dooglus: I think so
dooglus: these "runs" were tables
joshstrike (MOD): I don't know if that strategy really helps
dooglus: me neither
dooglus: it doesn't seem to work for me
joshstrike (MOD): I was telling her, if you're gonna count cards
dooglus: I'm $50 down on blackjack still, even after that $20 win
joshstrike (MOD): you're better off sticking to one table
joshstrike (MOD): and moderating your bet
joshstrike (MOD): b/c a new table is a total unknown for the first few hands.
dooglus: but aren't you better on a neutral table than a 'cold' one?
joshstrike (MOD): of course this requires betting more than the minimum per hand
joshstrike (MOD): no, a cold one is a known quantity, just bet low
dooglus: hmm
joshstrike (MOD): also what you consider cold is sometimes only +3 to +5. I don't think you're counting right.
joshstrike (MOD): believe me, we checked =)
bonjin: does counting work on online casinos like this?
joshstrike (MOD): in ours it does.
joshstrike (MOD): most of the time, no
joshstrike (MOD): but we use a six deck shoe that goes from one hand to the next.
bonjin: ok
bonjin: gg
a75rtuga: hey pm! :O
a75rtuga: gg
joshstrike (MOD): we don't tell you when it gets shuffled, but we do show it the next day
joshstrike (MOD): most online casinos just use a new deck for every hand.
joshstrike (MOD): we're the only one I know of that doesn't.
bonjin: might need to learn more about this. lol
joshstrike (MOD): but as doog discovered, we do also burn a card between each deal.
bonjin: what does that mean?
joshstrike (MOD): we discard one from the deck before each hand.
joshstrike (MOD): all together this does increase your odds as a player
joshstrike (MOD): but only to the point of playing in a real casino on a six deck shoe
joshstrike (MOD): in other words it's better than a continuous shuffler.
a75rtuga: hey
EasyJest: it sure is

I used to count cards at a Bitcoin casino and made a few hundred dollars doing so.

I talked to the owner of the casino before I started doing it and he was fine with it. (He told me I was doing it wrong, as I continued to win more and more, but that's another story).

I don't see how you go from that to "he probably cheated at Just-Dice".

Clutching at straws much?

I'm not saying "he didn't pay me the bounty I'm due so he probably will steal the PRCdice bankroll" because that doesn't follow.

All I'm saying is "he didn't pay me the bounty I'm due". I'm not then drawing far-fetched conclusions from it.

Let's stick to the facts shall we?

Edit: if you don't see the difference between taking advantage of the edge that's available in a game and lying, cheating, and stealing, then I feel sorry for you. In my book the two are completely different. Playing with known seeds to steal from the investors is wrong. Using a winning strategy in blackjack isn't. How can you honestly consider the two things to be in the same ballpark?