Just to show that you haven't been following it, the paper trail was simply standard, general payments made to the attorney firm by Trump. If the attorney firm did something bad with the funds, that's their problem, not Trumps.
No, it wasn't standard and Cohen didn't even have a firm - these were personal payments to reimburse the loan he took out on his house. Obviously you will never admit you're wrong or believe something that makes your favorite politician look like a criminal but paper trail shows that:
Michael Cohen took out a loan on his house for $130,000 and created a shell company to pay Stormy Daniels.
In order to compensate Cohen for the payment, he had to be repaid double so that he could pay taxes as if it were earned income. In addition to the 130k, Trump also owed him $50k for rigging some polls using a company called Red Finch (you were right, some polls are lies). So he was owed ($130k + $50k) X 2 = $360k. $180k to reimburse the payments he made, $180k to pay income tax to make it look like income. He was also paid a $60k "bonus" for his actual work. So the final total was $420k, and they agreed to pay him $35k monthly for 1 year. ($35k * 12 = $420k).
Here's the Trump org ceo doing the math (he's currently in Rikers island for perjury during Trumps last criminal trial, he also served time for fraud before that - Trump surrounded himself with criminals) The bonus is noted as $50k, but ended up being changed to $60k later.
Here's one of the 12 checks Trump signed over the next year to make it look like Cohen was working for him, even though he was not:
All the holes have been filled in. Trump micromanaged his company, not even the CEO was authorized to make a payment for more than $10k without Trumps blessing. And there's no reason to double a reimbursement for taxes, unless you want to make it look like earned income.
Document Dump:
https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/rchcAZNAFo_U/v0There is no reasonable scenario where all this happened without Trumps explicit approval. And if prosecutors had case as strong as this one against Hillary, and there were no technicalities that caused a mistrial or reversal on appeals, she'd be a convicted felon today - and rightfully so.
Squirm away.