Topic: QUICKSELLER Vs. LEGENDSTER, LIVE NOW on Pay Per View, ROUND 1 (Read 10417 times)

you think QS is same as BB? I don't think so, badbear looks not like QS. Like others said, you can request IP proofs for your speculations.

No one is confused, wait are you telling yourself that you have multiple personality disorder syndrome ?

I think you are confused.

But haven't you too done the same in the past? You called out Tomatocage as qsexpose's alt and me as some other member's alt (don't even remember the name) and I don't know how many alts have been called out here as those who criticize you are all alts of each other and scammers too. You also claim TC took 2 BTC bribe for getting you off his trust list.  


You think so? OK may be 

But we've seen you login with an alt and keep a conversation going in order to make it seem like there are more poeple on your side of an argument than there really are.  Anyone who reasearches the posts of ACCTSeller and Quickseller can see you doing this.  Because you are (or were, so you say) active in account sales, we have no idea how many accounts you're in control of.  So given that (1) you've been seen perpetrating this kind of sockpuppetry and (2) your background in account trading I think it's makes sense why you find yourself confronting this accusation again and again.

This is a common tactic of people who are loosing an argument. They claim that everyone who is against their side is an alt of each other in order to distract from the conversation.

Well the moron that started this thread needs to be banned from creating threads / commenting.

Those accusations have no fundament whatsoever they are just thrown randomly, you can see that he called me an alt of quickseller too because i was defending qs so if you defend qs means you are qs. Im surprised this thread is not locked by the mods since its bringing no benefit to the forum and its just useless but ok

I dont think theymos would do that. If that wild accusation was true then it would severely hamper Quickie boy's credibility as well as badbear's.

Quickie boy is doing the dirty work for this forum, things which theymos should hire & regularly pay his own staff members to do.
Not saying he cant afford to or isnt bothered to do that already, but directly acting against the credibility of one pretend cop would discourage others as well and could increase the work load for the staff members & make the whole situation more messed up.

But we dont have to worry about badbear being the same as Quickie cuz they arent. (* I think..)

Ask theymos or the MODs  I think they can trace/see their IP add to their previous posts, you can confirm it, if QS vs BD is one person.

What a waste of time to spread such acusatation

Of course there's no truth to it.


Probably because BadBear is a user and Quickseller is also user. Someone dislikes both of them, therefore they're the same person  .

Da fuck is this shit..?

If there is any truth in that statement what so ever .. the lid off my mind just got blown!

How did you come to this conclusion?

He's a great asset to the forum until you're the one that he decides to wrecklessly go after.  Yes, I think he is basically ethical, but the problem is that he's also childish.  By that I mean that he flips out on people when they disagree with him.  You can see this again and again (although maybe he's calmer nowadays, maybe he's learning his lessons, idk).  I corrected him on a few points a few months ago and he flew into tirades of "you're an idiot" etc, then went off into a 3 month long smear campaign where he was using alts and trying to dig up all these unsubstantiated charges against me and use them to have me kicked off a signature campaign.  Why?  Apprantely he didn't like it when I told him he was a hothead and that calling people idiots wasn't cool.

Quickseller is a little like an overambitious cop, he wants to catch the bad guys so damn badly that he doesn't care how many babies and old ladies get run over by his squad care while he's in pursuit.  It's the main reason he didn't last on default trust (my guess, anyway), he's so quick to call people out on half-baked conspiracy stories and accusations that his actions often do more harm than good.

That said, who knows, maybe he's learned his lesson but I don't know.  A week ago a newbie account showed up and started to try to reignite the quickseller drama with me, then disappeared again.  I'm sure it was quickseller in a trolling mood---the person even had his writing style---but who can say for sure.  Anyway, I'm hoping that as quickseller gets older, he'll learn to think twice before he acts.   Once he learns that lesson, he realy will be a great asset to this forum, till then, it's hit-or-miss at best.

My point is that I trust him and don't consider him to be "unethical or childish"
He's a great asset to the forum.

If you go back through the forums you'll see that my KOS account handled escrows as large as $4000 without issue proving I could be trusted with $4000 before the bigbitz incident. Your point?

It was my phones damn auto correct Quickseller* you can also see I sent him feedback a while back.

Lol, apprantely Sakarias-Corporation will trust anyone who's name starts with quick on any day of the week.  Good thing he got luck and Quickseller was nice to him.

He was referring to me. You can check his sent trust.

I understand, but this thread is about quickseller, not quicksilver https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/quicksilver-17818