QUICKSELLER Vs. LEGENDSTER, LIVE NOW on Pay Per View, ROUND 1 - page 8.

DiamondCardz

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1118

Quote from: TECSHARE on May 28, 2015, 01:44:01 AM

jamokes

"Appearing at the end of the 19th century as a blend of java and mocha, by the 1920s it became slang for someone who lacked mental abilities beyond that of a cup of coffee, probably influenced by moke. In the 1960s it also began to be used as slang for male genitalia.
jamoke - Wiktionary
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/jamoke"

Sorry needed to define that, that's a curious word to use...

Anyway:

I don't think the negative rating he left on you is unwarranted but I'm curious as to how you can be -1 / +12 and have 0 trust points. I'm guessing the positive ratings need more time to mature for the algorithm but that's still a bit dodgy, I don't think that just because I agree with you having a negative rating put on you means I should agree with that.

But god damnit TECSHARE we're not all secret illuminati members conspiring with the Bitcointalk staff just because we made an argument against you.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: DiamondCardz on May 28, 2015, 12:20:24 AM

Quote from: Vod on May 27, 2015, 11:54:29 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on May 27, 2015, 09:23:48 PM

I just lost what little respect I had left for Tomatocage. This is unfortunate, I once considered him a pillar of this community.

In case you didn't notice, QS left you the trust that fixed your trust issue.

Bahahaha, I just saw that as well. Bit ironic that the person who tries to stand up for you and prevent you from having a TWC tag is the same person who you decide to insult for being put back onto DefaultTrust.

That said, I've been away for a while, but I never had an inherent problem with QS. He did leave the occasional weird negative trust but generally his ratings were (are?) accurate.

QS: This was the insult.

Quickseller didn't fix anything, all he did was make it so I don't have ? ? ? any more. I still have a ZERO trust rating after hundreds of trades and 4 years of activity because Vod feels it is appropriate to destroy peoples trust ratings because he does not like what was said about him. Him leaving a rating for me doesn't change my opinion of him, and if anything I would prefer he had not left it, because we have never traded or even hardly had any direct interaction. Furthermore he calls my left ratings into question. I am curious which actual rating(s) he takes issue with, because unlike you jamokes I try to limit my ratings to people I have had direct interaction or trade with and have used negative ratings sparingly. Additionally my posts have noting to do with the default trust, but with how the rules are selectively enforced regarding it (specifically Vods systematic abuse of it). I don't consider this a favor, even if he intended it to be.

DiamondCardz

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1118

Quote from: Vod on May 27, 2015, 11:54:29 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on May 27, 2015, 09:23:48 PM

I just lost what little respect I had left for Tomatocage. This is unfortunate, I once considered him a pillar of this community.

In case you didn't notice, QS left you the trust that fixed your trust issue.

Bahahaha, I just saw that as well. Bit ironic that the person who tries to stand up for you and prevent you from having a TWC tag is the same person who you decide to insult for being put back onto DefaultTrust.

That said, I've been away for a while, but I never had an inherent problem with QS. He did leave the occasional weird negative trust but generally his ratings were (are?) accurate.

QS: This was the insult.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: TECSHARE on May 27, 2015, 09:23:48 PM

I just lost what little respect I had left for Tomatocage. This is unfortunate, I once considered him a pillar of this community.

In case you didn't notice, QS left you the trust that fixed your trust issue.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

I just lost what little respect I had left for Tomatocage. This is unfortunate, I once considered him a pillar of this community.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Quickseller on May 27, 2015, 05:34:42 PM

edit2: there was at least one person who was scammed because my negative trust ratings were not seen by default in the one week that I was off default trust, and I think that fact should say something about the effectiveness of my work

This is why people on DT should back each other up so that this doesn't happen if one of us gets removed.

Personally, I try to catch all the newbie loan requests, but I'm not as involved anymore as QS is to catch the other scams.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

LOL. It took barely 24 hours for KoS to notice that I was readded to default trust.

I am not even sure why you hate me so much. Did I out one of your alts trying to scam that is not publicly known to be your alt?

edit: If you don't care about BadBear giving you a negative rating, and you do care about my negative rating, and you think that QS=BadBear then at least one of those statements must be incorrect Cheesy

also - what was the threat? (@Salty)

edit2: there was at least one person who was scammed because my negative trust ratings were not seen by default in the one week that I was off default trust, and I think that fact should say something about the effectiveness of my work

SaltySpitoon

legendary

Activity: 2590

Merit: 2156

Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?

What assurance do you have to back up that Badbear is Quickseller 100%? I think all if not most of your arguments are either wrong or irrelevant.

Rather than starting a thread, you could have checked the default trust list to see that Quickseller is trusted by Tomatocage, and then Pmed Tomatocage asking for a reason why they added Quickseller.

BitcoinDistributor

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

*Mod Edit threat removed* -SaltySpitoon

Under my trust score I see -3, and him being on trusted feedback again. I give zero shits about badbear and vod's rating but seeing Quickseller trusted again...brings out a fire in me.

Did no one read how childish and unethical the guy is? And how he has no life besides being on here? Seriously, would you like to trust your $ in a person who is obviously a child.

Also, how ironic, Badbear is a college student. Quickseller is an account that randomly popped up a YEAR AGO having MANY accounts as old as 2011...coincidence? Around same time Badbear got into Bitcoin. Quickseller acts likes a child, badbear is in college....Quickseller gets default trust quicker then anyone before him...coincidence? I think not.

Quickseller = Badbear. 100%. Calling this bullshit for what it is.

Two years ago, you contacted me Salty asking if I would like to get lunch sometime since you live closeby. I would like to know if you would like to do that still. Let me know!

Topic: QUICKSELLER Vs. LEGENDSTER, LIVE NOW on Pay Per View, ROUND 1 - page 8. (Read 10417 times)