Topic: QUICKSELLER Vs. LEGENDSTER, LIVE NOW on Pay Per View, ROUND 1 - page 4. (Read 10417 times)

It was quite humorous actually. Tomatocage messaged me after I talked with him why he added you to his default trust and he told me to show examples of Quickseller's bad ratings. Well the ndnc or whatever that dude's name was happening and I quickly showed Tomatocage how Quickseller jumped too quickly to conclusions with that "scam hunt" and called out someone who was innocent and red marked him for multiple days.

Ironically, within hours Quickseller's default trust was gone.

It happened a few days ago. I was never given a reason however I have a feeling it had to do with this mistake :/

Quickseller is off default trust again?
When/why did this happen?

Yup thought as much. Pfft.

LOL god quickseller you are the easiest guy in the world to troll. I put you on ignore but I see you kept commenting so I put you on unignore to see what is it you are babbling about.

It was a joke, a troll. I knew that if I said three words "it was me" for who "framed" ndnc or whatever his name his, that you would then spend your life trying to prove that or wondering if I did.

I've never had business with ndnc or any interest with the guy. The only sig campaign I have and will ever use is bitmixer.io as it is automated without need to message people and all that bothersome work to get paid.

I made my signature cause despite you and others labeling me as the posterboy of scamhood around here, which makes me laugh as I continue to call out scammers when I see them, just check my feedback, I doxxed a longtime scammer not too long ago. Anyways, I made my sig cause despite that, two things
1) I run my own business now and hit 100k in sales (95k thru paypal, go figure and 5k in BTC) last week in only 5 months and it has been a nice side business for me. And yes its legal, yes its registered with the state, yes im paying taxes so dont try calling cops saying im selling drugs or something, im not.
2) Unrelated to the business I created, I do trading and have had good success over the last year or so on LBC

So yes, your rating cannot stop my success as I stated. Continue on with your delusions of thinking im the biggest scammer or framers or any of that of shit. From what i read the guy tried scamming for 0.2 BTC or some pity amount? No just no. I wouldnt waste my time over some pity amount like that. Back to ignore with you quickseller.

Seriously quickseller, do what vod did and what ive been doing outside of here, get a life. When you realize bitcointalk consumes your life as it obviously does for you, and used to for me, youll want to better yourself. I hope you realize that soon.

-the one and only
Kingofsports

That is what he apparently thinks, and I would be in agreement with him prior to him telling me that.

I don't think this is conclusive proof of anything however look at reply #43 of this. Also look at Bitcoindistrubator's signature:
He said that he intentionally posted an address that was related to ndnhc although he has never interacted with him.

Obviously most of this is just speculation, however I do think there is a non-zero possibility that I am right about this. At this point, a lot more circumstantial evidence is needed or a little more hard evidence is needed.

Your attempt to draw me into your personal battles has failed. I have already said everything I needed to say about QS.

Well, PistolPete is quite good at finding things out...so there's now a theory that you were framed to have framed nhdnc?

Huh. I guess that could make sense...Christ this is confusing.

Well to be fair, the accusation against ndnhc was reviewed by several people after I opened it over several days. Two people agreed with my conclusion enough to leave negative trust as well. The people who were defending him were only arguing that ndnhc was too much of a 'nice guy' and he 'made too much money' to ruin his reputation over .1 BTC.

The first time anyone brought up what ultimately exonerated ndnhc was when ndnhc brought up the point that the address was posted  after the giveaway had ended. Although one other person did hint at knowing specifically that they knew ndnhc was being framed (along with that they had evidence of such), they did not specifically give the evidence of such and they did not provide (me) of any kind of warning.

Other then the ndnhc incident it is fairly rare that I am actually wrong about someone being a scammer, although sometimes I remove a negative because sufficient time has elapsed, they go on to complete successful deals, or they repay money they borrowed/stole.

I was also thinking the same thing that I received via PM yesterday just as I was removing the negative on ndnhc:

Hopefully you're correct about him changing his overly-destructive MO.  Anyway, now that TC has removed him from default trust (again) perhaps it's time to let this thread die.  The title is more than a little inflammatory, and quite outdated at this point.

I don't think there's that much bad about him, though he can be jumpy as hell to make decisions. That's my primary concern but hopefully Quickseller is moving to address that anyway. This community needs more investigation, more question-asking and less jumping to conclusions.

I am curious to know how many threads we would see requesting specific moderators to be removed from being moderators if the identity of the moderator was revealed publicly any time a moderator took action against someone.

Serious question.

What is bad about Quickseller being on the default trust list?

With Vod going into retirement, the Bitcoin community needs someone like that.


~BCX~

..why ??  Did you poop out some jalapeno sauce ??

It makes little sense to keeping this guy on any Default list it is just thread after thread of complaints and just look at the recent bullshit claim he just made this weekend. Run a person through the mud without even talking to the guy? Hey Techshare you watching this or are you still hung up on Vod?

I noticed that Vod had previously left me a positive trust rating agreeing with me about the trust system (most likely out of spite of Badbear informing him he would be excluding him if he did not remove his rating). Now after the perceived slight quoted above, suddenly it is gone. I think he is having issues trying to figure out whom he should spite more (in stead of perhaps examining his own behavior).

No specifically I told Bigbitz once paid the $250 or $275 whatever it was that you would remove the negative trust and make a post saying that the debt or whatever he would call is settled/repaid so that I could actively reach out to those who red trusted me to consider changing / removing their feedback. Instead he goes on to tell me that he would not remove the negative trust and that i would still owe the remaining balance of 2.00 BTC - X.XX BTC (worth $250-$275) and would reach out to those who left negatives to keep it there until the full 2 BTC was repaid. So no there was no settlement and I did try my best to reach a fair agreement just get it done with.

Welp, RIP. That changes the game then, if he's just actively avoiding paying the money. Funny thing is Bitcoin is so low right now that he wouldn't even lose that much out of his own pocket to just pay the full 2 BTC back anyway...

What exactly is this list? Do you happen to have a copy of the dumped DB? It appears that among other things, if these accounts really can be linked back to KoS, that the account JustAGuyFromTexas had tried to send a fake escrow contract from DannyHamilton, which would mean that KoS is more then a one-time scammer as he claims.

The nature freedom of speech is that anyone can make any claim they want with or without there being any legitimacy to such claim. Feel free to find a thread that claims that I left an inaccurate negative rating, along with evidence that such rating was in fact inaccurate.

The rating I left in the referenced thread was never a negative rating, although the comment that I left is factually accurate.

I guess you are free to speculate that the ~.07 that TC will receive for the escrow fee is enough for him to compromise his interrogatory and sell a spot on default trust. I can say with a good amount of certainty that TC does not sell positions on the default trust network, however if spots were to be sold they would likely be sold for a lot more then .07 BTC. Also, I have used TC as escrow a number of other times.