Pages:
Author

Topic: QUICKSELLER Vs. LEGENDSTER, LIVE NOW on Pay Per View, ROUND 1 - page 2. (Read 10417 times)

hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
Call me Alice. just Alice.
I trusted Quickseller with my Private key, yes my PRIVATE KEY. My Trezor went haywire and he helped me get it back, he could've stolen all the coins but didn't. I think it was about 1200$+ worth of coins on that address.
I would trust Quickseller any day of the week.


Damn auto correct *Quickseller
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 764
www.V.systems

Serious question.

What is bad about Quickseller being on the default trust list?

With Vod going into retirement, the Bitcoin community needs someone like that.


~BCX~

I tried to address that issue here : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nominate-insert-name-here-to-the-default-trust-list-1074134 Its not right for a pretend cop to be 'trustworthy'.
Yet someone who is a scammer should be trusted enough to make accurate trust reports  Cheesy

Actually no, but people shouldnt be given the 'trust of the community' because they busted a few scams, sure thats a commendable thing but in this community 'trust' for trade and 'trust' for doing a good cleanup job is blurred.

Its like giving the janitor a cop's badge.

(Not looking down upon a janitor just explaining the situation)
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374

Serious question.

What is bad about Quickseller being on the default trust list?

With Vod going into retirement, the Bitcoin community needs someone like that.


~BCX~

I tried to address that issue here : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nominate-insert-name-here-to-the-default-trust-list-1074134 Its not right for a pretend cop to be 'trustworthy'.
Yet someone who is a scammer should be trusted enough to make accurate trust reports  Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 764
www.V.systems

Serious question.

What is bad about Quickseller being on the default trust list?

With Vod going into retirement, the Bitcoin community needs someone like that.


~BCX~

I tried to address that issue here : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nominate-insert-name-here-to-the-default-trust-list-1074134 Its not right for a pretend cop to be 'trustworthy'.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Dude what the hell are you babbling on about? All I said was that I sold the kingofsports account to watoshi when you said I didnt.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
You are one sad dude. Go ahead and ask Badbear to confirm those messages. Ask Tomatocage. Back to ignore with you troll. Any person with a brain would know that.

As for your ndnc thing, find me any evidence as to why i give a shit about the dude? I dont. 2nd, I don't follow your signed message or whatever things. I use mixers all the time, hell you can mixx your coins with others on blockchain.info so just cause inputs are from similar users isnt 100% conclusive. its probably this same reason you got taken off default trust. i mean seriously dude who spends their life analyzing fucking blockchain txs of everyone? Get a cyber security job or something useful for your obvious huge amount of free time.
Like I said, even if the PM's are legit, they are not conclusive.

The transaction in question is not a coin-join (or similar) transaction. The two accounts were certainly controlled by the same person at least at one point in time.

ndnhc was never the target when the address was posted on the PRC dice giveaway thread that was closed, the evidence against ndnhc was designed to crumble upon close inspection, however no one bothered to look closely until ndnhc actually responded to the allegation himself.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
You are one sad dude. Go ahead and ask Badbear to confirm those messages. Ask Tomatocage. Back to ignore with you troll. Any person with a brain would know that.

As for your ndnc thing, find me any evidence as to why i give a shit about the dude? I dont. 2nd, I don't follow your signed message or whatever things. I use mixers all the time, hell you can mixx your coins with others on blockchain.info so just cause inputs are from similar users isnt 100% conclusive. its probably this same reason you got taken off default trust. i mean seriously dude who spends their life analyzing fucking blockchain txs of everyone? Get a cyber security job or something useful for your obvious huge amount of free time.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Seems BitcoinDistributor changed the title of the OP/thread?
The OP is a huge troll. When he fake sold his KoS account, he changed the title of one of his 'Vod' threads to something along the lines of 'Vod is a good guy'

edit: this is the thread I am talking about, however it appears that KoS has since changed the title back
You still don't believe I sold the KOS account? LOL. Its honestly hillarious.

Ask Tomatocage, he escrowed the 0.10 BTC I sold it for. The buyer was Watoshi-Dimoto or a friend of his (I still dont know). He contacted me saying he wanted to buy and then said he wanted to use a different account to make the purchase, and this gandalf.grey dude contacted me. The weird part is the gandalf guy talked differently then Watoshi so IDK if it was him.

Anyways, it looks like he gave up on the account. I'd rebuy it back for 0.01 BTC just for shits n giggles if Watoshi / gandolf / whoever reads this.
Interesting how you are still trying to link ndnhc to a scam (you)
How is the world in ndnc related to Watoshi??? Did I miss sometime? I think I was pretty clear what I said, Watoshi bought the account from me. hmmm let me see if I still have the PMs. Dont know if he messaged me on kingofsports2 but I'll check.
ndnhc posted 1At8KjNtUyAhWdUuNrZyUsCVQCFqcuY68m here, and Watoshi-Dimobuto posted 13UytrmhA4FBuELZnXp12TXjj4Y19Hvb57 here. Both of these addresses signed this transaction.

The above is spelled out in this post, which I am fairly certain that you are/were aware of.


Your screenshot does not prove anything nor is it conclusive of anything even if the PM is legit.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
What do you know, I do still have PMs! Here ya go.

sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Seems BitcoinDistributor changed the title of the OP/thread?
The OP is a huge troll. When he fake sold his KoS account, he changed the title of one of his 'Vod' threads to something along the lines of 'Vod is a good guy'

edit: this is the thread I am talking about, however it appears that KoS has since changed the title back
You still don't believe I sold the KOS account? LOL. Its honestly hillarious.

Ask Tomatocage, he escrowed the 0.10 BTC I sold it for. The buyer was Watoshi-Dimoto or a friend of his (I still dont know). He contacted me saying he wanted to buy and then said he wanted to use a different account to make the purchase, and this gandalf.grey dude contacted me. The weird part is the gandalf guy talked differently then Watoshi so IDK if it was him.

Anyways, it looks like he gave up on the account. I'd rebuy it back for 0.01 BTC just for shits n giggles if Watoshi / gandolf / whoever reads this.
Interesting how you are still trying to link ndnhc to a scam (you)
How is the world in ndnc related to Watoshi??? Did I miss sometime? I think I was pretty clear what I said, Watoshi bought the account from me. hmmm let me see if I still have the PMs. Dont know if he messaged me on kingofsports2 but I'll check.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Seems BitcoinDistributor changed the title of the OP/thread?
I've changed the OP because this thread has been derailed and gone off to different subjects at least 5 times. Instead of making new threads, why not use this obviously popular thread to serve my annoucement needs.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Seems BitcoinDistributor changed the title of the OP/thread?
The OP is a huge troll. When he fake sold his KoS account, he changed the title of one of his 'Vod' threads to something along the lines of 'Vod is a good guy'

edit: this is the thread I am talking about, however it appears that KoS has since changed the title back
You still don't believe I sold the KOS account? LOL. Its honestly hillarious.

Ask Tomatocage, he escrowed the 0.10 BTC I sold it for. The buyer was Watoshi-Dimoto or a friend of his (I still dont know). He contacted me saying he wanted to buy and then said he wanted to use a different account to make the purchase, and this gandalf.grey dude contacted me. The weird part is the gandalf guy talked differently then Watoshi so IDK if it was him.

Anyways, it looks like he gave up on the account. I'd rebuy it back for 0.01 BTC just for shits n giggles if Watoshi / gandolf / whoever reads this.
Interesting how you are still trying to link ndnhc to a scam (you)
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Seems BitcoinDistributor changed the title of the OP/thread?
The OP is a huge troll. When he fake sold his KoS account, he changed the title of one of his 'Vod' threads to something along the lines of 'Vod is a good guy'

edit: this is the thread I am talking about, however it appears that KoS has since changed the title back
You still don't believe I sold the KOS account? LOL. Its honestly hillarious.

Ask Tomatocage, he escrowed the 0.10 BTC I sold it for. The buyer was Watoshi-Dimoto or a friend of his (I still dont know). He contacted me saying he wanted to buy and then said he wanted to use a different account to make the purchase, and this gandalf.grey dude contacted me. The weird part is the gandalf guy talked differently then Watoshi so IDK if it was him.

Anyways, it looks like he gave up on the account. I'd rebuy it back for 0.01 BTC just for shits n giggles if Watoshi / gandolf / whoever reads this.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Seems BitcoinDistributor changed the title of the OP/thread?
The OP is a huge troll. When he fake sold his KoS account, he changed the title of one of his 'Vod' threads to something along the lines of 'Vod is a good guy'

edit: this is the thread I am talking about, however it appears that KoS has since changed the title back
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
Seems BitcoinDistributor changed the title of the OP/thread?
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
yeah and this is why the USA is fucked up, because intead of people holding the power the gov which are default, fuck things for the little few?

Dont tell me I am wrong, I am trying to make a point, dont care about the trust given to me.  I had real trust from real trades nor did that give me any leverage here.  Ebay is a good example that is much more fairer system then the system we have here.

Fair? How? Have you read SaltySpitoon's* post? He has explained correctly about this.

Ebay gives false sense to users because most of them think feedback can't be faked where in fact, it is very easy to do.

I made a purchase from an eBay seller that has an excellent feedback rating from her customers.  I have yet to receive the items I purchased on July 8, 2012, even though the seller has claimed TWICE that she has mailed my items and has given me two tracking numbers.........nothing.....neither of them ever arrive.  I am very suspicious now that she has received such excellent ratings from others, with customers praising her for her generosity, customer service, and prompt delivery of their orders.  They all sound a little too good........is there any possible way that a seller can manipulate their feedback ratings?

---

Sure they can manipulate their feedback.  There is a seller who has 20+ accounts, and he uses the accounts to purchase items from his main account just so he can build up positive feedback.

* IIRC.
Woah. You quoted an outside source here. I've never seen that here in my 3 years on this forum. I'm impressed and need to learn on this. *Starts looking at text code*
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
yeah and this is why the USA is fucked up, because intead of people holding the power the gov which are default, fuck things for the little few?

Dont tell me I am wrong, I am trying to make a point, dont care about the trust given to me.  I had real trust from real trades nor did that give me any leverage here.  Ebay is a good example that is much more fairer system then the system we have here.

@bold: I received a negative rating from a buyer who himself backed out from my deal. He had purchased my gift card in an auction on Ebay and backed out later. Instead, I should be the one giving him a negtive feedback and yes, he has received 100% positives from other members when he himself seems to be a scammer.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
yeah and this is why the USA is fucked up, because intead of people holding the power the gov which are default, fuck things for the little few?

Dont tell me I am wrong, I am trying to make a point, dont care about the trust given to me.  I had real trust from real trades nor did that give me any leverage here.  Ebay is a good example that is much more fairer system then the system we have here.

Fair? How? Have you read SaltySpitoon's* post? He has explained correctly about this.

Ebay gives false sense to users because most of them think feedback can't be faked where in fact, it is very easy to do.

I made a purchase from an eBay seller that has an excellent feedback rating from her customers.  I have yet to receive the items I purchased on July 8, 2012, even though the seller has claimed TWICE that she has mailed my items and has given me two tracking numbers.........nothing.....neither of them ever arrive.  I am very suspicious now that she has received such excellent ratings from others, with customers praising her for her generosity, customer service, and prompt delivery of their orders.  They all sound a little too good........is there any possible way that a seller can manipulate their feedback ratings?

---

Sure they can manipulate their feedback.  There is a seller who has 20+ accounts, and he uses the accounts to purchase items from his main account just so he can build up positive feedback.

* IIRC.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Pre-sale - March 18
yeah and this is why the USA is fucked up, because intead of people holding the power the gov which are default, fuck things for the little few?

Dont tell me I am wrong, I am trying to make a point, dont care about the trust given to me.  I had real trust from real trades nor did that give me any leverage here.  Ebay is a good example that is much more fairer system then the system we have here.
Pages:
Jump to: