Topic: Reasons why ICOs fail - page 32. (Read 319623 times)
The main reason is not scam, but the fact that projects can not collect soft cap for the implementation of the project. The reasons can be very many, but I think that the main reason is the distrust of people to invest their money in projects in a falling market, because now it is the falling market when people lose their money and they are not going to lose them, so they simply fix the deposits.
There are a lot of reasons why ICOs fail. Many projects has low quality vision without professional persons around. Another reason is the lack of
marketing. There are some good ICOs with a nice concept and potential but do not have any effective marketing campaigns for their project.
marketing. There are some good ICOs with a nice concept and potential but do not have any effective marketing campaigns for their project.
When the market falls, people do not want to take risks, so they invest little in ico. I think when the market will grow - will give a big profit
Mostly now these days is there are just too many similar projects and copies flying around so the better it is unique the more it survives
I'm sure that the reason for the failure of ICO is the general news background, which is created, including here on the forum. Posts about bad projects of ICO are written by people who are far from understanding the work in ICO. Even worse is when such illiterate messages are written here because a large number of posts are needed. That's the feeling of failure of ICO. This is not a true situation
there's a lot of reason but most of it bad planing bad management the fuck up the whole thing
ICO fails mostly because their products are not well thought out and no one needs them. You should be able to find a very good ICO project through this research.
Mostly ICO will fail if the development team working the project are not really doing their job well for the development of its products and they only purely stealing the money of the developers and put the project in garbage after. So we must be careful in chosing ICO those with composed of tested development team members who runs the ICO with succeesful project experienced.
and there is also the possibility that the team that made ico was intentionally and indeed had planned to take away all the investment money from the investors who invested in the failed ico, but that was only an analysis of me when I saw the team profile of an ico that could be said to all working in ico lacks enough experience in the crypto world especially ico.
ICO fails mostly because their products are not well thought out and no one needs them. You should be able to find a very good ICO project through this research.
Ico fails for too many reasons, and one of this is due to the idea of the project. It might already be used or there is already an alike platform that uses such a project. Investors didn't see a reason to invest again over the same thing.
ICO fails mostly because their products are not well thought out and no one needs them. You should be able to find a very good ICO project through this research.
The main reason for the current failure of projects is the lack of practical significance of the product or service in the ICO project. Interest should be long after the end of the project, in my opinion this period should be at least 10 years. Now I see few such projects.
In my opinion, the number of ICOs that failed was because they were less precise in making strategies. This strategy starts from planning, implementation and sustainability. Usually the ICO only makes a strategy on planning and implementation. And even so they make it not in detail and mature. The continuity stage is usually not made by ICO in detail so that the ICO coin cannot last long in the market. Therefore, many new coins are plunged into the market every day but also cannot last long in the market. Besides this ICO failure can be caused by fraudulent ICO or fake ICO.
many icos were created just to collect the money, not to face the real problems of the world. it's a common business model of few people to simply make an ICO, nominate team and the profits.
Some factors that ico failed in their projects are they have lack of advertisements, the team is not focusing in their project but only focusing in investors, the project idea seems no future, look like a scam ico due of not active in telegram, and last the project has no development.
Many projects actually do not meet the requirements requested by the ICO.
most of the ICO failures are because their projects are completely unrelated to blockchain.
i am agree with you dude.today many fakes projects in crypto market that not correlated with blockchain.maybe they consider this is big opportunity to earn money by launching new projects. most of the ICO failures are because their projects are completely unrelated to blockchain.
Imho there are so much reasons why this is happening right now, one of the biggest reason it's because biggest part of them just want to raise money and don't have any unique idea or team and develop members not very expirienced at ICO and cryptocyrrency.
Many projects actually do not meet the requirements requested by the ICO.
most of the ICO failures are because their projects are completely unrelated to blockchain.
most of the ICO failures are because their projects are completely unrelated to blockchain.
Most ICOs are simply poor investments, that is the reason why they fail. The market right now is extremely difficult to survive in, an ICO would need to have every advantage imaginable in order to attract investment in a deeply bear market. This is why the bulk of projects do not even reach a fraction of their soft cap.
I think it is on account of there is no real interest for the venture. Numerous ICO groups have concocted an undertaking and after that gullibly trust that this venture will change the world and change the universe. Benefits will most likely come. Yet, they never consider what people in general truly needs
In my opinion, the number of ICOs that failed was because they were less precise in making strategies. This strategy starts from planning, implementation and sustainability. Usually the ICO only makes a strategy on planning and implementation. And even so they make it not in detail and mature. The continuity stage is usually not made by ICO in detail so that the ICO coin cannot last long in the market. Therefore, many new coins are plunged into the market every day but also cannot last long in the market. Besides this ICO failure can be caused by fraudulent ICO or fake ICO.
There are many ICOs out there, but more than 50% of them fail.
From my analogy, could this be the reasons why ICOs fail?
1. Being too complicated:
If you want investors to favour your ICO, make sure they understand your coin offering. Be concise yet interesting, creative yet not too ‘techy’ and try to explain concepts from scratch. Of course, the detail you go into is likely to depend on your target audience.
2. No unique Use case and lack of creativity:
The reality is, ICOs are not straightforward and with new ideas and concepts arising daily, you need to get noticed and that means coming up with some unique Use case
So, before a developer even attempts to launch an ICO or enter the crypto world, ask yourself: "What will make investors choose this particular ICO over a competitor’s ICO?"
I believe the list continues.
It is primarily because they do not reached the hard cap or even the soft cap. It is their target tokens to be sell. And then through advertising and promoting it to the investors we can sell tokens and can reach the hard cap if our project is really promising and it will make investors to encourage investing in IICO. From my analogy, could this be the reasons why ICOs fail?
1. Being too complicated:
If you want investors to favour your ICO, make sure they understand your coin offering. Be concise yet interesting, creative yet not too ‘techy’ and try to explain concepts from scratch. Of course, the detail you go into is likely to depend on your target audience.
2. No unique Use case and lack of creativity:
The reality is, ICOs are not straightforward and with new ideas and concepts arising daily, you need to get noticed and that means coming up with some unique Use case
So, before a developer even attempts to launch an ICO or enter the crypto world, ask yourself: "What will make investors choose this particular ICO over a competitor’s ICO?"
I believe the list continues.
Jump to: