Topic: Reasons why ICOs fail - page 50. (Read 319609 times)
An ICO is like a start-up and most don't succeed. The team, the vision, the demand and competition - there are plenty of reasons why projects aren't successful, which makes it really important to choose well and do your research. Even then it's not guaranteed. You should look at an ICO the way you would with a crowdfunding project, there's a strong possibility you won't get your money back or it'll be worth a lot less - it's a high risk investment.
I think that many projects that use ICO to call for capital and fraudulent money in the eyes of ICO people are getting worse. That makes many investors less trust in the ICO also they only short-term investment and led to that ICO failed before reaching the final goal.
Market situation don't give any chance to ICO to claim rewards which they want
There are plenty of reasons why ICO fail. Beginning from unprofessional team and ending with scams. Now there are a lot of them.
ICOs fail all because many dev are greedy and self centered, they only give ico with no product and use case, all they need is investors money and dump the project which made so many project fail and so many investors are now afraid to invest.
Today, many ICOs fail, because the project team does not have the vision of further development and scaling of its products taking into account the tasks of the society.
recently I participated in some ICOs, around 75% of it are totally a flop. Actually it is not a scam, but the longer I wait, the more I realize that price is keeps falling despite the fact that the project has a good potential. I think investors are losing interest in majority of ICOs.
Maybe that's the reason, and I agree with you, even though the ICO is good sometimes it still fails because of the waiting time, the longer it takes the investors are loosing interests in it, so
Mostly like that which made some Ico fail. there are also the same number of products in Ico, so investors become confused to invest. Because their concept is not unique and some investors will definitely not invest into it because they have the same concept in other projects.
It's a business that can't live without customers , it just dies . Too much ICO .
Most of ICO ar failing cos they are copies of other projects, and there are literally 6-7 bad copies of any project in crypto sphere. And what can you expect from something that is copy of a copy of a failed project, mostly without working platform and with bag full of nice promises...
Many of the reasons listed here do have a very serious impact on how people are still trying to earn on the trust of others. Nobody wants to make this world better and make the system of finance much more transparent. The people who want to make the world better are very small.
There are many ICOs out there, but more than 50% of them fail.
From my analogy, could this be the reasons why ICOs fail?
1. Being too complicated:
If you want investors to favour your ICO, make sure they understand your coin offering. Be concise yet interesting, creative yet not too ‘techy’ and try to explain concepts from scratch. Of course, the detail you go into is likely to depend on your target audience.
2. No unique Use case and lack of creativity:
The reality is, ICOs are not straightforward and with new ideas and concepts arising daily, you need to get noticed and that means coming up with some unique Use case
So, before a developer even attempts to launch an ICO or enter the crypto world, ask yourself: "What will make investors choose this particular ICO over a competitor’s ICO?"
I believe the list continues.
most existing ICO has a comparable idea with others and even with past forerunners. On the off chance that it doesn't have its own points of interest not unquestionably won't have the capacity to create for this. This occasionally makes the ICO couldn't succeed on the grounds that less has great potential later on. What's more, a developing number of ICO additionally influence speculators to be isolated into numerous ways to making ICO effectively. From my analogy, could this be the reasons why ICOs fail?
1. Being too complicated:
If you want investors to favour your ICO, make sure they understand your coin offering. Be concise yet interesting, creative yet not too ‘techy’ and try to explain concepts from scratch. Of course, the detail you go into is likely to depend on your target audience.
2. No unique Use case and lack of creativity:
The reality is, ICOs are not straightforward and with new ideas and concepts arising daily, you need to get noticed and that means coming up with some unique Use case
So, before a developer even attempts to launch an ICO or enter the crypto world, ask yourself: "What will make investors choose this particular ICO over a competitor’s ICO?"
I believe the list continues.
The most important reason is that the developers do not know how to attract investors through marketing.
I will support other members who encourage the idea that falling of ICO depends on ICO's characteristics only. So each ICO has its own problems.
Nowadays, with the development of digital technology, the coin is being attracted by many investors and they will be used by the ico programs to create the ico programs that will help boost the economy. the society of the country that accept ico
recently I participated in some ICOs, around 75% of it are totally a flop. Actually it is not a scam, but the longer I wait, the more I realize that price is keeps falling despite the fact that the project has a good potential. I think investors are losing interest in majority of ICOs.
Well, a lot of reasons can happen. First of all, there is an increasing amount of ICOs and it is getting harder to collect hard cap. thus far, majority of them failing and after listing they simply don't have excessive demand for token
Most ICOs fail before they are just here to get the btc and leave. They don't have any real project relating to real life application 
most existing ICO has a similar concept with others and even with previous predecessors. If it does not have its own advantages not certainly will not be able to generate for this. This sometimes makes the ICO could not succeed because less has good potential in the future. In addition, a growing number of ICO also make investors be divided into many paths to creating ICO successfully. This makes the ICO cannot achieve the minimum result that can be used to create ICO success.
They are only putting a small improvement concept to their new platforms. The majority of copycats are useless right now. Look at there are so many smartcontracts platforms right now but it seems like we need only ethereum platform.,EOS, ADA, TRON and any other smartcontract platforms are useless. We don't need em' all.
A lot of different ICO projects have appeared and continue to appear. However, lately I wanted to choose the ICO project to join as a signatory campaign participant and for a long time I could not just pick up anything that stood out from all this. Either the project ideas do not deserve attention, or the conditions of accession do not fit, there are increasingly many additional requirements, or the payment terms are not suitable.
This year it is very difficult to work for the ICO teams, even good projects can not raise enough funds. On the one hand, investors are afraid of numerous fraudulent projects, on the other - in conditions of a general market fall, such investment is not very profitable. In general, until a good market recovery begins, problems with the ICO will continue.
This year it is very difficult to work for the ICO teams, even good projects can not raise enough funds. On the one hand, investors are afraid of numerous fraudulent projects, on the other - in conditions of a general market fall, such investment is not very profitable. In general, until a good market recovery begins, problems with the ICO will continue.
Jump to: