Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed - page 89.

hacker1001101001

sr. member

Activity: 1288

Merit: 415

Quote from: nutildah on May 03, 2020, 02:55:20 AM

This post is objectively plagiarism.

Plagiarism is objectively a ban-able offense.

What happened to "objective standards"?

Yes, it is an objectively ban-able offense but only when it is done due to some financial motivation, doing it unknowingly or unintentionally without having any motives to spam or harm the forum makes it reconsiderable and objectively not an offense in specific cases.

Nice to see you caring about objectivity around.

wolwoo

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1148

Quote from: nutildah on May 03, 2020, 02:55:20 AM

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on May 02, 2020, 11:04:34 PM

Quote from: wolwoo on May 02, 2020, 07:40:45 PM

I promise that if I get banned, I will never be a bitcointalk.org member again. thanks

I don't think you would get banned by any sane or neutrally judging person due to the reported posts as it is clear that there were no hidden financial motives behind the above quoting mistake's. It's just the regular hunting of arrows into the dark game to sastify agendas and turning it up as an fake risk towards the community which in not.

Don't worry, you are cool !

This post is objectively plagiarism.

Plagiarism is objectively a ban-able offense.

What happened to "objective standards"?

.
Look, the whole post is not a quote. The first story is mine. I also know the second story, but I don't know the dates and numbers. I cited this, I forgot to share the link of the original page. Then I came to a conclusion with an analogy. If I had plagiarism, I would have to copy them all.

Quote from: nullius on April 28, 2020, 10:24:14 AM

Quote from: Lauda on April 28, 2020, 10:19:38 AM

Username: Wolwoo
Profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wolwoo-1003533

Evidence

[—so very much evidence!—]

What a shame in the eyes of wolves!

Quote from: nullius on March 08, 2020, 08:12:47 AM

Why was wolwoo recently so concerned about meticulously avoiding plagiarism, or even improper citation of sources? Did it just slip his mind that he has a history of blatantly ripping off non-forum articles for his posts?

Quote from: wolwoo on April 22, 2020, 10:53:08 AM

Quote from: nullius on April 17, 2020, 08:47:06 AM

[—long explanation—]

Quote from: wolwoo on April 14, 2020, 05:39:47 AM

I don't want to be accused of plagiarism

I doubt that you will be, given that you identified the author by name, you linked to his post, and (insofar as I can see in your Turkish post) you did not imply that you produced this work yourself. I make the foregoing suggested improvements because it seems you really want to do this right.

Plagiarism is a matter of stealing credit for another’s work. If an ordinary reasonable person reading your post would not assume that you wrote it yourself, and would not think that you claimed to write it yourself, then I do not think that you plagiarized the other post.

thank you for your interest and detailed explanations

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
today a Turkish user said he was banned for spam-plagiarism
where can we find out exactly why? he wants to appeal.

[...]

Quote from: wolwoo on April 22, 2020, 11:55:26 AM

Quote from: Halab on April 22, 2020, 11:44:11 AM

Quote from: wolwoo on April 22, 2020, 10:53:08 AM

today a Turkish user said he was banned for spam-plagiarism
where can we find out exactly why? he wants to appeal.

From what I can understand, coinforumgentr was translating articles with Google Translate into turkish.
And apparently Gospodin tried to warn him, but too late.

Thank you for your answer Sir
it is necessary to be more careful about this

Cue excuse: “I just don't remember when I did this shit!”

Cık cık cık Grin

I wasn't paying much attention to the forum rules. Here I express myself (as much as possible) freely. I was not afraid to do it wrong, but a friend was banned at the local place. I asked her situation. Then I said, "I have to be careful." A week later Lauda prepared a file for me

FatFork

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 2594

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: wolwoo on May 03, 2020, 02:23:43 AM

It would be better if I put a quotation mark ("") instead of a colon ( : ). But the reader understands that it is already a quote.

You probably didn't violate the forum rules knowingly and I can see your point but, as Lauda stated, this is not the way to properly attribute someone else's work. I'm sure the authors of those articles would agree with me. They are the ones who put in the effort and time to write those sentences, right? Then 'credit where credit's due'.

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on May 02, 2020, 11:04:34 PM

Quote from: wolwoo on May 02, 2020, 07:40:45 PM

I promise that if I get banned, I will never be a bitcointalk.org member again. thanks

I don't think you would get banned by any sane or neutrally judging person due to the reported posts as it is clear that there were no hidden financial motives behind the above quoting mistake's. It's just the regular hunting of arrows into the dark game to sastify agendas and turning it up as an fake risk towards the community which in not.

Don't worry, you are cool !

This post is objectively plagiarism.

Plagiarism is objectively a ban-able offense.

What happened to "objective standards"?

wolwoo

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1148

Quote from: Lauda on May 03, 2020, 02:07:26 AM

Quote from: wolwoo on May 03, 2020, 02:05:40 AM

I wanted to write the story right.
The defect seeker definitely finds it.
As I said, I respect the decision to be made. You respect too Wink

1) You wrote it wrong.
2) You stole work.
3) Unlike you, I do not respect double standards so no. Roll Eyes

It would be better if I put a quotation mark ("") instead of a colon ( : ). But the reader understands that it is already a quote.
Anyways
Believe that there are many people who "want to send me" in the local forum Cheesy

I wish the best

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: wolwoo on May 03, 2020, 02:05:40 AM

I wanted to write the story right.
The defect seeker definitely finds it.
As I said, I respect the decision to be made. You respect too Wink

1) You wrote it wrong.
2) You stole work.
3) Unlike you, I do not respect double standards so no. Roll Eyes

wolwoo

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1148

Quote from: Lauda on May 03, 2020, 12:53:10 AM

Quote from: wolwoo on May 02, 2020, 07:40:45 PM

I wrote the red ones
I searched the internet to write the second story correctly, already looking at the content "12000 gulden in 1629" etc..where can i know this?
When I started I said "another story"
":" I put the sign but I did not put the ".." sign

I forgot to include quotes in this section, but if you translate it is stated that this is a story at the beginning of the article. At the end of the article, it is clear that he is quoted by saying "dear readers".
I mentioned the correlation between two stories ....
It's 2017 and I'm a new member then ...It has been clearly stated in other links.
you can ban my membership if you wish
I'm tired of endless discussions...

This does not change that fact that this is not how attribute the work properly (which would have been trivially easy but you decided not to do it). This is intellectual theft nevertheless.

I wanted to write the story right.
The defect seeker definitely finds it.
As I said, I respect the decision to be made. You respect too Wink

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: wolwoo on May 02, 2020, 07:40:45 PM

I wrote the red ones
I searched the internet to write the second story correctly, already looking at the content "12000 gulden in 1629" etc..where can i know this?
When I started I said "another story"
":" I put the sign but I did not put the ".." sign

I forgot to include quotes in this section, but if you translate it is stated that this is a story at the beginning of the article. At the end of the article, it is clear that he is quoted by saying "dear readers".
I mentioned the correlation between two stories ....
It's 2017 and I'm a new member then ...It has been clearly stated in other links.
you can ban my membership if you wish
I'm tired of endless discussions...

This does not change that fact that this is not how attribute the work properly (which would have been trivially easy but you decided not to do it). This is intellectual theft nevertheless.

Quote from: wolwoo on May 02, 2020, 07:40:45 PM

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52984335
EFS merit to this.

EFS is a special case of a shady baboon, so your statement works against your case not in favor.

wolwoo

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1148

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on May 02, 2020, 11:04:34 PM

Quote from: wolwoo on May 02, 2020, 07:40:45 PM

I promise that if I get banned, I will never be a bitcointalk.org member again. thanks

I don't think you would get banned by any sane or neutrally judging person due to the reported posts as it is clear that there were no hidden financial motives behind the above quoting mistake's. It's just the regular hunting of arrows into the dark game to sastify agendas and turning it up as an fake risk towards the community which in not.

Don't worry, you are cool !

Thanks dude
If we are going to be banned in half of one of the 4300 odd messages, it should be written "specially for the perfect" to the entrance ... I do not have any special programs, I do not have the opportunity to search for those who are researching me.
If workers like us are gone, money hunters remain. They also eat each other Cheesy

hacker1001101001

sr. member

Activity: 1288

Merit: 415

Quote from: wolwoo on May 02, 2020, 07:40:45 PM

I promise that if I get banned, I will never be a bitcointalk.org member again. thanks

I don't think you would get banned by any sane or neutrally judging person due to the reported posts as it is clear that there were no hidden financial motives behind the above quoting mistake's. It's just the regular hunting of arrows into the dark game to sastify agendas and turning it up as an fake risk towards the community which in not.

Don't worry, you are cool !

wolwoo

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1148

Quote from: Vispilio on May 02, 2020, 10:27:43 PM

Quote from: wolwoo on May 02, 2020, 07:40:45 PM

...

If management does not want to see members like me who have been writing regularly for months without any interest here, I respect it. I do not have a multi account.

...

I promise that if I get banned, I will never be a bitcointalk.org member again. thanks

wolwoo is one of the most meticulous members I've seen on this forum when it comes to quoting sources and references where credit is due.

The following guideline by @theymos is excellent advice in my opinion, and should have put an end to the ridiculous practice of digging up long resolved issues and / or stalking account histories of hand selected members just to pursue petty vendettas against them:

Quote from: theymos on January 30, 2020, 05:13:15 PM

- Exercise a lot of forgiveness. People shouldn't be "permanently branded" as a result of small mistakes from which we've all moved past. Oftentimes, people get a rating due to unknowingly acting a bit outside of the community's consensus on appropriate behavior, and such ratings may indeed be appropriate. But if they correct the problem and don't seem likely to do it again, remove the rating or replace it with a neutral. Even if someone refuses to agree with the community consensus (ie. they refuse to back down philosophically), if they're willing to refrain from the behavior, their philosophical difference should not be used to justify a rating. For example, in the YoBit mass-ratings example above, ratings should be immediately removed after the person removes the signature, even if they maintain and continue to argue that they didn't do anything wrong. If someone agrees to "follow 'the law' without agreeing to it", that should be enough.

Thanks dude
I spend most of my time on this forum
Sometimes I am happy, sometimes I get angry, but I love bitcointalk.org ...
I have no inference from here, I gained 3-5 ethereum in 3 years, I have not participated in the bounty for months. Already account negative trust, most likely it will not buy campaigns ...
This is not a place where I make a living, but a platform where I spend time - learn - friendship - share my ideas ..
As far as I know, Vispilio is no different than me ...
Greetings to all
I wish everyone good day, good luck if my account is closed

Vispilio

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1656

Quote from: wolwoo on May 02, 2020, 07:40:45 PM

...

If management does not want to see members like me who have been writing regularly for months without any interest here, I respect it. I do not have a multi account.

...

I promise that if I get banned, I will never be a bitcointalk.org member again. thanks

wolwoo is one of the most meticulous members I've seen on this forum when it comes to quoting sources and references where credit is due.

The following guideline by @theymos is excellent advice in my opinion, and should have put an end to the ridiculous practice of digging up long resolved issues and / or stalking account histories of hand selected members just to pursue petty vendettas against them:

Quote from: theymos on January 30, 2020, 05:13:15 PM

- Exercise a lot of forgiveness. People shouldn't be "permanently branded" as a result of small mistakes from which we've all moved past. Oftentimes, people get a rating due to unknowingly acting a bit outside of the community's consensus on appropriate behavior, and such ratings may indeed be appropriate. But if they correct the problem and don't seem likely to do it again, remove the rating or replace it with a neutral. Even if someone refuses to agree with the community consensus (ie. they refuse to back down philosophically), if they're willing to refrain from the behavior, their philosophical difference should not be used to justify a rating. For example, in the YoBit mass-ratings example above, ratings should be immediately removed after the person removes the signature, even if they maintain and continue to argue that they didn't do anything wrong. If someone agrees to "follow 'the law' without agreeing to it", that should be enough.

wolwoo

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1148

Quote from: Lauda on April 28, 2020, 10:19:38 AM

Username: Wolwoo
Profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wolwoo-1003533

Evidence

Post 1: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21424301
Source 1: https://www.sabah.com.tr/yazarlar/erhan-afyoncu/2017/12/17/lale-cilginligi
Archival 1: http://archive.vn/wip/ylUCz

Post 2: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21070087
Source 2: https://www.bloomberght.com/haberler/haber/2041680-dolartl-neyi-fiyatliyor
Archival 2: http://archive.vn/wip/51N27

Post 4: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22385781
Source 4: http://www.bitcoinhakkindahersey.com/?Syf=26&Syz=607002
Archival 4: http://archive.vn/wip/gsp93

Post 5: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23540734
Source 5: https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/kisi-basina-dusen-milli-geliri-en-yuksek-ulke-belli-oldu/735249
Archival 5: http://archive.vn/wip/QwmGl

Post 8: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20499528
Source 8: https://www.timeturk.com/dunyada-ne-kadar-para-var/haber-695964
Archival 8: http://archive.vn/wip/LUvLA

Removed because they actually have a source link:

Quote

Post 3: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21798852
Source 3: http://www.bloomberght.com/piyasalar/haber/2046543-jpmorgandimon-bitcoin-in-sonu-iyi-olmayacak
Archival3: http://archive.vn/wip/bQzfi
Post 6: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52984335
Source 6: http://www.mahfiegilmez.com/2019/10/gosteris-tuketimi-ve-zuppe-etkisi.html
Archival 6: http://archive.vn/wip/aDEXS
Post 7: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53339930
Source 7: https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/ertugrul-ozkok/beyefendi-sperm-sizin-ama-cocuk-sizden-degil-41393597
Archival 7: http://archive.vn/wip/sFDd1

it is obvious that these are actually quoted, most of them are already mentioned ...

Quote from: wolwoo on September 01, 2017, 06:38:08 PM

Ünlü bir piyanistin "olmayan resitali"yle ilgili hikayeyi bilir misiniz? Salon tıklım tıklım, dünyaca meşhur piyanist gelir, selamlar reveranslar....Herkes pür dikkat konserin başlamasını bekler. Piyanist piyanosunun başına oturur, kendinden geçercesine tuşlara dokunmaya başlar, başlar ama ses yoktur. Herkes şaşırır, birbirine bakar ama konseri(!) de dinlemeye devam ederler. Bir saat falan geçer piyanist terli terli kalkar, selamını verir ve 1 nota dahi duymayan koca salon ayakta alkışlar. Resital sonunda piyanist bir açıklama yapar: "İnsanların ne kadar aptal olabileceklerini görmek istedim"

Bir hikâye daha: 17. yüzyılın ilk çeyreğinde Hollanda’yı lale çılgınlığı sardı. Nadir bulunan laleler inanılmaz fiyatlardan satılıyordu. 1629’da bir lale Amsterdam’da bir malikanenin fiyatına yani 12 BİN GULDENE satılınca herkesin gözü bu çiçeğe çevirildi. Fakir insanlar bile lale yetiştirmeye başladı. Yetiştirilen laleler satılınca, daha pahalı lale soğanları alınıyor ve ticareti hayatın her tarafını sarıyordu.
1636 sonbaharında çılgınlık iyice had safhaya vardı ve lale ticareti kumara döndüştü. Laleler, bar ve batakhanelerde kendisinin yerine kime ait olduğunu belirten kağıtlarla alınıp satılıyor, bir lale bir günde 10 kez el değiştiriyordu. Bu yüzden sıradan laler bile inanılmaz fiyatlara ulaştı. Laleler açtığında fiyatların inanılmaz yüksekliği yüzünden tüccarlarda laleyi alacak para yoktu.
Hollandalılar artık lale almak yerine satmaya başladılar. Fiyatlar bir haftada yüzde 95 düştü. Büyük paralar kazananların yanı sıra battıkları için Amsterdam kanallarına atlayarak intihar edenler bile oldu. 1637’de devlet bu duruma el koyarak yeni bir düzenleme yapıp, lale ticaretini daha küçük ölçekli ve kontrol edilebilir duruma getirdi.
Uluslararası lisana ‘Tulipomania’ şeklinde bir terim dahi kazandırılmış. Hollanda Altın Çağı olarak bilinen dönemde yaşananlar bu değerli okurlar…

İki hikayeyi de her türlü uyarlayabilirsiniz. BTC, waves, ethereum...aklınıza ne gelirse

I wrote the red ones
I searched the internet to write the second story correctly, already looking at the content "12000 gulden in 1629" etc..where can i know this?
When I started I said "another story"
":" I put the sign but I did not put the ".." sign

I forgot to include quotes in this section, but if you translate it is stated that this is a story at the beginning of the article. At the end of the article, it is clear that he is quoted by saying "dear readers".
I mentioned the correlation between two stories ....
It's 2017 and I'm a new member then ...It has been clearly stated in other links.
you can ban my membership if you wish
I'm tired of endless discussions...

If management does not want to see members like me who have been writing regularly for months without any interest here, I respect it. I do not have a multi account.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52984335
EFS merit to this.

I promise that if I get banned, I will never be a bitcointalk.org member again. thanks

Jawhead999

legendary

Activity: 1708

Merit: 1187

Hi I have found some user in this thread is still not get banned or nuked, maybe moderator miss it or the proof is not to strong to say it plagiarism. So I make this list to get more attention and kindly to check back of this user... does they deserve a ban or not. Not all user I list it, because I only want to list the active user ( at least active from 01/01/2020 )

|

Date

ZaraCB

full member

Activity: 333

Merit: 105

www.cd3d.app

User: ~~Albert655~~ (Banned)

Original post by LoyceV:

Quote from: LoyceV on August 01, 2019, 10:54:26 AM

Not mine, but being stuck on 666 for more than 2 months is worth a screenshot:
Image loading...

Copied by Albert655:

Quote from: ?? on ??

Not mine, but being stuck on 666 for more than 2 months is worth a screenshot:

Archive:
https://archive.st/archive/2020/5/bitcointalk.org/m6k1/bitcointalk.org/index.html

Rikafip

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 5937

Plagiarism by newbie account, and his 1st post is copied medium article about BTC arbitrage. Please nuke this user.

User Ezic007
Archive https://web.archive.org/web/20200501083054/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5244970.0

Quote from: Ezic007 on May 01, 2020, 03:46:42 AM

Crypto arbitrage trading is becoming a hot topic of discussion among cryptocurrency traders and investors.
2019 is seeing several free and paid crypto arbitrage tools start to come online. Each entices cryptocurrency traders with promises of guaranteed returns when buying and selling digital assets. The only question is, how does arbitrage trading work?
..

Original source The Beginner’s Guide to Bitcoin Arbitrage

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: nutildah on April 28, 2020, 10:41:40 AM

Quote from: Lauda on April 28, 2020, 10:19:38 AM

Username: Wolwoo
Profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wolwoo-1003533

Evidence

Post 1: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21424301
Source 1: https://www.sabah.com.tr/yazarlar/erhan-afyoncu/2017/12/17/lale-cilginligi
Archival 1: http://archive.vn/wip/ylUCz

I reported this one as plagiarism. Most of the other ones seem to have some quotations around them or the source of the content. But this one is definitely plagiarism.

Thanks. Sorry about that, removed the ones that have a link. "" marks are meaningless without attribution when the whole thing has been blatantly copy/pasted. Therefore all remaining posts (including the one you reported) are plagiarism.

nullius

copper member

Activity: 630

Merit: 2614

If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!

Quote from: nutildah on April 28, 2020, 10:41:40 AM

Quote from: Lauda on April 28, 2020, 10:19:38 AM

Username: Wolwoo
Profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wolwoo-1003533

Evidence

Post 1: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21424301
Source 1: https://www.sabah.com.tr/yazarlar/erhan-afyoncu/2017/12/17/lale-cilginligi
Archival 1: http://archive.vn/wip/ylUCz

I reported this one as plagiarism. Most of the other ones seem to have some quotations around them or the source of the content. But this one is definitely plagiarism.

I noticed that some (fewer than half) of the posts have source links thrown in, and some do not. So—the issue here is at best a mix of plagiarism, and improper attributions that give the wrong impression of the authorship of the text (a worse form of the same issue that I tried to explain to wolwoo earlier on this thread). It does not change the outcome.

Relevant aside: Since yesterday, I have been working on a post about what plagiarism is and is not, for another one of the plagiarism case threads. I am quite familiar with this issue; and I know how to distinguish properly between plagiarism, improper authorial attribution, and also the very different but oft-confused concept of copyright infringement.

A “crypto” forum should not rely too much on trusted archives for its chain of evidence, especially when said archives are CAPTCHAing Tor users. In case of editing or deletion of posts, I have digitally signed my own attestations of quotes of wolwoo’s eight cited posts as I observed them about an hour ago, and timestamped same with Peter Todd’s OpenTimestamps (which relies on the security of the Bitcoin blockchain). The SHA-256 hashes of my PGP-clearsigned attestation files that I can produce upon request:

Code:
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I will also provide OTS proof files upon request. (On a related note, I am working on a major update to Nullian Verification.)

Lafu

legendary

Activity: 3136

Merit: 3213

Please Ban the User : WillSann for copy and paste ! Banned
Have written a Scam Accusation first thats why i quote my post here.

Quote from: Lafu on April 28, 2020, 10:49:06 AM

Bottlecoin [BOTLEC] copied and pasted there ANN from Ravencoin Webpage and there ANN !

Thread : [ANN] Bottlecoin [BOTLEC] GPU PoW Mineable | Launch Soon |

User : WillSann

Possible this Account is sold or hacked , and maybe in hands now of the User that making Fake ANNs (but dont know thats why i write here) , no wallet links for now in the thread
Last post was done in December 06, 2017,

Archive : https://archive.fo/wip/2uKTP

Original Ravencoin ANN :
[ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)

User : shiggidy

Copy and paste

Quote from: WillSann on April 28, 2020, 10:05:15 AM

Project Info:
Bottlecoin was launched in the interest of fair distribution. Miners from all around the world have added to the network to create one of the strongest decentralized networks in existence. There is no ICO, no pre-mine, no masternodes, or any other gimmicky feature, and you can mine BOTLEC using AMD or NVIDIA GPUs. Bottle is focused on maintaining a decentralized network and the core developers have expressed their intent to change the algorithm should an ASIC ever be launched on Bottle's network.

Original

Quote from: shiggidy on April 01, 2018, 11:49:23 PM

Project Info:
Ravencoin was launched in the interest of fair distribution. Miners from all around the world have added to the network to create one of the strongest decentralized networks in existence. There is no ICO, no pre-mine, no masternodes, or any other gimmicky feature, and you can mine RVN using AMD or NVIDIA GPUs. Raven is focused on maintaining a decentralized network and the core developers have expressed their intent to change the algorithm should an ASIC ever be launched on Raven's network.

Also from Ravencoins Webpage :

Quote from: WillSann on April 28, 2020, 10:05:15 AM

Coin Specifications:

Algorithm: X16Rv2

Block Time: 1 minute
Block Reward: 5000 RVN
Block Reward halving schedule: ~4years
Total Coin Supply: 21 Billion
Block Size: 1MB (may increase in the future)

Pre-mine: No
Founders Reward: No
ICO: No
Masternodes: No
Airdrops: No
RPC port: 8766
Network port: 8767[/color]

Original

Quote from: shiggidy on April 01, 2018, 11:49:23 PM

Coin Specifications:
   Algorithm: X16Rv2
   Whitepaper: http://ravencoin.org/Ravencoin.pdf
   Roadmap: https://github.com/RavenProject/Ravencoin/blob/master/roadmap/README.md

   Block Time: 1 minute
   Block Reward: 5000 RVN
   Block Reward halving schedule: ~4years
   Total Coin Supply: 21 Billion
   Block Size: 1MB (may increase in the future)

   Pre-mine: No
   Founders Reward: No
   ICO: No
   Masternodes: No
   Airdrops: No
   RPC port: 8766
   Network port: 8767

Also there are 2 more Users thats still not banned after copy and pasting ANNs
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54295208
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54297689

Hope that they get banned soon from a Global Moderator

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: Lauda on April 28, 2020, 10:19:38 AM

Username: Wolwoo
Profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/wolwoo-1003533

Evidence

Post 1: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21424301
Source 1: https://www.sabah.com.tr/yazarlar/erhan-afyoncu/2017/12/17/lale-cilginligi
Archival 1: http://archive.vn/wip/ylUCz

I reported this one as plagiarism. Most of the other ones seem to have some quotations around them or the source of the content. But this one is definitely plagiarism.

Pages:

«
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
»

Bitcoin Forum>Other>Meta

Jump to:

Topic: Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed - page 89. (Read 118621 times)