Lauda is a proven scammer, extortionist and trust abuser
He might be everything you said above but that doesn't warrant a ban, does that? C'mon, we are talking about his plagiarism and ban, that mustn't be compared with what he is. 
Topic: Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed - page 84. (Read 118776 times)
May 24, 2020, 12:19:34 PM
May 24, 2020, 12:10:12 PM
@Lauda
I think a 60 day ban and a 2 year sig ban would be fair.. Would you agree?
I guess that would be too harsh. I remember an user cellard was banned due to plagiarism which later changed to 60 days ban + 1 year sig ban considering their contribution in the forum. I believe that Lauda is far decent user than cellard and have contributed much more than the user.I think a 60 day ban and a 2 year sig ban would be fair.. Would you agree?
I changed the ban to 60 days + 1 year sig ban seeing as it's a post from years ago and you seem to have contributed decently since.
Nobody cares about your asslicking lies. Newbie drag who knows nothing of the history here.
Lauda is a proven scammer, extortionist and trust abuser
Debunk these highly net negative points or stfu spreading lies about lauda and his non existent achievements
Clearly net negative as are you if you spread misleading lies
If you need the links to the incontrovertible evidence just ask.
May 24, 2020, 12:00:42 PM
@Lauda
I think a 60 day ban and a 2 year sig ban would be fair.. Would you agree?
I guess that would be too harsh. I remember an user cellard was banned due to plagiarism which later changed to 60 days ban + 1 year sig ban considering their contribution in the forum. I believe that Lauda is far decent user than cellard and have contributed much more than the user.I think a 60 day ban and a 2 year sig ban would be fair.. Would you agree?
I changed the ban to 60 days + 1 year sig ban seeing as it's a post from years ago and you seem to have contributed decently since.
May 24, 2020, 11:12:24 AM
Nutildah, Lauda, scam buster, scam facilitator, blah blah blah. Motive is irrelevant. Other people are irrelevant.
You are a plagiarizer.
You are a plagiarizer.
Stop spreading lies. Motive and intent and context are fundamental as theymos said and as every human knows you retarded cowardly cunt.
Like where you said I just threatened your life by saying I would bring evidence to a thread and cave your dumb cowardly skull in with it
You cut away the context and totally tried to mislead people like you are now by just quoting I will cave your dumb cowardly skull. Making it look like a physical threat. Typical scumbag scammer tactics.
Do you want to read the thread where the true legend cryptohunter and theymos discuss it in public ?
Theymos states context is KEY
Yes or no ?
May 24, 2020, 10:39:38 AM
Nutildah, Lauda, scam buster, scam facilitator, blah blah blah. Motive is irrelevant. Other people are irrelevant.
You are a plagiarizer.
You are a plagiarizer.
May 24, 2020, 10:27:32 AM
User cryptohunter - https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cryptohunter-92110
Copies -
https://archive.fo/L5no3#60%
Copy -
https://archive.fo/nbYV2#10%
Copies -
https://archive.fo/L5no3#60%
Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
https://archive.fo/Bl2dL#65%<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
https://archive.fo/dN1PN#40%<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
Original - <...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
Copy -
https://archive.fo/nbYV2#10%
1. Dash is centrally controlled. This is a fact.
<...>
And yes this is all true, and no I'm not trolling, just thought with all this Dash hype we could have a dose of reality.
Original -<...>
And yes this is all true, and no I'm not trolling, just thought with all this Dash hype we could have a dose of reality.
Quote from: https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@thedashguy/warning-why-i-don-t-trust-the-price-of-dash-nor-the-community-be-careful-folks-invest-wisely-diversify on February 16, 2017, 19:11:00 PM
1. Dash is centrally controlled. This is a fact.
<...>
And yes this is all true, and no I'm not trolling, just thought with all this Dash hype we could have a dose of reality.
<...>
And yes this is all true, and no I'm not trolling, just thought with all this Dash hype we could have a dose of reality.
For some reason I didn't see this the first time around. Let's expand on it a little bit. The first example is absolutely a case of plagiarism as cryptohunter did not accredit the author of original post in any way.
Original post:
Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4589219
Edufield said (after failed launch) that he will wait the next day to launch DRK (XCoin at that time) it is 11 pm.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4591407
Edufield disregard windows wallet and daemon and hurry up his launch, presumably to not have windows miners on board.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4592827
Edufield say he added four nodes for the launch at 4 am (5 hours later, despite his promise to wait). The 4 nodes from Edufield are 3 amazons AWS + another unknown (whois IP). Launch started at 3h54 am.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593601
Edufield said the github version was not updated, nobody could compile and only Edufield was able to mine until that time. It is 5.09 am and Edufield instamined alone 1153 block at 500 DRK + 60 block at reward 277 = 593120 DRK for him alone in about 1 hour.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593987
No windows wallet confirmed at 5h47 am, despite a user attempt to make one avaiable, that Edufield dismissed quickly.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4594096
Illodin, understand dev has instamined alot of coin.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4595573
From this list of nodes, at 8h34 am (4h40 after launch) there were 50 Amazon AWS node and 50 microsoft cloud computing instamining DRK (checked using IP whois service). This is 100/124 nodes using cloud computing to instamine DRK. We are at block 2870 and block reward is 500. From block 1153-1729 block reward is 277. After that it is 500 again hence 2294 block at 500 + 576 at 277 = 1306552 DRK (worth about 13M$ now) were instamined in less than 5 hour by Edufield and coworkers using about 100 cloud mining instances. Edufield himself instamined in not even 5 h from 600K to 1169K DRK ((1306K-600K)*100/124 + 600K) depending how many of the 100 cloud mining instance were its own. All this while having purposefully set the difficult ridiculously low and block reward 100 times what it is now.
From 6M$ - 13M$ in 5 h, Edufield did some lucrative work here!
Edufield is nominee for the Master Scammer 2014 award!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4589219
Edufield said (after failed launch) that he will wait the next day to launch DRK (XCoin at that time) it is 11 pm.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4591407
Edufield disregard windows wallet and daemon and hurry up his launch, presumably to not have windows miners on board.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4592827
Edufield say he added four nodes for the launch at 4 am (5 hours later, despite his promise to wait). The 4 nodes from Edufield are 3 amazons AWS + another unknown (whois IP). Launch started at 3h54 am.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593601
Edufield said the github version was not updated, nobody could compile and only Edufield was able to mine until that time. It is 5.09 am and Edufield instamined alone 1153 block at 500 DRK + 60 block at reward 277 = 593120 DRK for him alone in about 1 hour.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593987
No windows wallet confirmed at 5h47 am, despite a user attempt to make one avaiable, that Edufield dismissed quickly.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4594096
Illodin, understand dev has instamined alot of coin.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4595573
From this list of nodes, at 8h34 am (4h40 after launch) there were 50 Amazon AWS node and 50 microsoft cloud computing instamining DRK (checked using IP whois service). This is 100/124 nodes using cloud computing to instamine DRK. We are at block 2870 and block reward is 500. From block 1153-1729 block reward is 277. After that it is 500 again hence 2294 block at 500 + 576 at 277 = 1306552 DRK (worth about 13M$ now) were instamined in less than 5 hour by Edufield and coworkers using about 100 cloud mining instances. Edufield himself instamined in not even 5 h from 600K to 1169K DRK ((1306K-600K)*100/124 + 600K) depending how many of the 100 cloud mining instance were its own. All this while having purposefully set the difficult ridiculously low and block reward 100 times what it is now.
From 6M$ - 13M$ in 5 h, Edufield did some lucrative work here!
Edufield is nominee for the Master Scammer 2014 award!
cryptohunter post, plagiarized content bolded:
here have another read... denying a scam whilst being a known benefactor of that said scam and being full furnished with the facts proving it is a scam does make you a known scammer tok. I hope you realise that. The best you can do is acknowledge it is a scam and argue that the fact it is a scam is not an issue to some people. That is your best route. There is no other I can see for a known dash holder protecting his masternode investment. You've been here too long to make out you have no knowledge of the facts presented below. Therefore unless you want to be known as a scammer like qwizze and evans you can not continue to deny the facts and observable events that are there for all to study.
Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4589219
Edufield said (after failed launch) that he will wait the next day to launch DRK (XCoin at that time) it is 11 pm.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4591407
Edufield disregard windows wallet and daemon and hurry up his launch, presumably to not have windows miners on board.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4592827
Edufield say he added four nodes for the launch at 4 am (5 hours later, despite his promise to wait). The 4 nodes from Edufield are 3 amazons AWS + another unknown (whois IP). Launch started at 3h54 am.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593601
Edufield said the github version was not updated, nobody could compile and only Edufield was able to mine until that time. It is 5.09 am and Edufield instamined alone 1153 block at 500 DRK + 60 block at reward 277 = 593120 DRK for him alone in about 1 hour.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593987
No windows wallet confirmed at 5h47 am, despite a user attempt to make one avaiable, that Edufield dismissed quickly.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4594096
Illodin, understand dev has instamined alot of coin.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4595573
From this list of nodes, at 8h34 am (4h40 after launch) there were 50 Amazon AWS node and 50 microsoft cloud computing instamining DRK (checked using IP whois service). This is 100/124 nodes using cloud computing to instamine DRK. We are at block 2870 and block reward is 500. From block 1153-1729 block reward is 277. After that it is 500 again hence 2294 block at 500 + 576 at 277 = 1306552 DRK (worth about 13M$ now) were instamined in less than 5 hour by Edufield and coworkers using about 100 cloud mining instances. Edufield himself instamined in not even 5 h from 600K to 1169K DRK ((1306K-600K)*100/124 + 600K) depending how many of the 100 cloud mining instance were its own. All this while having purposefully set the difficult ridiculously low and block reward 100 times what it is now.
SCAM = unfair and dishonest scheme = dash
This latest defence is so strange. Where are the victims ? what are you talking about it is there in black and white.
1. everyone who was told it was a fair launch LIKE ALL THE OTHER LAUNCHES AT THE TIME. - then prevented from mining fairly = scammed
2. everyone who was told there would be much more opportunity to mine ( then that got slashed by 75%) - prevented from mining the coins that were then taken away = scammed.
here are your victims.
3. everyone buying now thinking dash can go somewhere not knowing the scam it is will forever hold it back = being scammed.
Every dasher on here trying to scam others into supporting your scam = scammers.
I will be updating my scammers thread to add all of your names to it.
Denying a scam after it is proven time and time again to you in black and white = scam enabler and defender = scammer.
Threads examining the evidence of the captive instamine and reduction of the minting to magnify such instamining ...PROOF OF SCAM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-the-darkcoindashdashpay-instamine-matters-999886
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-darkcoin-instamine-2-millions-drks-50-of-darkcoin-in-circulation-560138
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/darkcoin-now-known-as-dash-big-scam-lets-take-a-closer-look-559028
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/darkcoin-aka-dash-the-biggest-ongoing-scam-in-crypto-995710
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dash-aka-darkcoin-victim-resources-999084
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-darkcoin-instamine-2-millions-drks-50-of-darkcoin-in-circulation-560138
Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4589219
Edufield said (after failed launch) that he will wait the next day to launch DRK (XCoin at that time) it is 11 pm.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4591407
Edufield disregard windows wallet and daemon and hurry up his launch, presumably to not have windows miners on board.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4592827
Edufield say he added four nodes for the launch at 4 am (5 hours later, despite his promise to wait). The 4 nodes from Edufield are 3 amazons AWS + another unknown (whois IP). Launch started at 3h54 am.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593601
Edufield said the github version was not updated, nobody could compile and only Edufield was able to mine until that time. It is 5.09 am and Edufield instamined alone 1153 block at 500 DRK + 60 block at reward 277 = 593120 DRK for him alone in about 1 hour.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593987
No windows wallet confirmed at 5h47 am, despite a user attempt to make one avaiable, that Edufield dismissed quickly.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4594096
Illodin, understand dev has instamined alot of coin.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4595573
From this list of nodes, at 8h34 am (4h40 after launch) there were 50 Amazon AWS node and 50 microsoft cloud computing instamining DRK (checked using IP whois service). This is 100/124 nodes using cloud computing to instamine DRK. We are at block 2870 and block reward is 500. From block 1153-1729 block reward is 277. After that it is 500 again hence 2294 block at 500 + 576 at 277 = 1306552 DRK (worth about 13M$ now) were instamined in less than 5 hour by Edufield and coworkers using about 100 cloud mining instances. Edufield himself instamined in not even 5 h from 600K to 1169K DRK ((1306K-600K)*100/124 + 600K) depending how many of the 100 cloud mining instance were its own. All this while having purposefully set the difficult ridiculously low and block reward 100 times what it is now.
SCAM = unfair and dishonest scheme = dash
This latest defence is so strange. Where are the victims ? what are you talking about it is there in black and white.
1. everyone who was told it was a fair launch LIKE ALL THE OTHER LAUNCHES AT THE TIME. - then prevented from mining fairly = scammed
2. everyone who was told there would be much more opportunity to mine ( then that got slashed by 75%) - prevented from mining the coins that were then taken away = scammed.
here are your victims.
3. everyone buying now thinking dash can go somewhere not knowing the scam it is will forever hold it back = being scammed.
Every dasher on here trying to scam others into supporting your scam = scammers.
I will be updating my scammers thread to add all of your names to it.
Denying a scam after it is proven time and time again to you in black and white = scam enabler and defender = scammer.
Threads examining the evidence of the captive instamine and reduction of the minting to magnify such instamining ...PROOF OF SCAM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-the-darkcoindashdashpay-instamine-matters-999886
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-darkcoin-instamine-2-millions-drks-50-of-darkcoin-in-circulation-560138
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/darkcoin-now-known-as-dash-big-scam-lets-take-a-closer-look-559028
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/darkcoin-aka-dash-the-biggest-ongoing-scam-in-crypto-995710
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dash-aka-darkcoin-victim-resources-999084
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-darkcoin-instamine-2-millions-drks-50-of-darkcoin-in-circulation-560138
The meat of the post was plagiarized as he did not reference the original source of the material.
The second example is more a sloppy lack of accreditation as the link to the original Steemit article is posted above by the user who did it. But the first example is definitely plagiarism.
Please report cryptohunter's post for plagiarism and cite the original post as a reference.
The stupid cunt and scammer sponsored by fortunejack nutildah does not see that post is reference in the quote ch has quoted lol
There is no plagiarism there even that instamine proof ch must have posted 100x and referenced it most times
That same post was on the top of his scammer thread and referenced
Lol at this weak ass attempt
Lol at another proven willing scam facilitator for pay nutildah
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.20
Supporter of lauda the scammer pushing this scam
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/support-flag-for-scammer-lauda-explain-in-meta-if-you-dispute-the-flag-5249969
Saying that cryptohunter who others created these posts to support cryptohunters instamine claim to fight the biggest scam of all time and have a 2 000 000 000 compensation offer to the forum is net negative plagiarism
So to conclude you have 2 proven scammers nutildah and lauda
Claiming the person who busted the huge scam lauda was part of is to be banned for copy and pasting information created to help prove cryptohunter prove he was correct and win a 2000 000 000 usd compensation offer for the forum
This copy and paste he made tons of times he had already referenced many times before and clearly not claiming it was his own
2 scammers nutildah and lauda grasping at straws.
Let me laugh at them attempting to spin winning a 2 000 000 000 usd compensation offer from the same scam lauda was pushing on on others with lies he was on the launch and could confirm there was no instamine.
This exact lie that cryptohunter was fighting
Hahahah
That's it bringing a full thread to investigate this
Meanwhile open a flag against the willing scam facilitator for pay nutildah who would facilitate other members being scammed for 300 bucks. ? This person is on DT and fortunejack is sponsoring such willing scammers
May 24, 2020, 09:34:22 AM
User cryptohunter - https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cryptohunter-92110
Copies -
https://archive.fo/L5no3#60%
Copy -
https://archive.fo/nbYV2#10%
Copies -
https://archive.fo/L5no3#60%
Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
https://archive.fo/Bl2dL#65%<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
https://archive.fo/dN1PN#40%<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
Original - <...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.
Copy -
https://archive.fo/nbYV2#10%
1. Dash is centrally controlled. This is a fact.
<...>
And yes this is all true, and no I'm not trolling, just thought with all this Dash hype we could have a dose of reality.
Original -<...>
And yes this is all true, and no I'm not trolling, just thought with all this Dash hype we could have a dose of reality.
Quote from: https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@thedashguy/warning-why-i-don-t-trust-the-price-of-dash-nor-the-community-be-careful-folks-invest-wisely-diversify on February 16, 2017, 19:11:00 PM
1. Dash is centrally controlled. This is a fact.
<...>
And yes this is all true, and no I'm not trolling, just thought with all this Dash hype we could have a dose of reality.
<...>
And yes this is all true, and no I'm not trolling, just thought with all this Dash hype we could have a dose of reality.
For some reason I didn't see this the first time around. Let's expand on it a little bit. The first example is absolutely a case of plagiarism as cryptohunter did not accredit the author of original post in any way.
Original post:
Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4589219
Edufield said (after failed launch) that he will wait the next day to launch DRK (XCoin at that time) it is 11 pm.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4591407
Edufield disregard windows wallet and daemon and hurry up his launch, presumably to not have windows miners on board.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4592827
Edufield say he added four nodes for the launch at 4 am (5 hours later, despite his promise to wait). The 4 nodes from Edufield are 3 amazons AWS + another unknown (whois IP). Launch started at 3h54 am.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593601
Edufield said the github version was not updated, nobody could compile and only Edufield was able to mine until that time. It is 5.09 am and Edufield instamined alone 1153 block at 500 DRK + 60 block at reward 277 = 593120 DRK for him alone in about 1 hour.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593987
No windows wallet confirmed at 5h47 am, despite a user attempt to make one avaiable, that Edufield dismissed quickly.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4594096
Illodin, understand dev has instamined alot of coin.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4595573
From this list of nodes, at 8h34 am (4h40 after launch) there were 50 Amazon AWS node and 50 microsoft cloud computing instamining DRK (checked using IP whois service). This is 100/124 nodes using cloud computing to instamine DRK. We are at block 2870 and block reward is 500. From block 1153-1729 block reward is 277. After that it is 500 again hence 2294 block at 500 + 576 at 277 = 1306552 DRK (worth about 13M$ now) were instamined in less than 5 hour by Edufield and coworkers using about 100 cloud mining instances. Edufield himself instamined in not even 5 h from 600K to 1169K DRK ((1306K-600K)*100/124 + 600K) depending how many of the 100 cloud mining instance were its own. All this while having purposefully set the difficult ridiculously low and block reward 100 times what it is now.
From 6M$ - 13M$ in 5 h, Edufield did some lucrative work here!
Edufield is nominee for the Master Scammer 2014 award!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4589219
Edufield said (after failed launch) that he will wait the next day to launch DRK (XCoin at that time) it is 11 pm.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4591407
Edufield disregard windows wallet and daemon and hurry up his launch, presumably to not have windows miners on board.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4592827
Edufield say he added four nodes for the launch at 4 am (5 hours later, despite his promise to wait). The 4 nodes from Edufield are 3 amazons AWS + another unknown (whois IP). Launch started at 3h54 am.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593601
Edufield said the github version was not updated, nobody could compile and only Edufield was able to mine until that time. It is 5.09 am and Edufield instamined alone 1153 block at 500 DRK + 60 block at reward 277 = 593120 DRK for him alone in about 1 hour.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593987
No windows wallet confirmed at 5h47 am, despite a user attempt to make one avaiable, that Edufield dismissed quickly.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4594096
Illodin, understand dev has instamined alot of coin.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4595573
From this list of nodes, at 8h34 am (4h40 after launch) there were 50 Amazon AWS node and 50 microsoft cloud computing instamining DRK (checked using IP whois service). This is 100/124 nodes using cloud computing to instamine DRK. We are at block 2870 and block reward is 500. From block 1153-1729 block reward is 277. After that it is 500 again hence 2294 block at 500 + 576 at 277 = 1306552 DRK (worth about 13M$ now) were instamined in less than 5 hour by Edufield and coworkers using about 100 cloud mining instances. Edufield himself instamined in not even 5 h from 600K to 1169K DRK ((1306K-600K)*100/124 + 600K) depending how many of the 100 cloud mining instance were its own. All this while having purposefully set the difficult ridiculously low and block reward 100 times what it is now.
From 6M$ - 13M$ in 5 h, Edufield did some lucrative work here!
Edufield is nominee for the Master Scammer 2014 award!
cryptohunter post, plagiarized content bolded:
here have another read... denying a scam whilst being a known benefactor of that said scam and being full furnished with the facts proving it is a scam does make you a known scammer tok. I hope you realise that. The best you can do is acknowledge it is a scam and argue that the fact it is a scam is not an issue to some people. That is your best route. There is no other I can see for a known dash holder protecting his masternode investment. You've been here too long to make out you have no knowledge of the facts presented below. Therefore unless you want to be known as a scammer like qwizze and evans you can not continue to deny the facts and observable events that are there for all to study.
Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4589219
Edufield said (after failed launch) that he will wait the next day to launch DRK (XCoin at that time) it is 11 pm.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4591407
Edufield disregard windows wallet and daemon and hurry up his launch, presumably to not have windows miners on board.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4592827
Edufield say he added four nodes for the launch at 4 am (5 hours later, despite his promise to wait). The 4 nodes from Edufield are 3 amazons AWS + another unknown (whois IP). Launch started at 3h54 am.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593601
Edufield said the github version was not updated, nobody could compile and only Edufield was able to mine until that time. It is 5.09 am and Edufield instamined alone 1153 block at 500 DRK + 60 block at reward 277 = 593120 DRK for him alone in about 1 hour.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593987
No windows wallet confirmed at 5h47 am, despite a user attempt to make one avaiable, that Edufield dismissed quickly.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4594096
Illodin, understand dev has instamined alot of coin.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4595573
From this list of nodes, at 8h34 am (4h40 after launch) there were 50 Amazon AWS node and 50 microsoft cloud computing instamining DRK (checked using IP whois service). This is 100/124 nodes using cloud computing to instamine DRK. We are at block 2870 and block reward is 500. From block 1153-1729 block reward is 277. After that it is 500 again hence 2294 block at 500 + 576 at 277 = 1306552 DRK (worth about 13M$ now) were instamined in less than 5 hour by Edufield and coworkers using about 100 cloud mining instances. Edufield himself instamined in not even 5 h from 600K to 1169K DRK ((1306K-600K)*100/124 + 600K) depending how many of the 100 cloud mining instance were its own. All this while having purposefully set the difficult ridiculously low and block reward 100 times what it is now.
SCAM = unfair and dishonest scheme = dash
This latest defence is so strange. Where are the victims ? what are you talking about it is there in black and white.
1. everyone who was told it was a fair launch LIKE ALL THE OTHER LAUNCHES AT THE TIME. - then prevented from mining fairly = scammed
2. everyone who was told there would be much more opportunity to mine ( then that got slashed by 75%) - prevented from mining the coins that were then taken away = scammed.
here are your victims.
3. everyone buying now thinking dash can go somewhere not knowing the scam it is will forever hold it back = being scammed.
Every dasher on here trying to scam others into supporting your scam = scammers.
I will be updating my scammers thread to add all of your names to it.
Denying a scam after it is proven time and time again to you in black and white = scam enabler and defender = scammer.
Threads examining the evidence of the captive instamine and reduction of the minting to magnify such instamining ...PROOF OF SCAM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-the-darkcoindashdashpay-instamine-matters-999886
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-darkcoin-instamine-2-millions-drks-50-of-darkcoin-in-circulation-560138
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/darkcoin-now-known-as-dash-big-scam-lets-take-a-closer-look-559028
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/darkcoin-aka-dash-the-biggest-ongoing-scam-in-crypto-995710
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dash-aka-darkcoin-victim-resources-999084
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-darkcoin-instamine-2-millions-drks-50-of-darkcoin-in-circulation-560138
Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4589219
Edufield said (after failed launch) that he will wait the next day to launch DRK (XCoin at that time) it is 11 pm.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4591407
Edufield disregard windows wallet and daemon and hurry up his launch, presumably to not have windows miners on board.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4592827
Edufield say he added four nodes for the launch at 4 am (5 hours later, despite his promise to wait). The 4 nodes from Edufield are 3 amazons AWS + another unknown (whois IP). Launch started at 3h54 am.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593601
Edufield said the github version was not updated, nobody could compile and only Edufield was able to mine until that time. It is 5.09 am and Edufield instamined alone 1153 block at 500 DRK + 60 block at reward 277 = 593120 DRK for him alone in about 1 hour.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4593987
No windows wallet confirmed at 5h47 am, despite a user attempt to make one avaiable, that Edufield dismissed quickly.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4594096
Illodin, understand dev has instamined alot of coin.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4595573
From this list of nodes, at 8h34 am (4h40 after launch) there were 50 Amazon AWS node and 50 microsoft cloud computing instamining DRK (checked using IP whois service). This is 100/124 nodes using cloud computing to instamine DRK. We are at block 2870 and block reward is 500. From block 1153-1729 block reward is 277. After that it is 500 again hence 2294 block at 500 + 576 at 277 = 1306552 DRK (worth about 13M$ now) were instamined in less than 5 hour by Edufield and coworkers using about 100 cloud mining instances. Edufield himself instamined in not even 5 h from 600K to 1169K DRK ((1306K-600K)*100/124 + 600K) depending how many of the 100 cloud mining instance were its own. All this while having purposefully set the difficult ridiculously low and block reward 100 times what it is now.
SCAM = unfair and dishonest scheme = dash
This latest defence is so strange. Where are the victims ? what are you talking about it is there in black and white.
1. everyone who was told it was a fair launch LIKE ALL THE OTHER LAUNCHES AT THE TIME. - then prevented from mining fairly = scammed
2. everyone who was told there would be much more opportunity to mine ( then that got slashed by 75%) - prevented from mining the coins that were then taken away = scammed.
here are your victims.
3. everyone buying now thinking dash can go somewhere not knowing the scam it is will forever hold it back = being scammed.
Every dasher on here trying to scam others into supporting your scam = scammers.
I will be updating my scammers thread to add all of your names to it.
Denying a scam after it is proven time and time again to you in black and white = scam enabler and defender = scammer.
Threads examining the evidence of the captive instamine and reduction of the minting to magnify such instamining ...PROOF OF SCAM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-the-darkcoindashdashpay-instamine-matters-999886
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-darkcoin-instamine-2-millions-drks-50-of-darkcoin-in-circulation-560138
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/darkcoin-now-known-as-dash-big-scam-lets-take-a-closer-look-559028
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/darkcoin-aka-dash-the-biggest-ongoing-scam-in-crypto-995710
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dash-aka-darkcoin-victim-resources-999084
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-darkcoin-instamine-2-millions-drks-50-of-darkcoin-in-circulation-560138
The meat of the post was plagiarized as he did not reference the original source of the material.
The second example is more a sloppy lack of accreditation as the link to the original Steemit article is posted above by the user who did it. But the first example is definitely plagiarism.
Please report cryptohunter's post for plagiarism and cite the original post as a reference.
May 24, 2020, 06:47:40 AM
The bottom-line for his case is, I think, to let us hear him first before applying the Forum's disciplinary punishments.s
I think for such a novice or not a novice, but an account collector, there is a button "Report to moderator." This is an ordinary poster, its plagiarism should not be put up even for public discussion.
May 24, 2020, 06:22:35 AM
It is definitely not a newbie account because in other two posts he actively promotes the Divi project. This is a clear case for permaban or nuking, imho.
I think he doesn't deserve that much of a punishment nor befits any of the punishment at all. Let's hear first the reasons of the author himself and not to be so harsh. I'm not covering nor helping other Plagiarizing users, it is just the fact that he might've read it and translated it into his own words. Yes, this is just might an alt account. Yet all accusations are right, it's a 50-50 situation unless he can prove it that he didn't commit such actions.
The bottom-line for his case is, I think, to let us hear him first before applying the Forum's disciplinary punishments.s
May 24, 2020, 04:07:46 AM
Username : AlisonAlberto96
Bitcoin.org - FAQ
Dunno if this is an alt of someone trying to boost the posts of his main accounts and in this case should be permanently banned. But if it isn't the case and turns to be a simple newbie then i won't even recommend a temporarily ban, maybe signature ban is ok + warning from staff max.Did you know the main advantages of Bitcoin? The following: Freedom of payment: it is possible to send and receive any amount of money instantly to any part of the world, without borders, without holidays, without limits, etc. Bitcoin allows users to have maximum control of their money.
Bitcoin.org - FAQ
Quote
Payment freedom - It is possible to send and receive bitcoins anywhere in the world at any time. No bank holidays. No borders. No bureaucracy. Bitcoin allows its users to be in full control of their money.
I support philipma punishment for plagiarism and yes ethically all permabanned for plagiarism (more than x months) should receive an email informing them that their ban is left (or will be after x days)...
I generally don't check members punishment for plagiarism since I thought it is permaban as mentioned by theymos, but since it seems some users already got tempban? then lifting the old permaban should be fair for all tho...
It is definitely not a newbie account because in other two posts he actively promotes the Divi project. This is a clear case for permaban or nuking, imho.
May 24, 2020, 02:11:03 AM
Username : AlisonAlberto96
Bitcoin.org - FAQ
Dunno if this is an alt of someone trying to boost the posts of his main accounts and in this case should be permanently banned. But if it isn't the case and turns to be a simple newbie then i won't even recommend a temporarily ban, maybe signature ban is ok + warning from staff max.Did you know the main advantages of Bitcoin? The following: Freedom of payment: it is possible to send and receive any amount of money instantly to any part of the world, without borders, without holidays, without limits, etc. Bitcoin allows users to have maximum control of their money.
Bitcoin.org - FAQ
Quote
Payment freedom - It is possible to send and receive bitcoins anywhere in the world at any time. No bank holidays. No borders. No bureaucracy. Bitcoin allows its users to be in full control of their money.
I support philipma punishment for plagiarism and yes ethically all permabanned for plagiarism (more than x months) should receive an email informing them that their ban is left (or will be after x days)...
I generally don't check members punishment for plagiarism since I thought it is permaban as mentioned by theymos, but since it seems some users already got tempban? then lifting the old permaban should be fair for all tho...
May 24, 2020, 12:11:43 AM
Username : AlisonAlberto96
Bitcoin.org - FAQ
Did you know the main advantages of Bitcoin? The following: Freedom of payment: it is possible to send and receive any amount of money instantly to any part of the world, without borders, without holidays, without limits, etc. Bitcoin allows users to have maximum control of their money.
Bitcoin.org - FAQ
Quote
Payment freedom - It is possible to send and receive bitcoins anywhere in the world at any time. No bank holidays. No borders. No bureaucracy. Bitcoin allows its users to be in full control of their money.
Here is a perfect case of don’t permaban this offender.
there is a huge chance he read and condensed the first post into his mind and did not plagiarize.
As I see it this person should be either warned or a short ban.
I make the assumption that this is his or hers only offense. or gray rephrased statement.
If i was to say :
.” bitcoin is great i can leave an unstable country and not have to smuggle the money on my person. my wealth is portable.”
would i be guilty of stealing an idea 💡 .
no I would be stating facts that are true.
much like the poster did in this post.
facts are facts.
ideas are created and need to be credited.
What time does wallmart open in howell nj.
“Wallmart is open 24 hours a day in howell nj.“
thats a fact. a well known one. at least to people that live near howell,nj
i don’t care if it is exactly what two or three hundred people have said. Its a fact.
If I say “walmart never opens in Howell, NJ 07731 because it never closes”
I am stating a fact in way that could make you laugh.
If you lift that without saying philipma1957 said it you are closer to being guilty of plagiarism.
Since it may be an original fact created today by me.
These are finer points of plagiarism which is why permaban is not the way to go.
It should be the second or,third choice not the first one.
May 23, 2020, 11:50:01 PM
but not "meanwhile, another invisible Spirit (the Holy Spirit) is constantly at work behind the scenes around the earth, keeping the whole thing straight and intervening whenever he can".
That particular post is very reminiscent of George Carlin on this issue. I mean the whole "We have an invisible man, up in the skies, with a list of ten things you must not do". This isn't a novel, technical idea that needs to be memorized or reproduced from one author. Similar interpretations/ satires on christianity are quite prevalent in contemporary culture. Which reminds me to thank the revolutionaries who taught Christians to have the ability to laugh at themselves or their religion. World could be so much more peaceful if followers of that other Abrahamic religion could have the same large heartedness.I had a very close friend from 14 to 15.
He got into heroin when he was 16 and he stabbed his girlfriend in her throat with a pencil ✏️
She bleed to death. He truly was a nice person yet he made a mess out of her life and his own.
Fuck! Drugs truly are the worst. Of course, general breakdown of family and society is a contributing factor. Too much "liberation" has been a bad thing. We need a mix of conservatism too but unfortunately, then Americans get Trump. Republicans could surely do better. Okay, off-topicHe got into heroin when he was 16 and he stabbed his girlfriend in her throat with a pencil ✏️
She bleed to death. He truly was a nice person yet he made a mess out of her life and his own.
May 23, 2020, 11:49:20 PM
Username : AlisonAlberto96
Bitcoin.org - FAQ
Did you know the main advantages of Bitcoin? The following: Freedom of payment: it is possible to send and receive any amount of money instantly to any part of the world, without borders, without holidays, without limits, etc. Bitcoin allows users to have maximum control of their money.
Bitcoin.org - FAQ
Quote
Payment freedom - It is possible to send and receive bitcoins anywhere in the world at any time. No bank holidays. No borders. No bureaucracy. Bitcoin allows its users to be in full control of their money.
May 23, 2020, 11:14:10 PM
yeah, im on the boat with sigban 2+ and temp as well. The evidence is clear.
There has to be some repercussion for ones actions.... no matter how good of a person they seem to be.
To be frank: I have met some of the nicest felons before.... that doesn't change the facts of their actions.
There has to be some repercussion for ones actions.... no matter how good of a person they seem to be.
To be frank: I have met some of the nicest felons before.... that doesn't change the facts of their actions.
I had a very close friend from 14 to 15.
He got into heroin when he was 16 and he stabbed his girlfriend in her throat with a pencil ✏️
She bleed to death. He truly was a nice person yet he made a mess out of her life and his own.
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1166
My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?
May 23, 2020, 11:06:46 PM
yeah, im on the boat with sigban 2+ and temp as well. The evidence is clear.
There has to be some repercussion for ones actions.... no matter how good of a person they seem to be.
To be frank: I have met some of the nicest felons before.... that doesn't change the facts of their actions.
There has to be some repercussion for ones actions.... no matter how good of a person they seem to be.
To be frank: I have met some of the nicest felons before.... that doesn't change the facts of their actions.
May 23, 2020, 10:01:15 PM
Also back 2015 no one gave a shit about the issue.
Actually, we did. Other mods and I have banned many a plagiarist even earlier than that (definitely as early as 2013).
I have seen permabans for plagiarism based on four or five words in a row.
I would be pretty sure that bans done from 2010 to 2015 were not like some of the ones done over the last year or two.
I helped and argued for two or three people helping them to have their bans lifted due to really over done plagiarist charges.
I will rephrased my statement to this
Before 2015 I did not track these bans. I did not give a shit about them because I had not seen the ridiculous bans I have seen since 2018.
I helped
bittawm
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bittawm-144811
with his appeal
tvplus0017 can't remember the name was helped by me and others
because the bans were not fair
I don't think anyone should be banned permanently for plagiarism on first offense.
But a 30 or 60 or 90 day temp ba and a 1 or 2 year signature ban with the signature reading" I am signature banned due to plagiarism"
seems fine to me.
The case I make for lauda punishment is a signature ban 1 or 2 years plus
a temporary ban 1 or 2 or 3 months.
and take back quite a few permabans done to other people.
Lets go to 1 2 3 strikes you are out on plagiarism.
note i edited stakes to strikes.
and we really should look at some of the permabans done. as some were wrong.
May 23, 2020, 09:13:48 PM
We haven't had a good relationship with Lauda any time soon. He asked me to ban, but I wouldn't want someone who has 26401posts to be posted in the forum due to a few bugs. A good or bad history and many more mysteries account...
I am not angry with anyone, my anger is about behavior.
I am not angry with anyone, my anger is about behavior.
May 23, 2020, 08:50:19 PM
Having thoroughly investigated the matter, I think that this is one of those rare corner cases of the lability of the human brain. I do not think that Lauda realized what she was doing, or intended to rip off other people’s texts. I also don’t think that Lauda could fool me.
I do take into consideration that I have substantially interacted with Lauda, and I have seen her repeat things by rote in the course of ordinary conversation. (Just not from text written by other people—insofar as I am aware—and not so much as here.) I am too amateurish in textual criticism to be sure; but from my reading of the posts side by side with the source texts, I don’t think it’s implausible that she interpolated her own words with memorized talking points, without even thinking about it.
I do take into consideration that I have substantially interacted with Lauda, and I have seen her repeat things by rote in the course of ordinary conversation. (Just not from text written by other people—insofar as I am aware—and not so much as here.) I am too amateurish in textual criticism to be sure; but from my reading of the posts side by side with the source texts, I don’t think it’s implausible that she interpolated her own words with memorized talking points, without even thinking about it.
Occam's razor says that Lauda checked Google or Wikipedia for supporting arguments in a discussion and copied some phrases verbatim or with minor changes. I'd buy the talking point excuse if it was something simple, e.g. "blockchain is a decentralized ledger", but not "meanwhile, another invisible Spirit (the Holy Spirit) is constantly at work behind the scenes around the earth, keeping the whole thing straight and intervening whenever he can".
Regardless of the reason why the text was unattributed, it's still plagiarism. If he said something like "I've heard that
Between that, the manner of her response, and the sincerity with which Lauda despises plagiarism (including what happened here), I do not think that any action is warranted in this matter.
Well, I very sincerely hate scammers and yet I don't think that'd be a good excuse for scamming someone even if I do it while sleepwalking or drunk and don't remember it afterwards.
As a practical matter, if Lauda were hypothetically to be banned for posts made in 2014–2015, then the archives should be scrutinized; and every user who has ever committed a plagiarism here should be banned, going back to the time when this forum was hosted at forum.bitcoin.org, or even when it was a Sourceforge forum. Not that I would object to that, in and of itself.
There is nothing preventing you from doing that.
It adds credence to Kalemder and Suchmoon's comments regarding "word-spinning".
To be clear: I mentioned word spinning only as an example of plagiarism that is not copypasta. I didn't intend to say that word spinning is somehow relevant to Lauda's case.
To me, this is the most damning evidence of text edited post facto by someone with a different reading/writing level.
How does this (or anything in your post) make any difference?
May 23, 2020, 08:33:18 PM
A obvious Lauda alt, makes a valiant first post defending Lauda
stfu, Lauda
Did you even read the post? I gave examples of Lauda's posts having two grammatical "voices" - one unique to Lauda (with common ESL errors), and one shared by the alleged plagiarized content (with noticeably better use of punctuation, except for where Lauda is substituting in their own words, or "word-spinning").
I mentioned it backing up Kalemder's post:
Copy and paste a post. Then change it a little bit. Perform originalization. I'm sorry, but this is also idea theft. In fact, this is a worse crime. Honest people refer to the source.
Other posts are already completely copy-paste.
Other posts are already completely copy-paste.
and Suchmoon's:
Having busted many word spinners I can assure you that plagiarism is not just "copying and pasting stuff". Why do you keep doing this? There is no point arguing that plagiarism didn't occur. It did. Mods will decide the rest. Should you find yourself in a similar situation you would want the same thing, not mob justice.
I fail to see in what universe this would be called "defending" Lauda. Either you're skimming (in which case, why even comment?) or you have reading comprehension issues that need to be sorted out.
Yikes!
Jump to: