Topic: Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed - page 84. (Read 119161 times)

Are you unknowingly misrepresent the meaning of the words I was talking about? Or do you do it knowingly?
Use google translate to read my signature.

OK so thanks for admitting cryptohunter (you) engaged in plagiarism. I knew you had a sensible side, glad I took you off ignore just to read this one post.


I agree: cryptohunter should definitely be banned for plagiarism.

Well this is how it works and it is entirely logical

Copy and paste is copy and paste aka it happened

Plagiarism has levels of seriousness

1. Not intending to pass it off as your own, like sometimes referencing the same quote. I mean clearly  referencing it sometimes is not seriously trying to pretend they are the origin.

2. Intending to pass it off as your own with no financial gain .. just to look maybe clever or cool

3. Intending to pass it off as your own for a purely financial basis like chitbitcity who was doing it to make up posts to gain his sponsor quota for max pay who seems to be back posting away with a sig on?
Anyway AFAIK chibitcity is not a proven scammer, extortionist, etc so even though he is a level 3 plagiarist he must have been deemed to have some net value. It appears even CH or Toaa agrees with this. I am not sure why.


Lauda was wearing a sig at the time or not  I dont  know. So perhaps category 2 or 3 but clearly grafting copy and paste in to your own words in a paragraph is deliberate attempt at obfuscation. May be there was not a direct financial gain


I mean with plagiarism of any level intention is key and one of the most heavily weighted factors.

Now the key consideration with any punishment is net gain of the member when we match it against the plagiarism. The more serious the plagiarism the more net postive them member would have to have been. I mean a level 1 plagiarism and perhaps a totally neutral non achieving members would be fine.

For a level 3 plagiarism or even level 2.  Then a neutral member could have a problem.

A level 2 plagiarism  then you would perhaps need have done something a bit useful to counter your deliberate plagiarism.

For level 3 plagiarism a directly deliberate and directly financially motivated episode. Then I expect you would need to demonstrate you have been highly net positive to counter that type

Also some say date should be a factor due to it not being In the rules.

Theymos has said he is not a robot and is capable of differentiating between peoples intentions and motives, and their previous contributions will be considered.

If lauda was a not a proven scammer , extortionist , shady escrow,  trust abuser who is colluding with other proven scammers like nutildah tman etc I would likely say a 2 year sig ban is plenty. He has had a few temp bans so another would need to be longer than the last.

Since he is all of the above It is reasonable to push for a very serious punishment .

Debunk my points or accept them as true.

I will debate and discuss these points with anyone.  Sadly most DT are scammer supporting morons who know in will crush them as I always crush them.  Hence this fear.

Bottom line - any reason to ban a scammer is a good reason

You will find it impossible to demonstrate they are net positive.

These are attempts to distract attention from the the main meaning - plagiarism. They will lie again and again, order linguistic expertise, and so on. But the fact remains that this is PLAGIARISM! Some are truly useful for the forum users have been permanently banned for over a fewer number of plagiarism.

Well stop telling lies about his great contribution to the forum that should mitigate his punishment.

Proven scammers are net negative end of

Theymos has said and as any reasonable person would understand that " plagiarism " covers a wide and varied set of behavior and intentions all involving copy and paste

Sensible  consideration of the full context of the member and situation is required to arrive at the correct  action to be taken.

People claiming lauda is net positive are telling lies. I will debunk those lies whenever I see them.

Fine if we are not banning for plagiarism now then fine but he must have 10yr sig ban and no making  money from the forum from escrow or any other rev streams and kept entirely away from DT.

@nutildah proven scammer facilitator sponsored by fortunejack
Yes there were about 5 threads on the cryptohunter copy and paste of the proof provided to help prove lauda was lying about the premine. It was found sometimes he referenced it and sometimes did not reference it
It was clearly a case of attributed copy and paste on occasion

The context was obviously reviewed and since it was in the best interest of the entire forum being awarded 2 000 000 000 usd compensation it was certainly not net negative you dumb cunt.

So yes it seems sometimes he correctly linked to the original source sometimes not clearly not someone sneaking something in once trying to pretend it was his.
The motivation for him splattering this proof everywhere over the forum was to fight scammers like you and lauda who were pushing that scam I notice. You are a dark coin supporter were you not scammer nutildah?

This is worse than trying to punish people who copy and paste things trying to help people solve a problem or a mining guide or something

Cryptohunter was only wasting his time copy and pasting this proof someone made to support  cryptohunter s claims because people like lauda was lying and promoting the lie that he was on the launch and there was not instamine and scum bags like nutildah were benefitting from such lies

Yeah let's help scammers punish the real scam fighters that stopped them scamming and won 2 000 000 000 usd for the forum.
What a disgusting scamming cunt nutildah sponsored by fortunejack is

Yes, that's when it was first referenced in this thread by ScumBuster. Not sure how many people reported it. I don't think a reminder to the mods would be bad as its still plagiarism.

Anybody want to make the case that its not? I'm open to reasonable discussion of the matter as to how I could be mistaken.

He might be everything you said above but that doesn't warrant a ban, does that? C'mon, we are talking about his plagiarism and ban, that mustn't be compared with what he is.

Nobody cares about your asslicking lies. Newbie drag who knows nothing of the history here.
Lauda is a proven scammer, extortionist and trust abuser

Debunk these highly net negative points or stfu spreading lies about lauda and his non existent achievements

Clearly net negative as are you if you spread misleading lies

If you need the links to the incontrovertible evidence just ask.

I guess that would be too harsh. I remember an user cellard was banned due to plagiarism which later changed to 60 days ban + 1 year sig ban considering their contribution in the forum. I believe that Lauda is far decent user than cellard and have contributed much more than the user.

Stop spreading lies. Motive and intent and context are fundamental as theymos said and as every human knows you retarded cowardly cunt.

Like where you said I just threatened your life by saying I would bring evidence to a thread and cave your dumb cowardly skull in with it

You cut away the context and totally tried to mislead people like you are now by just quoting I will cave your dumb cowardly skull. Making it look like a physical threat. Typical scumbag scammer tactics.


Do you want to read the thread where the true legend cryptohunter and theymos discuss it in public ?
Theymos states context is KEY

Yes or no ?

Nutildah, Lauda, scam buster, scam facilitator, blah blah blah. Motive is irrelevant. Other people are irrelevant.

You are a plagiarizer.

The stupid cunt and scammer sponsored by fortunejack nutildah does not see that post is reference in the quote ch has quoted  lol

There is no plagiarism there even that instamine proof ch must have posted 100x and referenced it most times
That same post was on the top of his scammer thread and referenced

Lol at this weak ass attempt


Lol at another proven willing scam facilitator for pay nutildah

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.20

Supporter of lauda the scammer pushing this scam

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/support-flag-for-scammer-lauda-explain-in-meta-if-you-dispute-the-flag-5249969

Saying that cryptohunter who others created these posts to support cryptohunters instamine claim to fight the biggest scam of all time and have a 2 000 000 000 compensation offer to the forum is net negative plagiarism


So to conclude you have 2 proven scammers nutildah and lauda

Claiming the person who busted the huge scam lauda was part of is to be banned for copy and pasting information created to help prove cryptohunter prove he was correct and win a 2000 000 000 usd compensation offer for the forum
This copy and paste he made tons of times he had already referenced many times before and clearly not claiming it was his own

2 scammers nutildah and lauda grasping at straws.
Let me laugh at them attempting to spin winning a 2 000 000 000 usd compensation offer from the same scam lauda was pushing on on others with lies he was on the launch and could confirm there was no instamine.

This exact lie that cryptohunter was fighting

Hahahah

That's it bringing a full thread to investigate this

Meanwhile open a flag against the willing scam facilitator for pay nutildah who would facilitate other members being scammed for 300 bucks. ? This person is on DT and fortunejack is sponsoring such willing scammers

For some reason I didn't see this the first time around. Let's expand on it a little bit. The first example is absolutely a case of plagiarism as cryptohunter did not accredit the author of original post in any way.

Original post:


cryptohunter post, plagiarized content bolded:


The meat of the post was plagiarized as he did not reference the original source of the material.

The second example is more a sloppy lack of accreditation as the link to the original Steemit article is posted above by the user who did it. But the first example is definitely plagiarism.

Please report cryptohunter's post for plagiarism and cite the original post as a reference.

I think for such a novice or not a novice, but an account collector, there is a button "Report to moderator." This is an ordinary poster, its plagiarism should not be put up even for public discussion.

I think he doesn't deserve that much of a punishment nor befits any of the punishment at all. Let's hear first the reasons of the author himself and not to be so harsh. I'm not covering nor helping other Plagiarizing users, it is just the fact that he might've read it and translated it into his own words. Yes, this is just might an alt account. Yet all accusations are right, it's a 50-50 situation unless he can prove it that he didn't commit such actions.

The bottom-line for his case is, I think, to let us hear him first before applying the Forum's disciplinary punishments.s

It is definitely not a newbie account because in other two posts he actively promotes the Divi project. This is a clear case for permaban or nuking, imho.

Dunno if this is an alt of someone trying to boost the posts of his main accounts and in this case should be permanently banned. But if it isn't the case and turns to be a simple newbie then i won't even recommend a temporarily ban, maybe signature ban is ok + warning from staff max.
I support philipma punishment for plagiarism and yes ethically all permabanned for plagiarism (more than x months) should receive an email informing them that their ban is left (or will be after x days)...
I generally don't check members punishment for plagiarism since I thought it is permaban as mentioned by theymos, but since it seems some users already got tempban? then lifting the old permaban should be fair for all tho...

Here is a perfect case of don’t permaban this offender.

there is a huge chance he read and condensed the first post into his mind and did not plagiarize.

As I see it this person should be either warned or a short ban.

I make the assumption that this is his or hers only offense. or gray rephrased statement.

If i was to say :

.” bitcoin is great i can leave an unstable country and not have to smuggle the money on my person.  my wealth is portable.”

would i be guilty of stealing an idea 💡 .

no I would be stating facts that are true.

much like the poster did in this post.

facts are facts.

ideas are created and need to be credited.

What time does wallmart open in howell nj.

“Wallmart is open 24 hours a day in howell nj.“

thats a fact. a well known one. at least to people that live near howell,nj

 i don’t care if it is exactly what two or three hundred people have said. Its a fact.

If I say “walmart never opens in Howell, NJ 07731 because it never closes”

I am stating a fact in way that could make you laugh.

If you lift that without saying philipma1957 said it you are closer to being guilty of plagiarism.

Since it may be an original fact created today by me.

These are finer points of plagiarism which is why permaban is not the way to go.

It should be the second or,third choice not the first one.

That particular post is very reminiscent of George Carlin on this issue. I mean the whole "We have an invisible man, up in the skies, with a list of ten things you must not do". This isn't a novel, technical idea that needs to be memorized or reproduced from one author. Similar interpretations/ satires on christianity are quite prevalent in contemporary culture. Which reminds me to thank the revolutionaries who taught Christians to have the ability to laugh at themselves or their religion. World could be so much more peaceful if followers of that other Abrahamic religion could have the same large heartedness.

Fuck! Drugs truly are the worst. Of course, general breakdown of family and society is a contributing factor. Too much "liberation" has been a bad thing. We need a mix of conservatism too but unfortunately, then Americans get Trump. Republicans could surely do better. Okay, off-topic

Username : AlisonAlberto96


Bitcoin.org - FAQ