Topic: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! - page 19. (Read 50299 times)

I request support for this flag https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=825

A project called RoyaltyCoin provided us with white paper that was almost completely copied from another project with a similar idea called Inmusik. In white paper, the name Inmusik is replaced by RoyaltyCoin, there is also a small amount of rewriting that still does not change most phrases.

You can read more about this investigation here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/royaltycoin-plagiarized-whitepaper-5190530

I also checked the team profiles on LinkedIn, the RoyaltyCoin project is not mentioned anywhere.

Well it is clear we rattled the Bankera/Spectrocoin scammers to the point they locked their threads so this is the only reaction these imbeciles have 

The Reference threads are invalid, so there's not much to worry about. But I get that it's annoying.

I could offer to allow the accused to add a commentary to my Trust Flag viewer, but that's not the most obvious place to check when someone sees an inactive Flag on your profile.

If anyone is interested, I can add the commentary feature. But I won't restrict it to "the good guys" only: all accused users can use it if I make it.

Well.. this is getting really bad. two brand new and one old accounts just opened three false flags in my and  JollyGood profiles. Both of them are for violation of  a written contract. Reference links provided are also false.

Scammers profiles.

sockpuppet2 https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sockpuppet2-2691000

sock-puppet https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sock-puppet-2690989

moris2025 https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/moris2025-2305878

False flags.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=819

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=818

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=805

I don't know what to do ? Now anyone can create 1000 false flags without getting punished.

please ok this red flag for scamer,  embroidermate has 6 other names and embroidermate is the one who scam me and this scamer is one of them. 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=807

even his email says embroidermate.

I think it's me now, because another bankera paid shill and a scammer moris2025 https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/moris2025-2305878 opened a new flag in my profile yesterday.

False flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=799

This is becoming really annoying. If scammers will continue this way, I will go to guinness book as a world record holder of false flags.

It is typical revenge behaviour by scammers to open false flags against those that oppose them or expose them. The other thing is it shows their level of desperation too.

One of the things that I just do not understand is why are they continuously posting propaganda there with sock-puppets when they are not getting any business (or getting very little business) from this forum.

The coinsbit thread for example is full of trash too just like the Spectrocoin and Bankera threads yet they constantly purchase accounts and use newbies to create an army of sock-puppets to flood the thread with propaganda but they are not getting real genuine users posting there and are probably getting near zero business from here but they continue to post propaganda and flood. The question is why do they do it here when it brings no obvious benefit to them?



Well they just had to go after me too  

You are right, they locked both the Bankera and Spectrocoin threads so must be extremely upset. They lashed out using their sock-puppets in frustration by creating these false flags against anybody the challenged them but they have just made themselves look even more pathetic in their desperation. They have some flags against you too so you definitely rattled them too when you challenged them !

The Scam Accusation thread covering Bankera/Spectrocoin created by mosprognoz is an excellent piece of work. It is very detailed and it deserves credit for exposing the scammers in the way in which he did and that is the main reason they are fabricating information against him: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bankeraspectrocoin-paid-shills-bumping-the-thread-247-creating-a-fake-buzz-5174337

I think Veleor wears this badge of honour:

Looks like someone's on their way to having the most inactive flags against their account 
I now wonder who does have the most inactive flags to be honest, no doubt some good scambuster.

Don't forget this one:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=788

Looks like they're still upset over the Bankera thread getting locked. 

Bankera shill and scammer huup https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/huup-2425032 created two false flags. One in the profile of JollyGood and another in my profile. You can read about him and his alias here : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bankeraspectrocoin-paid-shills-bumping-the-thread-247-creating-a-fake-buzz-5174337

False flags :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=787

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=789

And another one on the same Maya scam topic, this one for the Joseph L Cord account which opened their [ANN] thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=782

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52545805

thank you please help me red flag scamer here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=780

^ You have the support.
I wonder how a project with plagiarized content go that much?

We have a bunch of scammers going under the MAYA Preferred shitcoin umbrella, now throwing their weight about and threatening legal action against a whistleblower here.
Their other accounts have been tagged/flagged but they open new ones, including Maya Preferred Official, which is the subject of this flag for which I am asking support, especially as it is now starting crude self moderated threads.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=778

Bitcoin SV (BSV) [#2] (active account)
Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitcoin-sv-bsv-2558986
Reason: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-bitcoin-sv-bsv-fake-team-member-and-plagiarized-white-paper-5149062
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=777

#1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=60

Maybe right now that is something just not on the agenda because of the recent introduction of 'bump' but if someone opens a flag it stands to reason he should be allowed to delete it especially if the point of dispute is resolved.

Having flags active for a minimum of 3 years is quite excessive if two parties involved find a solution and no longer have a dispute and harsh if both parties want the flag removed.

It's a long time and if you think about the positive side then in 3 to 10 years a person can turn into a good person. Everyone needs to have a chance to redemption themselves.

I liked this idea however in reality we will see the scammers will abandoned the account long before they have their clean time to come.

The 3 or 10 years for Type 2 and 3 Flags starts counting at the time of the incident, not when the flag was created. Example:

Can there be a possibility that a flag account that is once flagged can be flagged again , Or can DT add a time or extend the time of a flagged account? Just thinking