Oh yeah, I seen it other day and was laughing out of my ass LOL
Anyway supported and is going to tag the user too.
Topic: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! - page 21. (Read 49805 times)
User - https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/premegv-2523468
Thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/need-a-loan-of-10000-btc-i-have-5k-5175710
Flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=638
Reason for flag - See ridiculous loan request below (Scammers gon’ scam)
Thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/need-a-loan-of-10000-btc-i-have-5k-5175710
Flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=638
Reason for flag - See ridiculous loan request below (Scammers gon’ scam)
Hi guys!
I need a loan of $10k and I'm willing to put $5,000 on the line as to show you how serious about this I am. I'll repay the loan with in a 7 day period and willing to provide more information for peice of mind to the lender. Please contact me on telegram @galactivale or or post your telegram Bellow.
Edited: I know I'm a newbie so don't remind me
I need a loan of $10k and I'm willing to put $5,000 on the line as to show you how serious about this I am. I'll repay the loan with in a 7 day period and willing to provide more information for peice of mind to the lender. Please contact me on telegram @galactivale or or post your telegram Bellow.
Edited: I know I'm a newbie so don't remind me
legendary
Activity: 1922
Merit: 1230
AKA Ms-overzealous-condecsending-explitive-account
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=634
Quite obvious. Gift cards - locked, self-moderated & auto-buy alt of the "REFOUND" guy. Has at least 12 other past alts many of which have been nuked.
Quite obvious. Gift cards - locked, self-moderated & auto-buy alt of the "REFOUND" guy. Has at least 12 other past alts many of which have been nuked.
Please support flag on this guy. Existing trust is self explanatory. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=772007
Supported. You may want to update it with the direct link of the flag which is this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=630
legendary
Activity: 1922
Merit: 1230
AKA Ms-overzealous-condecsending-explitive-account
Please support flag on this guy. Existing trust is self explanatory.
Trust: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=772007
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=630
Trust: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=772007
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=630
Looking for support - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/user-zoneterror-probably-trying-to-steal-my-accountclear-phising-attempt-5175274
Flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=623
edit: other member created flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=789338;page=iflags
Thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-fake-gift-cards-httpsbitcointalkorgindexphpaction-profileu-789338-5175320
Flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=623
edit: other member created flag - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=789338;page=iflags
Thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-fake-gift-cards-httpsbitcointalkorgindexphpaction-profileu-789338-5175320
legendary
Activity: 1922
Merit: 1230
AKA Ms-overzealous-condecsending-explitive-account
AHHH! Didn't look down below! Thanks. Wanna help? 
I went ahead and supported your red flag. I certainly hope that some members of this forum don't decide to give you flack, since you deliberately made a deal with this person so you would have grounds to give him a red tag. Well, you delivered him the money and he failed to deliver the product. This could start adding up if you do this too often.
Thank you! That sounds weird, the guy is a scammer and soon to be proven alt of one other major active scammer and he took the sting to prove it. Stranger things happen here so "whatever". Life will go on.
AHHH! Didn't look down below! Thanks. Wanna help?
I went ahead and supported your red flag. I certainly hope that some members of this forum don't decide to give you flack, since you deliberately made a deal with this person so you would have grounds to give him a red tag. Well, you delivered him the money and he failed to deliver the product. This could start adding up if you do this too often.
legendary
Activity: 1922
Merit: 1230
AKA Ms-overzealous-condecsending-explitive-account
AHHH! Didn't look down below! Thanks. Wanna help?
Well, I added the second (type 2) flag here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=621 but it is only showing the original "type 1" flag.
Type 2 (or 3) need Support from at least 3 DT-members to be Active.You can find the flag here:
Quote
Inactive flags
This user has inactive flags, which may be totally inaccurate.
This user has inactive flags, which may be totally inaccurate.
legendary
Activity: 1922
Merit: 1230
AKA Ms-overzealous-condecsending-explitive-account
Well, I added the second (type 2) flag here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=621 but it is only showing the original "type 1" flag. I then tried to enter it again and it said the flag was added, but it's not.
Maybe because it needs support? Or maybe only 1 flag is permitted at a time?
Or maybe due to this: sandy-is-fine alleges: Axez D. Nyde violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. Axez D. Nyde did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around August 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.
Maybe because it needs support? Or maybe only 1 flag is permitted at a time?
Or maybe due to this: sandy-is-fine alleges: Axez D. Nyde violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. Axez D. Nyde did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around August 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.
And I think you can create two types of flag if you want to but not the same
Correct:These limits are in place:
- Per 180 days, you can only give 1 flag of each type to a given user. So you can't give someone multiple written-contract-violation flags in 180 days, for example.
- Globally, per year you can only create 1 flag per activity point you have, but at least 1/year.
- Per 180 days, you can only give 1 flag of each type to a given user. So you can't give someone multiple written-contract-violation flags in 180 days, for example.
- Globally, per year you can only create 1 flag per activity point you have, but at least 1/year.
Is there a way to change from a "type 1" to a "type 2" flag? Or have both especially if both are true?
You can not change one type to another. And I think you can create two types of flag if you want to but not the same (I have a little doubt)
legendary
Activity: 1922
Merit: 1230
AKA Ms-overzealous-condecsending-explitive-account
Is there a way to change from a "type 1" to a "type 2" flag? Or have both especially if both are true?
I took these notes on 3 flags which can be withdrawn:
type 1. Newbie warning: 'alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=29
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it: Due largely to the factors mentioned in'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=37
type 2. Violated implied agreement: 'violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=30
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=9
type 3. Violated written contract with damages: 'violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=41
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=35
I'll add this overview to the OP.
Quoting for visibility in the post history.type 1. Newbie warning: 'alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=29
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it: Due largely to the factors mentioned in'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=37
type 2. Violated implied agreement: 'violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=30
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=9
type 3. Violated written contract with damages: 'violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=41
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=35
I'll add this overview to the OP.
Thanks very much bud. Now I got what I needed. The 2nd one is caual or implied agreement and the 3rd one is a written contract. This is what I was missing this small detail. Thanks again.
Cheers :-)
I always find it hard to identify a type 2 and type 3 flag.
It took me a while too, I had to identify them for my Trust Flag viewer. Normally I would refer you to my site for the exact type of each flag, but it's still uploading data (currently 75% to go).I took these notes on 3 flags which can be withdrawn:
type 1. Newbie warning: 'alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=29
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it: Due largely to the factors mentioned in'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=37
type 2. Violated implied agreement: 'violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=30
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=9
type 3. Violated written contract with damages: 'violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=41
WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=35
I'll add this overview to the OP.
It says "violated a written contract, resulting in damages", which means type 3.
I always find it hard to identify a type 2 and type 3 flag.By the way, thanks for the reference.
Is this flag type2 or 3?
It says "violated a written contract, resulting in damages", which means type 3.Link: http://archive.is/BOyIK Users paid are marked blue.
Sorry, I don't have time to evaluate all evidence myself now, so I can't support it yet.
Kindly support my flag against the manager of ANYONE project
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=592
Reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/support-flag-against-anyone-project-refusal-to-paid-some-participants-5171602
Reason: Accomplice of refusal to pay signature participants.
Is this flag type2 or 3? And are you one of direct victim? I supported the flag but I needed to have the answer also.Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=592
Reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/support-flag-against-anyone-project-refusal-to-paid-some-participants-5171602
Reason: Accomplice of refusal to pay signature participants.
Cheers :-)
Need support: USER: Razerglass
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=559
Reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/legendary-member-loan-defaulted-004-btc-razerglass-5171995
Reason: Loan Defaulted.
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=559
Reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/legendary-member-loan-defaulted-004-btc-razerglass-5171995
Reason: Loan Defaulted.
Jump to: