Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! - page 23.

game-protect

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 507

Quote from: AB de Royse777 on July 11, 2019, 08:34:25 AM

Quote from: game-protect on July 11, 2019, 08:31:50 AM

A flag to show that Game Protect is not a scammer is a good idea.

Flags always mean there is something wrong so you will always get the negative impression from it unfortunately. The only positive impression you may get is from a positive feedback or neutral feedback with positive statement in it.

This is not true!

Believing means not knowing that Game Protect is a scammer!

Not knowing that Game Protect is a scammer confirms that Game Protect is not a scammer.

The more users believe = confirm that I am not a scammer, the higher is the trust rating and I have the best trust rating you can get on bitcointalk

The correct versions are:

Quote

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they believe that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them ~~high-risk~~ trustworthy.

Quote

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they know / have proof that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk.

AB de Royse777

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 3878

Visit: r7promotions.com

Quote from: game-protect on July 11, 2019, 08:31:50 AM

A flag to show that Game Protect is not a scammer is a good idea.

Flags always mean there is something wrong so you will always get the negative impression from it unfortunately. The only positive impression you may get is from a positive feedback or neutral feedback with positive statement in it.

By the way, this is not looking good I am afraid - 🔴🔴🔴SCAM🔴🔴🔴GAME-PROTECT.COM🔴🔴🔴SCAM🔴🔴🔴

game-protect

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 507

A flag to show that Game Protect is not a scammer is a good idea.

morvillz7z

legendary

Activity: 2170

Merit: 2019

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

If anyone wants to support a flag type 1 against ICOHolder, here's your chance:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=437

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/icoholder-1206615

They have a long and very bad reputation of verifying incorrect information about team members for various ICO projects thus misleading potential investors. They would verify stock images, cartoons and whatnot as long as they are being paid.

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2270

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on July 05, 2019, 07:15:54 AM

How has game-protect not got a newb/guest type 1 flag yet?

It wasn't necessary to flag them as they had big red box on top of their thread because of old trust system.

I can only say that there isn't any proof that their service helped anyone, however, there is no proof that they didn't but many things in their thread, site and behavior raised many red flags and I personally would not trust them.

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on July 05, 2019, 07:15:54 AM

I mean look at this shit -

Quote from: game-protect on July 04, 2019, 08:10:35 AM

Game Protect was recently approached by an UK lawyer who is expert for Bitcoin enforcement and we likely can enforce the crypto currencies scam artist Dean Nolan has scammed!

And there is no proof that lawyer did or didn't approached them and knowing GP they won't say anything except this.

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on July 06, 2019, 11:34:05 AM

It seems I can’t create a new flag with the link you provided (a better link) for another 180 days as I’ve already done one. Somebody else will have to do it or hopefully others support the current one.

I would not suggest anyone to support this flag because it will be abuse of system - as suchmoon said, link is not good. Give me a few minutes, I will create new one.

Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=435

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 9384

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Quote from: suchmoon on July 06, 2019, 07:49:05 AM

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on July 06, 2019, 07:33:35 AM

Bump to seek support for my flag in the post above

I would like to support it but your reference link is not good. You should have pointed it to https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/game-protect-online-gaming-consumer-protection-1535816 (game-protect thread) or create a new thread with what you posted above...

Keep in mind that flag reference links get truncated to the top of the thread so it doesn't work well if you're trying to link to a post somewhere deep in a thread.

It seems I can’t create a new flag with the link you provided (a better link) for another 180 days as I’ve already done one. Somebody else will have to do it or hopefully others support the current one.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on July 06, 2019, 07:33:35 AM

Bump to seek support for my flag in the post above

I would like to support it but your reference link is not good. You should have pointed it to https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/game-protect-online-gaming-consumer-protection-1535816 (game-protect thread) or create a new thread with what you posted above...

Keep in mind that flag reference links get truncated to the top of the thread so it doesn't work well if you're trying to link to a post somewhere deep in a thread.

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 9384

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Bump to seek support for my flag in the post above

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 9384

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

How has game-protect not got a newb/guest type 1 flag yet?
User profile - https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/game-protect-874254

He ponces around the forum pretending to be able to help people who have been scammed by casinos etc.

I mean look at this shit -

Quote from: game-protect on July 04, 2019, 08:10:35 AM

Game Protect was recently approached by an UK lawyer who is expert for Bitcoin enforcement and we likely can enforce the crypto currencies scam artist Dean Nolan has scammed!

He’s been doing it for years. Look at his post history - https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/game-protect-874254;sa=showPosts

I was tempted to create an alt & try to see if he charges for his bull shit service by contacting him, pretending to be an aggrieved gambler.

I’m pretty sure this guy has potential to be a scammer but I have no solid evidence. I feel a flag to warn noobs/guests COULD be beneficial. What do you think guys?

Edit - I’ve created a flag. Please support it -

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=372

This guy has so many negative trust feedbacks. I simply do not tryst the fact that he is qualified to or has any means of legally enforcing lawsuits/cases against gambling companies.
He is getting people to contact him privately which I believe could be for financial gain with absolutely no guarantee or promise to ever get peoples money back.

It you look at the post history it seems he’s getting desperate in recent days bumping lots of threads with the same C&P’d posts touting his likely faux business.

Please help & support my flag.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=372

vlom

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1113

ty
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=894070

Blacknavy

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1291

[FLAG] Mindrust [DT1] member gave me redtrust without reason

Quote from: Blacknavy on June 26, 2019, 04:15:40 PM

He obsessed with me because we had couple arguments in past.

Here's his slander

I've never encouraged merit farming/trading in my life. I use this forum properly and never cross the general rules.

He became a DT member just a 2-3 weeks ago and appearently he doesn't even know how to use his power.

Quote

Ortada hiçbir kanıt yok çünkü seçime katılan hiçbir üye o bahsettiğin grupta değil.

Quote

There is no evidence because none of the members in the election is in 'that merit trading group'

This was fully what i wrote. I do not know what to say because Mindrust is obviously crossing my words and trying to change the meaning.

I believe that DT members will oppose this. It's not fair someone to crop only one part of my sentences and giving me red trust. I hope someone will fix this.

FLAG #295

DireWolfM14

copper member

Activity: 2142

Merit: 4219

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: suchmoon on June 23, 2019, 12:44:06 PM

I think the idea is that the accuser should always create a dedicated thread for a flag and make it non-self-mod-unlocked so that the... uhm... defendant could respond.

That actually makes perfect sense. Imagine the kvetching that would ensue if the perp couldn't respond to his accusation.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: LoyceV on June 23, 2019, 01:07:05 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on June 23, 2019, 12:44:06 PM

I think the idea is that the accuser should always create a dedicated thread for a flag and make it non-self-mod-unlocked so that the... uhm... defendant could respond.

That was my understanding too, but many Flags link to threads created by someone else. Maybe it shouldn't be possible at all to create a Flag based on a thread that someone else created.

That might be an overkill. What if someone creates a thread researching a scam and then a victim wants to create a red box for it.

I think we should just use common sense and use reliable links (preferably not the scam threads themselves as the perp could then edit/remove it), and archive them just in case. That was the preferred MO in the "old" system too.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: suchmoon on June 23, 2019, 12:44:06 PM

I think the idea is that the accuser should always create a dedicated thread for a flag and make it non-self-mod-unlocked so that the... uhm... defendant could respond.

That was my understanding too, but many Flags link to threads created by someone else. Maybe it shouldn't be possible at all to create a Flag based on a thread that someone else created.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on June 23, 2019, 11:38:50 AM

ETA again: That worked, but something odd still happend. I used the link to my post as the reference link, but the flag trimmed the link to point to the topic it'self.

Yes, it does that. I think the idea is that the accuser should always create a dedicated thread for a flag and make it non-self-mod-unlocked so that the... uhm... defendant could respond.

Quote

Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that [...]

DireWolfM14

copper member

Activity: 2142

Merit: 4219

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

I tried using the post that I created as the reference link, and I get the same error. I then thought maybe it needed to be a topic link, so I used the link to this topic and still the same error. I haven't run into that trouble before, it's the weirdest thing.

~~@LFC_Bitcoin and @suchmoon, if you one of you could please try. Either I'm going crazy or...~~ Well, I know I'm crazy but it keeps me from going insane.

ETA: I just noticed this is a self moderated topic. DOH! I'll try staking my post in Lafu's thread and link to that.

ETA again: That worked, but something odd still happend. I used the link to my post as the reference link, but the flag trimmed the link to point to the topic it'self.

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 9384

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Same here - That topic does not exist, or it is self-moderated or locked.

Can you just create a flag & put the link as your post here which will then give the link to the scammy thread & act as evidence?

I would still support it.

Use this - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51573663

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on June 23, 2019, 10:43:28 AM

All of this in a locked thread.

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on June 23, 2019, 11:10:57 AM

Correct. I get sent to a page that says "That topic does not exist, or it is self-moderated or locked."

That's the reason right there. You're supposed to create a non-self-mod unlocked thread for a flag.

DireWolfM14

copper member

Activity: 2142

Merit: 4219

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on June 23, 2019, 11:01:11 AM

I don’t know what you mean?
Do you mean you can’t start a newbie/guest flag? If so that’s weird, do you want me to try?

Correct. I get sent to a page that says "That topic does not exist, or it is self-moderated or locked."

Could you try, please?

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 9384

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on June 23, 2019, 10:43:28 AM

Here's a Newbie (account created in 2011) claiming to have a billion dollars worth of bitcoin for sale, and requiring KYC to deal. All of this in a locked thread. Obviously just an attempt to steal someone's identification documents.

Username: andy3
Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/andy3-31289
Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.35551192
Archive: http://archive.fo/JEKBM
Flag:

ETA: I can't create a type 1 flag for this user, anyone know why?

I don’t know what you mean?
Do you mean you can’t start a newbie/guest flag? If so that’s weird, do you want me to try?

Topic: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! - page 23. (Read 49805 times)