Topic: [RESURRECTION] Bringing Life to Growthcoin (GRW) , MADATORY UPDATE TO 1.3.0 (Read 34546 times)
June 16, 2014, 02:35:13 PM
What happpend to the download link? I cannot access it.
June 08, 2014, 09:56:18 AM
This thread is closed, please use the NEW GRW THREAD HERE:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/re-ann-growthcoin-powpos-100-per-year-version-1301-641241
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/re-ann-growthcoin-powpos-100-per-year-version-1301-641241
June 08, 2014, 09:39:46 AM
Чтo зa xpeнь в cтapoм бyмaжникe 1.2.2 ecть дeньги, a в нoвoм 1.3.0 нeтy, в чeм пpoблeмa
When syncronizatino is finished, open the console and make an repairwallet (be sure to make a wallet.dat backup before) and the money will be restored
Блaгoдapю, пoмoглo
June 08, 2014, 04:02:13 AM
Чтo зa xpeнь в cтapoм бyмaжникe 1.2.2 ecть дeньги, a в нoвoм 1.3.0 нeтy, в чeм пpoблeмa
When syncronizatino is finished, open the console and make an repairwallet (be sure to make a wallet.dat backup before) and the money will be restored
June 08, 2014, 02:14:58 AM
Чтo зa xpeнь в cтapoм бyмaжникe 1.2.2 ecть дeньги, a в нoвoм 1.3.0 нeтy, в чeм пpoблeмa
June 06, 2014, 12:52:06 PM
█ ★Growthcoin (GRW) █→ Now Live on: http://www.cryptocoinrank.com/Growthcoin
Hope you and the community like it. For a brief description about www.cryptocoinrank.com see: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annwwwcryptocoinrankcom-for-sale-for-sale-for-sale-579901
Enjoy
June 05, 2014, 11:13:53 PM
New thread is open.
Please take this conversation to the NEW THREAD HERE:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/re-ann-growthcoin-powpos-100-per-year-version-1301-641241
Thanks
Please take this conversation to the NEW THREAD HERE:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/re-ann-growthcoin-powpos-100-per-year-version-1301-641241
Thanks
June 05, 2014, 07:08:25 PM
I think we definitely need a new [RE-ANN] thread with clean and nice looking OP.
GRW is resurrected now and runs great with the new wallet, it's time to move further.
If you do this, please use a dedicated account (like we did for Monero). Much easier to handle for a team than if it is tighted to a person. Longer term and scales better.GRW is resurrected now and runs great with the new wallet, it's time to move further.
I'm not into those generic accounts for the dev "team" as I find it casts a shadow on the coin. You are not really gaining anything IMO by having a newbie account at the head of an official coin page.
June 05, 2014, 07:02:25 PM
I know this was a long time ago, so I guess I can't get it back now, but is there a -salvagewallet or switch I could use to get these coins back?
Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014-02-20 03:00
To: GUxT3aUvKrFV84aASf9GCs7uvnDMTPVoon
Debit: -600.00 GRW
Transaction fee: -0.20 GRW
Net amount: -600.20 GRW
Transaction ID: f71436bfada384c553cb9dcffab1ff2da6990ddd85eb10a5790d8b4f53ebc1e8
They just sit there in the transaction list, unconfirmed. :-/
Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014-02-20 03:00
To: GUxT3aUvKrFV84aASf9GCs7uvnDMTPVoon
Debit: -600.00 GRW
Transaction fee: -0.20 GRW
Net amount: -600.20 GRW
Transaction ID: f71436bfada384c553cb9dcffab1ff2da6990ddd85eb10a5790d8b4f53ebc1e8
They just sit there in the transaction list, unconfirmed. :-/
if that was a transaction that never got accepted, a backup and repairwallet could restore those coins, or a salvagewallet should do it. If those were mined on a fork... chances are they will be lost.
The same day, a few hours apart there has been transactions to this wallet address that worked, just this one didn't. I have tried repairwallet (console), switches -rescan -reindex and -salvagewallet, but no luck there, it's gone.
hum, maybe those coins were from a fork so you are trying to spend inputs that were never accepted by the network. I know I had a similar issue when I mined on a fork a few months back, lost those coins too.
June 05, 2014, 03:48:48 PM
I think we definitely need a new [RE-ANN] thread with clean and nice looking OP.
GRW is resurrected now and runs great with the new wallet, it's time to move further.
If you do this, please use a dedicated account (like we did for Monero). Much easier to handle for a team than if it is tighted to a person. Longer term and scales better. GRW is resurrected now and runs great with the new wallet, it's time to move further.
June 05, 2014, 03:47:59 PM
On a side note, have you guys seen the 666 (both 666 in and 666 out) transactions of the Nazi 4U wallet? Solo mined from block 1 to 663. 
http://grw.blockx.info/get/address/GMgJPWnq3Fe4Yn91gTsHa6fAhdswNazi4u (Address GMgJPWnq3Fe4Yn91gTsHa6fAhdswNazi4u)
Hillarious. (Well, almost, it's one of the weirdest things I've seen here, so far). 
http://grw.blockx.info/get/address/GMgJPWnq3Fe4Yn91gTsHa6fAhdswNazi4u (Address GMgJPWnq3Fe4Yn91gTsHa6fAhdswNazi4u)
Hillarious.
(Well, almost, it's one of the weirdest things I've seen here, so far). June 05, 2014, 03:37:49 PM
I know this was a long time ago, so I guess I can't get it back now, but is there a -salvagewallet or switch I could use to get these coins back?
Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014-02-20 03:00
To: GUxT3aUvKrFV84aASf9GCs7uvnDMTPVoon
Debit: -600.00 GRW
Transaction fee: -0.20 GRW
Net amount: -600.20 GRW
Transaction ID: f71436bfada384c553cb9dcffab1ff2da6990ddd85eb10a5790d8b4f53ebc1e8
They just sit there in the transaction list, unconfirmed. :-/
Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014-02-20 03:00
To: GUxT3aUvKrFV84aASf9GCs7uvnDMTPVoon
Debit: -600.00 GRW
Transaction fee: -0.20 GRW
Net amount: -600.20 GRW
Transaction ID: f71436bfada384c553cb9dcffab1ff2da6990ddd85eb10a5790d8b4f53ebc1e8
They just sit there in the transaction list, unconfirmed. :-/
if that was a transaction that never got accepted, a backup and repairwallet could restore those coins, or a salvagewallet should do it. If those were mined on a fork... chances are they will be lost.
The same day, a few hours apart there has been transactions to this wallet address that worked, just this one didn't. I have tried repairwallet (console), switches -rescan -reindex and -salvagewallet, but no luck there, it's gone.
June 05, 2014, 10:23:05 AM
create a fashion bring forth new idea .let grwcoin to the moon!
June 05, 2014, 09:55:49 AM
While I understand the noble reason behind your stand, I think the fact that a coin being listed on an exchange with volume is better than the cost of the bribe is bad.
That being said, Cryptsy was chosen because it wasn't too outrageous has a bribe to get listed.
Now if there is another way of achieving this, I would be more than happy to hear about it and try it.
This still is a community decision so I wont assume the cost of the bribe alone!
That being said, Cryptsy was chosen because it wasn't too outrageous has a bribe to get listed.
Now if there is another way of achieving this, I would be more than happy to hear about it and try it.
This still is a community decision so I wont assume the cost of the bribe alone!
i agree with you.
June 05, 2014, 09:50:48 AM
While I understand the noble reason behind your stand, I think the fact that a coin being listed on an exchange with volume is better than the cost of the bribe is bad.
That being said, Cryptsy was chosen because it wasn't too outrageous has a bribe to get listed.
Now if there is another way of achieving this, I would be more than happy to hear about it and try it.
This still is a community decision so I wont assume the cost of the bribe alone!
That being said, Cryptsy was chosen because it wasn't too outrageous has a bribe to get listed.
Now if there is another way of achieving this, I would be more than happy to hear about it and try it.
This still is a community decision so I wont assume the cost of the bribe alone!
June 05, 2014, 06:44:45 AM
It has indeed gone wayy out of the hand!
it takes atleast 20 btcs for some exchanges which is atrocious! I'm with you on this and we need to take a stand!think i was trying with an outdated version of crypto++ and was missing a thing or two, nothing wrong with your source.
As far as cryptsy , I would not send them a single satoshi to list a coin
I refuse to do so for the coins I have developed and would suggest all serious developers and users/traders of cryptocurrency just take a stand and stop allowing exchanges to demand a bribe to list a coin.
We are the customers and while they have a right to list what coins they please , this voting with the bribe of btc has gotten out of hand.
I wish you success in the revival of the coin. The blockchain is getting there , pretty tall !!
I am relatively new here and wasn't around when the first source was launched. I am not aware of the changes you are talking about.
If you want to contribute to the revival of this coin, we are looking to rise some BTC to buy are way in Cryptsy. 5 BTC is our goal and should get us to the top spot pretty easily.
I've setup this address for the Cryptsy FUND: 1Cx2AdwyfcLWjiz8tvz3N9v7n5UeixmYf
Also, I do appreciate the gesture of sending me GRW/BTC, but I'd prefer the funds be spent towards the development of the coin. So I've also setup a GRW address for development and bounties.
Glad to see "older" supporters coming back
BTW, what tweaks did you have to make in order to build, was it something that needs to be changed in the code ?
As far as cryptsy , I would not send them a single satoshi to list a coin
I refuse to do so for the coins I have developed and would suggest all serious developers and users/traders of cryptocurrency just take a stand and stop allowing exchanges to demand a bribe to list a coin.
We are the customers and while they have a right to list what coins they please , this voting with the bribe of btc has gotten out of hand.
I wish you success in the revival of the coin. The blockchain is getting there , pretty tall !!
ok , i got the wallet to compile after a few tweaks,
going to take a while for the blockchain to download, then I will find my old wallet and see what shows up ....
from a development standpoint , I am curious,
I don't think the original GRO had Crypto++ included, why did you put it in ?
You don't have to answer but just curious really..... also it looks like (working off memory here I have to dig up the old source code that is long gone from github) you took out the original stake modifier in kernel.cpp and added your own, this should not matter as they are just basically hardcoded checkpoints anyway, just curious if you did this why ?
Looks like a solid effort and a lot of work !!
I don't remember how many coins I have left and if I can earn a little stake now but i will certainly throw a few your way ....
I like non hostile community takeovers and updating 'dead' coins.....(i have done a few in my day but all were pretty simple jobs just getting things started again) nothing as extensive as this work.....
Cheers !! Maybe an exchange will finally pick this coin up now.....
I realize it is considered by many just another scryptcoin /clone whatever BUT I personally am a lot more inclined to support a coin that has kept running (Even on 3 wheels like this one did) on its own for a long time than one of these 2 day mine, ipo proof of stake x13 mutations I see the forums cluttered with here......
There is something to be said for 'paying your dues' and longevity, being around 6 months or a year or more should mean something in the world of cryptocurrency...... I think it does to some people but not enough....
Still looking foreward to see how it will work out !!
going to take a while for the blockchain to download, then I will find my old wallet and see what shows up ....
from a development standpoint , I am curious,
I don't think the original GRO had Crypto++ included, why did you put it in ?
You don't have to answer but just curious really..... also it looks like (working off memory here I have to dig up the old source code that is long gone from github) you took out the original stake modifier in kernel.cpp and added your own, this should not matter as they are just basically hardcoded checkpoints anyway, just curious if you did this why ?
Looks like a solid effort and a lot of work !!
I don't remember how many coins I have left and if I can earn a little stake now but i will certainly throw a few your way ....
I like non hostile community takeovers and updating 'dead' coins.....(i have done a few in my day but all were pretty simple jobs just getting things started again) nothing as extensive as this work.....
Cheers !! Maybe an exchange will finally pick this coin up now.....
I realize it is considered by many just another scryptcoin /clone whatever BUT I personally am a lot more inclined to support a coin that has kept running (Even on 3 wheels like this one did) on its own for a long time than one of these 2 day mine, ipo proof of stake x13 mutations I see the forums cluttered with here......
There is something to be said for 'paying your dues' and longevity, being around 6 months or a year or more should mean something in the world of cryptocurrency...... I think it does to some people but not enough....
Still looking foreward to see how it will work out !!
I am relatively new here and wasn't around when the first source was launched. I am not aware of the changes you are talking about.
If you want to contribute to the revival of this coin, we are looking to rise some BTC to buy are way in Cryptsy. 5 BTC is our goal and should get us to the top spot pretty easily.
I've setup this address for the Cryptsy FUND: 1Cx2AdwyfcLWjiz8tvz3N9v7n5UeixmYf
Also, I do appreciate the gesture of sending me GRW/BTC, but I'd prefer the funds be spent towards the development of the coin. So I've also setup a GRW address for development and bounties.
GRowthPRXXnMkMpXbFM1iEG8d7ShYdhp3B
Glad to see "older" supporters coming back
BTW, what tweaks did you have to make in order to build, was it something that needs to be changed in the code ?
June 05, 2014, 02:00:46 AM
think i was trying with an outdated version of crypto++ and was missing a thing or two, nothing wrong with your source.
As far as cryptsy , I would not send them a single satoshi to list a coin
I refuse to do so for the coins I have developed and would suggest all serious developers and users/traders of cryptocurrency just take a stand and stop allowing exchanges to demand a bribe to list a coin.
We are the customers and while they have a right to list what coins they please , this voting with the bribe of btc has gotten out of hand.
I wish you success in the revival of the coin. The blockchain is getting there , pretty tall !!
I am relatively new here and wasn't around when the first source was launched. I am not aware of the changes you are talking about.
If you want to contribute to the revival of this coin, we are looking to rise some BTC to buy are way in Cryptsy. 5 BTC is our goal and should get us to the top spot pretty easily.
I've setup this address for the Cryptsy FUND: 1Cx2AdwyfcLWjiz8tvz3N9v7n5UeixmYf
Also, I do appreciate the gesture of sending me GRW/BTC, but I'd prefer the funds be spent towards the development of the coin. So I've also setup a GRW address for development and bounties.
Glad to see "older" supporters coming back
BTW, what tweaks did you have to make in order to build, was it something that needs to be changed in the code ?
As far as cryptsy , I would not send them a single satoshi to list a coin
I refuse to do so for the coins I have developed and would suggest all serious developers and users/traders of cryptocurrency just take a stand and stop allowing exchanges to demand a bribe to list a coin.
We are the customers and while they have a right to list what coins they please , this voting with the bribe of btc has gotten out of hand.
I wish you success in the revival of the coin. The blockchain is getting there , pretty tall !!
ok , i got the wallet to compile after a few tweaks,
going to take a while for the blockchain to download, then I will find my old wallet and see what shows up ....
from a development standpoint , I am curious,
I don't think the original GRO had Crypto++ included, why did you put it in ?
You don't have to answer but just curious really..... also it looks like (working off memory here I have to dig up the old source code that is long gone from github) you took out the original stake modifier in kernel.cpp and added your own, this should not matter as they are just basically hardcoded checkpoints anyway, just curious if you did this why ?
Looks like a solid effort and a lot of work !!
I don't remember how many coins I have left and if I can earn a little stake now but i will certainly throw a few your way ....
I like non hostile community takeovers and updating 'dead' coins.....(i have done a few in my day but all were pretty simple jobs just getting things started again) nothing as extensive as this work.....
Cheers !! Maybe an exchange will finally pick this coin up now.....
I realize it is considered by many just another scryptcoin /clone whatever BUT I personally am a lot more inclined to support a coin that has kept running (Even on 3 wheels like this one did) on its own for a long time than one of these 2 day mine, ipo proof of stake x13 mutations I see the forums cluttered with here......
There is something to be said for 'paying your dues' and longevity, being around 6 months or a year or more should mean something in the world of cryptocurrency...... I think it does to some people but not enough....
Still looking foreward to see how it will work out !!
going to take a while for the blockchain to download, then I will find my old wallet and see what shows up ....
from a development standpoint , I am curious,
I don't think the original GRO had Crypto++ included, why did you put it in ?
You don't have to answer but just curious really..... also it looks like (working off memory here I have to dig up the old source code that is long gone from github) you took out the original stake modifier in kernel.cpp and added your own, this should not matter as they are just basically hardcoded checkpoints anyway, just curious if you did this why ?
Looks like a solid effort and a lot of work !!
I don't remember how many coins I have left and if I can earn a little stake now but i will certainly throw a few your way ....
I like non hostile community takeovers and updating 'dead' coins.....(i have done a few in my day but all were pretty simple jobs just getting things started again) nothing as extensive as this work.....
Cheers !! Maybe an exchange will finally pick this coin up now.....
I realize it is considered by many just another scryptcoin /clone whatever BUT I personally am a lot more inclined to support a coin that has kept running (Even on 3 wheels like this one did) on its own for a long time than one of these 2 day mine, ipo proof of stake x13 mutations I see the forums cluttered with here......
There is something to be said for 'paying your dues' and longevity, being around 6 months or a year or more should mean something in the world of cryptocurrency...... I think it does to some people but not enough....
Still looking foreward to see how it will work out !!
I am relatively new here and wasn't around when the first source was launched. I am not aware of the changes you are talking about.
If you want to contribute to the revival of this coin, we are looking to rise some BTC to buy are way in Cryptsy. 5 BTC is our goal and should get us to the top spot pretty easily.
I've setup this address for the Cryptsy FUND: 1Cx2AdwyfcLWjiz8tvz3N9v7n5UeixmYf
Also, I do appreciate the gesture of sending me GRW/BTC, but I'd prefer the funds be spent towards the development of the coin. So I've also setup a GRW address for development and bounties.
GRowthPRXXnMkMpXbFM1iEG8d7ShYdhp3B
Glad to see "older" supporters coming back
BTW, what tweaks did you have to make in order to build, was it something that needs to be changed in the code ?
June 04, 2014, 07:41:33 PM
Meanwhile guys, I managed to talk to Jimmy over cryptocointalk.com and was added as a mod for the GrowthCoin forum.
One of the big advantages we get from cryptocointalk is that we can start a thread for each discussion or issue we may have. It's better organized so in the long run has we don't end up with a 300 page thread that makes it impossible to find information!
you can find it here: https://cryptocointalk.com/forum/337-growthcoin-grw/
One of the big advantages we get from cryptocointalk is that we can start a thread for each discussion or issue we may have. It's better organized so in the long run has we don't end up with a 300 page thread that makes it impossible to find information!
you can find it here: https://cryptocointalk.com/forum/337-growthcoin-grw/
June 04, 2014, 07:25:51 PM
I would need a feedback from the community.
I said this already but I think now is the time to take position.
I believe starting a new thread for this conversation would give us better control over the OP and changes could be made easier and faster.
My concern is that this would be a third thread on GRW. A lot of people still don't know that we are reviving this coin so I'm afraid that if we start a new thread, it might confuse more people.
So I'm asking you guys what you think about that
Thanks
I said this already but I think now is the time to take position.
I believe starting a new thread for this conversation would give us better control over the OP and changes could be made easier and faster.
My concern is that this would be a third thread on GRW. A lot of people still don't know that we are reviving this coin so I'm afraid that if we start a new thread, it might confuse more people.
So I'm asking you guys what you think about that
Thanks
I think we definitely need a new [RE-ANN] thread with clean and nice looking OP.
GRW is resurrected now and runs great with the new wallet, it's time to move further.
i think we do not need a new thread ,but change the first page of the thread,let the first page
nicer and professional.
Unick has no control over OP of this thread, so it takes too much time to change something there, will hurt the coin on the long run.
June 04, 2014, 07:08:19 PM
I would need a feedback from the community.
I said this already but I think now is the time to take position.
I believe starting a new thread for this conversation would give us better control over the OP and changes could be made easier and faster.
My concern is that this would be a third thread on GRW. A lot of people still don't know that we are reviving this coin so I'm afraid that if we start a new thread, it might confuse more people.
So I'm asking you guys what you think about that
Thanks
I said this already but I think now is the time to take position.
I believe starting a new thread for this conversation would give us better control over the OP and changes could be made easier and faster.
My concern is that this would be a third thread on GRW. A lot of people still don't know that we are reviving this coin so I'm afraid that if we start a new thread, it might confuse more people.
So I'm asking you guys what you think about that
Thanks
I think we definitely need a new [RE-ANN] thread with clean and nice looking OP.
GRW is resurrected now and runs great with the new wallet, it's time to move further.
i think we do not need a new thread ,but change the first page of the thread,let the first page
nicer and professional.
Jump to: