Topic: Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘 - page 144. (Read 82109 times)

In addition to that, for those people who are still and are planning to sell their identities through verifying different accounts (such as casino account, social media, exchange accounts, etc.) worst is to give documents and verification photos to anyone specially whom that  are unknown for them, you do not want yourself to get in trouble as if those people you've transacted with might have shady transactions being done.
To hide their identity. This is one of the major reasons why people ask others to verify an account using their name.

When governments come for a person, there are millions that use it, but when those millions are stuck in one place then government could bottleneck that place and could check it anyway they want.

Just think about the Binance example you are giving, if they didn't do KYC then they would not be able to do exchanging anywhere in the west, because they all want that, and I personally would prefer it if they just operated here and give KYC, but the difference between Binance and a casino is that we are talking about something that is gambling vs trading. One of them is legal and the other is not so legal in other places which is the trouble.

We already know about Roobet being legit casino without any doubt and don't want to click on any links here.We have been around here on the forum from a long time and Roobet has proved and build the reputation in the market with so many options for players along with the promotion and events for the community to help them.So we know about it.

The SEC doing some follow-up is the reason why I said if we're going to count 1-10 the casinos that will make use of XMR in the future it will be only 1 casino which believe may be created by a privacy focus project.
The exchange like Binance has to surrender to the authorities because it's never a DEX, to begin with, but I'm surprised that they never delist Monero.
Having said that, I just want people to understand that no matter how we like privacy and no KYC for huge withdrawals on casinos since Cryptocurrency is the talk worldwide we will never escape the KYC aspect except if a privacy focus project creates a no KYC casino but if we consider the risk involved it doesn't worth it.

Good to see Roobet keep improving to advertise their casino on many popular players.

Previously Charles Oliveira who very known on UFC became Roobet's brand ambassador, now Canelo Alvarez as the most known on boxing, I think no one will don't know Canelo if anyone are interested with boxing. Roobet as a kangaroo is right to focus on UFC and boxing since kangaroo is a powerful animal.

I don't surprised if Roobet will looking for other MMA events e.g. Bellator, KSW, CageWarrior etc.

That’s mainly because people saw that it is working. I mean I am not saying that it is working because I cannot possibly know if it is or not, but from what I gather, if one place did it once and then everyone followed and casinos keep doing it, that feels like maybe it did work and it has been something good. I feel like if all these places are sponsoring or hiring famous sports ambassadors then it would be a great deal for all of them.

I am super happy about the potential this carries, eventually the crypto market will be like betting market where they will do advertisement anywhere they possibly can, which will result with crypto growing as a whole.

I agree bug bounties are important programs for big companies to develop
specially those that work with values like roobet, duelbits, so forth and so on

great point

This is what I was saying in the above post as if you are engaged in document forging or selling them then you may face the consequences for it once it's known to the authorities as whosoever is buying documents his intentions are for some illicit work only.But I think we should focus more on the Roobet discussion in this thread not going off topic more.

A reminder to anyone that they should never sell their own data's because those scammers could use their identities for what every they like and if they use the same like this then the authority will find the accused person then the person who sell their identities for KYC purposes will be sued. Maybe in future we can see that level 2 to happen if there will be many cases like this will exist on Roobet.

Yes, and I really like that integration in the event that it happens, because not everyone will do it, perhaps for fear that they might give them even more follow-up? I'm not very sure, but the SEC may be able to get in there, I think that the current KYC requirements that are so demanding, both for casinos and exchanges, is for that same action, to be able to do follow-ups, so they don't use Monero, because I've seen As an exchange as prestigious as Binance, they have surrendered to the is of many governments and authorities of some countries and have blocked many users of the exchange, including the blocking of some user funds that those governments considered suspicious, this is good for users. which are bad actually, but Monero makes the transactions more private, more anonymous, I think that would make it more difficult for the authorities to trace them. I think that may be a compelling reason today.

You are right my friend, let's see what a pleasant surprise Stake.com comes up with, most likely yes, Inoue is a great representation, however we have to wait, but I liked Roobet's movement with Canelo, honestly the Mexican He showed what he is made of, although I think that for now he will be resting because he wants to have that urgent operation done on his hand and I hope everything goes well for him, but he is a great figure as a representative of the casino, I think this is the corresponding path for being able to be at the top of boxing, now he is having more fans and this is a very good thing, the bets are increasing and I think that everything is going very well.


You are right, as much as our documents are private, they are our identity, it is not worth leaving them there for some money, there are many who choose to use identities to commit many crimes, this is very common in the borders dangerous places in the world, where there are connections between two countries, like in South America, the most active border is where this type of thing is seen, where many crimes have been committed based on the relevant documentation that has been stolen, and on occasions when they realize, they have to report quickly because identity theft is the order of the day.

I would say you should never sell your documents because if someone is getting it from you his intentions are not good and most of the illicit crimes are done through this manner only.This is why I also fear KYC because your documents could be sold on dark web if you are sending them to non trusted third party users so beware of them and hackers use it to withdraw funds and bypass the restrictions easily.

The addition of Canelo as a brand ambassador is indeed a big step as he is one of the biggest name in boxing (together with Fury, Joshua, Uysk, ...). Seems that more and more casinos are starting to sponsor different sports such as UFC, boxing or soccer.

I think I disagree with you on this thing.  Abusers will always try to abuse the system whether the casino is on hand stopping them to abuse the bonus and promotions.  The casino had put lots of restrictions even banning or freezing the same IP accounts.  They even clearly stated their rules on both TOS and promotional rules.  It is that these abusers are getting smarter in creating a workaround to exploit the system and bypass rules.  These abusers even extend their creativity to hiring people just to bypass KYC and other stuff.  So basically the casino is trying their best not to get exploited but the method in combatting fraudsters and cheaters are limited.

That's cool. Although I am a big fan of GGG, this contract is good news for crypto in general. Canelo is currently the biggest name in boxing and if only he wanted to fight thrice a year, he can easily become the world's highest-paid athlete just like his superstar predecessors Pacman and Mayweather.

This is a great move by Roobet as another crypto casino Stake also is becoming the major sponsor of world title fights in Japan, probably the main target is Japanese superstar and boxing's pound-for-pound Naoya Inoue.

An acquisition at a good time, the new ambassador of the casino Roobet "opens winning," it is not clear to me if he is the only boxer they have and if Canelo signs in a long-term negotiation.

source: telegram/Roobet. +1

If we dont talk technically about those hacks on coding manner and simply just the casino had been abused through those bonuses and promotions then it does only signify that they arent doing up their

job on which it would really be just normal that the team should really be setting out specific rules and conditions for those bonuses.It would be normal for a business to do so because if they do just

let loose in terms of those mechanics and wager requirement or something related to this then it would really be just ending up on getting abused which is normal
since there are people who would really be finding a way.

I believe the description you've pointed out from this post is about bug bounty.
For companies' websites, specially if it is crucial which involves money or big amount of data, security testing and bug hunting should be practiced (and I think most of them are doing it).
In the past, various bounty campaigns from different companies were announced here.

Well now they are giving a lot of problems with the KYC, but if we start to see in many casino threads, there are users and players who tell them and demand that the casinos please be authentic, that they need to have all their licenses and having the licenses not only do they guarantee security and trust but also the conditions are that users provide KYC, this is something that not only happens in bookmakers, but also in exchanges they are an almost mandatory requirement, but they cannot do anything, this to cover themselves the backs, to avoid money laundering and many illicit things, this is something that must be understood, otherwise the authenticity of the casinos is what will be at stake.

What happens is that always in a casino when they find a way to abuse a system they will exploit it until there are no more exploitable resources, and even more so when the casino is not aware of a certain vulnerability, there is a reason to be able to decapitalize the money. of a casino, this gives a step to continue looking for ways to continue doing it and not saying it, maybe in casinos they do not put a high enough reward to encourage them to collaborate with security, sometimes a casino pays a lot of money in security so that those holes of pertinent insecurity do not exist, that happens in all casinos, there will always be those problems.

great point FanEagle
casinos must invest a lot on having great user experience and avoid getting people abusing rewards and claiming false victories
this is probably easier to do than protecting from hacks, online security is a must specially for big companies.

Unfortunately gambling has a lot of people who would like to find loopholes and try to ruin everything. I remember so many casinos ending up with a trouble and they ended up with a trouble because they are constantly getting hacking attempts and sometimes it gets lucky and they do manage to hack it. The problem is that they could try to find a way to fix that but as we all know it is not going to be that easy and that is why the best thing to do would be using cold storage by the casinos.

Abusing is less technical, they won't hack you but they will abuse all the rewards and bonuses and competitions and whatever else you do, so they could empty the wallets as much as they can before they get caught.